Formula Data Analysis – Telegram
Formula Data Analysis
3.4K subscribers
1.42K photos
10 videos
3 files
916 links
All the analyses of the world’s most famous page on Formula 1 telemetry: join NOW to understand F1 better!🏎📈
Download Telegram
🔵VER will start the #F1 Sprint in P1, yet he wasn't the quickest in any sector! (But quick everywhere)
⚪️The upgraded Haas was mighty!

1) BEST SECTORS:
- S1: HAM fastest, by far (+0.13s vs VER)
- S2: RUS fastest, then NOR
- S3: LEC and HUL fastest
VER struggled in S2, NOR in S3

2) GRIP:
RUS reached the highest top speed (330km/h) yet he was also stronger than VER and LEC under braking! (Reached 6g of deceleration)

VER had excellent cornering grip, but braking was lacking.

🔴LEC produced the lowest maximum lateral acceleration (in fact he struggled in S1).
👍103
RACE PACE - F1 SPRINT

Verstappen was quickest on average, but Sainz was almost as quick despite the numerous fights!
He can win the race. 🍀

🥇🔵VER
🥈🔴SAI +0.05s/lap (traffic)
🥉🔴LEC+0.24s/lap (traffic)

📈Impressed: Ferrari.
📉Disappointed: Mercedes (Big drop in pace), McL.

The race will probably be down to how the relative performance will differ on a full tank and different tyre compounds.
13👍3
RACE PACE Austin GP

Ferrari's 1-2 was their most 'dominant' race of the year: 0.26s/lap advantage on McL! (LEC vs NOR) 🏆

Next best: Australia (+0.11s/lap)
Best pace since early '22! 💡

NOR: 0.1s/lap quicker than VER 👌
RUS and PER: underwhelming pace even considering traffic. 🚨

Ferrari's aero updates (introduced in Singapore) seem to have worked, as Austin is a very representative track (diverse sectors; downforce and drag are both important).
16🔥4👍2
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
TOP SPEEDS - Austin GP

RUS reached 344km/h! Plenty of slipstream+DRS during his comeback.

VER was slowest - by far. Just 313km/h, as he never used DRS on the main straight. That's low even considering that.

PIA's drag was high: lowest top speed with (326) and without DRS (312).
👍12👏1
Mexico City GP offers a unique challenge:
The ~20% lower air density (due to altitude) reduces downforce and drag massively.
⬇️
- High drag not as critical (will help McL)
- High downforce even more crucial!

Often highest top speeds of the season despite the high-downforce wings. 💡

Cars will be sliding significantly due to the decreased downforce and the slippery tarmac.

📸 @pirellisport
👍13
In the race, Charles Leclerc was on average over THREE SECONDS PER LAP quicker than last year... using the same strategy (Medium➡️Hard)! 🤯

Track conditions alone cannot explain this impressive improvement... and now Ferrari is given over 1 in 4 chances of getting the WCC. 🍀

The team also introduced a more flexible front wing, providing at least two benefits:
-Reduced drag at high speed;
-Speed-dependent aero balance (Low speed: more front downforce ➡️ better agility and overall grip; High speed: less front downforce ➡️ better stability, aiding driver confidence).

Race pace Improvement by other drivers:
NOR: 2.44s/lap (one less stop than in ‘23)
VER: 2.04 s/lap (one less stop than in ‘23)
SAI: 2.55s/lap (one less stop than in ‘23)

Even SAI, despite being quicker than LEC in ‘23 (due to the additional stop) and slower in ‘24, gained over half a second vs VER.
🔥152👍1
Weekly reminder that you can find ALL my socials and extra content through THIS link
👇
https://linktr.ee/fdataanalysis
Mexico's lower air density is forcing Ferrari to add cooling louvres to its car - even compared to another high-altitude track like Austria. 🔥

Engine cooling is improved at the expense of more drag and less rear downforce. 📉

Ferrari struggled with temperatures in '23 when they opted for an asymmetrical cooling arrangement. 🚨

F1 teams with lower cooling requirements and turbocompressors better suited to the less dense air will lose less performance in Mexico!
12👍3🔥2
Austin GP damaged Lando Norris's championship hopes while reviving Ferrari’s chances. 🔥

WDC probability (Before vs After Austin)
🥇🔵VER: 58.89% ➡️ 80.13% (+21.24%📈)
🥈🟠NOR: 38.37% ➡️ 17.60% (-20.77%📉)

WCC
🥇🟠McL: 86.86% ➡️ 88.50% (+1.64%📈)
🥈🔴Ferrari: 6.47% ➡️ 14.29% (+7.82%📉)
🥉🔵RBR: 9.20% ➡️ 5.88% (-3.32%📉)

The probability swing after Mexico will be wild (as fewer and fewer points are available).
Data by : @oddschecker

You might have noticed that the sum of the ‘post Austin’ WCC percentages is over 100%. That’s because I forgot to remove the bookmaker’s edge, my bad!

The pecking order is not affected by that, obviously.
11👍6🔥3
FP2 - F1 DATA HIGHLIGHTS

🔴SAI was 0.178s quicker than 🟠PIA, but McL's engine mode was clearly lower! 😏

1) TOP SPEEDS:
Ferrari: 352km/h... and it's still FP2!
+5km/h vs RedBull, +9km/h vs McL

2) BEST SECTORS:
In fact, SAI/LEC were quickest in S1 (two long straights)
McL dominated the slow S3

3) Sainz vs Piastri:
SAI's higher engine power is clear as day: he gained significantly through all the straights.
Once McL turns up the power, they should be on par or quicker than Ferrari. 🔥
👍92
Sainz beat Verstappen by 0.225s by gaining significantly from Turn 3 to 6 - and not losing his advantage afterwards 🔥

SAI: +1km/h top speed on the main straight; +4km/h on the next one 🚀

VER used III gear in T4, while SAI downshifted to II

VER took T9 full-throttle!
🔥12👍3
Who's excited for the race? 🔥😉
🔥36👍7🥱4
📊 RACE PACE #MexicoGP 

SAI just 0.05s/lap quicker than NOR! (Who suffered the initial gap)

VER was no quicker than HAM: what a difference vs season-start!

MAG as quick as (traffic-hit) PIA

Change vs '23 (s/lap)
McL: -2.33📈
Ferrari: -2.20📈
Merc: -1.45👌
RBR: -1.03🚨

It's your turn: who will win the two championships?🤔
19🔥2👍1
Weekly reminder that you can JOIN the CHAT channel to discuss my analyses OUTSIDE of the 'comments'!
👇Use this link👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FDataAnCHAT
In the 2nd stint, Magnussen was 0.1s/lap QUICKER than Verstappen, on average 🤯
VER's tyres were just 4 laps older

In the 1st stint (Mediums, slow laps removed), VER's pace was better.
In the last 15 laps of the race, MAG was much quicker than him
🔥10👍3😢2
Yep… that was close! 😳
Impressive commitment by the cameraman 😲

📸: @FlorentGooden
😱14👍1