FP3 ANALYSIS 📊
1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid.
2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull.
3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the straights.
1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid.
2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull.
3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the straights.
👍5❤3
Formula Data Analysis
FP3 ANALYSIS 📊 1)Sectors: HAM was fastest in S1 and S2, and just 0.01s behind VER in S3. HAM was NOT on a higher engine mode: Mercedes looks solid. 2)Top Speeds: Aston>>Ferrari>Merc>McL>RedBull. 3)Minisectors: VER quick in the chicanes, STR dominated the…
This time I tried to condense the information of several analyses into a single tweet: let me know if you enjoyed it, and I will do that again in the future!
And is you want to see 10 times the analyses I've got you covered!👇
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/canadian-gp-analyses-repository
And is you want to see 10 times the analyses I've got you covered!👇
https://buymeacoffee.com/f1dataanalysis/canadian-gp-analyses-repository
Buy Me a Coffee
Canadian GP - Analyses Repository — Formula Data Analysis
Post by Formula Data Analysis
👍3
BEST QUALIFYING SECTORS📊
S1 (Slowest): VER quickest, RUS 0.07s behind.
S2 (Medium speed): HAM and RUS quickest. VER just 6th.
S3 (Fastest): RUS quickest; McL had the worst top speed yet was competitive here (fast in the hairpin+chicane).
Ferrari uncompetitive everywhere⚠️
Ferrari's unexpected elimination in Q2 seems to have been influenced by the cold weather: the SF-24 is very gentle on its tyres, so it struggles to heat them up quickly.
McL's top speed was the slowest of them all (just 323km/h, vs Aston's 331, Merc/RBR's 328, and Ferrari's 327).
S1 (Slowest): VER quickest, RUS 0.07s behind.
S2 (Medium speed): HAM and RUS quickest. VER just 6th.
S3 (Fastest): RUS quickest; McL had the worst top speed yet was competitive here (fast in the hairpin+chicane).
Ferrari uncompetitive everywhere⚠️
Ferrari's unexpected elimination in Q2 seems to have been influenced by the cold weather: the SF-24 is very gentle on its tyres, so it struggles to heat them up quickly.
McL's top speed was the slowest of them all (just 323km/h, vs Aston's 331, Merc/RBR's 328, and Ferrari's 327).
👍5👏3🔥1
How much was Russell's slipstream (from ALB) worth?💡
RUS Best Lap: 1:11.742, 328km/h
RUS Pole Lap: 1:12.000, 334km/h (+6), ~0.07s gained
Would have been P3 without that (behind NOR).
Different ERS for HAM: only 324 on the main straight, but quicker on all the others.
RUS Best Lap: 1:11.742, 328km/h
RUS Pole Lap: 1:12.000, 334km/h (+6), ~0.07s gained
Would have been P3 without that (behind NOR).
Different ERS for HAM: only 324 on the main straight, but quicker on all the others.
❤5👍1🤔1
LONG RUNS FROM F1 FP3 (M tyres):
🔴Sainz quickest: Ferrari couldn't extract the car's potential in qualifying. Their pace should aid their comeback.
Still, 0.9s/lap away from last year's race-winning pace (most teams were far from their limits).
🟠No representative runs from McL.
As even the quickest driver (SAI) was almost 1s/lap off verstappen’s pace last year we can conclude that the FP3 was not very representative.
More suspense for the race!
🔴Sainz quickest: Ferrari couldn't extract the car's potential in qualifying. Their pace should aid their comeback.
Still, 0.9s/lap away from last year's race-winning pace (most teams were far from their limits).
🟠No representative runs from McL.
As even the quickest driver (SAI) was almost 1s/lap off verstappen’s pace last year we can conclude that the FP3 was not very representative.
More suspense for the race!
👍6👀2🤔1
Comments on Canadian GP!
- Another multi-team fight: RBR/McL/Ferrari in Imola, Ferrari/McL in Monaco, RBR/McL/Merc here
- Ferrari’s worst result since Aus ‘23. Engine issues, no grip, bad strategy
- Solid Aston
- RIC’s P8 silences his critics
- Double points for Alpine
YOUR take?🤔
- Another multi-team fight: RBR/McL/Ferrari in Imola, Ferrari/McL in Monaco, RBR/McL/Merc here
- Ferrari’s worst result since Aus ‘23. Engine issues, no grip, bad strategy
- Solid Aston
- RIC’s P8 silences his critics
- Double points for Alpine
YOUR take?🤔
❤9👏4👍1
Formula Data Analysis
RACE PACE Canadian GP: 🟠NOR had the best pace, but🟡VER was just 0.03s/lap behind: a McL victory was in the cards. 🟢After passing ALO, HAM's pace was clearly better: he matched VER since the restart. If only he qualified P6... 🔴Driving on HARD slicks under…
This version of the plot includes only the drivers who covered over 90% of the laps, for which the comparison is more representative (same track conditions and average fuel levels).
