A core value of Democrats is Racism.

So last night, Firearms Policy Coalition @gunpolicy scored a MASSIVE victory over the ATF & #illegitimate Biden Regime. Last night, the US Northern District of TX Federal Court ruled that the ATF’s ‘frame & receiver’ so-called ‘rule’ was NULL & VOID. Let’s dive into this exciting case and its implications!

This case primarly was a plaintiff, Jennifer VanDerStock represented by FPC in a lawsuit to challenge the ATF’s rule stating that 80% frames & receivers that are pejoratively called ‘Ghost Guns’ by the anti-gun extremists & the Left. They are only 80% machined & require the buyer to perform the remaining 20% machining to turn into a gun.

This is a key distinction—
Biden himself famously committed a felony by possessing a Polymer80 made 80% Glock frame & jig and complete slide kit. Within the DC city limits, possession is a Felony. Fast forward to the 23 second mark in this video to see Joe Biden commit a felony.
https://youtu.be/HufRBQjGLuw

So what does that have to do with VanDerStock v Garland? I’m glad you asked that! The bumpstock ban was the FIRST action of the three where ATF simply REWROTE the 1968 gun control act that redefines what machine guns, frames and receivers, completed guns, gun parts, etc are. In very technical terms & language congress spelled out what these things are.

The bump stock ban, and now under Joe Biden the ban on 80% frames/receivers, and on Pistol Braces followed the same methodology: The ATF abused and exceeded Chevron Deference Inferred powers to REWRITE what these things are.

The ATF had to change the definition of a machine gun in its ‘determination’ of what they are in order to write new ‘rules’ dictating who could possess them and how. These ‘rules’ came with criminal penalties for anyone who didn’t follow ATF’s new rules.

This of critical importance: Chevron Deference says if the law is vague, the court hearing a lawsuit will find for the Agency as the Agency is most qualified to interpret any vagueness of the law. This, THIS, is the pretext the ATF and the EPA have been using to FAR exceed their authority, writing laws from scratch from tortured revised versions of laws already on the books.

Primarily, the National Firearms Act of 1935, the Gun Control Act of 1968, the Clean Air Act of 1967, Clean Water Act of 1972. The EPA has lost two Supreme Court cases in three terms, West Virginia v EPA where it was held they unconstitutionally exceeded limits of Chevron to create PUNITIVE restrictions on coal plants & auto makers rewriting the Clean Air Act, and in Sackett v EPA where SCOTUS held EPA far exceeded Chevron Deference authority by illegally rewriting and expanding the Clean Waters Act.

Onto the ATF! Recently a Federal Court ruled the ATF’s expansion of the NFA to add bumpstocks illegally rewrote the NFA to add items. The NFA has specific technical language defining what a Machine Gun is—the ATF just rewrote the definition, told owners of bumpstocks under their new ‘rule’ (law made without congress) that they must file for & obtain a tax stamp, register them as machine guns or face 10 years in prison & a $250,000 fine. The 5th Circuit Court Of Appeals (COA) ruled against ATF.

Cargill v Garland:
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/gdpzqwrjdvw/01062023cargill.pdf

This was the first shoe to drop. The ATF at the Biden White House & anti-gun enterprise extremist groups like ‘Moms Demand Action’ & ‘Everytown For Gun Safety’ & ‘Brady Group’ pressure illegally redefined bumpstocks & illegally added them to the NFA. The 5th Circuit COA ruled their bumpstock rule null & void as an illegal overreach on ATF’s part.

The decision on the VanDerStock v Garland case is the SECOND MAJOR SHOE to drop. In the Federal Court’s ruling, Judge Reed O’Conner ruled that the ATF illegally rewrote definitions clearly defined in the 1968 GCA just as ATF had done in Cargill v Garland. The ATF illegally rewrote the law by changing definitions to suit the Anti-Gun Agenda putting forth criminal penalties for makers, sellers and owners far exceeding their authority under Chevron Deference.

The plaintiffs in this case sued on the basis that the ATF’s *final* rule (law created without congress) frames/receivers violated the Administrative Procedures Act’s substantive & procedural requirements, & exceeded INFERRED powers of the ATF under GCA of ’68 & was unconstitutional.

Right away, the court goes into deciding the motions to add plaintiffs with an interest in the case, and of PARTICULAR NOTE is @polymer80inc who the ATF actually singled out explicitly in their press release on the new rule they sent to Federal Firearms License dealers (gun shops and gun sellers) (FFLs).
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2022/08/26/atf-2021r-05f-80-receiver-rule/

And this next part takes this ruling and turns that Atomic Bomb the court dropped on ATF into a Thermonuclear Hydrogen Bomb: The court not only rules again the rule, but rules that @polymer80inc can GO AFTER THE GOVERNMENT ON SEPARATE CLAIMS OF HARM, ORIGINATING FROM THE ILLEGAL ATF RAID ON POLYMER80’S FACILITIES, AND TARGETING THEM IN THEIR RELEASE TO FFL’S.

The ATF isnt done being taken to the woodshed. Polyermer80 was SINGLED OUT by ATF in an attempt to BANKRUPT them—This case is not over for the ATF. They are going further be held LIABLE.

And now the Finale: the legal loophole ATF & EPA have been abusing to create these rules ILLEGALLY rewriting laws in place of Congress, Chevron Deference, is ABOUT TO DIE.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/01/supreme-court-chevron-doctrine-climate-change-00094670

👆 EM is a fellow Greenie Beanie who started a successful VC firm after he hung up the uniform. Bright guy, worth a follow.

He has a new book out on the global shit show that's worth a read as well.