Elon Musk / SpaceX / Tesla / ElonJet / Private Jets Yachts Facts about Pollution and Climate Change – Telegram
For those that want more about the point 7, here a comparison between cars (from "Vertically Integrated Supply Chain of Batteries, Electric Vehicles, and Charging Infrastructure: A Review of Three Milestone Projects from Theory of Constraints Perspective") or more about electric cars (from "How technology, recycling, and policy can mitigate supply risks to the long-term transition to zero-emission vehicles")
Since 1990, the bottom 50% of the world population has been responsible for only 16% of all emissions growth, whereas the top 1% has been responsible for 23% of the total. While per-capita emissions of the global top 1% increased since 1990, emissions from low- and middle-income groups within rich countries declined.

From Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019
Figure 3 reports several values concerning the Life Cycle Analysis of GHG emissions from electricity generation technologies. he difference between fossil fuels and RES is extremely significant. In this study an average value obtained by values reported in Figure 3 is chosen for the fossil fuels: ECDOIL = 824 gCO2eq/kWh, ECDCOAL = 1149 gCO2eq/kWh and ECDGAS = 568 gCO2eq/kWh.

Compared to traditional internal combustion engines cars, which are powered solely by diesel or unleaded gasoline, the electricity for EV charging can be generated from various energy sources—conventional (e.g., lignite, coal, natural gas) and renewable (e.g., biomass, biogas, solar energy, wind energy, hydro energy).

The results shown in Figure 5 revealed that for the Polish case study, charging batteries with electricity from the mains may be more harmful to the environment than using ICE cars.
Electricity consumption also has a significant impact on the environmental performance of electric cars. The EV with high electricity consumption may turn out to be less eco-friendly than standard ICE cars.

Among the analyzed classes, this is the case in the City class, where indirect emission, assuming battery charging from the grid, is higher (3.17 kgCO2∙day−1) than direct emission of diesel (2.70 kgCO2∙day−1) and lower than direct emission of gasoline cars (3.30 kgCO2∙day−1).

Among the analyzed energy sources, the highest MREC-CO2 emission is characterized by solid biomass (1440 kgCO2∙MWh−1). However, in this case, the overall balance of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere is zero or insignificant, due to the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide absorbed by biomass during the plant’s growing phase.

The results show that the average indirect CO2-equvalent emissions for the selected electric vehicle model were 92 gram CO2 per kilometer (vs. Diesel 163.87+).

More on https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/201
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Are such climate activists a problem? Let we check the facts! Without translating all in English, luxury brands and rich people are the worse!, just check links we shared on point 2, 8-13, .... but there are more too.

Ist da jetzt ein Problem? Nein! Denn:
1) Prada usw. haben genüg Geld 💳 zu wegwerfen 🚽
2) Reiche Menschen sind die Erste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! die nichts tun, wie wir schon auf https://news.1rj.ru/str/SwitzerlandFacts/63 https://news.1rj.ru/str/ClimateChangeTelegram/26
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ClimateChangeTelegram/28 https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution usw. berichtet haben
3) Wird das auf kleine unbekannte Geschäfte gemacht, niemand redet über das
4) Normale Leute werden nicht direkt beeinflusst, nicht wie z.B. beim Greenpeace-Fallschirmjäger
5) Teuere Marken = Mitteilung auch an den 🏦💶 Leuten
6) Man kann es putzen ...
7) Egal was man macht, Leute kritisieren immer alles und tun am Ende auch einfach nichts. "Danke 🇺🇦 Ukraine und 🇷🇺 Russland, dass ihr ein Tritt im Arsch endlich gegeben habt", sonst wäre das immer noch gleich wie vor 20 Jahren ... Leute können einfach nicht aus ihre Komfortzone herausgehen.
8) Demanding more transparency and responsibility
in the watch and jewellery sector https://perma.cc/96F2-24NN
9) The fashion industry as a whole is a big polluter https://perma.cc/L9KQ-E8C7
10) Despite strong commercial drivers for greater sustainability, luxury brands have been slow to respond https://perma.cc/PJ8U-4KUJ
11) ... with the fashion industry being ‘‘the second largest cause of pollution worldwide’’ https://perma.cc/72L4-3GDT
12) ... while luxury giants Hermès, Fendi, Prada and Louis Vuitton among the worst rated brands in 2021 https://perma.cc/YX9H-JFLY
13) The fashion industry is one of the largest markets for illegal wildlife products https://perma.cc/GY87-NDCM
14) .... many more
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Roman Abramovich, David Geffen, Sheldon Adelson, Bernard Arnault, Ann Walton Kroenke, Ernesto Bertarelli, Larry Ellison, Ronald Perelman, Laurene Jobs, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Tilman Fertitta, Giorgio Armani, Carlos Slim, Christiano Ronaldo, Elon Musk, Leonardo DiCaprio, etc. instead of buying and using yachts, buy and enjoy this one!

Superyachts symbolize climate breakdown https://perma.cc/4XLD-KXUG

Boat and Yacht Carbon Footprint Calculator: Erase Your Emissions and Go Climate Neutral https://perma.cc/US3E-H4QB

Scandale : les 300 plus grands yachts émettent plus de 280 000 tonnes de CO2 par an https://perma.cc/DK7Z-TYE9

Private planes, mansions and superyachts: What gives billionaires like Musk and Abramovich such a massive carbon footprint https://perma.cc/Z97W-5DYK

Backup by @ElonMuskPollution
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Yes, this is exactly what the world and even Elon Musk are doing with our planet. Great work WWF, showing that in a simply epic picture! Be ready Elon Musk, our project against your pollution bullshit will be launched soon. Between all men in the world, you are one of the worse.

@WWFTelegram
@WWFFacts
@GreenpeaceTelegram
@PollutionFacts @MissionWillowProject etc.
This is the big difference between Pavel Durov and all other rich people! "Some people suggested I should have instead bought a house or a jet. But I prefer to stay focused on my work, without “owning” anything" while other rich people just pollute our planet, etc.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
First, such things are not released by Elon Musk, but for example by
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/150
like https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/32

Second: it's like talking about "please plant trees" but in the meantime we create deforestation too
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WWFFacts/11
or we burn our forests with wildfires
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/670

Or "we need to find a therapy, but at the same time the dude is smoking 1000 cigarettes pro day!

3. You are acting like Leonardo di Caprio. Called "best climate activist" when the reality is that the CO2 he is trying to remove get generated by Leo ...

You are exactly the same! even if you use less yachts ...

4. Electric cars are NOT the huge "wow, now all problems are fixed". Check all previous posts. Don't just consider the direct CO2, consider the indirect generated CO2 too! Otherwise you are like USA, saying USA pollute less than China, but in reality is the whole opposite! (per capita)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/518

5. well, and what are the direct and indirect consequences for the nature doing that? Again, the solution is to reduce emissions, not to find a fix after we increase emissions!

Same for hybrid / electric cars. If people still don't change their lifestyle, they continue to pollute (less, but they do that!)

We need to go outside our comfort zone once at all