🤣💃🏽🕺🏿Enjoy!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HKN1M74qcYE/

For friends who are new here, Welcome!! This is an awesome community of badasses. I'm so happy you're here! 🎉

Telegram has "channels" and "groups". This channel "Dr. Edith Ubuntu Chan" is linked with our discussion group "friends of Dr. E..." so everybody can comment.

If you'd like to be able to make your own new posts in the discussion group, separate from any of my posts, you can join the group here - https://news.1rj.ru/str/joinchat/GAItpNvWUKfRQmgf

Welcome everybody!! Look forward to learning from/with you!

🎼🎵🍄🧘‍♀️💖🌈🙌

REWARD of $265,000 for demonstrating coronavirus:
Earlier this year, Samuel Eckert’s German Team and the Isolate Truth Fund pledged a reward of $265,000 for any scientist who can provide incontrovertible proof that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated and therefore exists. They pointed out that not one lab in the world has yet been able to isolate this corona virus.

To date, the $265,000 reward continues to be unclaimed.

Hi friends, I'm so glad you're also open and curious about this topic too. I invite you to do your own research and decide for yourself.

My personal perspective is that humanity is evolving, and we're waking up from the dream of germ theory, recognizing that health is (has always been) a confluence of holistic factors. We're outgrowing old limited paradigms.

I believe that scientists and researchers are good and honest people. But humans have blind-spots based on programming and indoctrination, and importantly, research funding! The blessing of this time is that many of us are waking up. We're asking fundamental questions. What causes disease? What causes health?

As always, please do your own research and decide for yourself:

1) Virus Mania - by Torsten Engelbrecht. Claus Köhnlein, MD, Samantha Bailey, MD, Stefano Scoglio PhD
https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/en/home/

2) Contagion Myth by Dr. Tom Cowan
https://drtomcowan.com/books/

(3) As far as I know Dr. Stefan Lanka has not written a book. But here's a collection of resources, articles, interviews, etc summarizing his perspective. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vS18-q5y-tR6v4WdlFVcEYAgVOCuwC1Rk4hTM8L6E0s6ym61Ub76lD4Wm-gWENmxszRbMUDxXE3YyI1/pub

Hope these are helpful resources.

Friends, I LOVE that our community is able to hold this level of intelligent and nuanced conversation about what causes symptoms and what causes health. 🙌

When I look into the crystal ball, I see that in 20yrs everybody will look back and understand just how archaic and medieval this whole "Germ Theory" thing was.

We'll laugh at how we used to base our understanding of "health" on dying cells in a petri dish, dead cadavers, and separate mechanical parts. 🤣

In 20yrs, conversations like this one with Dr. Barre Lando & Dr. Andrew Kaufman - will be the norm. Enjoy! ❤️
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiUcXgGHg9I

Recently, we've been flooded w/ requests from Freedom Loving Friends for support and training in navigating these rapidly changing times:

* How do we stay centered, clear and balanced - while witnessing a seemingly insane world unfold in front of our eyes?
* What's the Inner Game needed to meet the many outer challenges?
* What to do with all these emotions of Grief, Sadness, Anger, Worry, heartache?
* How can I transmute these into loving, empowered action?
* How do I inspire others to awaken to greater awareness? to honor Informed Consent, Medical Freedom, personal responsibility and sovereignty?

So we decided, let's launch a custom private group - just for YOU! 🎉

INNER TRAINING FOR FREEDOM LOVERS.

A six-week advanced ninja training for Freedom Loving People and Visionary Pioneers.

If this resonates, please join us!

Our journey begins Tues May 11th. Let's do this together.

⭐️ DrEdithUbuntu.com/Inner-Training

💃🏻🌈💖🦋🎉🙌

Eternal gratitude to Bruce Lipton for being the pioneer and loving truth-teller that he is.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e71exrhEBQc&feature=youtu.be

divine comedy! 🤣

In case you need a little boost - get up and DANCE with me! 🤘🏽
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcjzHMhBtf0

Yes. You. me. we. We came here to bring love, awesomeness, and pure badassery! ✊🏋️‍♀️🙌

When people ask me if I'm provax or anti-vax, I used to say "I'm a big fan of Informed Consent."