👍9
Formula Data Analysis
Leclerc's engine problem was even bigger than it sounded like: Fastest Lap with the problem: L23 1:26.623: 306km/h with DRS. Fastest lap after solving it: L39 1:26.012: 308km/h... without DRS. It was like running with negative DRS, plus a loss of acceleration.
Leclerc’s paradox:
- The more it rained, the more the car struggled with the track conditions compared to the competitors.
- The less it rained, the more the engine problem impacted his pace.
The guy really cannot go 2 race weekends without problems.
- The more it rained, the more the car struggled with the track conditions compared to the competitors.
- The less it rained, the more the engine problem impacted his pace.
The guy really cannot go 2 race weekends without problems.
🤡11😁5😢4❤1😨1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Linktree
Formula Data Analysis | Instagram, Facebook | Linktree
Follow me on all socials!
👍2🔥1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Visualizing the airflow around Mercedes' sidepods! 👀 (Collab with @justf1car 📸)
Mercedes introduced a zero-pod design in 2022, but had to switch to a more conventional one mid-2023.
They progressively mitigated the car's high drag, but the gain in downforce wasn't as apparent.
Example:
Best Mercedes Quali lap - Saudi Arabia
2022: 323km/h top speed, 232km/h in T9
2023: 329km/h top speed, 229km/h in T9
2024: 332km/h top speed, 228km/h in T9
A zero-pod design is expected to produce MORE drag, as the sidepod does not shield the rear tyres from the incoming airflow.
Enjoyed the post? Follow @justf1car for the best F1 animations, and @FDataAnalysis to understand F1 better! 🤩 🏎
Mercedes introduced a zero-pod design in 2022, but had to switch to a more conventional one mid-2023.
They progressively mitigated the car's high drag, but the gain in downforce wasn't as apparent.
Example:
Best Mercedes Quali lap - Saudi Arabia
2022: 323km/h top speed, 232km/h in T9
2023: 329km/h top speed, 229km/h in T9
2024: 332km/h top speed, 228km/h in T9
A zero-pod design is expected to produce MORE drag, as the sidepod does not shield the rear tyres from the incoming airflow.
Enjoyed the post? Follow @justf1car for the best F1 animations, and @FDataAnalysis to understand F1 better! 🤩 🏎
🔥11❤3👍3
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
Telegram
[Chat] - Formula Data Analysis
Use this CHAT do discuss the contents posted in the main CHANNEL 💬
🔥2👍1
QUALIFYING PERFORMANCE
📈Mercedes, McL, Alpine, and Racing Bulls have improved throughout the season.
📉Red Bull's gap to the fastest lap was significant in the last 2 events. Aston got worse, too, compared to the start of the season.
(Using each team's fastest quali lap.)
Ferrari’s case is hard to interpret:
1) After a very strong start, the team has gotten slower in qualifying until China.
2) After that, they progressively improved, culminating in Monaco’s pole.
3) Lastly, that pole was followed by their worst 2024 qualifying session.
📈Mercedes, McL, Alpine, and Racing Bulls have improved throughout the season.
📉Red Bull's gap to the fastest lap was significant in the last 2 events. Aston got worse, too, compared to the start of the season.
(Using each team's fastest quali lap.)
Ferrari’s case is hard to interpret:
1) After a very strong start, the team has gotten slower in qualifying until China.
2) After that, they progressively improved, culminating in Monaco’s pole.
3) Lastly, that pole was followed by their worst 2024 qualifying session.
⚡7👍4❤2🤔1
2024 QUALIFYING PERFORMANCE
[🟣Canada]
Merc and RacingBulls had their best qualifying in Canada. The track suited Williams, too.
🔴Ferrari, instead, struggled massively: as in China, they had tyre temperature issues.
🟠McL is versatile: consistent and solid performance.
Who’s your bet for the Spanish pole? 🤔
[🟣Canada]
Merc and RacingBulls had their best qualifying in Canada. The track suited Williams, too.
🔴Ferrari, instead, struggled massively: as in China, they had tyre temperature issues.
🟠McL is versatile: consistent and solid performance.
Who’s your bet for the Spanish pole? 🤔
❤7👍1
Leclerc's engine issue was worth around 15km/h (~100hp)
After solving the problem, his top speed gap to SAI got even larger, as he couldn't push on Hards under the rain.
After pitting for Inters, his top speed started to improve but had to retire before it reached SAI's level.
Made via @JMP_software
After solving the problem, his top speed gap to SAI got even larger, as he couldn't push on Hards under the rain.
After pitting for Inters, his top speed started to improve but had to retire before it reached SAI's level.
Made via @JMP_software
👍7❤1