• Rolling Stone should have closed shop a long time ago
• Rolling Stone has published articles glamorizing Hamas terrorists
• Rolling Stone has celebrated Ilhan Omar, who frequently makes anti-Semitic statements
• Rolling Stone loves to construct strawmen, burn them down, and declare victory
• Rolling Stone cannot name one policy position of Mamdani that is not Communist aligned
• In the new vocabulary of their favorite Senator, Elizabeth Warren, Rolling Stone can eat dirt
• Rolling Stone has published articles glamorizing Hamas terrorists
• Rolling Stone has celebrated Ilhan Omar, who frequently makes anti-Semitic statements
• Rolling Stone loves to construct strawmen, burn them down, and declare victory
• Rolling Stone cannot name one policy position of Mamdani that is not Communist aligned
• In the new vocabulary of their favorite Senator, Elizabeth Warren, Rolling Stone can eat dirt
💯4
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1985910044622561370?t=F9jNJtyQ-EQTVuuT4552yg&s=19
I think most of people on "both sides" have a caricature of the other side. As in, the pro-Israel people think that the other sides hates Jews at all costs, whereas the less-pro-Israel people thinks the other side worships Israel at all costs.
Maybe, just maybe, the reality is - most of "both sides" are actually America first and have a caricature impression of the other side.
I think most of people on "both sides" have a caricature of the other side. As in, the pro-Israel people think that the other sides hates Jews at all costs, whereas the less-pro-Israel people thinks the other side worships Israel at all costs.
Maybe, just maybe, the reality is - most of "both sides" are actually America first and have a caricature impression of the other side.
X (formerly Twitter)
DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) on X
I think most of people on "both sides" have a caricature of the other side. As in, the pro-Israel people think that the other sides hates Jews at all costs, whereas the less-pro-Israel people thinks the other side worships Israel at all costs.
Maybe, just…
Maybe, just…
🤔1
My husband and I would not have been Saved if not for James Lindsay. Period. Full stop. And that's why I can't join in the bash-fest.
Pray for him, love him, know he will be a mighty warrior when he does believe.
Pray for him, love him, know he will be a mighty warrior when he does believe.
❤1🙏1
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1985908878530527674?t=c1i-hC7IGmruF5NGr5lOsA&s=19
No.
Iran bombing proved that micro-targeted strikes could bring peace without war.
Gaza -- frankly, that President Trump made a deal, proved that Hamas could have stopped all that destruction simply by accepting a few easy terms. And even then, didn't we find out afterwards that there were huge food inventories, just not distributed by Hamas?
Hamas leaders are not human beings. Hamas leaders do not value life. If you did not blame us for entering war against Taliban in 2001, you cannot blame Israel for entering war against Hamas. By all accounts, Israel handled Gaza in a way more moral manner than we did Afghanistan.
No.
Iran bombing proved that micro-targeted strikes could bring peace without war.
Gaza -- frankly, that President Trump made a deal, proved that Hamas could have stopped all that destruction simply by accepting a few easy terms. And even then, didn't we find out afterwards that there were huge food inventories, just not distributed by Hamas?
Hamas leaders are not human beings. Hamas leaders do not value life. If you did not blame us for entering war against Taliban in 2001, you cannot blame Israel for entering war against Hamas. By all accounts, Israel handled Gaza in a way more moral manner than we did Afghanistan.
X (formerly Twitter)
DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) on X
No.
Iran bombing proved that micro-targeted strikes could bring peace without war.
Gaza -- frankly, that President Trump made a deal, proved that Hamas could have stopped all that destruction simply by accepting a few easy terms. And even then, didn't we…
Iran bombing proved that micro-targeted strikes could bring peace without war.
Gaza -- frankly, that President Trump made a deal, proved that Hamas could have stopped all that destruction simply by accepting a few easy terms. And even then, didn't we…
💯2
Hello Alex,
Your father spent the 1980s fighting Communism, or at least pretending to. You've chosen to praise what he claimed to oppose.
That’s your life's accomplishment: collapsing so far you make George Soros look consistent.
