Deni Temirov – Telegram
Deni Temirov
13 subscribers
5 photos
2 videos
15 links
Blog of Erzy.net founder and CEO

For cross promotion: https://erzy.net/DeniEng

Youtube channel- https://youtube.com/@denitemirov-z9h
Download Telegram
Check out one of the oldest English language Telegram channels. Author writes about personal growth and road to freedom
When do we need explanations?

Sometimes, things happen that catch us off guard. It's like expecting a sunny day but getting rain instead. During such times, we often find ourselves asking "why?" or "how?"

Let's say, we have a simple idea of how things work. This idea is like a map in our mind. But when something unexpected happens, it's like finding a new street on our map. We might feel surprised, especially if this new "street" was not there before.

A good surprise can make us happy, like finding a hidden $20 bill in an old jacket. Yet, we still wonder how it got there. It’s the sudden, new things that make us want to understand what's going on.

For example, let’s pretend I believed tiny make-believe creatures pedaled inside my car to make it move. This funny idea would stay with me until the day my car stops, and I have to check under the hood. Instead of finding tiny creatures, I see lots of metal parts. I’d be very surprised because this is not what I expected to see. Now, I’d want to know how a car really works.

It's like when we see something new or different, our minds become little detectives, trying to solve a mystery. Whether it's a happy surprise or an misfortune, we just want to understand what happened. And that’s why, when things don’t go as expected, we start asking questions and looking for explanations.
Today begins month of Ramadan.
It’s month when muslim people will be fasting for 30 days.
In Islam fasting is done from sunrise to sundown.
Personally I practice intermittent fasting throughout the year(4-5 days a month) whenever I feel like I’m starting to gain extra weight or I’m feeling inflammation in my body(which usually happens at the same time).

Intermittent fasting is when you don’t eat anything for at least 16 hours, after that your body cells begins to eat the broken/weak cells which can cause all kinds of sicknesses(even cancer).
Some Muslim people like to wake up to eat food before sunrise, personally I think it’s a bad idea for following reasons:
- Going back to sleep right after eating is not good for digestion;
- You’re not going to have good sleep after eating;
- You are going to decrease health benefits from fasting by shorting fasting time(don’t you want to lower chances of getting cancer?!);
- You will actually gain weight instead of loosing if you do that.

Fasting is only hard first 1-2 days after that you get used to it and you actually feel more energetic. I personally like to do something physical when I’m fasting so I don’t think about food, for example house cleaning 🧹

For Muslim i wish not only to be able to keep fast and also mental strength to keep a pure mind (which is a lot harder than not eating).

For non Muslims I suggest to try intermittent fasting if you’re experiencing inflammations in your body.

https://youtu.be/350bk9Ph3ak?si=df5wktiOigkWhK2v
Forwarded from Pavel Durov (Pavel Durov)
🤫 A story shared by Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter, uncovered that the current leaders of Signal, an allegedly “secure” messaging app, are activists used by the US state department for regime change abroad 🥷

🥸 The US government spent $3M to build Signal’s encryption, and today the exact same encryption is implemented in WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Google Messages and even Skype. It looks almost as if big tech in the US is not allowed to build its own encryption protocols that would be independent of government interference 🐕‍🦺

🕵️‍♂️ An alarming number of important people I’ve spoken to remarked that their “private” Signal messages had been exploited against them in US courts or media. But whenever somebody raises doubt about their encryption, Signal’s typical response is “we are open source so anyone can verify that everything is all right”. That, however, is a trick 🤡

🕵️‍♂️ Unlike Telegram, Signal doesn’t allow researchers to make sure that their GitHub code is the same code that is used in the Signal app run on users’ iPhones. Signal refused to add reproducible builds for iOS, closing a GitHub request from the community. And WhatsApp doesn’t even publish the code of its apps, so all their talk about “privacy” is an even more obvious circus trick 💤

🛡 Telegram is the only massively popular messaging service that allows everyone to make sure that all of its apps indeed use the same open source code that is published on Github. For the past ten years, Telegram Secret Chats have remained the only popular method of communication that is verifiably private 💪
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍1🤯1
Most anticipated book on AI will be published tomorrow on 25th of June.
Got my pre order🤞

https://youtu.be/Dpgy0sVzKjw?si=niqdptMBFdHds-1l
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🧐🤔
😁1
Deni Temirov
Photo
We are able to do that now using AI.
There's an ongoing debate: can we create an AI more intelligent than all humans combined?

