This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This video is the best example because it summarizes so many things!
a) like said before WE DON'T AGREE with such death penalty
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/223
but remember we don't know the whole story ... no matter our first impression is "@ShittyDeathSentences"!
and many other have the same opinion too:
"Why does he die after killing one person when people really sitting in prison for life for killing 10?" 😍 this are our governments🤦♂️ like said previously
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/228
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/224
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/968
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/151
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1167
etc.
b) Maybe this shitty sentence is even based on discrimination because he is black ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BlackHumanRights
in the style of
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/149
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/150
Again, sentences SHOULD BE APPLIED with BRAIN! and the same, no matter age, religion, colour, nationality, sex or whatever!
Yes, even 16 years old people should get same sentence like 18 years old + 1 day
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/659
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/211
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/73
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1660
c) Such type of people should be reeducated! exactly like Sucre
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/208
at the end even homeless have drugs issues!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikAbuse/36
This is not the case of serious criminal ...
d) so like said in a) this show how sentences get applied with shit! and this is the problem. Not the death penalty, but those who apply such things with no sense and discrimination!
So the point is not to protest against death penalty BUT TO PROTEST AGAINST HOW OUR GOVERNMENTS ARE SHIT! and criminal
https://news.1rj.ru/str/GovernmentInPrison
and nothing happens to such dudes too! even if someone remains 50 years in prison as innocent!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/GovernmentInPrison/5
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/128
We need to change this!
a) like said before WE DON'T AGREE with such death penalty
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/223
but remember we don't know the whole story ... no matter our first impression is "@ShittyDeathSentences"!
and many other have the same opinion too:
"Why does he die after killing one person when people really sitting in prison for life for killing 10?" 😍 this are our governments🤦♂️ like said previously
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/228
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/224
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/968
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/151
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1167
etc.
b) Maybe this shitty sentence is even based on discrimination because he is black ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BlackHumanRights
in the style of
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/149
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/150
Again, sentences SHOULD BE APPLIED with BRAIN! and the same, no matter age, religion, colour, nationality, sex or whatever!
Yes, even 16 years old people should get same sentence like 18 years old + 1 day
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/659
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/211
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/73
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1660
c) Such type of people should be reeducated! exactly like Sucre
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/208
at the end even homeless have drugs issues!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikAbuse/36
This is not the case of serious criminal ...
d) so like said in a) this show how sentences get applied with shit! and this is the problem. Not the death penalty, but those who apply such things with no sense and discrimination!
So the point is not to protest against death penalty BUT TO PROTEST AGAINST HOW OUR GOVERNMENTS ARE SHIT! and criminal
https://news.1rj.ru/str/GovernmentInPrison
and nothing happens to such dudes too! even if someone remains 50 years in prison as innocent!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/GovernmentInPrison/5
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/128
We need to change this!
It's really sad to see bullshit over bullshit if we check stats Amnesty @AmnestyBullshit is using to promote their "no death sentence" fight!
Our world should check pro and contra, not just pro with 50% of the informations, and maybe even false informations!
As we said multiple times, we are against any type of discrimination, means even innocent people sentenced for life or death just for other personal interests, like https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/201
In such case all people making bullshit sentence should get in prisons!
We are against bullshit shared as scientific facts! So, yes, maybe the death sentence doesn't reduce the homicide rates, this still doesn't mean that such sentence is bad, if we consider other aspects, that Amnesty just IGNORE! We know, we haven't done a full detailed search about this huge complex topic, but just the things we checked, most of them are just false or partially false! So first check all previous posts to make a conclusion.
Plus like we said multiple times we are not just focused on promoting few human rights, like Amnesty is doing. They do almost nothing about euthanasia, animals and planet rights. Plus remember that there are not just right of prisoners, but of the victims and other people. This is important to remember, otherwise it happens the same shit like with trans women wanting to compete in women sport, discriminating the women rights! THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, like prisoners getting more rights than normal people!
It's time to make proper sentence without discrimination and using facts. It's time to remove all soft sentences, where people can kill or rape again after few years ... It's time to defend the right of people and not using bullshit religious ideas / opinions. Yes, religion has an huge influence, just think about the topic "abortion" or other things! It's time that people start to think with facts and the brain, not with tradition, social pressure, bullshit and no sense religious aspects. It's ok to follow a religion, but ....
Our world should check pro and contra, not just pro with 50% of the informations, and maybe even false informations!
As we said multiple times, we are against any type of discrimination, means even innocent people sentenced for life or death just for other personal interests, like https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/201
In such case all people making bullshit sentence should get in prisons!