You and your father destroyed America until it was ready for foreign subversives like Mamdani to rise. You don’t believe he’ll fix New York. You just want to see it fall.
The difference between you and your father is that he had a mind worth wasting.
Your father spent the 1980s fighting Communism, or at least pretending to. You've chosen to praise what he claimed to oppose.
That’s your life's accomplishment: collapsing so far you make George Soros look consistent.
You and your father destroyed America until it was ready for foreign subversives like Mamdani to rise. You don’t believe he’ll fix New York. You just want to see it fall.
The difference between you and your father is that he had a mind worth wasting.
🔥5
As far as I know, I was one of the few who expected a clean D sweep, and hopefully that gives me at least a little credibility in talking about why it happened. This is a structural problem and one that’s only going to intensify as the Buffett heirs begin spending their father’s fortune. That'll be worth a couple billion dollars pumped into the civic engagement network annually.
That said, listen closely to what @honestpollster is saying. The same structural issues also drive outrage and add to a feeling of "everything's rigged." A lot of people, especially younger ones, feel like the system is stacked against them. And honestly, they're not wrong.
I think the Israel stuff is mostly a way of externalizing that blame.
That said, listen closely to what @honestpollster is saying. The same structural issues also drive outrage and add to a feeling of "everything's rigged." A lot of people, especially younger ones, feel like the system is stacked against them. And honestly, they're not wrong.
I think the Israel stuff is mostly a way of externalizing that blame.
❤3🙏2
This is from a website put together by Democracy Funders Network, which is ran by the Pritzker family.
According to the website, the total "democracy" NGO ecosystem revenue is 33 billion *annually* with more than 200,000 staff.
22% of that funding comes from government grants.
Thanks for @SKDoubleDub33 for finding the site.
According to the website, the total "democracy" NGO ecosystem revenue is 33 billion *annually* with more than 200,000 staff.
22% of that funding comes from government grants.
Thanks for @SKDoubleDub33 for finding the site.
👀3❤2🤔2
Successful people always take advantage of opportunities for their benefit!!!
Investment is like a seed that is planted, sprouts, grows, and yields many fruits!
If you don't plant, you won't harvest!
If you don't plant, you will spend your money buying fruits from those who planted...
Think well and invest
Investment is like a seed that is planted, sprouts, grows, and yields many fruits!
If you don't plant, you won't harvest!
If you don't plant, you will spend your money buying fruits from those who planted...
Think well and invest
Yesterday you said today and today you said tomorrow.
When you become so afraid to invest in your future, wealth becomes so afraid to come to you.
When you become so afraid to invest in your future, wealth becomes so afraid to come to you.
🤔4🤡1
This is from a website put together by Democracy Funders Network, which is ran by the Pritzker family.
According to the website, the total "democracy" NGO ecosystem revenue is 33 billion *annually* with more than 200,000 staff.
22% of that funding comes from government grants.
Thanks for @SKDoubleDub33 for finding the site.
According to the website, the total "democracy" NGO ecosystem revenue is 33 billion *annually* with more than 200,000 staff.
22% of that funding comes from government grants.
Thanks for @SKDoubleDub33 for finding the site.
🤔2🔥1
Easy.
The 2003 SARS outbreak exposed how outdated WHO's disease rules were, since the old International Health Regulations only covered a few named diseases. In response, the World Health Assembly launched a revision process.
By 2004, avian flu drove CDC and global experts to draft the Manhattan Principles, which coined "One Health," a plan to unite human, animal, and environmental health to stop zoonotic outbreaks before they start.
In 2005, WHO member states unanimously adopted the updated International Health Regulations (IHR 2005), legally binding all countries to detect, report, and respond to any event that might become a global health emergency.
That framework began taking shape in practice with USAID's PREDICT program (2009), which hunted new zoonotic viruses worldwide and trained scientists in the One Health approach. One of its partners was EcoHealth Alliance, which later collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to study bat coronaviruses under a 2014 NIH grant.
