(Continued…)
So some of the reasons that the FBI is seizing our phones is because they are trying to track down all the players, confiscate copies of the images, and to intimidate anyone questioning the integrity of our elections.
There is a federal grand jury in Colorado spearheading this.
So some of the reasons that the FBI is seizing our phones is because they are trying to track down all the players, confiscate copies of the images, and to intimidate anyone questioning the integrity of our elections.
There is a federal grand jury in Colorado spearheading this.
🤬182🔥31👍4😱2❤1🤮1🖕1
“Horns of a Dilemma”
That moment in public when someone keeps staring at you….
You can tell that they recognize you, but they’re not sure how.
Do I introduce myself? It seems so immodest.
On the other hand, once someone connects the dots they often shake my hand to thank me for my work, give me hugs, inquire about Nellie, or want to take selfies with me. Often, they want me to pass along messages of appreciation to Mike Lindell.
Do I deny us the opportunity for fellowship?
On the other hand, it’s like asking a woman if she is pregnant. If I’ve read the situation correctly, I can congratulate the expecting mother and tell her how lovely she is. If I’m wrong it’s humiliating to both of us.
Ah, what the heck. Let ‘er rip…
“Hi! How are you doin?”
That moment in public when someone keeps staring at you….
You can tell that they recognize you, but they’re not sure how.
Do I introduce myself? It seems so immodest.
On the other hand, once someone connects the dots they often shake my hand to thank me for my work, give me hugs, inquire about Nellie, or want to take selfies with me. Often, they want me to pass along messages of appreciation to Mike Lindell.
Do I deny us the opportunity for fellowship?
On the other hand, it’s like asking a woman if she is pregnant. If I’ve read the situation correctly, I can congratulate the expecting mother and tell her how lovely she is. If I’m wrong it’s humiliating to both of us.
Ah, what the heck. Let ‘er rip…
“Hi! How are you doin?”
🔥103❤57👍39😁32
I mentioned this graph during my talk at the Freedom conference in Waynesville Ohio this morning, and Pastor Steve asked me for a copy.
It's from the back of my Thompson Chain Reference Bible, and it describes 450 years of Israel's history.
Note that Israel repeatedly lost its way, God would judge them, they would repent, and then God would redeem them.
America has lost its way. If it we will repent, God is ready to forgive us and to restore us.
If America continues to reject God, murder its babies, and desecrate everything that is sacred, then our future is bleak.
It's from the back of my Thompson Chain Reference Bible, and it describes 450 years of Israel's history.
Note that Israel repeatedly lost its way, God would judge them, they would repent, and then God would redeem them.
America has lost its way. If it we will repent, God is ready to forgive us and to restore us.
If America continues to reject God, murder its babies, and desecrate everything that is sacred, then our future is bleak.
❤111🙏63👍31🔥5
“I’m a Numbers Guy”
At the Freedom Conference today in Waynesville Ohio, I said that I am a “numbers guy.” What does this mean?
It means that I like to track the numbers, following the data, in order to decide where I stand on a topic.
Above are two of several data sets I’ve tracked monthly for decades in order to form my opinions regarding the effect of Covid and Anthropogenic Climate Change.
I recognize that there are important nuances to consider, but these data sets provide useful baselines.
The first graph is from the CDC, and it shows the number of weekly deaths in the United States due to ALL causes for the past few years.
The second graph shows the ENTIRE satellite record of the average global atmospheric temperature. (Credit Dr Roy Spencer)
At present, my working hypotheses are:
1) I’ve been expecting the total number of weekly deaths to drop below normal because Covid and our response to it have killed lots of folks before their time. If the graph remains above average much longer it suggests that the vaccines are doing more harm than good.
2) There is no obvious effect of humans on the average global temperature. The steady temperature rise we see of 1.3 C per 100 years follows the natural historic trend seen since the little ice ice several hundred years ago.
Science and politics do not play well together, especially when the media is complicit in political propaganda.