But lately I find myself saying: "I'm a big fan of the Nuremberg Code. Are you a fan too?"

https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code

1) The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2) The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3) The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4) The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5) No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6) The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7) Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8) The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9) During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.

10) During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code

Hi everybody, a friend emailed me this letter template (and summary of links). Thought I'd share below - in case you have situations where this type of letter could be useful? See below. 👇

————-


Hi (Insert Name),


I understand you may have already taken one of the emergency CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines but you also may still be deciding whether or not it is the right choice for you (or have family or friends still deciding). For your consideration, I have created a document of reasons to abstain. Because of the unprecedented censorship of tech companies and the mainstream media this year, I put together this list of articles, videos and science I trust while carefully researching the new mRNA/DNA νaϲϲines this past year to ensure you have access to all the information you need for true informed consent in making your choice.


Though I personally will abstain from taking emergency CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines, I support your choice either way. Because of the building social pressure and real consequences to job, school or ostracism from the activities we love, deciding to abstain is, and will continue to be, a very difficult choice. I am here if you need support or just want to talk.


If you have decided to take a CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲine, I accept your choice without question, judgement or prejudice. I encourage you though to still review this document to help understand the legitimate concerns with CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines. I welcome your reactions, questions, corrections or comments, even if negative.


Kind regards,

(Your name)


Reasons to abstain from emergency CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines

https://tinyurl.com/4bc739m4


Reasons to abstain from emergency CΟVIDΙ9 vaϲϲines

Last updated: Apr 01 2021

#1 Experimental


Despite claims by the media, all CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines available today are experimental νaϲϲines whose safety studies are ongoing. The νaϲϲines are NOT approved and are available only under emergency use authorization by the FDA and are not approved or licensed by the FDA. Phase 3 safety studies are still in progress and will not end for years to come.

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 Vaϲϲine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older to Prevent CΟVID-Ι9
ModernaTX, Inc.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427
Actual Study Start Date : July 27, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date : October 27, 2022
Estimated Study Completion Date : October 27, 2022
FDA Emergency use authorization: https://www.fda.gov/media/144636/download

Moderna package information insert showing EUA authorization (unapproved product)
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=e0651c7a-2fe2-459d-a766-0d59e919f058

Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaϲϲine Candidates Against CΟVID-Ι9 in Healthy Individuals
BioNTech SE/Pfizer
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728
Actual Study Start Date : April 29, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date : August 3, 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date : January 31, 2023
FDA Emergency use authorization: https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download

Pfizer package information insert showing EUA authorization (unapproved product) https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471

Federal law prohibits employers and others from requiring νaϲϲination with a CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲine distributed under an EUA
Feb 23 2021
https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/23/federal-law-prohibits-employers-and-others-from-requiring-vaccination-with-a-covid-19-vaccine-distributed-under-an-eua/
...The abbreviated timelines for the emergency use applications and authorizations means there is much the FDA does not know about these products even as it authorizes them for emergency use, including their effectiveness against asymptomatic infection, death, and transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease.
...Given the uncertainty about the two νaϲϲines, their EUAs are explicit that each is “an investigational νaϲϲine not licensed for any indication” and require that all “promotional material relating to the CΟVID-Ι9 Vaϲϲine clearly and conspicuously … state that this product has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA” (emphasis added).

Under Federal Law, Can Your Employer Make You Get the CΟVID Vaϲϲine?
Jan 29 2021
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/under-federal-law-can-your-employer-make-you-get-covid-vaccine
States and employers, under federal law, can’t mandate emergency use products such as the Pfizer and Moderna CΟVID νaϲϲines. But that doesn’t mean some won’t try.

For Now, US Troops Won't Be Required to Get New CΟVID-Ι9 Vaϲϲine
Nov 23 2020
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/11/23/now-us-troops-wont-be-required-get-new-covid-19-vaccine.html
...as the two departments sort out the details on who should receive the νaϲϲine and where, DoD officials stressed it will not be mandatory for U.S. service members...
According to officials, the νaϲϲine will remain voluntary as long as it is authorized under emergency conditions and doesn't have official approval from the FDA.

---

#2 Long term safety unknown


Despite media claims of "safe" νaϲϲines, CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines have been studied for safety for only a few months. In the past, νaϲϲines have taken years (sometimes up to a decade), to develop and study for safety. Because there are no long term studies, there is no data showing if problems will develop long term.

Moderna mRNA-1273 8 months
BioNTech SE/Pfizer BNT162b2 10 months

How long it took to develop 12 other νaϲϲines in history
https://www.businessinsider.com/how-long-it-took-to-develop-other-vaccines-in-history-2020-7

Researchers rush to test coronavirus vaccine in people without knowing how well it works in animals
Mar 11 2020
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/11/researchers-rush-to-start-moderna-coronavirus-vaccine-trial-without-usual-animal-testing
“The traditional vaccine timeline is 15 to 20 years. That would not be acceptable here,” said Mark Feinberg, president and CEO of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, whose work as chief public health and science officer at Merck Vaccines was instrumental in the development of the immunization against Ebola. 

---

#3 Promising and effective CΟVID treatments are already available, could be studied further or could be approved for emergency use but are suppressed


Peter McCullough, MD testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee [on suppressed CΟVID treatments]
Mar 11 2021
20m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAHi3lX3oGM 
(backup: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jJe5BJwl6tdv)
https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide/

Dr. Pierre Kory testifies to Senate Committee about ivermectin
Dec 08 2020
29m
https://vimeo.com/490351508

The Story of Ivermectin
Feb 28 2021
25m
https://tv.gab.com/channel/gordr/view/the-story-of-ivermectin-vs-remdesivir-603bc089f92a30bda575a1ed

Front Line CΟVID-Ι9 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCA)
https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Meta-analysis of randomized trials of ivermectin to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection
Jan 19 2021
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-148845/v1
In six randomized trials of moderate or severe infection, there was a 75% reduction in mortality

Expanding Use of Ivermectin as Early Treatment for CΟVID
Feb 10 2021
https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/expanding-use-of-ivermectin-as-early-treatment-forcovid/
A recent decision on the part of YouTube to remove two videos of expert testimony before the US Senate is part of a disturbing trend in which Big Tech firms act as commissars to suppress information they alone interpret as harmful to the public interest.

Common asthma treatment reduces need for hospitalisation in CΟVID-Ι9 patients, study suggests
Feb 09 2021
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-02-09-common-asthma-treatment-reduces-need-hospitalisation-covid-19-patients-study
suggests that inhaled budesonide reduced the relative risk of requiring urgent care or hospitalisation by 90% in the 28-day study period. Participants allocated the budesonide inhaler also had a quicker resolution of fever, symptoms and fewer persistent symptoms after 28 days.

https://budesonideworks.com/validation-2/

Dr. Simone Gold - The truth about the CV19 νaϲϲine
Jan 04 2021
56m
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cspP45qJChtf
20:50 Lancet hydroxychloroquine study and scientific and media corruption

HCQ is effective for CΟVID-Ι9 when used early: real-time meta analysis of 219 studies
Mar 13 2021
https://hcqmeta.com/
Early treatment is most successful, with 100% of 28 studies reporting a positive effect (12 statistically significant in isolation) and an estimated reduction of 64% in the effect measured (death, hospitalization, etc.) using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.36 [0.25-0.50].

https://c19study.com/

---

#4 New genetic engineering technology


All CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines use new untested genetic engineering vaccine technology (mRNA/DNA), never used in any successful human vaccine before.

The story of mRNA: How a once-dismissed idea became a leading technology in the CΟVID νaϲϲine race
Nov 10 2020
https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/10/the-story-of-mrna-how-a-once-dismissed-idea-became-a-leading-technology-in-the-covid-vaccine-race
...Although relatively easy and quick to produce compared to traditional νaϲϲine-making, no mRNA νaϲϲine or drug has ever won approval.

How the Johnson & Johnson [DNA] Vaccine Works
Jan 13 2021
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/johnson-johnson-covid-19-vaccine.html (bypass paywall: https://archive.is/RPPOx)

---

#5 Not a νaϲϲine since it does not prevent infection or transmission


Despite media claims of CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines being necessary to end the pandemic, CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines have NOT been shown to prevent infection or prevent transmission. This is normally required to call a medical product a νaϲϲine. CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲines studies show only that they reduce moderate and mild symptoms. Hence, they are more correctly called experimental genetic engineering biologic treatments.

Vaϲϲinated people may still spread virus and are still required to social distance and wear masks.

Covid Vaccine Nonsense
Mar 30 2021
https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/30/covid-vaccine-nonsense
US-based human rights lawyer breaks down the contradictory claims of “effectiveness”, the incomplete studies and legal minefield of forced use of experimental vaccines
...The efforts to require every American to be injected with an experimental vaccine for Covid-19 are based on the false notion that vaccination will protect recipients from becoming infected with SARS-Cov-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, or protect them from passing along the infection to other people.

Can a CΟVID-Ι9 Vaϲϲine Stop the Spread? Good Question.
Nov 20 2020
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/941388
"We don't know if people can become infected and thus also transmit even with νaϲϲination," said former US Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, MD, in a November 18 briefing on CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines sponsored by the American Public Health Association (APHA) and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).

CΟVID-Ι9 Vaϲϲine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed
Sep 23 2020
https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/09/23/covid-19-vaccine-protocols-reveal-that-trials-are-designed-to-succeed
...Prevention of infection is not a criterion for success for any of these νaϲϲines. In fact, their endpoints all require confirmed infections and all those they will include in the analysis for success, the only difference being the severity of symptoms between the vaϲϲinated and unvaϲϲinated. Measuring differences amongst only those infected by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the implicit conclusion that the νaϲϲines are not expected to prevent infection, only modify symptoms of those infected.
We all expect an effective νaϲϲine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the νaϲϲine protocols—Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca—do not require that their νaϲϲine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache.

Fauci: Early CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines will only prevent symptoms, not block the virus
Oct 26 2020
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/fauci-vaccines-will-only-prevent-symptoms-not-block-the-virus-195051568.html

CΟVID: Vaϲϲinated people may spread virus, says Van-Tam
Jan 24 2021
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-55784199



---

#6 Manufacturers can never be sued for harm 


All νaϲϲine manufacturers have immunity to lawsuits from any damages their νaϲϲines might cause now or from long term effects discovered years from now. This undermines any financial incentive for manufacturers to ensure long term safety now or to improve safety overtime.

You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe CΟVID νaϲϲine side effects. The government likely won't compensate you for damages either
Dec 16 2020
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html

---

#7 Risks of CΟVID does not warrant risk of mass νaϲϲination of all people


Martin Kulldorff
Professor Harvard Medical School. Disease surveillance methods. Infectious disease outbreaks. Vaccine safety.
Mar 15 2021
https://twitter.com/MartinKulldorff/status/1371638485686358018
“...Thinking that everyone must be vaccinated is as scientifically flawed as thinking that nobody should. COVID vaccines are important for older high-risk people, and their care-takers. Those with prior natural infection do not need it. Nor children.”

Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID-19: an overview of systematic evaluations
John P A Ioannidis
Mar 26 2021
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33768536/
All systematic evaluations of seroprevalence data converge that SARS-CoV-2 infection is widely spread globally. Acknowledging residual uncertainties, the available evidence suggests average global IFR of ~0.15% and ~1.5-2.0 billion infections by February 2021 with substantial differences in IFR and in infection spread across continents, countries, and locations.

CΟVID-Ι9 Primary, Not Only, Cause of 94% of Deaths
Sept 01 2020
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200901/covid-19-primary-not-only-cause-94-percent-of-deaths
About 94% of people who have died from CΟVID-Ι9 in the U.S. also had other contributing conditions listed on their death certificates, according to new data released by the CDC.
On average, patients’ records had 2.6 additional conditions. Only 6% of deaths listed CΟVID-Ι9 as the only cause.

CΟVID-Ι9 Has Claimed the Lives of 100,000 Long-Term Care Residents and Staff 
https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/covid-19-has-claimed-the-lives-of-100000-long-term-care-residents-and-staff/
Nationwide, deaths in long-term care facilities account for 40% of all CΟVID-Ι9 deaths.

Act Now America: Ask Key Congressmen To Formally Investigate the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19
https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/investigate-the-cdc/
In March 2020, the CDC changed the protocols for how death certificates are recorded, significantly altering death certificate reporting. However, the CDC did so for only one type of death — COVID 19 — and allegedly without following the proper federal requirements. Soon after, the CDC adopted the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists’ April 15, 2020 position paper for defining what constitutes a COVID case. However, it did so without implementing known safeguards to ensure that single individuals would not be counted multiple times, thus altering case counts and subsequent data.

---

#8 Risk of later immune overreaction due to incomplete and flawed animal studies 


All prior coronavirus νaϲϲines resulted in death and serious harm when vaϲϲinated animals were exposed to the live virus, an effect called antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). Animal trials for CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines did not rule out ADE.

Note: ADE is also called "pathogenic priming" or "immune enhancement" or "paradoxical immune enhancement"

...
March 15, 2021 - According to court documents, Purdue files a restructuring plan to dissolve itself and establish a new company dedicated to programs designed to combat the opioid crisis. As part of the proposed plan, the Sackler family agrees to pay an additional $4.2 billion over the next nine years to resolve various civil claims.

Medical Journals Are an Extension of the Marketing Arm of Pharmaceutical Companies
2005 May
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1140949/
“Journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry”, wrote Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet, in March 2004 [1]. In the same year, Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, lambasted the industry for becoming “primarily a marketing machine” and co-opting “every institution that might stand in its way” [2]. Medical journals were conspicuously absent from her list of co-opted institutions, but she and Horton are not the only editors who have become increasingly queasy about the power and influence of the industry. Jerry Kassirer, another former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, argues that the industry has deflected the moral compasses of many physicians [3], and the editors of PLoS Medicine have declared that they will not become “part of the cycle of dependency…between journals and the pharmaceutical industry” [4]. Something is clearly up.

The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine
Mar 09 2021
42m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAEAWyfuEWY
As much of the world rushes to receive a lightly-tested pharmaceutical product, we thought it was high time to look again at the (very) big business of medicine. Leemon McHenry, PhD, guides us to the fraudulent core of ghostwritten studies, captured legislators, revolving-door regulatory agencies, pay-to-play medical journals, and the "key opinion leaders" who lend their academic credentials to giant corporations...for a price.  
With every stage in the process seemingly structured for corruption,  we can only wonder along with Professor McHenry: "Who's looking out for scientific integrity?"

---

#10 PCR test is flawed and allows false positives to be manipulated


Most cases, deaths, hospitalizations and all νaϲϲine studies use the experimental PCR test for diagnosing CΟVIDΙ9 whose false positive rate can be effectively controlled by the PCR test lab/manufacturer by setting the test's cycle rate (which they are not required to disclose). Many asymptomatic people were, and continue to be, tested using only the PCR test to diagnose CΟVIDΙ9, a fundamental redefinition of the term 'case'. This problem was corrected by the WHO Jan 20 2021 (US presidential inauguration day).

If more than 35 cycles are used then the test returns 100% false positive rate. Additionally, a positive PCR test is misrepresented as an active infection "case" when this was, in every prior year, only determined by doctor diagnosis using observed symptoms and tests. The PCR test does not detect active virus but instead detects genetic material which could be from a prior infection, from another coronavirus or from the body itself. A positive PCR test by itself is insufficient to diagnose disease.

PCR test FDA emergency authorization
March 31 2020
https://www.fda.gov/media/136598/download

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
...The Food and Drug Administration said in an emailed statement that it does not specify the cycle threshold ranges used to determine who is positive, and that “commercial manufacturers and laboratories set their own.

2007 article that explains the known problems with PCR testing and how it led to a false epidemic and the compulsory and unnecessary νaϲϲination of thousands of health care workers:
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html

Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaϲϲines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus
Apr 20 2012
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060
Because of a concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, νaϲϲine development was initiated. Evaluations of an inactivated whole virus νaϲϲine in ferrets and nonhuman primates and a virus-like-particle νaϲϲine in mice induced protection against infection but challenged animals exhibited an immunopathologic-type lung disease.

Informed consent disclosure to νaϲϲine trial subjects of risk of CΟVID-Ι9 νaϲϲines worsening clinical disease
Oct 28 2020
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270
...Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant CΟVID-Ι9 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in νaϲϲine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after νaϲϲine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

Pfizer CΟVID νaϲϲine trial shows alarming evidence of pathogenic priming in older adults
Dec 11 2020
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/pfizer-covid-vaccine-trial-shows-alarming-evidence-of-pathogenic-priming-in-older-adults (backup: https://archive.is/qVXC5)

Researchers fast-track coronavirus νaϲϲine by skipping key animal testing first
Mar 13 2020
https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-vaccine-trial-no-animal-testing.html
A clinical trial for an experimental coronavirus νaϲϲine has begun recruiting participants in Seattle, but researchers did not first show that the νaϲϲine triggered an immune response in animals, as is normally required. 


---

#9 Pharmaceutical industry has a long history of corruption


Pfizer
https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/pfizer
Penalty total since 2000: $4,712,210,359
healthcare-related offenses $3,373,675,000

Pfizer faces DOJ, SEC foreign bribery probes for China, Russia operations
Nov 09 2020
https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/pfizer-faces-doj-sec-foreign-bribery-probes-for-china-russia-operations

Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History
Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing
Sep 02 2009
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history

Tough on Crime? Pfizer and the CIHR
May 2010
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21532766/
Pfizer has been a "habitual offender," persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results. Since 2002 the company and its subsidiaries have been assessed $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards. 

Johnson and Johnson
https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=johnson-and-johnson
Penalty total since 2000: $4,247,999,381
healthcare-related offenses $3,136,511,000

Johnson & Johnson Has a Long Rap Sheet — Why Should We Trust Its Vaϲϲine?
Mar 01 2021
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/johnson-johnson-why-trust-vaccine/

Johnson & Johnson to Pay More Than $2.2 Billion to Resolve Criminal and Civil Investigations
Allegations Include Off-label Marketing and Kickbacks to Doctors and Pharmacists
Nov 04 2013
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/johnson-johnson-pay-more-22-billion-resolve-criminal-and-civil-investigations

Opioid Crisis Fast Facts
Mar 16 2021
https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/health/opioid-crisis-fast-facts/index.html
August 26, 2019 - Oklahoma wins its case against Johnson & Johnson in the first major opioid lawsuit trial to be held in the United States. Cleveland County District Judge Thad Balkman orders Johnson & Johnson to pay $572 million for its role in the state’s opioid crisis. The penalty is later reduced to $465 million, due to a mathematical error made when calculating the judgment.

...“The big message is that every lab is vulnerable to having false positives,” Dr. Petti said. “No single test result is absolute and that is even more important with a test result based on P.C.R.”
As for Dr. Herndon, though, she now knows she is off the hook.
“I thought I might have caused the epidemic,” she said.

CΟVID Testing Fraud Uncovered
24m
https://thehighwire.com/videos/covid-testing-fraud-uncovered
As cases of coronavirus rise across America, shouldn’t death rates be going up too? Del breaks down how CΟVID tests may be seriously flawed by providing less than accurate results and why the majority of positive cases could be false.

Dr Mike Yeadon - PCR Testing
Nov 20 2020
33m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1onx7LaNio

WHO issued new PCR test guidance that requires re-testing positives without symptoms on Jan 20 (which will cause cases to fall due to less false positives)

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2
Jan 20 2021
https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05
*Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.*
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2).
This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.

---

#11 Suspicious deaths and injuries following νaϲϲination


There have been suspicious deaths following CΟVIDΙ9 νaϲϲination in elderly in nursing homes around the world. There is no process in place to investigate if the νaϲϲines are contributing to these deaths. Despite having been recently vaϲϲinated, it is presumed by authorities these deaths are either coincidences or a CΟVIDΙ9 outbreak.

Reports of Deaths After CΟVID Vaϲϲines Up by 259 in 1 Week, CDC Data Show
Mar 12 2021
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-reports-death-up/

CΟVID-Ι9 outbreak at Auburn nursing home infects 137 residents, kills 24
Jan 09 2021