Forwarded from 옥수수 🌽
Advocating for a civil war in the United States while not wanting the feds to put you on the watchlist is an oxymoron
Forwarded from Stalinist Revisionism
Chris (@CDMorlock) argues in his post (https://x.com/cdmorlock/status/1872525565250642099) that Russia cannot be deemed imperialist under Lenin’s Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, pointing to a decline in Russia’s finance capital share from 5.2% in 1910 to 0% in 2024, a claim echoed by @ZaharisJason who asserted
Russia doesn’t meet any of Lenin’s five criteria. This interpretation, is bolstered by ChatGPT-derived data from Chris, that fixates on capital export as the sole marker of imperialism, but such reductionism distorts Lenin’s approach, which views imperialism as a dynamic force in capitalism rooted in historical processes, including pre-capitalist forms like feudal tribute systems (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/). Lenin outlines five interconnected features:
1. Monopoly concentration
2. Finance capital fusion
3. Capital export
4. International monopolies
5. Territorial division
This is not as a rigid checklist but as a holistic framing, and Chris’s narrow focus ignores how Russia’s actions….. especially in 2025 align with a hybrid imperialism blending territorial expansion and resource control. Despite sanctions slashing inflows by 50-70% and depleting $280 billion in reserves by 2025 (https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/sanctions-and-russias-war-limiting-putins-capabilities), Russia’s outward FDI hit $29 billion in 2023, with net outflows at -0.38% of GDP and $8 billion in inward FDI in 2024, contradicting the “0%” claim (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU) (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf). This shift, driven by sanctions, reflects a pivot to resource-based imperialism, with state-linked monopolies like Gazprom (16% of global gas reserves) and Rosneft (38% of India’s crude imports in 2025) dominating energy markets, fulfilling Lenin’s monopoly and international trust criteria (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf).
Russia’s territorial ambitions, from Crimea’s 2014 annexation to ongoing 2025 Ukraine offensives, fit Lenin’s fifth criterion of world division, while oligarch-driven FDI ($5.9 billion in Q1 2025) and BRICS currency shifts sustain finance capital and capital export dynamics (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU). Chris’s reliance on Michael Hudson’s Super Imperialism also misses, as Hudson critiques U.S. debt imperialism ($34 trillion in 2025) and Russia’s resistance via BRICS but does not absolve its territorial expansionism, such as Donbas resource grabs, which aligns with Lenin’s evolving lens rather than a static baseline (https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm). If anything, this extends Lenin’s framework to neo-imperialism, where peripheral powers like Russia project influence through military and resource control, evident in overseas bases and actions in Ukraine, Chechnya, and beyond. Non-Marxist realist analyses and geopolitical reports, label Russia’s 2025 maneuvers as peripheral neo-imperialism, noting its leveling of Grozny and “prison of nations” continuity with Lenin’s tsarist critique (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/self-det/ch01.htm; https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/31/ukraine-planning-new-strikes-deep-inside-russia-says-zelenskyy).
By clinging to a rigid, outdated metric, Chris’s argument sidesteps the dialectical adaptability central to Lenin’s method, whitewashing Russia’s imperialist character as it manifests in 2025 through a synthesis of territorial, resource, and military power projection. Things I support, it provides the Multipolar world a means to crush Anglo-American hegemony. The age of Empires is here! (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/russias-imperial-destiny-returns) (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/dugin-on-alaska-and-the-eurasian-monroe-doctrine)
Russia doesn’t meet any of Lenin’s five criteria. This interpretation, is bolstered by ChatGPT-derived data from Chris, that fixates on capital export as the sole marker of imperialism, but such reductionism distorts Lenin’s approach, which views imperialism as a dynamic force in capitalism rooted in historical processes, including pre-capitalist forms like feudal tribute systems (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/). Lenin outlines five interconnected features:
1. Monopoly concentration
2. Finance capital fusion
3. Capital export
4. International monopolies
5. Territorial division
This is not as a rigid checklist but as a holistic framing, and Chris’s narrow focus ignores how Russia’s actions….. especially in 2025 align with a hybrid imperialism blending territorial expansion and resource control. Despite sanctions slashing inflows by 50-70% and depleting $280 billion in reserves by 2025 (https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/sanctions-and-russias-war-limiting-putins-capabilities), Russia’s outward FDI hit $29 billion in 2023, with net outflows at -0.38% of GDP and $8 billion in inward FDI in 2024, contradicting the “0%” claim (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU) (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf). This shift, driven by sanctions, reflects a pivot to resource-based imperialism, with state-linked monopolies like Gazprom (16% of global gas reserves) and Rosneft (38% of India’s crude imports in 2025) dominating energy markets, fulfilling Lenin’s monopoly and international trust criteria (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf).
Russia’s territorial ambitions, from Crimea’s 2014 annexation to ongoing 2025 Ukraine offensives, fit Lenin’s fifth criterion of world division, while oligarch-driven FDI ($5.9 billion in Q1 2025) and BRICS currency shifts sustain finance capital and capital export dynamics (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU). Chris’s reliance on Michael Hudson’s Super Imperialism also misses, as Hudson critiques U.S. debt imperialism ($34 trillion in 2025) and Russia’s resistance via BRICS but does not absolve its territorial expansionism, such as Donbas resource grabs, which aligns with Lenin’s evolving lens rather than a static baseline (https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm). If anything, this extends Lenin’s framework to neo-imperialism, where peripheral powers like Russia project influence through military and resource control, evident in overseas bases and actions in Ukraine, Chechnya, and beyond. Non-Marxist realist analyses and geopolitical reports, label Russia’s 2025 maneuvers as peripheral neo-imperialism, noting its leveling of Grozny and “prison of nations” continuity with Lenin’s tsarist critique (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/self-det/ch01.htm; https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/31/ukraine-planning-new-strikes-deep-inside-russia-says-zelenskyy).
