Good things are unfolding! CHD issued NOTICE OF LIABILITY to California Schools.

"Mandating employees, students or others to use products that have been approved only conditionally for emergency use violates federal and state law.[9] Federal and state law are clear: mandates are illegal for EUA products. The prohibition on EUA mandates has been upheld in court.[10] The RT-PCR test, COVID vaccines, and certain face coverings are not FDA-approved; they are available only under an EUA.[11]

The EUA statute explicitly states that administration of all EUA products must “ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed … of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”

Full details — https://ca.childrenshealthdefense.org/home-page/letter-to-california-county-supervisors-regarding-illegal-mandates-of-eua-products-like-tests-and-vaccines/

Weekly Inner Reset begins in 5mins. ahhh... Let's -b-r-e-a-t-h-e-.
https://www.dredithubuntu.com/reset.html

More and more doctors speaking out. Add this to your collection of resources to share w/ mainstream western med minded friends to help break the spell.

https://rumble.com/vf34ub-ryan-n-cole-md-educates-idaho-legislators.html

🤣💃🏽🕺🏿Enjoy!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HKN1M74qcYE/

For friends who are new here, Welcome!! This is an awesome community of badasses. I'm so happy you're here! 🎉

Telegram has "channels" and "groups". This channel "Dr. Edith Ubuntu Chan" is linked with our discussion group "friends of Dr. E..." so everybody can comment.

If you'd like to be able to make your own new posts in the discussion group, separate from any of my posts, you can join the group here - https://news.1rj.ru/str/joinchat/GAItpNvWUKfRQmgf

Welcome everybody!! Look forward to learning from/with you!

🎼🎵🍄🧘‍♀️💖🌈🙌

REWARD of $265,000 for demonstrating coronavirus:
Earlier this year, Samuel Eckert’s German Team and the Isolate Truth Fund pledged a reward of $265,000 for any scientist who can provide incontrovertible proof that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated and therefore exists. They pointed out that not one lab in the world has yet been able to isolate this corona virus.

To date, the $265,000 reward continues to be unclaimed.

Hi friends, I'm so glad you're also open and curious about this topic too. I invite you to do your own research and decide for yourself.

My personal perspective is that humanity is evolving, and we're waking up from the dream of germ theory, recognizing that health is (has always been) a confluence of holistic factors. We're outgrowing old limited paradigms.

I believe that scientists and researchers are good and honest people. But humans have blind-spots based on programming and indoctrination, and importantly, research funding! The blessing of this time is that many of us are waking up. We're asking fundamental questions. What causes disease? What causes health?

As always, please do your own research and decide for yourself:

1) Virus Mania - by Torsten Engelbrecht. Claus Köhnlein, MD, Samantha Bailey, MD, Stefano Scoglio PhD
https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/en/home/

2) Contagion Myth by Dr. Tom Cowan
https://drtomcowan.com/books/

(3) As far as I know Dr. Stefan Lanka has not written a book. But here's a collection of resources, articles, interviews, etc summarizing his perspective. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vS18-q5y-tR6v4WdlFVcEYAgVOCuwC1Rk4hTM8L6E0s6ym61Ub76lD4Wm-gWENmxszRbMUDxXE3YyI1/pub

Hope these are helpful resources.

Friends, I LOVE that our community is able to hold this level of intelligent and nuanced conversation about what causes symptoms and what causes health. 🙌

When I look into the crystal ball, I see that in 20yrs everybody will look back and understand just how archaic and medieval this whole "Germ Theory" thing was.

We'll laugh at how we used to base our understanding of "health" on dying cells in a petri dish, dead cadavers, and separate mechanical parts. 🤣

In 20yrs, conversations like this one with Dr. Barre Lando & Dr. Andrew Kaufman - will be the norm. Enjoy! ❤️
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiUcXgGHg9I

Recently, we've been flooded w/ requests from Freedom Loving Friends for support and training in navigating these rapidly changing times:

* How do we stay centered, clear and balanced - while witnessing a seemingly insane world unfold in front of our eyes?
* What's the Inner Game needed to meet the many outer challenges?
* What to do with all these emotions of Grief, Sadness, Anger, Worry, heartache?
* How can I transmute these into loving, empowered action?
* How do I inspire others to awaken to greater awareness? to honor Informed Consent, Medical Freedom, personal responsibility and sovereignty?

So we decided, let's launch a custom private group - just for YOU! 🎉

INNER TRAINING FOR FREEDOM LOVERS.

A six-week advanced ninja training for Freedom Loving People and Visionary Pioneers.

If this resonates, please join us!

Our journey begins Tues May 11th. Let's do this together.

⭐️ DrEdithUbuntu.com/Inner-Training

💃🏻🌈💖🦋🎉🙌

Eternal gratitude to Bruce Lipton for being the pioneer and loving truth-teller that he is.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e71exrhEBQc&feature=youtu.be

divine comedy! 🤣

In case you need a little boost - get up and DANCE with me! 🤘🏽
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcjzHMhBtf0

Yes. You. me. we. We came here to bring love, awesomeness, and pure badassery! ✊🏋️‍♀️🙌

When people ask me if I'm provax or anti-vax, I used to say "I'm a big fan of Informed Consent."