We are against bullshit shared as scientific facts! So, yes, maybe the death sentence doesn't reduce the homicide rates, this still doesn't mean that such sentence is bad, if we consider other aspects, that Amnesty just IGNORE! We know, we haven't done a full detailed search about this huge complex topic, but just the things we checked, most of them are just false or partially false! So first check all previous posts to make a conclusion.
Plus like we said multiple times we are not just focused on promoting few human rights, like Amnesty is doing. They do almost nothing about euthanasia, animals and planet rights. Plus remember that there are not just right of prisoners, but of the victims and other people. This is important to remember, otherwise it happens the same shit like with trans women wanting to compete in women sport, discriminating the women rights! THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, like prisoners getting more rights than normal people!
It's time to make proper sentence without discrimination and using facts. It's time to remove all soft sentences, where people can kill or rape again after few years ... It's time to defend the right of people and not using bullshit religious ideas / opinions. Yes, religion has an huge influence, just think about the topic "abortion" or other things! It's time that people start to think with facts and the brain, not with tradition, social pressure, bullshit and no sense religious aspects. It's ok to follow a religion, but ....
The Death Penalty: No Evidence for Deterrence
What the paper simply write: there is no evidence, means no way to show with high quality scientific studies that cannot be applied at all, that a death sentence is effective.
What people understand when they read quickly just the noscript: a death sentence is not effective. This is not what the paper is saying! It clearly says there is no positive or negative evidence, because doing proper studies would be unethical, especially if we would removed all factors that influence such values.
This doesn't happen just with the prison, but even in many other topics. We cannot crash a plane to study what are the effects ... we cannot tell a patient "please eat 0 kcal, because i want to check how many days it requires before you die". There are so many scientific questions that cannot be answer, due to ethical problem with such studies ...
Studies show no link between the presence or absence of the death penalty and murder rates https://perma.cc/6P4Q-SP5J
If the death penalty is not a proven deterrent to murder (= MEANS NO REAL POSITIVE STUDIES), is it worth the excessive costs, risks of error, uncertainty of completion, and other problems that are inherent to its practice? —> so since we cannot answer that by science, we use factors like errors during execution or the price to say "it's not ok" —> we cannot say "scientifically there is a negative evidence!"
Even saying "murders are less" is bullshit, like we showed in previous posts, because yes, maybe in one US state this is the case, in another one is totally fake saying that ...
Plus even if there is an increase or decrease, can we really say "it's due to the death sentence?". Canada was the best example. An increase without that ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/340
So instead of checking half of the information, let we really check facts:
- scientific evidence: NEUTRAL or better NOT POSSIBLE TO ANSWER DUE TO ETHICAL ISSUES
- more / less homicide = bullshit
- cost: not clear
- wrong sentence / errors: depends
What the paper simply write: there is no evidence, means no way to show with high quality scientific studies that cannot be applied at all, that a death sentence is effective.
What people understand when they read quickly just the noscript: a death sentence is not effective. This is not what the paper is saying! It clearly says there is no positive or negative evidence, because doing proper studies would be unethical, especially if we would removed all factors that influence such values.
This doesn't happen just with the prison, but even in many other topics. We cannot crash a plane to study what are the effects ... we cannot tell a patient "please eat 0 kcal, because i want to check how many days it requires before you die". There are so many scientific questions that cannot be answer, due to ethical problem with such studies ...
Studies show no link between the presence or absence of the death penalty and murder rates https://perma.cc/6P4Q-SP5J
If the death penalty is not a proven deterrent to murder (= MEANS NO REAL POSITIVE STUDIES), is it worth the excessive costs, risks of error, uncertainty of completion, and other problems that are inherent to its practice? —> so since we cannot answer that by science, we use factors like errors during execution or the price to say "it's not ok" —> we cannot say "scientifically there is a negative evidence!"
Even saying "murders are less" is bullshit, like we showed in previous posts, because yes, maybe in one US state this is the case, in another one is totally fake saying that ...
Plus even if there is an increase or decrease, can we really say "it's due to the death sentence?". Canada was the best example. An increase without that ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/340
So instead of checking half of the information, let we really check facts:
- scientific evidence: NEUTRAL or better NOT POSSIBLE TO ANSWER DUE TO ETHICAL ISSUES
- more / less homicide = bullshit
- cost: not clear
- wrong sentence / errors: depends
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Death Penalty - Peine de mort, changeons maintenant de point de vue Part 1
We discussed 3-4 arguments for a death sentence made by a 🇫🇷 YT dude
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/206
where we don't agree with "make happy victims" ... because this IS NOT THE GOAL!
