Figure 3 reports several values concerning the Life Cycle Analysis of GHG emissions from electricity generation technologies. he difference between fossil fuels and RES is extremely significant. In this study an average value obtained by values reported in Figure 3 is chosen for the fossil fuels: ECDOIL = 824 gCO2eq/kWh, ECDCOAL = 1149 gCO2eq/kWh and ECDGAS = 568 gCO2eq/kWh.
Compared to traditional internal combustion engines cars, which are powered solely by diesel or unleaded gasoline, the electricity for EV charging can be generated from various energy sources—conventional (e.g., lignite, coal, natural gas) and renewable (e.g., biomass, biogas, solar energy, wind energy, hydro energy).
The results shown in Figure 5 revealed that for the Polish case study, charging batteries with electricity from the mains may be more harmful to the environment than using ICE cars.
Electricity consumption also has a significant impact on the environmental performance of electric cars. The EV with high electricity consumption may turn out to be less eco-friendly than standard ICE cars.
Among the analyzed classes, this is the case in the City class, where indirect emission, assuming battery charging from the grid, is higher (3.17 kgCO2∙day−1) than direct emission of diesel (2.70 kgCO2∙day−1) and lower than direct emission of gasoline cars (3.30 kgCO2∙day−1).
Among the analyzed energy sources, the highest MREC-CO2 emission is characterized by solid biomass (1440 kgCO2∙MWh−1). However, in this case, the overall balance of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere is zero or insignificant, due to the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide absorbed by biomass during the plant’s growing phase.
The results show that the average indirect CO2-equvalent emissions for the selected electric vehicle model were 92 gram CO2 per kilometer (vs. Diesel 163.87+).
More on https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/201
Compared to traditional internal combustion engines cars, which are powered solely by diesel or unleaded gasoline, the electricity for EV charging can be generated from various energy sources—conventional (e.g., lignite, coal, natural gas) and renewable (e.g., biomass, biogas, solar energy, wind energy, hydro energy).
The results shown in Figure 5 revealed that for the Polish case study, charging batteries with electricity from the mains may be more harmful to the environment than using ICE cars.
Electricity consumption also has a significant impact on the environmental performance of electric cars. The EV with high electricity consumption may turn out to be less eco-friendly than standard ICE cars.
Among the analyzed classes, this is the case in the City class, where indirect emission, assuming battery charging from the grid, is higher (3.17 kgCO2∙day−1) than direct emission of diesel (2.70 kgCO2∙day−1) and lower than direct emission of gasoline cars (3.30 kgCO2∙day−1).
Among the analyzed energy sources, the highest MREC-CO2 emission is characterized by solid biomass (1440 kgCO2∙MWh−1). However, in this case, the overall balance of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere is zero or insignificant, due to the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide absorbed by biomass during the plant’s growing phase.
The results show that the average indirect CO2-equvalent emissions for the selected electric vehicle model were 92 gram CO2 per kilometer (vs. Diesel 163.87+).
More on https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/201
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Are such climate activists a problem? Let we check the facts! Without translating all in English, luxury brands and rich people are the worse!, just check links we shared on point 2, 8-13, .... but there are more too.
Ist da jetzt ein Problem? Nein! Denn:
1) Prada usw. haben genüg Geld 💳 zu wegwerfen 🚽
2) Reiche Menschen sind die Erste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! die nichts tun, wie wir schon auf https://news.1rj.ru/str/SwitzerlandFacts/63 https://news.1rj.ru/str/ClimateChangeTelegram/26
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ClimateChangeTelegram/28 https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution usw. berichtet haben
3) Wird das auf kleine unbekannte Geschäfte gemacht, niemand redet über das
4) Normale Leute werden nicht direkt beeinflusst, nicht wie z.B. beim Greenpeace-Fallschirmjäger
5) Teuere Marken = Mitteilung auch an den 🏦💶 Leuten
6) Man kann es putzen ...
7) Egal was man macht, Leute kritisieren immer alles und tun am Ende auch einfach nichts. "Danke 🇺🇦 Ukraine und 🇷🇺 Russland, dass ihr ein Tritt im Arsch endlich gegeben habt", sonst wäre das immer noch gleich wie vor 20 Jahren ... Leute können einfach nicht aus ihre Komfortzone herausgehen.
8) Demanding more transparency and responsibility
in the watch and jewellery sector https://perma.cc/96F2-24NN
9) The fashion industry as a whole is a big polluter https://perma.cc/L9KQ-E8C7
10) Despite strong commercial drivers for greater sustainability, luxury brands have been slow to respond https://perma.cc/PJ8U-4KUJ
11) ... with the fashion industry being ‘‘the second largest cause of pollution worldwide’’ https://perma.cc/72L4-3GDT
12) ... while luxury giants Hermès, Fendi, Prada and Louis Vuitton among the worst rated brands in 2021 https://perma.cc/YX9H-JFLY
13) The fashion industry is one of the largest markets for illegal wildlife products https://perma.cc/GY87-NDCM
14) .... many more
Ist da jetzt ein Problem? Nein! Denn:
1) Prada usw. haben genüg Geld 💳 zu wegwerfen 🚽
2) Reiche Menschen sind die Erste!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! die nichts tun, wie wir schon auf https://news.1rj.ru/str/SwitzerlandFacts/63 https://news.1rj.ru/str/ClimateChangeTelegram/26
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ClimateChangeTelegram/28 https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution usw. berichtet haben
3) Wird das auf kleine unbekannte Geschäfte gemacht, niemand redet über das
4) Normale Leute werden nicht direkt beeinflusst, nicht wie z.B. beim Greenpeace-Fallschirmjäger
5) Teuere Marken = Mitteilung auch an den 🏦💶 Leuten
6) Man kann es putzen ...
