ITALIAN GP - RACE | ACCELERATION TIMES & ACCELERATION TIMES PER COMPOUND
The ‘Best Starter’ trophy for the Italian GP goes to…
Lance Stroll ! 🏆
He was quickest (matching Norris) to reach both 100km/h and 200km/h… and he did so on Hards! 🚀
Antonelli’s launch off the line was terrible: he needed 0.7s more than Stroll to reach 100km/h…
No clear impact of tyre compound on start performance.
The ‘Best Starter’ trophy for the Italian GP goes to…
Lance Stroll ! 🏆
He was quickest (matching Norris) to reach both 100km/h and 200km/h… and he did so on Hards! 🚀
Antonelli’s launch off the line was terrible: he needed 0.7s more than Stroll to reach 100km/h…
No clear impact of tyre compound on start performance.
❤8
2016, Baku: Valtteri Bottas reached 378km/h (235 mph), the highest speed ever recorded in any official F1 session! 🚀
All stars aligned:
✅ Longest straight in F1 (2.2km !)
✅ Last year with narrow-track (1.8m, vs current 2.0m) V6 cars ➡️ Little drag, yet powerful
✅ Most powerful engine on grid
✅ Least draggy car on grid
✅ Tow
✅ DRS
Insane!
All stars aligned:
✅ Longest straight in F1 (2.2km !)
✅ Last year with narrow-track (1.8m, vs current 2.0m) V6 cars ➡️ Little drag, yet powerful
✅ Most powerful engine on grid
✅ Least draggy car on grid
✅ Tow
✅ DRS
Insane!
🔥9❤2
AZERBAIJAN GP - WING THURSDAY!
🟣 Alpine's choice is radical: they installed their Monza rear wing! Must minimise drag to compensate for the weaker engine, but this will hurt them significantly in the first 2 sectors.
⚪️ Haas: most loaded wing.
🔴 Ferrari: most loaded top team.
🔵 RBR similar to 🟠 McL.
⚫️ Mercedes' unique design is hard to gauge.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
🟣 Alpine's choice is radical: they installed their Monza rear wing! Must minimise drag to compensate for the weaker engine, but this will hurt them significantly in the first 2 sectors.
⚪️ Haas: most loaded wing.
🔴 Ferrari: most loaded top team.
🔵 RBR similar to 🟠 McL.
⚫️ Mercedes' unique design is hard to gauge.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
❤8👍2
Formula Data Analysis
AZERBAIJAN GP - WING THURSDAY! 🟣 Alpine's choice is radical: they installed their Monza rear wing! Must minimise drag to compensate for the weaker engine, but this will hurt them significantly in the first 2 sectors. ⚪️ Haas: most loaded wing. 🔴 Ferrari:…
Baku is the track where McL's 'Mini-DRS' drama started:
💡McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing":
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull.
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? 🤔
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted; @multiviewer
💡McLaren has a "Mini-DRS", which acts on top of the "Flexy wing":
- Wing flex: McL > Ferrari >> RedBull.
- McL has a never-seen-before lift of the upper plane leading edge: it's as if the DRS opens partially at high speed, providing a further advantage.
The effect is measurable: McL had the highest top speed when the DRS was inactive despite being slowest when the DRS was open (Data from quali).
Is this legal? 🤔
- The flexy wing is, as it passed the FIA's load tests. A wing that flexes are 'against the spirit of the rules', but until the load tests change to avoid that such a thing is perfectly ok.
- I'm not sure about the deformation of the DRS plane: I expect Ferrari to protest that, but the outcome is hard to predict.
Photo and idea: @brakeboosted; @multiviewer
❤6👍3🔥1
AZERBAIJAN GP - PRACTICE 2
1) BEST SECTOR GAP:
19km/h top speed difference between LAW and PIA: the largest difference in a FP session since... ages? 😳
🟠 McL is suffering from high drag (slowest team in S3: a straight), and PIA has a more loaded setup than NOR (-6km/h top speed). McL lost a lot on the main straight, yet was no quicker than 🔴 Ferrari in S1 and S2: Ferrari is looking good. ✅
As I predicted yesterday, 🟣 Alpine's minimum load rear wing is making them suffer in the first 2 sectors. 🚨
LAW had a slipstream on his best lap, yet still reached 349km/h without it!
1) BEST SECTOR GAP:
19km/h top speed difference between LAW and PIA: the largest difference in a FP session since... ages? 😳
🟠 McL is suffering from high drag (slowest team in S3: a straight), and PIA has a more loaded setup than NOR (-6km/h top speed). McL lost a lot on the main straight, yet was no quicker than 🔴 Ferrari in S1 and S2: Ferrari is looking good. ✅
As I predicted yesterday, 🟣 Alpine's minimum load rear wing is making them suffer in the first 2 sectors. 🚨
LAW had a slipstream on his best lap, yet still reached 349km/h without it!