At the Freedom Conference today in Waynesville Ohio, I said that I am a “numbers guy.” What does this mean?
It means that I like to track the numbers, following the data, in order to decide where I stand on a topic.
Above are two of several data sets I’ve tracked monthly for decades in order to form my opinions regarding the effect of Covid and Anthropogenic Climate Change.
I recognize that there are important nuances to consider, but these data sets provide useful baselines.
The first graph is from the CDC, and it shows the number of weekly deaths in the United States due to ALL causes for the past few years.
The second graph shows the ENTIRE satellite record of the average global atmospheric temperature. (Credit Dr Roy Spencer)
At present, my working hypotheses are:
1) I’ve been expecting the total number of weekly deaths to drop below normal because Covid and our response to it have killed lots of folks before their time. If the graph remains above average much longer it suggests that the vaccines are doing more harm than good.
2) There is no obvious effect of humans on the average global temperature. The steady temperature rise we see of 1.3 C per 100 years follows the natural historic trend seen since the little ice ice several hundred years ago.
Science and politics do not play well together, especially when the media is complicit in political propaganda.
👍131🔥30🤔12🙏12👏6
"Oregon Lawsuit Update"
I am going to be testifying in Washington County, Oregon this week.
This is an important case, because the SoS and AG have admitted in formal court documents that their machines are wirelessly accessible, and that in addition to their STATE elections being compromised, our NATIONAL elections can also be compromised because the devices are wirelessly accessible* even when they are not connected to local networks.
And Oregon is not alone. Election officials in other states have made similar admissions, not to mention the system vendors themselves.
Of course, this is what we have been saying for twenty months now, despite the false and misleading mantra, “The machines are not connected to the internet.”
Ignorant election officials think that because their machines are not hard wired, or not connected to a local hotspot, or are “air-gapped,” or only connected to “internal secure networks” that their elections are secure.
This reveals so much ignorance on the topic that it makes me question their qualifications or their integrity, and wonder if they are complicit.
The internal modems can simply connect to any convenient hotspot or a local cell tower.
And we know they do… we have electronic recordings of it taking place.
I am going to be testifying in Washington County, Oregon this week.
This is an important case, because the SoS and AG have admitted in formal court documents that their machines are wirelessly accessible, and that in addition to their STATE elections being compromised, our NATIONAL elections can also be compromised because the devices are wirelessly accessible* even when they are not connected to local networks.
And Oregon is not alone. Election officials in other states have made similar admissions, not to mention the system vendors themselves.
Of course, this is what we have been saying for twenty months now, despite the false and misleading mantra, “The machines are not connected to the internet.”
Ignorant election officials think that because their machines are not hard wired, or not connected to a local hotspot, or are “air-gapped,” or only connected to “internal secure networks” that their elections are secure.
This reveals so much ignorance on the topic that it makes me question their qualifications or their integrity, and wonder if they are complicit.
The internal modems can simply connect to any convenient hotspot or a local cell tower.
And we know they do… we have electronic recordings of it taking place.
👍116🔥62🙏32❤1
"Ignorant or Complicit"
The EAC ("Election Assistance Commission") is a federal agency that polices our election equipment vendors.
Here is Politico reporting that the EAC forced ES&S, one of the largest election equipment vendors, to inform eighty-nine of their customers that they had shipped 33,000 voting machines fully equipped with modems.
Folks, we're not making this up. Our elections are completely hacked. Any election official who denies this is either ignorant or complicit.
The EAC ("Election Assistance Commission") is a federal agency that polices our election equipment vendors.
Here is Politico reporting that the EAC forced ES&S, one of the largest election equipment vendors, to inform eighty-nine of their customers that they had shipped 33,000 voting machines fully equipped with modems.
Folks, we're not making this up. Our elections are completely hacked. Any election official who denies this is either ignorant or complicit.
❤78🔥58👍25🙏6🤔2😢2
“WWND”
I’ve often heard the saying, “What would Jesus do.” It’s a useful tool when considering how to respond to a given situation.