Let we check the other video ...
YES! HE SAID 3 PRO AND 3 CONTRA! so what the dude wrote in the comment is already bullshit! because he searched anything! and probably he does the same for all other things! SEARCHING NOTHING!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SocialNetworkFacts/4
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SocialNetworkFacts/6
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SocialNetworkFacts/7
like most people do too!
a) error risk? NOPE! because a death sentence SHOULD ONLY BE APPLIED WITH 100% PROOF, in the style of Breivik
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence
or Dahmer
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DahmerDeathSentence
We said death sentence to people who did terror attack to animal / nature and humans by doing wildfires! Yes, but we even wrote IT'S DIFFICULT TO FIND WHO IT WAS! this doesn't mean governments should apply a death sentence if no proof is available.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/27
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/28
NO PROOFS MEANS LIFE SENTENCE! (for serious crimes ...) and no parole for trash criminals with serious crimes but not enough proofs!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ParoleFacts
or if death penalty will never be a reality (just check how our governments have a shitty way to think about all tabu topics)
and remember, killing is not synonym of death sentence or life sentence!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/145
There is homicide and homicide!
All other death sentences without proofs are just
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences
The point is different when we talk about CEO and animal torture! CEO know exactly that! and if they don't know, they are shitty CEO! So a death sentence for animal torture only for CEOs is generally a death sentence with 100% proof!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/12
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/20
and obviously we don't talk about the torture of 1 animal ...
We discussed 3-4 arguments for a death sentence made by a 🇫🇷 YT dude
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/206
where we don't agree with "make happy victims" ... because this IS NOT THE GOAL!
Let we check the other video ...
YES! HE SAID 3 PRO AND 3 CONTRA! so what the dude wrote in the comment is already bullshit! because he searched anything! and probably he does the same for all other things! SEARCHING NOTHING!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SocialNetworkFacts/4
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SocialNetworkFacts/6
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SocialNetworkFacts/7
like most people do too!
a) error risk? NOPE! because a death sentence SHOULD ONLY BE APPLIED WITH 100% PROOF, in the style of Breivik
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence
or Dahmer
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DahmerDeathSentence
We said death sentence to people who did terror attack to animal / nature and humans by doing wildfires! Yes, but we even wrote IT'S DIFFICULT TO FIND WHO IT WAS! this doesn't mean governments should apply a death sentence if no proof is available.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/27
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/28
NO PROOFS MEANS LIFE SENTENCE! (for serious crimes ...) and no parole for trash criminals with serious crimes but not enough proofs!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ParoleFacts
or if death penalty will never be a reality (just check how our governments have a shitty way to think about all tabu topics)
and remember, killing is not synonym of death sentence or life sentence!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/145
There is homicide and homicide!
All other death sentences without proofs are just
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences
The point is different when we talk about CEO and animal torture! CEO know exactly that! and if they don't know, they are shitty CEO! So a death sentence for animal torture only for CEOs is generally a death sentence with 100% proof!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/12
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/20
and obviously we don't talk about the torture of 1 animal ...
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Death Penalty - Peine de mort, changeons maintenant de point de vue Part 2
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
So again sentences should be done WITH BRAIN AND PROOF! not discrimination and personal interest!
When we talk about "death sentence and money for homeless" we are NOT saying well to spend less money all people should be sentenced to death!!! This is totally different, discrimination and against human rights!
Serious criminals that deserve at least a life sentence without parole don't deserve that the population is "wasting 15 million of dollars for such criminals!", because this is human right abuse, not human right!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/65
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightAbuse
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikHotel
To understand better what are our point, you can find our values here
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WeAreTheFutureTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
b) No evidence ... we already talked that is NOT possible to say if this is effective, because this cannot be answered by science ... It's like making a scientific research asking people to do suicide and then evaluate different things! IT'S ETHICAL NOT POSSIBLE! and currently there is no evidence at all, from both side (keeping that or removing that!)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/583
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceNOW/44
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/210
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/211
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1169
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/212
Let we remember Amnesty bullshit
https://news.1rj.ru/str/GenRevolutionOfficial/226
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/561
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/4
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence/29
The same about terrorism!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1167
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1169
YOU HAVE NO IDEA IF THIS WILL REDUCE OR NOT! so don't tell bullshit "he will not reduce that!"
See next post
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
So again sentences should be done WITH BRAIN AND PROOF! not discrimination and personal interest!
