Full investigation:

https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1675131778296676358?t=ut4hplY49YUI4fDPh122yA&s=19

Full video:

https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1675131918851923975?t=trbfWKyHoLpJLnpfKhhPZw&s=19

A core value of Democrats is Racism.

So last night, Firearms Policy Coalition @gunpolicy scored a MASSIVE victory over the ATF & #illegitimate Biden Regime. Last night, the US Northern District of TX Federal Court ruled that the ATF’s ‘frame & receiver’ so-called ‘rule’ was NULL & VOID. Let’s dive into this exciting case and its implications!

This case primarly was a plaintiff, Jennifer VanDerStock represented by FPC in a lawsuit to challenge the ATF’s rule stating that 80% frames & receivers that are pejoratively called ‘Ghost Guns’ by the anti-gun extremists & the Left. They are only 80% machined & require the buyer to perform the remaining 20% machining to turn into a gun.

This is a key distinction—
Biden himself famously committed a felony by possessing a Polymer80 made 80% Glock frame & jig and complete slide kit. Within the DC city limits, possession is a Felony. Fast forward to the 23 second mark in this video to see Joe Biden commit a felony.
https://youtu.be/HufRBQjGLuw

So what does that have to do with VanDerStock v Garland? I’m glad you asked that! The bumpstock ban was the FIRST action of the three where ATF simply REWROTE the 1968 gun control act that redefines what machine guns, frames and receivers, completed guns, gun parts, etc are. In very technical terms & language congress spelled out what these things are.

The bump stock ban, and now under Joe Biden the ban on 80% frames/receivers, and on Pistol Braces followed the same methodology: The ATF abused and exceeded Chevron Deference Inferred powers to REWRITE what these things are.

The ATF had to change the definition of a machine gun in its ‘determination’ of what they are in order to write new ‘rules’ dictating who could possess them and how. These ‘rules’ came with criminal penalties for anyone who didn’t follow ATF’s new rules.

This of critical importance: Chevron Deference says if the law is vague, the court hearing a lawsuit will find for the Agency as the Agency is most qualified to interpret any vagueness of the law. This, THIS, is the pretext the ATF and the EPA have been using to FAR exceed their authority, writing laws from scratch from tortured revised versions of laws already on the books.

Primarily, the National Firearms Act of 1935, the Gun Control Act of 1968, the Clean Air Act of 1967, Clean Water Act of 1972. The EPA has lost two Supreme Court cases in three terms, West Virginia v EPA where it was held they unconstitutionally exceeded limits of Chevron to create PUNITIVE restrictions on coal plants & auto makers rewriting the Clean Air Act, and in Sackett v EPA where SCOTUS held EPA far exceeded Chevron Deference authority by illegally rewriting and expanding the Clean Waters Act.

Onto the ATF! Recently a Federal Court ruled the ATF’s expansion of the NFA to add bumpstocks illegally rewrote the NFA to add items. The NFA has specific technical language defining what a Machine Gun is—the ATF just rewrote the definition, told owners of bumpstocks under their new ‘rule’ (law made without congress) that they must file for & obtain a tax stamp, register them as machine guns or face 10 years in prison & a $250,000 fine. The 5th Circuit Court Of Appeals (COA) ruled against ATF.

Cargill v Garland:
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/gdpzqwrjdvw/01062023cargill.pdf