So, about the 🟠 McL (NOR) vs 🔴 Ferrari (LEC) Monza fight...
- Ferrari: +7km/h top speed;
- Mostly due to less drag (largest difference at high speed), yet straight-end deployment might be larger, too;
- LEC: more power out of Parabolica (lower initial speed, yet soon becomes quicker than NOR, even though both are full-throttle);
- NOR mostly gained T4 to T7.
Advantage for McL, but Ferrari could have a solid home race!
- Ferrari: +7km/h top speed;
- Mostly due to less drag (largest difference at high speed), yet straight-end deployment might be larger, too;
- LEC: more power out of Parabolica (lower initial speed, yet soon becomes quicker than NOR, even though both are full-throttle);
- NOR mostly gained T4 to T7.
Advantage for McL, but Ferrari could have a solid home race!
❤16
ITALIAN GP - QUALIFYING
And that was the fastest lap in F1’s history! 🚀
264.682km/h average speed! 😳
Verstappen beat Hamilton’s previous record (264.362km/h, in 2020) by 0.320km/h (or 0.095s).
Ground effect cars are becoming the fastest F1 cars ever on high-speed tracks, even faster than the 2020 ones!
And that was the fastest lap in F1’s history! 🚀
264.682km/h average speed! 😳
Verstappen beat Hamilton’s previous record (264.362km/h, in 2020) by 0.320km/h (or 0.095s).
Ground effect cars are becoming the fastest F1 cars ever on high-speed tracks, even faster than the 2020 ones!
❤20
THE FASTEST F1 LAP EVER (vs its predecessor)
⬛️ VER's more loaded upper plane vs 🟪 HAM's 2020 car made his DRS much more effective:
- Similar straight-line performance without DRS;
- Yet +8km/h top speed with DRS! 🚀
Old-gen cars still quicker in most fast corners. 🔥
Made via @JMP_software
⬛️ VER's more loaded upper plane vs 🟪 HAM's 2020 car made his DRS much more effective:
- Similar straight-line performance without DRS;
- Yet +8km/h top speed with DRS! 🚀
Old-gen cars still quicker in most fast corners. 🔥
Made via @JMP_software
❤7
Formula Data Analysis
THE FASTEST F1 LAP EVER (vs its predecessor) ⬛️ VER's more loaded upper plane vs 🟪 HAM's 2020 car made his DRS much more effective: - Similar straight-line performance without DRS; - Yet +8km/h top speed with DRS! 🚀 Old-gen cars still quicker in most fast…
RBR effectively ‘cut’ VER’s upper plane right before quali.
The difference in DRS effectiveness was very large despite that!
The difference in DRS effectiveness was very large despite that!
❤10
You've just watched the fastest race in F1's history! 🚀
Records broken:
- Highest average race speed: 250.706 km/h by VER (pit-stop included 🤯) !
- Highest avg. fastest lap speed: 257.781 km/h by NOR !
The Italian GP lasted just 1:13.24.325! ⏱
Yesterday, the record for the fastest F1 lap ever was broken, too (264.682 km/h avg)!
Records broken:
- Highest average race speed: 250.706 km/h by VER (pit-stop included 🤯) !
- Highest avg. fastest lap speed: 257.781 km/h by NOR !
The Italian GP lasted just 1:13.24.325! ⏱
Yesterday, the record for the fastest F1 lap ever was broken, too (264.682 km/h avg)!
❤14
ITALIAN GP - RACE PACE
Sawing off 🟦VER's wing didn't kill his pace: he just had his first dominant 2025 win (0.27s/lap quicker than 🟧NOR)!
Teams' pace gap (s/lap, best driver)
🥇RBR;
🥈McL +0.27;
🥉Ferrari +0.46;
4️⃣Merc +0.55;
5️⃣Williams +0.88;
6️⃣Sauber +0.95;
7️⃣Haas +0.96;
8️⃣RBs +0.98;
9️⃣Aston +1.40 (ALO retired);
🔟Alpine +1.54.
Sawing off 🟦VER's wing didn't kill his pace: he just had his first dominant 2025 win (0.27s/lap quicker than 🟧NOR)!