👍5🔥4❤2
AZERBAIJAN GP - QUALIFYING | VER vs SAI Telmetry:
In the quali session with most red flags (6) in F1's history, 🟡 VER edged a fantastic 🔵 SAI partly thanks to... way lower drag! 💡
With a 7km/h top speed advantage, VER gained ~0.3s on the main straight alone... even though SAI had a better exit! 🚀
SAI, on Mediums, was quicker in T5 and T15, too.
Best session sectors:
S1: VER 0.006s quicker;
S2: SAI 0.003s quicker;
S3: VER 0.080s quicker.
SAI downshifted aggressively: 8th->3rd gear in way less time than VER!
In the quali session with most red flags (6) in F1's history, 🟡 VER edged a fantastic 🔵 SAI partly thanks to... way lower drag! 💡
With a 7km/h top speed advantage, VER gained ~0.3s on the main straight alone... even though SAI had a better exit! 🚀
SAI, on Mediums, was quicker in T5 and T15, too.
Best session sectors:
S1: VER 0.006s quicker;
S2: SAI 0.003s quicker;
S3: VER 0.080s quicker.
SAI downshifted aggressively: 8th->3rd gear in way less time than VER!
❤7👍1
AZERBAIJAN GP - RACE | RACE PACE 📊
(Impacted by traffic!)
VER quickest (could manage his pace).
RUS was a close 2nd (+0.15s/lap) despite traffic following a bad start.
SAI and ANT bridged the gap between the top 2 and the 'others' (NOR, TSU, Ferrari and Racing Bulls).
Alpine was dead last.
Per team:
1) RBR quickest
2) Merc +0.15s/lap
3) Williams +0.38
4) McL +0.55
5) Ferrari +0.59
6) RBs +0.60
7) Haas +1.12
8) Sauber +1.20
9) Aston +1.24
10) Alpine +1.92 (‼️)
(Impacted by traffic!)
VER quickest (could manage his pace).
RUS was a close 2nd (+0.15s/lap) despite traffic following a bad start.
SAI and ANT bridged the gap between the top 2 and the 'others' (NOR, TSU, Ferrari and Racing Bulls).
Alpine was dead last.
Per team:
1) RBR quickest
2) Merc +0.15s/lap
3) Williams +0.38
4) McL +0.55
5) Ferrari +0.59
6) RBs +0.60
7) Haas +1.12
8) Sauber +1.20
9) Aston +1.24
10) Alpine +1.92 (‼️)
❤6👍1
Formula Data Analysis
AZERBAIJAN GP - RACE | RACE PACE 📊 (Impacted by traffic!) VER quickest (could manage his pace). RUS was a close 2nd (+0.15s/lap) despite traffic following a bad start. SAI and ANT bridged the gap between the top 2 and the 'others' (NOR, TSU, Ferrari and…
How much did LEC’s ERS issue (2kW, or 2.7hp) affect top speed? Just 0.3 km/h…
So Vasseur’s statement seems off.
Vasseur "We lacked, I think, 2kW, not much, but enough to make Charles unable to overtake".
Let’s check the numbers:
🔋 PU power: ~1000hp, or ~735kW;
🪫 With issue: ~733kW.
- Drag coefficient unchanged;
- Drag POWER grows with the CUBE of speed:;
🔋 Top speed: ~350km/h;
🪫 With issue: 350km/h*(735kW/733kW)^1/3=349.7km/h... 0.3km/h reduction.
Possible explanations:
1) He meant 20kW → ~3 km/h loss;
2) Downplayed the issue;
3) It was 2kW, but irrelevant for overtaking;
4) It was 2kW but mattered via compounding: less acceleration→farther back→weaker slipstream→even less accel. ... (unlikely).
The only certainty? The physics. 🤣
So Vasseur’s statement seems off.
Vasseur "We lacked, I think, 2kW, not much, but enough to make Charles unable to overtake".
Let’s check the numbers:
🔋 PU power: ~1000hp, or ~735kW;
🪫 With issue: ~733kW.
- Drag coefficient unchanged;
- Drag POWER grows with the CUBE of speed:;
🔋 Top speed: ~350km/h;
🪫 With issue: 350km/h*(735kW/733kW)^1/3=349.7km/h... 0.3km/h reduction.
Possible explanations:
1) He meant 20kW → ~3 km/h loss;
2) Downplayed the issue;
3) It was 2kW, but irrelevant for overtaking;
4) It was 2kW but mattered via compounding: less acceleration→farther back→weaker slipstream→even less accel. ... (unlikely).