This brings to mind the classic Omnipotence Paradox, which questions whether an all-powerful being can create a task so challenging that even it cannot accomplish it—a logical contradiction. While humans are not omnipotent, we are currently the most intelligent beings on Earth, attempting to create an intelligence that could surpass our own and potentially escape our control. Philosophers like Aquinas argued that true omnipotence does not include the ability to perform logical contradictions, suggesting inherent limits even to infinite power. Given that, perhaps there are inherent limits to what we can create. So, can we develop an AI that fundamentally surpasses us, or are we bound by natural constraints in our creative abilities?
👍1
🔎 The Art of Verification: Distinguishing Facts from Flashy Headlines 🔎

In today’s fast-paced world, information spreads online in seconds, and it’s easy to get swept up by scientific claims backed by just one study or a “so-called expert.” But how can you really tell if what you’re seeing is true? Here’s a quick guide to help you assess the scientific validity of news, check experts’ credentials, and ensure you’re getting facts—not sensationalism.

Key Steps to Verify Information in News:

1. Use Fact-Checking Tools: Fact-checking platforms make it easier to find out if a claim has already been investigated.
AP Fact-Check
Fact-Check.Org
Snopes
Politifact
Reuters Fact-Check
2. Check Expert Backgrounds: Tools like Google Scholar help verify an expert’s academic history, published studies, and whether they’re cited by peers—offering an overview of their credibility.
3. Look for Retractions: Retraction Watch is useful for checking whether an expert’s research has been debunked or retracted, a red flag for credibility.
4. Verify Licensing: Some professions require licenses (e.g., doctors). In the U.S., Career One Stop lists licensed professions by state, and you can verify someone’s credentials there.
5. Assess Research Quality: Google Scholar also helps evaluate the legitimacy of cited research. For accurate insights, look for meta-analyses and systematic reviews.
6. Check for Bias: Bias-detection tools assess media outlets’ reliability and spot biased or sensational sources.
Is This Credible (by Factual) – Unfortunately unavailable at the moment
Media Bias Fact-Check
7. Guidelines for Further Research: Organizations like the News Literacy Project, Pierce College, and Mind Tools provide additional resources for evaluating news sources.

In the end, a few extra steps go a long way in ensuring you’re accessing trustworthy information. Use these tools to look deeper, separate hype from fact, and make informed decisions. 🌐🔍
🚀 Separating Roles from Titles: Avoiding the Cringe Factor in Organizations

You know that cringe-worthy feeling when someone totally misreads a situation? It’s uncomfortable, right? 😬 In organizations, that same cringe factor happens when someone’s noscript doesn’t match the role they’re actually playing.

Take a "Lead Developer," for instance. You’d think they’re coding away, but they might actually be managing a team, architecting solutions, or even running tests. Titles and roles don’t always align.

The real challenge, though, is at the leadership level. Founders and execs often juggle multiple roles—strategist, recruiter, problem-solver—switching hats constantly to bridge gaps and support the team where it’s needed most. Clear role definitions help ensure everyone knows their contribution, reducing friction and avoiding that organizational “cringe” that comes from mismatched expectations.

This concept was emphasized by Peter Thiel in his CS183 Stanford lecture series, where he discussed how PayPal’s success was rooted in role clarity and adaptability. By separating roles from noscripts and setting clear expectations, Thiel helped create a streamlined, effective team structure. 📈
https://youtu.be/YRnSEK11aSM?si=HSK5yne_Mv0RyuO7

For a closer look, check out the Class 5 lecture notes where Thiel dives into these ideas in more detail: Peter Thiel’s CS183 Class 5 Notes.

#Leadership #PeterThiel #OrganizationalStructure #RoleClarity #AIRevolution #StartupLeadership #NoMoreCringe
Exciting news! We’ve just launched our FREE ICD-10 Code Finder.

Say goodbye to time-consuming searches and manual lookups—simply type in your diagnosis and find the right code instantly. Try it out today and streamline your practice!

https://medecho.io/icdcodefinder

#ICD10 #HealthcareInnovation #MalaysianDoctors #MedTech #FreeTool
🔥1