Forwarded from Stalinist Revisionism
Dimitrov admitting, that Marxism-Leninism must warp into a type of fascism to fight fascism.
Forwarded from Stalinist Revisionism
Example:
In the American class struggle, where the sinews of labor weave our nation, Industrial Unionism stands as a monument to the indomitable spirit of the working class — a type of socialism forged by titans like Eugene Debs and Daniel De Leon. This is no mere ideology; it is the beating heart of our heritage, a vision of industrial democracy where the toiler, not the tyrant, holds the reins of production. But let us cast a piercing gaze upon Marxist Cockshott…. He argues for a De Leonist syndicalist economy, where the capital of each industry is wrested from the clutches of the bourgeois and vested in industrial syndicates, converging in a state legislature to chart the course toward cybernetic communism. A transitional stage, he calls it, rooted in syndicalism, even flirting with the mutualist ideals of cooperative sovereignty. Yet, does this not bear of compromise, a dalliance with the Third Way?
In the American class struggle, where the sinews of labor weave our nation, Industrial Unionism stands as a monument to the indomitable spirit of the working class — a type of socialism forged by titans like Eugene Debs and Daniel De Leon. This is no mere ideology; it is the beating heart of our heritage, a vision of industrial democracy where the toiler, not the tyrant, holds the reins of production. But let us cast a piercing gaze upon Marxist Cockshott…. He argues for a De Leonist syndicalist economy, where the capital of each industry is wrested from the clutches of the bourgeois and vested in industrial syndicates, converging in a state legislature to chart the course toward cybernetic communism. A transitional stage, he calls it, rooted in syndicalism, even flirting with the mutualist ideals of cooperative sovereignty. Yet, does this not bear of compromise, a dalliance with the Third Way?
Forwarded from Middle East Spectator — MES
— 🇦🇲/🇷🇺 NEW: Failed Armenian Prime Minister, Nikol Pashinyan, says it's the fault of the USSR for making Armenia believe in 'a false sense of patriotism' and considering Karabakh as sovereign Armenian territory
@Middle_East_Spectator
@Middle_East_Spectator
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🥴7
Forwarded from Nativist Concern
Many retards have been calling China communist and uninvestible for years.
Now the USA is copying China's state capitalist model.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/disclosetv/17403
Now the USA is copying China's state capitalist model.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/disclosetv/17403
Telegram
Disclose.tv
NEW - Trump's Pentagon holding "monstrous discussion[s]" about taking equity stakes in military defense contractors, says Commerce Secretary Lutnick.
Read more: https://www.disclose.tv/id/eiviun48mr/
@disclosetv
Read more: https://www.disclose.tv/id/eiviun48mr/
@disclosetv
Forwarded from 옥수수 🌽
Advocating for a civil war in the United States while not wanting the feds to put you on the watchlist is an oxymoron
Forwarded from Stalinist Revisionism
Chris (@CDMorlock) argues in his post (https://x.com/cdmorlock/status/1872525565250642099) that Russia cannot be deemed imperialist under Lenin’s Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, pointing to a decline in Russia’s finance capital share from 5.2% in 1910 to 0% in 2024, a claim echoed by @ZaharisJason who asserted
Russia doesn’t meet any of Lenin’s five criteria. This interpretation, is bolstered by ChatGPT-derived data from Chris, that fixates on capital export as the sole marker of imperialism, but such reductionism distorts Lenin’s approach, which views imperialism as a dynamic force in capitalism rooted in historical processes, including pre-capitalist forms like feudal tribute systems (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/). Lenin outlines five interconnected features:
1. Monopoly concentration
2. Finance capital fusion
3. Capital export
4. International monopolies
5. Territorial division
This is not as a rigid checklist but as a holistic framing, and Chris’s narrow focus ignores how Russia’s actions….. especially in 2025 align with a hybrid imperialism blending territorial expansion and resource control. Despite sanctions slashing inflows by 50-70% and depleting $280 billion in reserves by 2025 (https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/sanctions-and-russias-war-limiting-putins-capabilities), Russia’s outward FDI hit $29 billion in 2023, with net outflows at -0.38% of GDP and $8 billion in inward FDI in 2024, contradicting the “0%” claim (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU) (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf). This shift, driven by sanctions, reflects a pivot to resource-based imperialism, with state-linked monopolies like Gazprom (16% of global gas reserves) and Rosneft (38% of India’s crude imports in 2025) dominating energy markets, fulfilling Lenin’s monopoly and international trust criteria (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf).
Russia’s territorial ambitions, from Crimea’s 2014 annexation to ongoing 2025 Ukraine offensives, fit Lenin’s fifth criterion of world division, while oligarch-driven FDI ($5.9 billion in Q1 2025) and BRICS currency shifts sustain finance capital and capital export dynamics (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU). Chris’s reliance on Michael Hudson’s Super Imperialism also misses, as Hudson critiques U.S. debt imperialism ($34 trillion in 2025) and Russia’s resistance via BRICS but does not absolve its territorial expansionism, such as Donbas resource grabs, which aligns with Lenin’s evolving lens rather than a static baseline (https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm). If anything, this extends Lenin’s framework to neo-imperialism, where peripheral powers like Russia project influence through military and resource control, evident in overseas bases and actions in Ukraine, Chechnya, and beyond. Non-Marxist realist analyses and geopolitical reports, label Russia’s 2025 maneuvers as peripheral neo-imperialism, noting its leveling of Grozny and “prison of nations” continuity with Lenin’s tsarist critique (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/self-det/ch01.htm; https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/31/ukraine-planning-new-strikes-deep-inside-russia-says-zelenskyy).
