Rear Wings - Canadian GP
💡The track's long straights call for medium-low load, but the rain will make more loaded wings more beneficial.
🌧Rain will hit on Friday and Saturday, but not necessarily on Sunday: F1 teams have a bet to make!
Mercedes' has a unique wing design.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
💡The track's long straights call for medium-low load, but the rain will make more loaded wings more beneficial.
🌧Rain will hit on Friday and Saturday, but not necessarily on Sunday: F1 teams have a bet to make!
Mercedes' has a unique wing design.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
👍6👏4❤3
Formula Data Analysis
In 2026, F1 cars: - Will get 0.2m shorter and 0.1m narrower➡️30kg lighter (still 16kg heavier than in ‘21). - Active aero: Z-mode vs X-mode (more downforce and drag). - DRS replaced by a ‘push to pass’ button➡️increased power after 290km/h. - More powerful…
The ‘26 #F1 rules will make it HARDER to overtake in tracks like Monaco💡
‘Manual Override Mode’ will replace the DRS:
- Electric power for the attacking driver: 350kw.
- It will decrease linearly over 290km/h for the defending one.📉
But most cars don’t reach 290km/h in Monaco!⚠️
This problem is not unique to Monaco: it also applies to ‘conventional’, high-downforce race tracks.
Hungary, for example: in the fastest lap of the race, VER only reached 301km/h on the main straight: he remained over 290km/h for less than 3s.
The FIA MUST make the speed threshold track-specific.
‘Manual Override Mode’ will replace the DRS:
- Electric power for the attacking driver: 350kw.
- It will decrease linearly over 290km/h for the defending one.📉
But most cars don’t reach 290km/h in Monaco!⚠️
This problem is not unique to Monaco: it also applies to ‘conventional’, high-downforce race tracks.
Hungary, for example: in the fastest lap of the race, VER only reached 301km/h on the main straight: he remained over 290km/h for less than 3s.
The FIA MUST make the speed threshold track-specific.
🤔7👍2🔥2
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL 💬
🔥1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL 💬
🔥1
FP3 ANALYSIS 📊
1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid.
2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull.
3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the straights.
1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid.
2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull.
3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the straights.
👍5❤3
Formula Data Analysis
FP3 ANALYSIS 📊 1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid. 2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull. 3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the…
This time I tried to condense the information of several analyses into a single tweet: let me know if you enjoyed it, and I will do that again in the future!
And is you want to see 10 times the analyses I've got you covered!👇
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/canadian-gp-analyses-repository
And is you want to see 10 times the analyses I've got you covered!👇
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/canadian-gp-analyses-repository
Buy Me a Coffee
Canadian GP - Analyses Repository — Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
👍3
BEST QUALIFYING SECTORS📊
S1 (Slowest): VER quickest, RUS 0.07s behind.
S2 (Medium speed): HAM and RUS quickest. VER just 6th.
S3 (Fastest): RUS quickest; McL had the worst top speed yet was competitive here (fast in the hairpin+chicane).
Ferrari uncompetitive everywhere⚠️
Ferrari's unexpected elimination in Q2 seems to have been influenced by the cold weather: the SF-24 is very gentle on its tyres, so it struggles to heat them up quickly.
McL's top speed was the slowest of them all (just 323km/h, vs Aston's 331, Merc/RBR's 328, and Ferrari's 327).
S1 (Slowest): VER quickest, RUS 0.07s behind.
S2 (Medium speed): HAM and RUS quickest. VER just 6th.
S3 (Fastest): RUS quickest; McL had the worst top speed yet was competitive here (fast in the hairpin+chicane).
Ferrari uncompetitive everywhere⚠️
Ferrari's unexpected elimination in Q2 seems to have been influenced by the cold weather: the SF-24 is very gentle on its tyres, so it struggles to heat them up quickly.
McL's top speed was the slowest of them all (just 323km/h, vs Aston's 331, Merc/RBR's 328, and Ferrari's 327).
👍5👏3🔥1
How much was Russell's slipstream (from ALB) worth?💡
RUS Best Lap: 1:11.742, 328km/h
RUS Pole Lap: 1:12.000, 334km/h (+6), ~0.07s gained
Would have been P3 without that (behind NOR).
Different ERS for HAM: only 324 on the main straight, but quicker on all the others.
RUS Best Lap: 1:11.742, 328km/h
RUS Pole Lap: 1:12.000, 334km/h (+6), ~0.07s gained
Would have been P3 without that (behind NOR).
Different ERS for HAM: only 324 on the main straight, but quicker on all the others.
❤5👍1🤔1
LONG RUNS FROM F1 FP3 (M tyres):
🔴Sainz quickest: Ferrari couldn't extract the car's potential in qualifying. Their pace should aid their comeback.
Still, 0.9s/lap away from last year's race-winning pace (most teams were far from their limits).
🟠No representative runs from McL.
As even the quickest driver (SAI) was almost 1s/lap off verstappen’s pace last year we can conclude that the FP3 was not very representative.
More suspense for the race!
🔴Sainz quickest: Ferrari couldn't extract the car's potential in qualifying. Their pace should aid their comeback.
Still, 0.9s/lap away from last year's race-winning pace (most teams were far from their limits).
🟠No representative runs from McL.
As even the quickest driver (SAI) was almost 1s/lap off verstappen’s pace last year we can conclude that the FP3 was not very representative.
More suspense for the race!
👍6👀2🤔1
Comments on Canadian GP!
- Another multi-team fight: RBR/McL/Ferrari in Imola, Ferrari/McL in Monaco, RBR/McL/Merc here
- Ferrari’s worst result since Aus ‘23. Engine issues, no grip, bad strategy
- Solid Aston
- RIC’s P8 silences his critics
- Double points for Alpine
YOUR take?🤔
- Another multi-team fight: RBR/McL/Ferrari in Imola, Ferrari/McL in Monaco, RBR/McL/Merc here
- Ferrari’s worst result since Aus ‘23. Engine issues, no grip, bad strategy
- Solid Aston
- RIC’s P8 silences his critics
- Double points for Alpine
YOUR take?🤔
❤9👏4👍1
Formula Data Analysis
RACE PACE Canadian GP: 🟠NOR had the best pace, but🟡VER was just 0.03s/lap behind: a McL victory was in the cards. 🟢After passing ALO, HAM's pace was clearly better: he matched VER since the restart. If only he qualified P6... 🔴Driving on HARD slicks under…
This version of the plot includes only the drivers who covered over 90% of the laps, for which the comparison is more representative (same track conditions and average fuel levels).
👍9
Formula Data Analysis
Leclerc's engine problem was even bigger than it sounded like: Fastest Lap with the problem: L23 1:26.623: 306km/h with DRS. Fastest lap after solving it: L39 1:26.012: 308km/h... without DRS. It was like running with negative DRS, plus a loss of acceleration.
Leclerc’s paradox:
- The more it rained, the more the car struggled with the track conditions compared to the competitors.
- The less it rained, the more the engine problem impacted his pace.
The guy really cannot go 2 race weekends without problems.
- The more it rained, the more the car struggled with the track conditions compared to the competitors.
- The less it rained, the more the engine problem impacted his pace.
The guy really cannot go 2 race weekends without problems.
🤡11😁5😢4❤1😨1