Meanwhile, WHO, FAO, and OIE formalized their Tripartite Concept Note in 2010, turning One Health into an institutional partnership. This tripartite later became a key partner in the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA), launched in 2014 by the U.S. and allies to accelerate IHR 2005 compliance.
EcoHealth Alliance and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security both participated in GHSA networks. Hopkins would go on to stage the infamous Clade X (2018) and Event 201 (2019) pandemic simulations which happened just months before the COVID-19 outbreak.
At the same time, the Sendai Framework (2015) wove biological threats into global disaster planning and introduced the "Build Back Better" language for post-crisis recovery, further cementing IHR 2005 principles in international policy.
So by the mid-2010s, the global outbreak response framework and the virus discovery networks had fused into one system.
In other words: the same institutions doing the gain-of-function COVID-19 research were also heavily involved in creating the response playbook and doing the scenario games. It was all happening in parallel. We likely would not have had COVID-19 in the first place if we had never adopted the IHR 2005 regulations in the first place.
The pandemic created its response, but the response also created the pandemic. That's the cover-up.
Now go end the filibuster.
The 2003 SARS outbreak exposed how outdated WHO's disease rules were, since the old International Health Regulations only covered a few named diseases. In response, the World Health Assembly launched a revision process.
By 2004, avian flu drove CDC and global experts to draft the Manhattan Principles, which coined "One Health," a plan to unite human, animal, and environmental health to stop zoonotic outbreaks before they start.
In 2005, WHO member states unanimously adopted the updated International Health Regulations (IHR 2005), legally binding all countries to detect, report, and respond to any event that might become a global health emergency.
That framework began taking shape in practice with USAID's PREDICT program (2009), which hunted new zoonotic viruses worldwide and trained scientists in the One Health approach. One of its partners was EcoHealth Alliance, which later collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to study bat coronaviruses under a 2014 NIH grant.
Meanwhile, WHO, FAO, and OIE formalized their Tripartite Concept Note in 2010, turning One Health into an institutional partnership. This tripartite later became a key partner in the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA), launched in 2014 by the U.S. and allies to accelerate IHR 2005 compliance.
EcoHealth Alliance and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security both participated in GHSA networks. Hopkins would go on to stage the infamous Clade X (2018) and Event 201 (2019) pandemic simulations which happened just months before the COVID-19 outbreak.
At the same time, the Sendai Framework (2015) wove biological threats into global disaster planning and introduced the "Build Back Better" language for post-crisis recovery, further cementing IHR 2005 principles in international policy.
So by the mid-2010s, the global outbreak response framework and the virus discovery networks had fused into one system.
In other words: the same institutions doing the gain-of-function COVID-19 research were also heavily involved in creating the response playbook and doing the scenario games. It was all happening in parallel. We likely would not have had COVID-19 in the first place if we had never adopted the IHR 2005 regulations in the first place.
The pandemic created its response, but the response also created the pandemic. That's the cover-up.
Now go end the filibuster.
❤6👌1
In just 15 minutes from now, at 8:30 AM MT, @infowarsjournal will be hosting a conversation with @iamlisalogan about the New Pluralists and what we've been discovering. Tune in!
😁2👍1
The kid was motivated and did great in class today! Looks like it's faux-filet au beurre rouge for dinner tonight.
❤2
In a strange way, Iran-Contra is the ultimate proof of how far he'd go to disappear Communists. And also how very, very wrong when the Finch/Bolton/Kristol whatever crowd tries to claim him.
⚡3
Ronald Reagan lived to disappear Communists.
Anyone telling you otherwise, like, say, those claiming Reagan is in the globalist tradition of Romney... is gaslighting you.
Take that to the bank, as someone who's studied Reagan's "warts and all."
Anyone telling you otherwise, like, say, those claiming Reagan is in the globalist tradition of Romney... is gaslighting you.
Take that to the bank, as someone who's studied Reagan's "warts and all."
🔥5
Remember, nobody commits 33 billion dollars annually and 215,000+ employees to vague Hallmark platitudes like "building bridges."
They commit that to do a coup on the United States.
They commit that to do a coup on the United States.
🔥6