By clinging to a rigid, outdated metric, Chris’s argument sidesteps the dialectical adaptability central to Lenin’s method, whitewashing Russia’s imperialist character as it manifests in 2025 through a synthesis of territorial, resource, and military power projection. Things I support, it provides the Multipolar world a means to crush Anglo-American hegemony. The age of Empires is here! (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/russias-imperial-destiny-returns) (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/dugin-on-alaska-and-the-eurasian-monroe-doctrine)
Russia doesn’t meet any of Lenin’s five criteria. This interpretation, is bolstered by ChatGPT-derived data from Chris, that fixates on capital export as the sole marker of imperialism, but such reductionism distorts Lenin’s approach, which views imperialism as a dynamic force in capitalism rooted in historical processes, including pre-capitalist forms like feudal tribute systems (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/). Lenin outlines five interconnected features:
1. Monopoly concentration
2. Finance capital fusion
3. Capital export
4. International monopolies
5. Territorial division
This is not as a rigid checklist but as a holistic framing, and Chris’s narrow focus ignores how Russia’s actions….. especially in 2025 align with a hybrid imperialism blending territorial expansion and resource control. Despite sanctions slashing inflows by 50-70% and depleting $280 billion in reserves by 2025 (https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/sanctions-and-russias-war-limiting-putins-capabilities), Russia’s outward FDI hit $29 billion in 2023, with net outflows at -0.38% of GDP and $8 billion in inward FDI in 2024, contradicting the “0%” claim (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU) (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf). This shift, driven by sanctions, reflects a pivot to resource-based imperialism, with state-linked monopolies like Gazprom (16% of global gas reserves) and Rosneft (38% of India’s crude imports in 2025) dominating energy markets, fulfilling Lenin’s monopoly and international trust criteria (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf).
Russia’s territorial ambitions, from Crimea’s 2014 annexation to ongoing 2025 Ukraine offensives, fit Lenin’s fifth criterion of world division, while oligarch-driven FDI ($5.9 billion in Q1 2025) and BRICS currency shifts sustain finance capital and capital export dynamics (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU). Chris’s reliance on Michael Hudson’s Super Imperialism also misses, as Hudson critiques U.S. debt imperialism ($34 trillion in 2025) and Russia’s resistance via BRICS but does not absolve its territorial expansionism, such as Donbas resource grabs, which aligns with Lenin’s evolving lens rather than a static baseline (https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm). If anything, this extends Lenin’s framework to neo-imperialism, where peripheral powers like Russia project influence through military and resource control, evident in overseas bases and actions in Ukraine, Chechnya, and beyond. Non-Marxist realist analyses and geopolitical reports, label Russia’s 2025 maneuvers as peripheral neo-imperialism, noting its leveling of Grozny and “prison of nations” continuity with Lenin’s tsarist critique (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/self-det/ch01.htm; https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/31/ukraine-planning-new-strikes-deep-inside-russia-says-zelenskyy).
By clinging to a rigid, outdated metric, Chris’s argument sidesteps the dialectical adaptability central to Lenin’s method, whitewashing Russia’s imperialist character as it manifests in 2025 through a synthesis of territorial, resource, and military power projection. Things I support, it provides the Multipolar world a means to crush Anglo-American hegemony. The age of Empires is here! (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/russias-imperial-destiny-returns) (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/dugin-on-alaska-and-the-eurasian-monroe-doctrine)
X (formerly Twitter)
Chris Morlock (@CDMorlock) on X
The Russian Federation is NOT Imperialist Given Lenin's Figures and Metrics
Common argument from the so called "Marxist" and "Communist" left in America: "The war in Ukraine is imperialist." "This is a war of Imperialisms". "Russia is Imperialist." Lenin…
Common argument from the so called "Marxist" and "Communist" left in America: "The war in Ukraine is imperialist." "This is a war of Imperialisms". "Russia is Imperialist." Lenin…
Forwarded from Joel Davis
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nice to get some love from Thomas Rousseau. Always had a great relationship with Patriot Front and always will!
⚡1
Forwarded from 𝑬𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎
“Brexit is the greatest European nationalist victory since 1933. It is the first blow against globalism in the post-war period: a nation re-establishing its sovereignty, organising to say, ‘We don’t want foreign powers dictating how our country is going to be run.’ They’re taking power back for themselves.”
Matthew Heimbach
Matthew Heimbach
👍7
Forwarded from Nativist Concern
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Me when some libtard deconstructionist brings up my 0.8% Palestinian DNA
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nativistconcern/2473
https://news.1rj.ru/str/nativistconcern/2473