When we talk about "death sentence and money for homeless" we are NOT saying well to spend less money all people should be sentenced to death!!! This is totally different, discrimination and against human rights!
Serious criminals that deserve at least a life sentence without parole don't deserve that the population is "wasting 15 million of dollars for such criminals!", because this is human right abuse, not human right!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/65
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightAbuse
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikHotel
To understand better what are our point, you can find our values here
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WeAreTheFutureTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
b) No evidence ... we already talked that is NOT possible to say if this is effective, because this cannot be answered by science ... It's like making a scientific research asking people to do suicide and then evaluate different things! IT'S ETHICAL NOT POSSIBLE! and currently there is no evidence at all, from both side (keeping that or removing that!)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/583
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceNOW/44
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/210
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/211
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1169
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/212
Let we remember Amnesty bullshit
https://news.1rj.ru/str/GenRevolutionOfficial/226
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/561
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/4
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence/29
The same about terrorism!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1167
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1169
YOU HAVE NO IDEA IF THIS WILL REDUCE OR NOT! so don't tell bullshit "he will not reduce that!"
See next post
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Death Penalty - Peine de mort, changeons maintenant de point de vue Part 3
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
So again, there is NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE for less or more crimes with or without a death sentence! and Amnesty and other are just talking BULLSHIT! with no science and real stats! just manipulation
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/67
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/14
But at the end what do you expect from shitty human rights organisation, that fight just for the shit they want!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AfDWahrheit/25
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1152
AGAIN, YOU HAVE NO IDEA IF THIS WILL REDUCE OR NOT CRIMES! so don't tell bullshit "this will not reduce that!"
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/22
It's like border walls. Yes, border walls will NOT FIX ALL ISSUES!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MigrationTelegram/752
but border walls STILL REDUCE ILLEGAL MIGRANTS! even if many are still 🦧
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MigrationTelegram/751
but many are not ready to do that! The same can be said about other things, like keeping or banning weapons ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/83
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/84
This doesn't mean border walls are shit! ... Yes, they are shit, when they do ecocide!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BorderWallEcocide
or there is discrimination behind that ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/40
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/42
No matter what, the point is not just "does this will reduce or not crimes" because there is much more behind. Just think for example how many people wish to do suicide or other things, but they don't do that, because they have fear of the consequences if you don't die immediately ... The same can be said for other things and for crimes too.
If you know you would get a death sentence after 1 week, you would rape a girl! "because a) you did sex b) you would immediately die" ... BUT THIS SHOULD NOT BE THE CASE! In this case yes, DEATH SENTENCE WOULD PROBABLY INCREASE CRIMES! but this is a wrong way!
See next post
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
So again, there is NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE for less or more crimes with or without a death sentence! and Amnesty and other are just talking BULLSHIT! with no science and real stats! just manipulation
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/67
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/14
But at the end what do you expect from shitty human rights organisation, that fight just for the shit they want!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AfDWahrheit/25
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1152
AGAIN, YOU HAVE NO IDEA IF THIS WILL REDUCE OR NOT CRIMES! so don't tell bullshit "this will not reduce that!"
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/22
It's like border walls. Yes, border walls will NOT FIX ALL ISSUES!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MigrationTelegram/752
but border walls STILL REDUCE ILLEGAL MIGRANTS! even if many are still 🦧
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MigrationTelegram/751
but many are not ready to do that! The same can be said about other things, like keeping or banning weapons ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/83
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/84
This doesn't mean border walls are shit! ... Yes, they are shit, when they do ecocide!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BorderWallEcocide
or there is discrimination behind that ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/40
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/42
No matter what, the point is not just "does this will reduce or not crimes" because there is much more behind. Just think for example how many people wish to do suicide or other things, but they don't do that, because they have fear of the consequences if you don't die immediately ... The same can be said for other things and for crimes too.
If you know you would get a death sentence after 1 week, you would rape a girl! "because a) you did sex b) you would immediately die" ... BUT THIS SHOULD NOT BE THE CASE! In this case yes, DEATH SENTENCE WOULD PROBABLY INCREASE CRIMES! but this is a wrong way!
See next post
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Death Penalty - Peine de mort, changeons maintenant de point de vue Part 4
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
So again the goal is NOT A VIP SUICIDE!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/29
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/15
Death sentence should be applied generally after many years of prison (at least 10 years, better 20!), but not after 60 years ... because this is not a death sentence anymore! Exactly like discovering innocent after 40 years is just ridiculous! We don't need to put innocent in prison! at least no death sentence without proof!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/31
So yes a) is in part correct, because our governments are shit ... not the death penalty ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/10
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/100
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/169
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/170
3) remember WE HAVE 2 SIDE OF HUMAN RIGHTS!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/20
NEVER FORGET THAT!