The only certainty? The physics. 🤣
❤18
AZERBAIJAN GP - RACE | TOP SPEEDS
Bearman hit 361 km/h, while Leclerc’s deployment issue stands out!
BEA reached it on L11 with:
✅ DRS;
✅ Double tow (STR, HUL).
For all DRS users (e.g. ANT), top speed shows a bimodal distribution:
- Low in free air;
- Very high with DRS + tow.
The only exception? LEC: His ERS issue meant DRS + tow resulted in just “medium” top speeds! 🚨
Made via @JMP_software
Bearman hit 361 km/h, while Leclerc’s deployment issue stands out!
BEA reached it on L11 with:
✅ DRS;
✅ Double tow (STR, HUL).
For all DRS users (e.g. ANT), top speed shows a bimodal distribution:
- Low in free air;
- Very high with DRS + tow.
The only exception? LEC: His ERS issue meant DRS + tow resulted in just “medium” top speeds! 🚨
Made via @JMP_software
❤4
AZERBAIJAN GP - RACE | FERRARI'S WING CHOICES
Ferrari opted for the less loaded wing after comparing it to a more loaded one in FP2, gaining 6km/h in top speed! 🚀
The difference in acceleration (graph below) was significant at any speed above 240km/h. ✅
Braking/cornering/traction were slightly worse, as expected. ❌
In the race, Ferrari struggled with overtaking (esp. LEC with an ERS issue), not with tyre wear or in the first 2 sectors: they made the right call, imho. 👌
Made via @JMP_software
Ferrari opted for the less loaded wing after comparing it to a more loaded one in FP2, gaining 6km/h in top speed! 🚀
The difference in acceleration (graph below) was significant at any speed above 240km/h. ✅
Braking/cornering/traction were slightly worse, as expected. ❌
In the race, Ferrari struggled with overtaking (esp. LEC with an ERS issue), not with tyre wear or in the first 2 sectors: they made the right call, imho. 👌
Made via @JMP_software
❤10👍1
🗒 SINGAPORE PREVIEW
The C6 (softest) compound WON’T be used: cannot sustain extreme temperatures + max downforce! 🔥
C3-C5 used, instead: deg on the C3 will be minimal.
- ⏬Max Downforce (despite sector 3 double chicane removal).
- ⚠️Traction > Braking > Cornering.
Very similar to Baku’s sectors 1 and 2, where VER and SAI were quickest overall! 👀
Comment with YOUR prediction!
📸 @pirellisport
The C6 (softest) compound WON’T be used: cannot sustain extreme temperatures + max downforce! 🔥
C3-C5 used, instead: deg on the C3 will be minimal.
- ⏬Max Downforce (despite sector 3 double chicane removal).
- ⚠️Traction > Braking > Cornering.
Very similar to Baku’s sectors 1 and 2, where VER and SAI were quickest overall! 👀
Comment with YOUR prediction!
📸 @pirellisport
❤7👍3
SINGAPORE GP | WING THURSDAY!
SINGAPORE = MAX DOWNFORCE! ⚠️
Still, some teams have a more extreme max downforce wing than others:
- Aston has a deeper and wider lower plane spoon compared to Alpine; the upper plane looks more vertical, too.
- Mercedes’ lower plane is much more cambered than Ferrari’s.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
SINGAPORE = MAX DOWNFORCE! ⚠️
Still, some teams have a more extreme max downforce wing than others:
- Aston has a deeper and wider lower plane spoon compared to Alpine; the upper plane looks more vertical, too.
- Mercedes’ lower plane is much more cambered than Ferrari’s.
📸 @AlbertFabrega
❤6👍2
SINGAPORE GP - PRACTICE 2
🗒 Outlook after FP2:
- 🟦 VER confirmed same good feelings of the past 2 weekends➡️RB21's issues likely solved!
- Disrupted session, yet 🟧McL does NOT look dominant anymore. 69pts WDC lead, 7 races remaining.
- Best top speed: ⬜️Haas, 🟥Ferrari. Worst: 🟧McL, 🟨RBs.
GAP TO IDEAL LAP
The black line indicates the ideal laptime, as the combination of that driver's or team's best sectors. The green line is the actual laptime achieved.
Ideal laps (best sectors combined)
1) Aston 1:30.704 ‼️ (Best S1/S3);
2) McL 1:30.714;
3) RBs 1:30.846;
4) RBR 1:30.857 (Best S2);
5) Ferrari 1:30.944;
....
10) Mercedes (1:32.489) [Mediums].
HAM and Ferrari (0.522s) had the largest margin for improvement by combining their respective best sectors.
