Weird, Jerrold didn't have anything to say about that when DA Bragg used Cohen as a star witness. What changed?
👆🏼 some are saying this reporter is the same one from "fiery but mostly peaceful" fame.
A gentle reminder:
On the morning of Jan 6, 2021, a legally-required number of legislators, both state and federal, were voicing objections and asking for more time to follow the process for investigating massive voting anomalies across the swing states.
The first vanguard of unprovoked, violent agents provacateurs breached the exterior while Trump was still speaking.
This was very different from the crowd who actually listened to Trump speak. They were largely tranquil when they arrived at the capitol grounds, singing patriotic songs and joining in prayer.
That only changed after Federal agents from various agencies began to indiscriminately fire explosives (flash bangs), gas (CS gas - which the media called a war crime in its use against ANTIFA burning down St John's church the prior May), and rubber bullets.
Those actions by the Federal agents have been shown from multiple vantage points across the complex to have been the point of agitation for the crowd that wasn't among the initial vanguard (who, again, skipped Trump's speech entirely).
It should be remembered that those state & federal legislators began the morning doing precisely what Trump supporters wanted - asking for time to fully investigate the (many, glaring) anomalies.
When Congress opened back into business (later the same day), Pelosi chose to open an entirely new session rather than reconvening the morning session.
Doing so prevented the legislators who wanted to follow the legal process to get time to investigate from doing so.
There are videos of them on the floor asking why they were being prevented from continuing the mornings process and being wholly ignored.
Summary: legislators were doing what Trump supporters wanted. The vanguard of agents provacateurs - the ones who were violent without being provoked - didn't even attend Trump's speech.
The legislative process to ask for investigations was ceased by those provacateurs. When congress re-opened, they were denied the ability to continue.
Cui Bono?
The core question - who benefitted - has been and was wholly ignored by the media and January 6th committee.
Ask yourself why we got so many lies (Sicknik) and obfuscations rather than an actual accounting of what happened and when.
On the morning of Jan 6, 2021, a legally-required number of legislators, both state and federal, were voicing objections and asking for more time to follow the process for investigating massive voting anomalies across the swing states.
The first vanguard of unprovoked, violent agents provacateurs breached the exterior while Trump was still speaking.
This was very different from the crowd who actually listened to Trump speak. They were largely tranquil when they arrived at the capitol grounds, singing patriotic songs and joining in prayer.
That only changed after Federal agents from various agencies began to indiscriminately fire explosives (flash bangs), gas (CS gas - which the media called a war crime in its use against ANTIFA burning down St John's church the prior May), and rubber bullets.
Those actions by the Federal agents have been shown from multiple vantage points across the complex to have been the point of agitation for the crowd that wasn't among the initial vanguard (who, again, skipped Trump's speech entirely).
It should be remembered that those state & federal legislators began the morning doing precisely what Trump supporters wanted - asking for time to fully investigate the (many, glaring) anomalies.
When Congress opened back into business (later the same day), Pelosi chose to open an entirely new session rather than reconvening the morning session.
Doing so prevented the legislators who wanted to follow the legal process to get time to investigate from doing so.
There are videos of them on the floor asking why they were being prevented from continuing the mornings process and being wholly ignored.
Summary: legislators were doing what Trump supporters wanted. The vanguard of agents provacateurs - the ones who were violent without being provoked - didn't even attend Trump's speech.
The legislative process to ask for investigations was ceased by those provacateurs. When congress re-opened, they were denied the ability to continue.
Cui Bono?
The core question - who benefitted - has been and was wholly ignored by the media and January 6th committee.
Ask yourself why we got so many lies (Sicknik) and obfuscations rather than an actual accounting of what happened and when.