Teams' pace gap (s/lap, best driver)
🥇RBR;
🥈McL +0.27;
🥉Ferrari +0.46;
4️⃣Merc +0.55;
5️⃣Williams +0.88;
6️⃣Sauber +0.95;
7️⃣Haas +0.96;
8️⃣RBs +0.98;
9️⃣Aston +1.40 (ALO retired);
🔟Alpine +1.54.
❤11
Formula Data Analysis
ITALIAN GP - RACE PACE Sawing off 🟦VER's wing didn't kill his pace: he just had his first dominant 2025 win (0.27s/lap quicker than 🟧NOR)! Teams' pace gap (s/lap, best driver) 🥇RBR; 🥈McL +0.27; 🥉Ferrari +0.46; 4️⃣Merc +0.55; 5️⃣Williams +0.88; 6️⃣Sauber…
VER drove excellently, but his dominant performance could not have happened without a fast car. I expected McL's high-load setup to give them some tyre-wear advantage, but I was wrong.
That performance must be track-specific, but could RBR have finally understood how to tackle some of the car's issues?
That performance must be track-specific, but could RBR have finally understood how to tackle some of the car's issues?
❤18🔥1👨💻1
ITALIAN GP - TOP SPEED PER LAP
Hamilton reached 365km/h in the race: the highest speed ever recorded this season! 🚀
(Previously: 356km/h at Spa)
✅ It’s also the highest Monza top speed for any ground-effect car:
‘22: 360 SAI
‘23: 359 HAM
‘24: 363 HUL
ALB reached 369km/h in Las Vegas last year: we might break the 370km/h barrier there! 🤯
He reached 13040rpm in 8th gear, well over 1000rpm above the usual upshift rpm (~11700rpm).
This combination of very high temperature (due to the slipstream/hot air and high ICE friction at high rpm) and forces on the piston (due to the high ‘centrifugal’ forces) is critical: the engine can fail after just a few seconds in these conditions, as happened to GAS last year.
Notice that LEC reached 355km/h WITHOUT DRS, on L2 due to a slipstream.
Gasly’s top speed was terrible: just 345km/h with DRS and 334km/h without it.
Hamilton reached 365km/h in the race: the highest speed ever recorded this season! 🚀
(Previously: 356km/h at Spa)
✅ It’s also the highest Monza top speed for any ground-effect car:
‘22: 360 SAI
‘23: 359 HAM
‘24: 363 HUL
ALB reached 369km/h in Las Vegas last year: we might break the 370km/h barrier there! 🤯
He reached 13040rpm in 8th gear, well over 1000rpm above the usual upshift rpm (~11700rpm).
This combination of very high temperature (due to the slipstream/hot air and high ICE friction at high rpm) and forces on the piston (due to the high ‘centrifugal’ forces) is critical: the engine can fail after just a few seconds in these conditions, as happened to GAS last year.
Notice that LEC reached 355km/h WITHOUT DRS, on L2 due to a slipstream.
Gasly’s top speed was terrible: just 345km/h with DRS and 334km/h without it.
❤12🔥1
ITALIAN GP - QUALI GAINS VS 2024
All teams were quicker this year in Monza Quali (aided by the resurfacing), but the spread was big: Sauber gained almost two seconds, Mercedes less than three tenths!
- Big gains by Aston, Haas, and Red Bull.
- McL and Ferrari improved less (were quick already last year).
All teams were quicker this year in Monza Quali (aided by the resurfacing), but the spread was big: Sauber gained almost two seconds, Mercedes less than three tenths!
- Big gains by Aston, Haas, and Red Bull.
- McL and Ferrari improved less (were quick already last year).
❤9
ITALIAN GP - RACE | ACCELERATION TIMES & ACCELERATION TIMES PER COMPOUND
The ‘Best Starter’ trophy for the Italian GP goes to…
Lance Stroll ! 🏆
He was quickest (matching Norris) to reach both 100km/h and 200km/h… and he did so on Hards! 🚀
Antonelli’s launch off the line was terrible: he needed 0.7s more than Stroll to reach 100km/h…
No clear impact of tyre compound on start performance.