But sometimes I prefer, “What would Nellie do.”
Recently, a friend told me that his seventeen year old daughter just had a baby, born out of wedlock.
One response could be, “Wow, I’m sorry. Your daughter really messed up. Didn’t you teach her any morals? What kind of father are you?”
Instead, I said, “Wow. Congratulations! Please tell her for me that I’m proud of her.”
After all, there is now a beautiful new child in the world with a family that loves her and will care for her. And this young girl bravely chose to give a human being a life rather than destroying it. I *am* proud of her.
But what would *Nellie* do?
She would squeal, “A baby!” Ask to cradle it in her arms, and snuggle and kiss it, cooing.
Nellie beats my response, hands down.
I’ve often heard the saying, “What would Jesus do.” It’s a useful tool when considering how to respond to a given situation.
But sometimes I prefer, “What would Nellie do.”
Recently, a friend told me that his seventeen year old daughter just had a baby, born out of wedlock.
One response could be, “Wow, I’m sorry. Your daughter really messed up. Didn’t you teach her any morals? What kind of father are you?”
Instead, I said, “Wow. Congratulations! Please tell her for me that I’m proud of her.”
After all, there is now a beautiful new child in the world with a family that loves her and will care for her. And this young girl bravely chose to give a human being a life rather than destroying it. I *am* proud of her.
But what would *Nellie* do?
She would squeal, “A baby!” Ask to cradle it in her arms, and snuggle and kiss it, cooing.
Nellie beats my response, hands down.
❤227👍17🔥13😁1
Write-in candidate...
Usherforohio.com
Vote in-person on election day, and write in Marshall Usher for governor!
Super qualified, grassroots. We gotta dump Dewine, and put someone in charge who respects liberty.
Usherforohio.com
Vote in-person on election day, and write in Marshall Usher for governor!
Super qualified, grassroots. We gotta dump Dewine, and put someone in charge who respects liberty.
❤115🔥31👍24
“Oregon Trial Update”
As an expert witness, I had a front row seat all day today in an Oregon court.
Attorney Steve Joncus did a great job, and I learned a lot. I was passing him notes all day, and it was fun watching him convert my suggestions and questions into legally correct ones.
I testify tomorrow last, after about four others.
Some really good things happened today…
For example, the county election manager for 33 years said that she knew how to turn the modems in her voting machines on and off… and it didn’t require a password.
She also said that she’d never found any fraud in any of her elections… she wouldn’t even know where to start.
I’ve seen this a lot across the country. Very sweet government employees who would be great babysitters for your children, but shouldn’t be running our elections.
It’s shocking that none of the other side and their “expert” witnesses had seen the movie 2000 mules, and didn’t even know who Tina Peters is.
Think about that… people in charge of our elections who are completely oblivious of what is going on in our country.
As an expert witness, I had a front row seat all day today in an Oregon court.
Attorney Steve Joncus did a great job, and I learned a lot. I was passing him notes all day, and it was fun watching him convert my suggestions and questions into legally correct ones.
I testify tomorrow last, after about four others.
Some really good things happened today…
For example, the county election manager for 33 years said that she knew how to turn the modems in her voting machines on and off… and it didn’t require a password.
She also said that she’d never found any fraud in any of her elections… she wouldn’t even know where to start.
I’ve seen this a lot across the country. Very sweet government employees who would be great babysitters for your children, but shouldn’t be running our elections.
It’s shocking that none of the other side and their “expert” witnesses had seen the movie 2000 mules, and didn’t even know who Tina Peters is.
Think about that… people in charge of our elections who are completely oblivious of what is going on in our country.
👍172😢79🔥29🤯20🙏14🤔1
“Oregon Lawsuit, II”
The lawsuit In which I am testifying in Oregon concerns some local citizens who were given an election file by a local clerk.