By clinging to a rigid, outdated metric, Chris’s argument sidesteps the dialectical adaptability central to Lenin’s method, whitewashing Russia’s imperialist character as it manifests in 2025 through a synthesis of territorial, resource, and military power projection. Things I support, it provides the Multipolar world a means to crush Anglo-American hegemony. The age of Empires is here! (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/russias-imperial-destiny-returns) (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/dugin-on-alaska-and-the-eurasian-monroe-doctrine)
X (formerly Twitter)
Chris Morlock (@CDMorlock) on X
The Russian Federation is NOT Imperialist Given Lenin's Figures and Metrics
Common argument from the so called "Marxist" and "Communist" left in America: "The war in Ukraine is imperialist." "This is a war of Imperialisms". "Russia is Imperialist." Lenin…
Common argument from the so called "Marxist" and "Communist" left in America: "The war in Ukraine is imperialist." "This is a war of Imperialisms". "Russia is Imperialist." Lenin…
Forwarded from Joel Davis
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nice to get some love from Thomas Rousseau. Always had a great relationship with Patriot Front and always will!
⚡1
Forwarded from 𝑬𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎
“Brexit is the greatest European nationalist victory since 1933. It is the first blow against globalism in the post-war period: a nation re-establishing its sovereignty, organising to say, ‘We don’t want foreign powers dictating how our country is going to be run.’ They’re taking power back for themselves.”
Matthew Heimbach
Matthew Heimbach
👍7
Forwarded from Nativist Concern
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Me when some libtard deconstructionist brings up my 0.8% Palestinian DNA
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nativistconcern/2473
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nativistconcern/2473
Forwarded from C.H.D. Social Credit
Joshua Haldeman, Elon Musk's Canadian grandfather, once gave an address over the CBC in 1948 ennoscriptd "Social Credit vs. Communism" where he argued that "Social Credit offers the only practical solution for opposing communism." That remains true today. We assume that his "conversion" to Douglas Social Credit after he had left technocracy (which Douglas had repeatedly rejected) ... was sincere
https://socred.org/.../joshua-haldeman-elon-musk-s...
https://socred.org/.../joshua-haldeman-elon-musk-s...
⚡4
Forwarded from 𝑬𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎
THE KIND OF "SOCIALISM" U.S. NAZIS BELIEVE IN…
Listed above are the BASIC DIFFERENCES between National Socialism and Communism. There are many more differences. Many ill-informed people make the mistake of associating Nazis with Communists. This is a serious mistake, usually the result of not being well informed on the subjects.
Some people believe Nazis and Communists are the same because both use the word "socialist". The kind of "socialism" that the American Nazi Party believes in is very different than the kind of "socialism" that the Communists advocate. American Nazis believe in the kind of "socialism" that is necessary for the survival of society such as the Police Departments, Fire Dept., Army, Public Health Service, etc., which are indeed SOCIALIST establishments because they are owned by all the people and are for the benefit of all
the people and can never be owned or entrusted to any one individual.
Without the above types of socialism, our nation and society as we know it, would cease to exist.
Listed above are the BASIC DIFFERENCES between National Socialism and Communism. There are many more differences. Many ill-informed people make the mistake of associating Nazis with Communists. This is a serious mistake, usually the result of not being well informed on the subjects.
Some people believe Nazis and Communists are the same because both use the word "socialist". The kind of "socialism" that the American Nazi Party believes in is very different than the kind of "socialism" that the Communists advocate. American Nazis believe in the kind of "socialism" that is necessary for the survival of society such as the Police Departments, Fire Dept., Army, Public Health Service, etc., which are indeed SOCIALIST establishments because they are owned by all the people and are for the benefit of all
the people and can never be owned or entrusted to any one individual.
Without the above types of socialism, our nation and society as we know it, would cease to exist.
⚡7
Launching my own book publishing company soon stay tuned.
👍10🤔2
The Fascio Newsletter (Uncensored)
Launching my own book publishing company soon stay tuned.
These are going to be the first few books I list:
1 Mein Kampf
2 Doctrine of Fascism
3 Revolt Against The Modern World
4 The Philosophy of Fascism
5 Imperium
6 Reflections on Violence
7 For My Legionaries
8 Anthology of Speeches and Quotes
9 Origins and Doctrine of Fascism
10 The Decline of The West vol 1 and vol 2
11 Storm of Steel
12 The Disintegration of The System
1 Mein Kampf
2 Doctrine of Fascism
3 Revolt Against The Modern World
4 The Philosophy of Fascism
5 Imperium
6 Reflections on Violence
7 For My Legionaries
8 Anthology of Speeches and Quotes
9 Origins and Doctrine of Fascism
10 The Decline of The West vol 1 and vol 2
11 Storm of Steel
12 The Disintegration of The System
⚡17🥴5🙏1
Forwarded from Maragno Edits (Maragno)
"There was a period when I had 14 women, and I would have three or four every night, one after the other... that gives you an idea of my sexuality."
- Benito Mussolini, 1920s-1930s.
Source: IMDb – section of quotes attributed to Mussolini
🗿11😢3