7) Egal was man macht, Leute kritisieren immer alles und tun am Ende auch einfach nichts. "Danke 🇺🇦 Ukraine und 🇷🇺 Russland, dass ihr ein Tritt im Arsch endlich gegeben habt", sonst wäre das immer noch gleich wie vor 20 Jahren ... Leute können einfach nicht aus ihre Komfortzone herausgehen.
8) Demanding more transparency and responsibility
in the watch and jewellery sector https://perma.cc/96F2-24NN
9) The fashion industry as a whole is a big polluter https://perma.cc/L9KQ-E8C7
10) Despite strong commercial drivers for greater sustainability, luxury brands have been slow to respond https://perma.cc/PJ8U-4KUJ
11) ... with the fashion industry being ‘‘the second largest cause of pollution worldwide’’ https://perma.cc/72L4-3GDT
12) ... while luxury giants Hermès, Fendi, Prada and Louis Vuitton among the worst rated brands in 2021 https://perma.cc/YX9H-JFLY
13) The fashion industry is one of the largest markets for illegal wildlife products https://perma.cc/GY87-NDCM
14) .... many more
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Maybe you should start to read https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1197 @ClimateChangeTelegram or @ElonMuskPollution ... instead of thinking without 🧠
Pro of 🛩 for such people: ⚡️ Negative points: Nothing = 0!
Backup by @ElonMuskPollution
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Pro of 🛩 for such people: ⚡️ Negative points: Nothing = 0!
Backup by @ElonMuskPollution
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Roman Abramovich, David Geffen, Sheldon Adelson, Bernard Arnault, Ann Walton Kroenke, Ernesto Bertarelli, Larry Ellison, Ronald Perelman, Laurene Jobs, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Tilman Fertitta, Giorgio Armani, Carlos Slim, Christiano Ronaldo, Elon Musk, Leonardo DiCaprio, etc. instead of buying and using yachts, buy and enjoy this one!
Superyachts symbolize climate breakdown https://perma.cc/4XLD-KXUG
Boat and Yacht Carbon Footprint Calculator: Erase Your Emissions and Go Climate Neutral https://perma.cc/US3E-H4QB
Scandale : les 300 plus grands yachts émettent plus de 280 000 tonnes de CO2 par an https://perma.cc/DK7Z-TYE9
Private planes, mansions and superyachts: What gives billionaires like Musk and Abramovich such a massive carbon footprint https://perma.cc/Z97W-5DYK
Backup by @ElonMuskPollution
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Superyachts symbolize climate breakdown https://perma.cc/4XLD-KXUG
Boat and Yacht Carbon Footprint Calculator: Erase Your Emissions and Go Climate Neutral https://perma.cc/US3E-H4QB
Scandale : les 300 plus grands yachts émettent plus de 280 000 tonnes de CO2 par an https://perma.cc/DK7Z-TYE9
Private planes, mansions and superyachts: What gives billionaires like Musk and Abramovich such a massive carbon footprint https://perma.cc/Z97W-5DYK
Backup by @ElonMuskPollution
A @grttme project - Other backups: https://swiy.co/tgme
Yes, this is exactly what the world and even Elon Musk are doing with our planet. Great work WWF, showing that in a simply epic picture! Be ready Elon Musk, our project against your pollution bullshit will be launched soon. Between all men in the world, you are one of the worse.
@WWFTelegram
@WWFFacts
@GreenpeaceTelegram
@PollutionFacts @MissionWillowProject etc.
@WWFTelegram
@WWFFacts
@GreenpeaceTelegram
@PollutionFacts @MissionWillowProject etc.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
First, such things are not released by Elon Musk, but for example by
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/150
like https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/32
Second: it's like talking about "please plant trees" but in the meantime we create deforestation too
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WWFFacts/11
or we burn our forests with wildfires
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/670
Or "we need to find a therapy, but at the same time the dude is smoking 1000 cigarettes pro day!
3. You are acting like Leonardo di Caprio. Called "best climate activist" when the reality is that the CO2 he is trying to remove get generated by Leo ...
You are exactly the same! even if you use less yachts ...
4. Electric cars are NOT the huge "wow, now all problems are fixed". Check all previous posts. Don't just consider the direct CO2, consider the indirect generated CO2 too! Otherwise you are like USA, saying USA pollute less than China, but in reality is the whole opposite! (per capita)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/518
5. well, and what are the direct and indirect consequences for the nature doing that? Again, the solution is to reduce emissions, not to find a fix after we increase emissions!