VER getting pole looks as likely, if not more, than a McL driver. Will LEC get a grid drop for the contact? 👀
🗒 Outlook after FP2:
- 🟦 VER confirmed same good feelings of the past 2 weekends➡️RB21's issues likely solved!
- Disrupted session, yet 🟧McL does NOT look dominant anymore. 69pts WDC lead, 7 races remaining.
- Best top speed: ⬜️Haas, 🟥Ferrari. Worst: 🟧McL, 🟨RBs.
GAP TO IDEAL LAP
The black line indicates the ideal laptime, as the combination of that driver's or team's best sectors. The green line is the actual laptime achieved.
Ideal laps (best sectors combined)
1) Aston 1:30.704 ‼️ (Best S1/S3);
2) McL 1:30.714;
3) RBs 1:30.846;
4) RBR 1:30.857 (Best S2);
5) Ferrari 1:30.944;
....
10) Mercedes (1:32.489) [Mediums].
HAM and Ferrari (0.522s) had the largest margin for improvement by combining their respective best sectors.
VER getting pole looks as likely, if not more, than a McL driver. Will LEC get a grid drop for the contact? 👀
❤14🥰1
Have you ever wondered which track lets #F1 drivers stay full-throttle the most?
I wrote code to find out! 😏
Monza & Jeddah: over 75% of the lap full throttle ➡️ MENTAL! 🔥
Monaco: lowest, but still not far from 50%!
But look at this:
- Singapore: ~315km/h top speed, 55.1% full throttle.
- Mexico: ~350km/h top speed, only 48.3%!
Why?
Mexico’s 2285m altitude cuts drag and downforce by ~20%: higher top speed, but way less grip
Which one surprised you the most? For me, it was Australia.
Made via @JMP_software
I wrote code to find out! 😏
Monza & Jeddah: over 75% of the lap full throttle ➡️ MENTAL! 🔥
Monaco: lowest, but still not far from 50%!
But look at this:
- Singapore: ~315km/h top speed, 55.1% full throttle.
- Mexico: ~350km/h top speed, only 48.3%!
Why?
Mexico’s 2285m altitude cuts drag and downforce by ~20%: higher top speed, but way less grip
Which one surprised you the most? For me, it was Australia.
Made via @JMP_software
❤11🔥1
SINGAPORE GP | RACE PACE! 🏁
Four drivers had a pace within 0.1s of RUS's, whose brilliant first stint let him cruise in the second one!
Ferrari designed an issues-filled car: you’d expect them to fix them over the season, yet they’ve worsened. Both drivers had to run at backmarker pace at the end!
PACE PER TEAM (Fastest one-stopper)
1) Merc;
2) McL +0.04s/lap;
3) RBR +0.06;
4) Ferrari +0.42;
5) Aston +1.07;
6) Haas +1.42;
7) Williams +1.55;
8) RBs +1.82;
9) Sauber +1.99;
10) Alpine +2.14;
[Note: abnormally slow laps (e.g. HAM’s final ones) excluded from pace calc.]
Four drivers had a pace within 0.1s of RUS's, whose brilliant first stint let him cruise in the second one!
Ferrari designed an issues-filled car: you’d expect them to fix them over the season, yet they’ve worsened. Both drivers had to run at backmarker pace at the end!
PACE PER TEAM (Fastest one-stopper)
1) Merc;
2) McL +0.04s/lap;
3) RBR +0.06;
4) Ferrari +0.42;
5) Aston +1.07;
6) Haas +1.42;
7) Williams +1.55;
8) RBs +1.82;
9) Sauber +1.99;
10) Alpine +2.14;
[Note: abnormally slow laps (e.g. HAM’s final ones) excluded from pace calc.]
❤8👍1
Formula Data Analysis
SINGAPORE GP | RACE PACE! 🏁 Four drivers had a pace within 0.1s of RUS's, whose brilliant first stint let him cruise in the second one! Ferrari designed an issues-filled car: you’d expect them to fix them over the season, yet they’ve worsened. Both drivers…
RACE PACE LAST YEAR
NOR was quickest, by far (0.41s/lap advantage vs VER).
Ferrari and Mercedes fought to be the 3rd best team, but were 1 second off NOR.
Compared to last year, 🟩Mercedes took a massive step forward at the expense of 🟧McL. Still, 🟦VER and 🟥Ferrari got closer to the race winner, pace-wise.
NOR was quickest, by far (0.41s/lap advantage vs VER).
Ferrari and Mercedes fought to be the 3rd best team, but were 1 second off NOR.
Compared to last year, 🟩Mercedes took a massive step forward at the expense of 🟧McL. Still, 🟦VER and 🟥Ferrari got closer to the race winner, pace-wise.
❤7🔥1