Their only consistency is adherence to their own process. From my book:

This woman is not a raving Soros rando. She has been decorated with the highest civilian honors in multiple countries - Italy, France, Germany, Council of Europe for her democracy work. She is an expert on "basic principles of human rights, democracy and the rule of law."

I just came across this in an Open Society Foundations document about how to fix public “mistrust” of liberal "democracy," and I honestly feel sick reading it. I've read many alarming quotes, but few are so "mask off" like this.

"I believe the time has come for a responsible, courageous elite, those who care far more about addressing the genuine social problems than about election results. Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate… can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections—will be able to justify public trust and spearhead... our struggle to survive.""

Read that again. The proposed solution to the public's distrust in democracy... is less democracy.
An unelected "elite" to whom the public should cede sovereignty.

Abolish democracy to save democracy. This kind of thinking is what we're up against.

• Rolling Stone should have closed shop a long time ago

• Rolling Stone has published articles glamorizing Hamas terrorists

• Rolling Stone has celebrated Ilhan Omar, who frequently makes anti-Semitic statements

• Rolling Stone loves to construct strawmen, burn them down, and declare victory

• Rolling Stone cannot name one policy position of Mamdani that is not Communist aligned

• In the new vocabulary of their favorite Senator, Elizabeth Warren, Rolling Stone can eat dirt