But lately I find myself saying: "I'm a big fan of the Nuremberg Code. Are you a fan too?"

https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code

1) The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2) The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3) The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4) The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5) No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6) The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7) Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8) The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9) During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.

10) During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code

Hi everybody, a friend emailed me this letter template (and summary of links). Thought I'd share below - in case you have situations where this type of letter could be useful? See below. 👇

————-


Hi (Insert Name),


I understand you may have already taken one of the emergency CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines but you also may still be deciding whether or not it is the right choice for you (or have family or friends still deciding). For your consideration, I have created a document of reasons to abstain. Because of the unprecedented censorship of tech companies and the mainstream media this year, I put together this list of articles, videos and science I trust while carefully researching the new mRNA/DNA νaϲϲines this past year to ensure you have access to all the information you need for true informed consent in making your choice.


Though I personally will abstain from taking emergency CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines, I support your choice either way. Because of the building social pressure and real consequences to job, school or ostracism from the activities we love, deciding to abstain is, and will continue to be, a very difficult choice. I am here if you need support or just want to talk.


If you have decided to take a CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲine, I accept your choice without question, judgement or prejudice. I encourage you though to still review this document to help understand the legitimate concerns with CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines. I welcome your reactions, questions, corrections or comments, even if negative.


Kind regards,

(Your name)


Reasons to abstain from emergency CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines

https://tinyurl.com/4bc739m4


Reasons to abstain from emergency CΟVIDΙ9 vaϲϲines

Last updated: Apr 01 2021

#1 Experimental


Despite claims by the media, all CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines available today are experimental νaϲϲines whose safety studies are ongoing. The νaϲϲines are NOT approved and are available only under emergency use authorization by the FDA and are not approved or licensed by the FDA. Phase 3 safety studies are still in progress and will not end for years to come.

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 Vaϲϲine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older to Prevent CΟVID-Ι9
ModernaTX, Inc.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427
Actual Study Start Date : July 27, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date : October 27, 2022
Estimated Study Completion Date : October 27, 2022
FDA Emergency use authorization: https://www.fda.gov/media/144636/download

Moderna package information insert showing EUA authorization (unapproved product)
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=e0651c7a-2fe2-459d-a766-0d59e919f058

Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaϲϲine Candidates Against CΟVID-Ι9 in Healthy Individuals
BioNTech SE/Pfizer
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728
Actual Study Start Date : April 29, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date : August 3, 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : January 31, 2023
FDA Emergency use authorization: https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download

Pfizer package information insert showing EUA authorization (unapproved product) https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471

Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring νaϲϲination with a CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲine distributed under an EUA
Feb 23 2021
https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/federal-law-prohibits-employers-and-others-from-requiring-vaccination-with-a-covid-19-vaccine-distributed-under-an-eua/
...The abbreviated timelines for the emergency use applications and authorizations means there is much the FDA does not know about these products even as it authorizes them for emergency use, including their effectiveness against asymptomatic infection, death, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease.
...Given the uncertainty about the two νaϲϲines, their EUAs are explicit that each is “an investigational νaϲϲine not licensed for any indication” and require that all “promotional material relating to the CΟVID-Ι9 Vaϲϲine clearly and conspicuously … state that this product has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA” (emphasis added).

Under Federal Law, Can Your Employer Make You Get the CΟVID Vaϲϲine?
Jan 29 2021
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/under-federal-law-can-your-employer-make-you-get-covid-vaccine
States and employers, under federal law, can’t mandate emergency use products such as the Pfizer and Moderna CΟVID νaϲϲines. But that doesn’t mean some won’t try.

For Now, US Troops Won't Be Required to Get New CΟVID-Ι9 Vaϲϲine
Nov 23 2020
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/11/23/now-us-troops-wont-be-required-get-new-covid-19-vaccine.html
...as the two departments sort out the details on who should receive the νaϲϲine and where, DoD officials stressed it will not be mandatory for U.S. service members...
According to officials, the νaϲϲine will remain voluntary as long as it is authorized under emergency conditions and doesn't have official approval from the FDA.

---

#2 Long term safety unknown


Despite media claims of "safe" νaϲϲines, CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines have been studied for safety for only a few months. In the past, νaϲϲines have taken years (sometimes up to a decade), to develop and study for safety. Because there are no long term studies, there is no data showing if problems will develop long term.

Moderna mRNA-1273 8 months
BioNTech SE/Pfizer BNT162b2 10 months

How long it took to develop 12 other νaϲϲines in history
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-long-it-took-to-develop-other-vaccines-in-history-2020-7

Researchers rush to test coronavirus vaccine in people without knowing how well it works in animals
Mar 11 2020
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/11/researchers-rush-to-start-moderna-coronavirus-vaccine-trial-without-usual-animal-testing
“The traditional vaccine timeline is 15 to 20 years. That would not be acceptable here,” said Mark Feinberg, president and CEO of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, whose work as chief public health and science officer at Merck Vaccines was instrumental in the development of the immunization against Ebola. 