When the Secretary of State found out, she instructed the Oregon Attorney General to file a protective order prohibiting the citizen from sharing the file with anyone, claiming that it would compromise the integrity of Oregon elections and any other state that uses such election systems, because they can be accessed wirelessly, even when they are not connected to local networks.
This lawsuit is an effort by state and local officials to enforce the protective order, claiming that what the citizens received was protected by intellectual property rights.
Such lawsuits are important, because they allow us to enter important facts into the legal record. (Like the fact that the election machines have modems in them that the clerk can turn on and off without a password.)
And the *process* is more important than the actual legal outcome, because evidence of fraud is now formally entered into the public legal record. People can no longer claim that “there is no evidence of election fraud,” because there are now multiple lawsuits and formal court records containing lots of evidence (e.g. depernolaw.com)
The lawsuit In which I am testifying in Oregon concerns some local citizens who were given an election file by a local clerk.
When the Secretary of State found out, she instructed the Oregon Attorney General to file a protective order prohibiting the citizen from sharing the file with anyone, claiming that it would compromise the integrity of Oregon elections and any other state that uses such election systems, because they can be accessed wirelessly, even when they are not connected to local networks.
This lawsuit is an effort by state and local officials to enforce the protective order, claiming that what the citizens received was protected by intellectual property rights.
Such lawsuits are important, because they allow us to enter important facts into the legal record. (Like the fact that the election machines have modems in them that the clerk can turn on and off without a password.)
And the *process* is more important than the actual legal outcome, because evidence of fraud is now formally entered into the public legal record. People can no longer claim that “there is no evidence of election fraud,” because there are now multiple lawsuits and formal court records containing lots of evidence (e.g. depernolaw.com)
👍155🔥83🙏10
“Oregon Case 2nd Day”
The second day of testimony in the Sippel v Sec of State trial concluded today, and after a few more legal details the judge will give her ruling whether or not the data given to Tim Sippel can be shared publicly.
We heard excellent testimony from several witnesses, starting with the defendant Tim Sippel, who is a talented computer dude. He explained all the analyses he’s done to date on the data the state was arguing he was not supposed to have been given. Sippel has discovered and submitted lots of issues to the county, and they have so far been unresponsive.
There were some important take-always from his testimony.
1) He also had trouble reconciling the county numbers with the SoS numbers.
2) Nearly every ballot is imprinted with a unique identifier (QR code). In other words, the ballots are not anonymous.
3) His analysis of the ballot images differs from Clear Ballot’s analysis by 8000 ballots, and many of the scanned ballots were clearly not from the official printer.
No wonder the state doesn’t want people to see these data… they start asking questions.
Why should it take computer wizards to evaluate the accuracy of our elections?
No election system should be used that a typical high school student could not completely understand and execute. Because most of our election officials are even less proficient than the typical high school student today when it comes to modern technology.
The second day of testimony in the Sippel v Sec of State trial concluded today, and after a few more legal details the judge will give her ruling whether or not the data given to Tim Sippel can be shared publicly.
We heard excellent testimony from several witnesses, starting with the defendant Tim Sippel, who is a talented computer dude. He explained all the analyses he’s done to date on the data the state was arguing he was not supposed to have been given. Sippel has discovered and submitted lots of issues to the county, and they have so far been unresponsive.
There were some important take-always from his testimony.
1) He also had trouble reconciling the county numbers with the SoS numbers.
2) Nearly every ballot is imprinted with a unique identifier (QR code). In other words, the ballots are not anonymous.
3) His analysis of the ballot images differs from Clear Ballot’s analysis by 8000 ballots, and many of the scanned ballots were clearly not from the official printer.
No wonder the state doesn’t want people to see these data… they start asking questions.
Why should it take computer wizards to evaluate the accuracy of our elections?
No election system should be used that a typical high school student could not completely understand and execute. Because most of our election officials are even less proficient than the typical high school student today when it comes to modern technology.
🔥173👍46🙏32❤17
🔥43👏8👍2