Same for hybrid / electric cars. If people still don't change their lifestyle, they continue to pollute (less, but they do that!)
We need to go outside our comfort zone once at all
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/150
like https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/32
Second: it's like talking about "please plant trees" but in the meantime we create deforestation too
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WWFFacts/11
or we burn our forests with wildfires
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/670
Or "we need to find a therapy, but at the same time the dude is smoking 1000 cigarettes pro day!
3. You are acting like Leonardo di Caprio. Called "best climate activist" when the reality is that the CO2 he is trying to remove get generated by Leo ...
You are exactly the same! even if you use less yachts ...
4. Electric cars are NOT the huge "wow, now all problems are fixed". Check all previous posts. Don't just consider the direct CO2, consider the indirect generated CO2 too! Otherwise you are like USA, saying USA pollute less than China, but in reality is the whole opposite! (per capita)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/518
5. well, and what are the direct and indirect consequences for the nature doing that? Again, the solution is to reduce emissions, not to find a fix after we increase emissions!
Same for hybrid / electric cars. If people still don't change their lifestyle, they continue to pollute (less, but they do that!)
We need to go outside our comfort zone once at all
Elon Musk and Tesla are the future? Let we check the reality!
For the year as a whole, the proportion of electric cars in new car sales ended at 79.3 per cent. This has led to us having 138,260 new electric cars on Norwegian roads. This is a new record, despite the fact that overall car sales were lower than the previous year.
Electric van sales in 2022 have not been as encouraging. The proportion of new electric vans ended at 23 per cent in 2022. Despite the fact that there is still a long way to go before the goal of 100 per cent electric vans in 2025, it is positive that the proportion has increased considerably since the electric proportion was only 8.5 per cent in 2020 .
Rekordsterkt elbilår https://perma.cc/U4BF-37HX
They sold more Audi, Volkswagen, Hyundai, etc. than Tesla! So for those seeing Elon Musk and Tesla as god for climate change, let we say less shit. Check previous post, where we already talked about electric cars ...
Yes, Tesla sold 100% electric, but Audi is 93%!
Plus we still need to remember that Audi for example is currently selling just expensive models (Audi is expensive per default...), like Q8, Q4, etc. https://perma.cc/3DGZ-V6U6 in such case Tesla https://perma.cc/S5WJ-YPXS or Hyundai https://perma.cc/EVR3-TGLZ are cheaper for example. Fiat Topolino is more cheaper ...
Number of public charging stations for electric vehicles in Norway from 2011 to 2022, by type https://perma.cc/29T6-GLCB
Norway – the EV capital of the world https://perma.cc/2CJH-9EQL
Not that charging is a major problem in Norway – we have 25.102 charging stations, including more than 6000 rapid chargers, all over the country. Say goodbye to range anxiety!
Another point: does Tesla have electric bus, planes, ships! NOPE. Buzz Cargo? Nope! https://perma.cc/HYW5-4XXR Again: electric is not synonym with Elon Musk! Otherwise Norway would not be 🇳🇴 ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/508
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/507
Without considering all indirect CO2 pollution of electric ... (check previous posts).
For the year as a whole, the proportion of electric cars in new car sales ended at 79.3 per cent. This has led to us having 138,260 new electric cars on Norwegian roads. This is a new record, despite the fact that overall car sales were lower than the previous year.
Electric van sales in 2022 have not been as encouraging. The proportion of new electric vans ended at 23 per cent in 2022. Despite the fact that there is still a long way to go before the goal of 100 per cent electric vans in 2025, it is positive that the proportion has increased considerably since the electric proportion was only 8.5 per cent in 2020 .
Rekordsterkt elbilår https://perma.cc/U4BF-37HX
They sold more Audi, Volkswagen, Hyundai, etc. than Tesla! So for those seeing Elon Musk and Tesla as god for climate change, let we say less shit. Check previous post, where we already talked about electric cars ...
Yes, Tesla sold 100% electric, but Audi is 93%!
Plus we still need to remember that Audi for example is currently selling just expensive models (Audi is expensive per default...), like Q8, Q4, etc. https://perma.cc/3DGZ-V6U6 in such case Tesla https://perma.cc/S5WJ-YPXS or Hyundai https://perma.cc/EVR3-TGLZ are cheaper for example. Fiat Topolino is more cheaper ...
Number of public charging stations for electric vehicles in Norway from 2011 to 2022, by type https://perma.cc/29T6-GLCB
Norway – the EV capital of the world https://perma.cc/2CJH-9EQL
Not that charging is a major problem in Norway – we have 25.102 charging stations, including more than 6000 rapid chargers, all over the country. Say goodbye to range anxiety!
Another point: does Tesla have electric bus, planes, ships! NOPE. Buzz Cargo? Nope! https://perma.cc/HYW5-4XXR Again: electric is not synonym with Elon Musk! Otherwise Norway would not be 🇳🇴 ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/508
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/507
Without considering all indirect CO2 pollution of electric ... (check previous posts).