---

#3 Promising and effective CΟVID treatments are already available, could be studied further or could be approved for emergency use but are suppressed


Peter McCullough, MD testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee [on suppressed CΟVID treatments]
Mar 11 2021
20m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM 
(backup: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jJe5BJwl6tdv)
https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/

Dr. Pierre Kory testifies to Senate Committee about ivermectin
Dec 08 2020
29m
https://vimeo.com/490351508

The Story of Ivermectin
Feb 28 2021
25m
https://tv.gab.com/channel/gordr/view/the-story-of-ivermectin-vs-remdesivir-603bc089f92a30bda575a1ed

Front Line CΟVID-Ι9 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCA)
https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Meta-analysis of randomized trials of ivermectin to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection
Jan 19 2021
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-148845/v1
In six randomized trials of moderate or severe infection, there was a 75% reduction in mortality

Expanding Use of Ivermectin as Early Treatment for CΟVID
Feb 10 2021
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/expanding-use-of-ivermectin-as-early-treatment-forcovid/
A recent decision on the part of YouTube to remove two videos of expert testimony before the US Senate is part of a disturbing trend in which Big Tech firms act as commissars to suppress information they alone interpret as harmful to the public interest.

Common asthma treatment reduces need for hospitalisation in CΟVID-Ι9 patients, study suggests
Feb 09 2021
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-02-09-common-asthma-treatment-reduces-need-hospitalisation-covid-19-patients-study
suggests that inhaled budesonide reduced the relative risk of requiring urgent care or hospitalisation by 90% in the 28-day study period. Participants allocated the budesonide inhaler also had a quicker resolution of fever, symptoms and fewer persistent symptoms after 28 days.

https://budesonideworks.com/validation-2/

Dr. Simone Gold - The truth about the CV19 νaϲϲine
Jan 04 2021
56m
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cspP45qJChtf
20:50 Lancet hydroxychloroquine study and scientific and media corruption

HCQ is effective for CΟVID-Ι9 when used early: real-time meta analysis of 219 studies
Mar 13 2021
https://hcqmeta.com/
Early treatment is most successful, with 100% of 28 studies reporting a positive effect (12 statistically significant in isolation) and an estimated reduction of 64% in the effect measured (death, hospitalization, etc.) using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.36 [0.25-0.50].

https://c19study.com/

---

#4 New genetic engineering technology


All CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines use new untested genetic engineering vaccine technology (mRNA/DNA), never used in any successful human vaccine before.

The story of mRNA: How a once-dismissed idea became a leading technology in the CΟVID νaϲϲine race
Nov 10 2020
https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/10/the-story-of-mrna-how-a-once-dismissed-idea-became-a-leading-technology-in-the-covid-vaccine-race
...Although relatively easy and quick to produce compared to traditional νaϲϲine-making, no mRNA νaϲϲine or drug has ever won approval.

How the Johnson & Johnson [DNA] Vaccine Works
Jan 13 2021
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine.html (bypass paywall: https://archive.is/RPPOx)

---

#5 Not a νaϲϲine since it does not prevent infection or transmission


Despite media claims of CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines being necessary to end the pandemic, CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines have NOT been shown to prevent infection or prevent transmission. This is normally required to call a medical product a νaϲϲine. CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines studies show only that they reduce moderate and mild symptoms. Hence, they are more correctly called experimental genetic engineering biologic treatments.

Vaϲϲinated people may still spread virus and are still required to social distance and wear masks.

Covid Vaccine Nonsense
Mar 30 2021
https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/30/covid-vaccine-nonsense
US-based human rights lawyer breaks down the contradictory claims of “effectiveness”, the incomplete studies and legal minefield of forced use of experimental vaccines
...The efforts to require every American to be injected with an experimental vaccine for Covid-19 are based on the false notion that vaccination will protect recipients from becoming infected with SARS-Cov-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, or protect them from passing along the infection to other people.

Can a CΟVID-Ι9 Vaϲϲine Stop the Spread? Good Question.
Nov 20 2020
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/941388
"We don't know if people can become infected and thus also transmit even with νaϲϲination," said former US Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, MD, in a November 18 briefing on CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines sponsored by the American Public Health Association (APHA) and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).

CΟVID-Ι9 Vaϲϲine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed
Sep 23 2020
https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/09/23/covid-19-vaccine-protocols-reveal-that-trials-are-designed-to-succeed
...Prevention of infection is not a criterion for success for any of these νaϲϲines. In fact, their endpoints all require confirmed infections and all those they will include in the analysis for success, the only difference being the severity of symptoms between the vaϲϲinated and unvaϲϲinated. Measuring differences amongst only those infected by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the implicit conclusion that the νaϲϲines are not expected to prevent infection, only modify symptoms of those infected.
We all expect an effective νaϲϲine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the νaϲϲine protocols—Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca—do not require that their νaϲϲine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache.