This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Funny and sad at the same time
Forwarded from LF Capo
I am grateful for any lane you choose to be in and help spread truth. I thank you from the bottom of my heart for people like you who are brave beyond words, who supported me in not getting the shot and leaving my job instead. I will be continuing to pray for you. I can see on your face how hard this is to find out some of the truths because you know the deeper ramifications involved. God Bless you Dr. Ruby and thank you. Sending prayers for good health and protection and joy with a peace that passes all understanding. ❤️
Covid-19 has now hijacked the resources of the industrialised world’s health systems and undermined their economies in an unprecedented way. Israel has just authorised its fourth booster in a year, even as the toll of adverse events and deaths mounts in their wake. It is now evident that the revenue stream is for the time being more ‘durable’ than any protection derived from the vaccines.
We are all in this together and we must change this but make no mistake, when we get to the other side of this, everything is going to have to be different.
We are all in this together and we must change this but make no mistake, when we get to the other side of this, everything is going to have to be different.
Let’s hold off on elevating Senator Ron Johnson to sainthood until he actually does something with the information he’s been given and the hearing he held two weeks ago in DC
I have another Embalmer coming forward with incredible pictures and a full-
on corroboration of board-certified funeral Director and Embalmer, Mr. Richard Hirschman’s revelations.
What the hell are these shots encoded for? The bodies of the sudden dead are trying to tell us.
TRUTH In Medicine
Stewpeters.tv
on corroboration of board-certified funeral Director and Embalmer, Mr. Richard Hirschman’s revelations.
What the hell are these shots encoded for? The bodies of the sudden dead are trying to tell us.
TRUTH In Medicine
Stewpeters.tv
Are the booster shots causing cancer rates to explode?
Find out on the Dr. Jane Ruby Show TODAY on Red Voice Media and Stewpeters.tv
TRUTH In Medicine
Find out on the Dr. Jane Ruby Show TODAY on Red Voice Media and Stewpeters.tv
TRUTH In Medicine
Buy American and support 2 great patriots, Mike Lindell & Dr. Jane.
Great sheets, the mattress topper is to die for and I keep buying the soft, cushy slippers for everyone in my family.
Use my Promo Code: RUBY For huge discounts at checkout!
MyPillow.com
Promo Code: RUBY
Great sheets, the mattress topper is to die for and I keep buying the soft, cushy slippers for everyone in my family.
Use my Promo Code: RUBY For huge discounts at checkout!
MyPillow.com
Promo Code: RUBY
I believe this persistent school mandated mask operation is a false flag operation to keep people distracted and expending their energies fighting school boards that are not going to budge anyway because they’re getting billions from the Biden administration.
It’s designed to keep people preoccupied while the real crimes are happening
If parents want to take the power back, all they need to do is pull the kids out.
It’s designed to keep people preoccupied while the real crimes are happening
If parents want to take the power back, all they need to do is pull the kids out.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is guilty of racketeering and conspiracy to commit mass murder on his own citizens. Here is the trail of receipts:
ONE of the dozens of examples of this Canadian government interest is found here: https://investor.arbutusbio.com/static-files/8e2ab596-277e-4d93-86bb-f8a045018224
University of British Columbia Certain early work on LNP delivery systems and related inventions was undertaken at the University of British Columbia ("UBC"). These inventions are licensed to us by UBC under a license agreement, initially entered in 1998 as amended in 2001, 2006 and 2007. We have granted sublicenses under the UBC license to Alnylam as well as to Spectrum. Alnylam has in turn sublicensed back to us certain of the licensed UBC patents. In mid-2009, we, along with our subsidiary Protiva, entered into a supplemental agreement with UBC, Alnylam and Acuitas regarding a separate research collaboration to be conducted among UBC, Alnylam and Acuitas to which we have license rights. The settlement agreement provided for the effective termination of all obligations under such supplemental agreement as between all of the parties. UBC subsequently filed a demand for arbitration against us for allegedly unpaid royalties based on publicly available information, and an unspecified amount based on non-public information. Please refer to "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" for additional information.
Acuitas Therapeutics Inc. On August 29, 2016, we provided Acuitas with notice that we considered Acuitas to be in material breach of their cross-license agreement. The cross-license agreement provides that it may be terminated upon any material breach by the other party 60 days after receipt of written notice of termination describing the material breach in reasonable detail. On October 25, 2016, Acuitas filed a Notice of Civil Claim in the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking an order that we perform our obligations under the cross license agreement, for damages ancillary to specific performance, injunctive relief, interest and costs. We disputed Acuitas' position and filed a counterclaim seeking, among other relief, a declaration that the cross-license agreement had been terminated. On January 10, 2017, we filed an application seeking an order to enjoin Acuitas from entering into any further agreements purporting to sublicense our technology from the date of the order to the date of trial or further order from the court. Acuitas filed a response to our application and the matter was the subject of a hearing held on January 26, 2017, which resulted in the Supreme Court of British Columbia granting a pre-trial injunction against Acuitas. Under the terms of the pre-trial injunction, Acuitas was prevented from entering into any new agreements which include sublicensing of our LNP. On March 7, 2017, Acuitas appealed the injunction decision and on April 3, 2017, their appeal was denied. On September 29, 2017, the injunction order was extended by consent to March 2, 2018. On February 21, 2018, the contractual issues concerning the cross-license agreement (excluding the claims for damages) were settled out of court, resulting in the termination of Acuitas’ rights to further use or sublicense our LNP technology, making permanent the effect of the Court’s prior injunction. The settlement stipulates that the four non-exclusive viral vaccine sublicenses previously granted to Moderna, Inc. ("Moderna") are the only sublicenses to survive.
ONE of the dozens of examples of this Canadian government interest is found here: https://investor.arbutusbio.com/static-files/8e2ab596-277e-4d93-86bb-f8a045018224
University of British Columbia Certain early work on LNP delivery systems and related inventions was undertaken at the University of British Columbia ("UBC"). These inventions are licensed to us by UBC under a license agreement, initially entered in 1998 as amended in 2001, 2006 and 2007. We have granted sublicenses under the UBC license to Alnylam as well as to Spectrum. Alnylam has in turn sublicensed back to us certain of the licensed UBC patents. In mid-2009, we, along with our subsidiary Protiva, entered into a supplemental agreement with UBC, Alnylam and Acuitas regarding a separate research collaboration to be conducted among UBC, Alnylam and Acuitas to which we have license rights. The settlement agreement provided for the effective termination of all obligations under such supplemental agreement as between all of the parties. UBC subsequently filed a demand for arbitration against us for allegedly unpaid royalties based on publicly available information, and an unspecified amount based on non-public information. Please refer to "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" for additional information.
Acuitas Therapeutics Inc. On August 29, 2016, we provided Acuitas with notice that we considered Acuitas to be in material breach of their cross-license agreement. The cross-license agreement provides that it may be terminated upon any material breach by the other party 60 days after receipt of written notice of termination describing the material breach in reasonable detail. On October 25, 2016, Acuitas filed a Notice of Civil Claim in the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking an order that we perform our obligations under the cross license agreement, for damages ancillary to specific performance, injunctive relief, interest and costs. We disputed Acuitas' position and filed a counterclaim seeking, among other relief, a declaration that the cross-license agreement had been terminated. On January 10, 2017, we filed an application seeking an order to enjoin Acuitas from entering into any further agreements purporting to sublicense our technology from the date of the order to the date of trial or further order from the court. Acuitas filed a response to our application and the matter was the subject of a hearing held on January 26, 2017, which resulted in the Supreme Court of British Columbia granting a pre-trial injunction against Acuitas. Under the terms of the pre-trial injunction, Acuitas was prevented from entering into any new agreements which include sublicensing of our LNP. On March 7, 2017, Acuitas appealed the injunction decision and on April 3, 2017, their appeal was denied. On September 29, 2017, the injunction order was extended by consent to March 2, 2018. On February 21, 2018, the contractual issues concerning the cross-license agreement (excluding the claims for damages) were settled out of court, resulting in the termination of Acuitas’ rights to further use or sublicense our LNP technology, making permanent the effect of the Court’s prior injunction. The settlement stipulates that the four non-exclusive viral vaccine sublicenses previously granted to Moderna, Inc. ("Moderna") are the only sublicenses to survive.
These four sublicenses, previously granted by Acuitas to Moderna under the pre-April 15, 2010 LNP patent families are each limited to a specific viral target. Moderna has no other rights to our broad suite of LNP intellectual property. No other sublicenses of our technology were provided to third parties by Acuitas and accordingly, no other sublicenses of Arbutus technology by Acuitas survived the settlement.
Forwarded from David Avocado Wolfe
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Remember these globalists are career liars and fraudsters. Be ever vigilant and watch for their dirty tricks. (3 min 52 seconds) Their goal has always been the same: to kill or enslave you and take your money and property.
Many of you have asked me to talk about the difference between relative risk ratio and absolute risk ratio because Pfizer fraudulently used RRR to propagate a fake efficacy rate of 95% when in reality it was less than 1%.
The truth is the FDA knows the difference and they still authorize an approved these poisonous bioweapons:
Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right? But that’s not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR), but it doesn’t tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we need Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR).
During the Pfizer trial, 0.88% of the placebo group got covid-19 and 0.04% of the vaccinated group got covid-19. So the ARR or net benefit that you’re being offered with the Pfizer vaccine is 0.84%. That 95% number refers to the relative difference between 0.88% and 0.04%. That’s what they call 95% RRR.
Relative Risk Reduction is well known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using Absolute Risk Reduction instead, which begs the question of how many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit?
TRUTH In Medicine
The truth is the FDA knows the difference and they still authorize an approved these poisonous bioweapons:
Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right? But that’s not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR), but it doesn’t tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we need Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR).
During the Pfizer trial, 0.88% of the placebo group got covid-19 and 0.04% of the vaccinated group got covid-19. So the ARR or net benefit that you’re being offered with the Pfizer vaccine is 0.84%. That 95% number refers to the relative difference between 0.88% and 0.04%. That’s what they call 95% RRR.
Relative Risk Reduction is well known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using Absolute Risk Reduction instead, which begs the question of how many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit?
TRUTH In Medicine
Pfizer‘s bitch, the agency formally known as the United States FDA, is either playing theater or they are all scrambling because the data sucks and they know it.
Who are these parents that are bringing in six month old babies to be experimented on??
Are your babies dying from these injections and are you being paid to be quiet?
Who are these parents that are bringing in six month old babies to be experimented on??
Are your babies dying from these injections and are you being paid to be quiet?
I was interviewed a few days ago by a reporter from Epoch Times
The same reporter interviewed Embalmer, Richard Hirshman, who came forward on my show to break his story about the strange clots.
Both Mr. Hirshman and I were told that the editors at Epoch Times have decided to refrain from publishing our stories because some of the people in their office have taken the Bioweapon injections and they might be “offended“
Maybe it would be a good idea if all of you contacted the epoch times and urge them to run the story so that lives will be saved and good journalism will be done.
The same reporter interviewed Embalmer, Richard Hirshman, who came forward on my show to break his story about the strange clots.
Both Mr. Hirshman and I were told that the editors at Epoch Times have decided to refrain from publishing our stories because some of the people in their office have taken the Bioweapon injections and they might be “offended“
Maybe it would be a good idea if all of you contacted the epoch times and urge them to run the story so that lives will be saved and good journalism will be done.