So yes, sometimes we need to respect innocent prisoners, other times we need to respect safety of other prisoners / guards / population!
REMEMBER THAT GUARDS DIE DUE TO PRISONERS TOO! but no one is talking about!
Prisoners can kill a guard, and our government answer with "this is perfectly fine" 🤦♂️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/510
THIS IS THE SHITTY REALITY!
How we do things are shit. Is the same like saying "social network" are bad! NOPE. It depends how people are using such socials ... Social are not bad! Bad is the way we use that ...
Don't just have one point of view for such complex stories. Plus like said:
Homicide is not Homicide!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/238
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AfDFakten/1100
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/145
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CrimeExamples/109
Death Sentence is not Death Sentence!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceNOW
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathExecutionMethod
Terrorism is more complex
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1167
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1169
More
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/212
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
So again the goal is NOT A VIP SUICIDE!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/29
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/15
Death sentence should be applied generally after many years of prison (at least 10 years, better 20!), but not after 60 years ... because this is not a death sentence anymore! Exactly like discovering innocent after 40 years is just ridiculous! We don't need to put innocent in prison! at least no death sentence without proof!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/31
So yes a) is in part correct, because our governments are shit ... not the death penalty ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/10
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/100
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/169
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences/170
3) remember WE HAVE 2 SIDE OF HUMAN RIGHTS!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/20
NEVER FORGET THAT!
So yes, sometimes we need to respect innocent prisoners, other times we need to respect safety of other prisoners / guards / population!
REMEMBER THAT GUARDS DIE DUE TO PRISONERS TOO! but no one is talking about!
Prisoners can kill a guard, and our government answer with "this is perfectly fine" 🤦♂️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/510
THIS IS THE SHITTY REALITY!
How we do things are shit. Is the same like saying "social network" are bad! NOPE. It depends how people are using such socials ... Social are not bad! Bad is the way we use that ...
Don't just have one point of view for such complex stories. Plus like said:
Homicide is not Homicide!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/238
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AfDFakten/1100
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/145
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CrimeExamples/109
Death Sentence is not Death Sentence!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceNOW
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathExecutionMethod
Terrorism is more complex
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1167
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarWomenRights/1169
More
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/212
🤣 was not escape one of our topic in the last posts ...
Well, here you go ... another prisoner escaped in Norway ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/22
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ParoleFacts/73
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/93
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/81
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CannibalTelegram/37
Related
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/510
Well, here you go ... another prisoner escaped in Norway ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/22
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ParoleFacts/73
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/93
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/81
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CannibalTelegram/37
Related
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/510
Inhumane 🙅♂️ = assisted suicide!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/18
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/21
Selfmade suicide (due to missing laws) > Death Sentence!!!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/123
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/122
Waiting —> our answer will be available soon! Preview: selfmade suicide IS NOTHING BETTER!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/94
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EmpathyTelegram/20
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole/114
30 ans
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/93
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/94
Article 5 ... seems a bit like Breivik complaining
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikAbuse/58
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole
Execution methods 🤦♂️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathExecutionMethod/13
Error
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
Killing will not safe the victim
Yes, because a person is already death or because a raper IS NOT RAPING THE SAME PERSON AGAIN! (for example)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/78
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/22
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/93
etc.
Nombre de crimes BULLSHIT
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/49
Terrorism
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/43
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/21
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/23
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/380
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/384
⅔ banned
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/723
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/722
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/19
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/25
Related
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/49
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
etc.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/18
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/21
Selfmade suicide (due to missing laws) > Death Sentence!!!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/123
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/122
Waiting —> our answer will be available soon! Preview: selfmade suicide IS NOTHING BETTER!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/94
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EmpathyTelegram/20
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole/114
30 ans
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/93
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/94
Article 5 ... seems a bit like Breivik complaining
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikAbuse/58
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole
Execution methods 🤦♂️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathExecutionMethod/13
Error
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
Killing will not safe the victim
Yes, because a person is already death or because a raper IS NOT RAPING THE SAME PERSON AGAIN! (for example)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/78
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/22
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyShit/93
etc.
Nombre de crimes BULLSHIT
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/49
Terrorism
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/43
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/21
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/23
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/380
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/384
⅔ banned
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/723
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/722
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/19
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/25
Related
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/49
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
etc.