The ‘Best Starter’ trophy for the Italian GP goes to…
Lance Stroll ! 🏆
He was quickest (matching Norris) to reach both 100km/h and 200km/h… and he did so on Hards! 🚀
Antonelli’s launch off the line was terrible: he needed 0.7s more than Stroll to reach 100km/h…
No clear impact of tyre compound on start performance.
❤8
2016, Baku: Valtteri Bottas reached 378km/h (235 mph), the highest speed ever recorded in any official F1 session! 🚀
All stars aligned:
✅ Longest straight in F1 (2.2km !)
✅ Last year with narrow-track (1.8m, vs current 2.0m) V6 cars ➡️ Little drag, yet powerful
✅ Most powerful engine on grid
✅ Least draggy car on grid
✅ Tow
✅ DRS
Insane!
All stars aligned:
✅ Longest straight in F1 (2.2km !)
✅ Last year with narrow-track (1.8m, vs current 2.0m) V6 cars ➡️ Little drag, yet powerful
✅ Most powerful engine on grid
✅ Least draggy car on grid
✅ Tow
✅ DRS
Insane!
🔥9❤2
AZERBAIJAN GP - WING THURSDAY!
🟣 Alpine's choice is radical: they installed their Monza rear wing! Must minimise drag to compensate for the weaker engine, but this will hurt them significantly in the first 2 sectors.
⚪️ Haas: most loaded wing.
🔴 Ferrari: most loaded top team.
🔵 RBR similar to 🟠 McL.
⚫️ Mercedes' unique design is hard to gauge.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
🟣 Alpine's choice is radical: they installed their Monza rear wing! Must minimise drag to compensate for the weaker engine, but this will hurt them significantly in the first 2 sectors.
⚪️ Haas: most loaded wing.
🔴 Ferrari: most loaded top team.
🔵 RBR similar to 🟠 McL.
⚫️ Mercedes' unique design is hard to gauge.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
❤8👍2
Formula Data Analysis
AZERBAIJAN GP - WING THURSDAY! 🟣 Alpine's choice is radical: they installed their Monza rear wing! Must minimise drag to compensate for the weaker engine, but this will hurt them significantly in the first 2 sectors. ⚪️ Haas: most loaded wing. 🔴 Ferrari:…
Baku is the track where McL's 'Mini-DRS' drama started:
💡McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing":
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull.
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? 🤔
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted; @multiviewer
💡McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing":
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull.
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? 🤔
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted; @multiviewer
❤6👍3🔥1
AZERBAIJAN GP - PRACTICE 2
1) BEST SECTOR GAP:
19km/h top speed difference between LAW and PIA: the largest difference in a FP session since... ages? 😳
🟠 McL is suffering from high drag (slowest team in S3: a straight), and PIA has a more loaded setup than NOR (-6km/h top speed). McL lost a lot on the main straight, yet was no quicker than 🔴 Ferrari in S1 and S2: Ferrari is looking good. ✅
As I predicted yesterday, 🟣 Alpine's minimum load rear wing is making them suffer in the first 2 sectors. 🚨
LAW had a slipstream on his best lap, yet still reached 349km/h without it!
1) BEST SECTOR GAP:
19km/h top speed difference between LAW and PIA: the largest difference in a FP session since... ages? 😳
🟠 McL is suffering from high drag (slowest team in S3: a straight), and PIA has a more loaded setup than NOR (-6km/h top speed). McL lost a lot on the main straight, yet was no quicker than 🔴 Ferrari in S1 and S2: Ferrari is looking good. ✅
As I predicted yesterday, 🟣 Alpine's minimum load rear wing is making them suffer in the first 2 sectors. 🚨
LAW had a slipstream on his best lap, yet still reached 349km/h without it!
👍5🔥4❤2
AZERBAIJAN GP - QUALIFYING | VER vs SAI Telmetry:
In the quali session with most red flags (6) in F1's history, 🟡 VER edged a fantastic 🔵 SAI partly thanks to... way lower drag! 💡
With a 7km/h top speed advantage, VER gained ~0.3s on the main straight alone... even though SAI had a better exit! 🚀
SAI, on Mediums, was quicker in T5 and T15, too.
Best session sectors:
S1: VER 0.006s quicker;
S2: SAI 0.003s quicker;
S3: VER 0.080s quicker.
SAI downshifted aggressively: 8th->3rd gear in way less time than VER!
In the quali session with most red flags (6) in F1's history, 🟡 VER edged a fantastic 🔵 SAI partly thanks to... way lower drag! 💡
With a 7km/h top speed advantage, VER gained ~0.3s on the main straight alone... even though SAI had a better exit! 🚀
SAI, on Mediums, was quicker in T5 and T15, too.
Best session sectors:
S1: VER 0.006s quicker;
S2: SAI 0.003s quicker;
S3: VER 0.080s quicker.
SAI downshifted aggressively: 8th->3rd gear in way less time than VER!
❤7👍1
AZERBAIJAN GP - RACE | RACE PACE 📊
(Impacted by traffic!)
VER quickest (could manage his pace).
RUS was a close 2nd (+0.15s/lap) despite traffic following a bad start.
SAI and ANT bridged the gap between the top 2 and the 'others' (NOR, TSU, Ferrari and Racing Bulls).
Alpine was dead last.
Per team:
1) RBR quickest
2) Merc +0.15s/lap
3) Williams +0.38
4) McL +0.55
5) Ferrari +0.59
6) RBs +0.60
7) Haas +1.12
8) Sauber +1.20
9) Aston +1.24
10) Alpine +1.92 (‼️)
(Impacted by traffic!)
VER quickest (could manage his pace).
RUS was a close 2nd (+0.15s/lap) despite traffic following a bad start.
SAI and ANT bridged the gap between the top 2 and the 'others' (NOR, TSU, Ferrari and Racing Bulls).
Alpine was dead last.
Per team:
1) RBR quickest
2) Merc +0.15s/lap
3) Williams +0.38
4) McL +0.55
5) Ferrari +0.59
6) RBs +0.60
7) Haas +1.12
8) Sauber +1.20
9) Aston +1.24
10) Alpine +1.92 (‼️)
❤6👍1
Formula Data Analysis
AZERBAIJAN GP - RACE | RACE PACE 📊 (Impacted by traffic!) VER quickest (could manage his pace). RUS was a close 2nd (+0.15s/lap) despite traffic following a bad start. SAI and ANT bridged the gap between the top 2 and the 'others' (NOR, TSU, Ferrari and…
How much did LEC’s ERS issue (2kW, or 2.7hp) affect top speed? Just 0.3 km/h…
So Vasseur’s statement seems off.
Vasseur "We lacked, I think, 2kW, not much, but enough to make Charles unable to overtake".
Let’s check the numbers:
🔋 PU power: ~1000hp, or ~735kW;
🪫 With issue: ~733kW.
- Drag coefficient unchanged;
- Drag POWER grows with the CUBE of speed:;
🔋 Top speed: ~350km/h;
🪫 With issue: 350km/h*(735kW/733kW)^1/3=349.7km/h... 0.3km/h reduction.
Possible explanations:
1) He meant 20kW → ~3 km/h loss;
2) Downplayed the issue;
3) It was 2kW, but irrelevant for overtaking;
4) It was 2kW but mattered via compounding: less acceleration→farther back→weaker slipstream→even less accel. ... (unlikely).
The only certainty? The physics. 🤣
So Vasseur’s statement seems off.
Vasseur "We lacked, I think, 2kW, not much, but enough to make Charles unable to overtake".
Let’s check the numbers:
🔋 PU power: ~1000hp, or ~735kW;
🪫 With issue: ~733kW.
- Drag coefficient unchanged;
- Drag POWER grows with the CUBE of speed:;
🔋 Top speed: ~350km/h;
🪫 With issue: 350km/h*(735kW/733kW)^1/3=349.7km/h... 0.3km/h reduction.
Possible explanations:
1) He meant 20kW → ~3 km/h loss;
2) Downplayed the issue;
3) It was 2kW, but irrelevant for overtaking;
4) It was 2kW but mattered via compounding: less acceleration→farther back→weaker slipstream→even less accel. ... (unlikely).
The only certainty? The physics. 🤣
❤18