“I’m a Numbers Guy”
At the Freedom Conference today in Waynesville Ohio, I said that I am a “numbers guy.” What does this mean?
It means that I like to track the numbers, following the data, in order to decide where I stand on a topic.
Above are two of several data sets I’ve tracked monthly for decades in order to form my opinions regarding the effect of Covid and Anthropogenic Climate Change.
I recognize that there are important nuances to consider, but these data sets provide useful baselines.
The first graph is from the CDC, and it shows the number of weekly deaths in the United States due to ALL causes for the past few years.
The second graph shows the ENTIRE satellite record of the average global atmospheric temperature. (Credit Dr Roy Spencer)
At present, my working hypotheses are:
1) I’ve been expecting the total number of weekly deaths to drop below normal because Covid and our response to it have killed lots of folks before their time. If the graph remains above average much longer it suggests that the vaccines are doing more harm than good.
2) There is no obvious effect of humans on the average global temperature. The steady temperature rise we see of 1.3 C per 100 years follows the natural historic trend seen since the little ice ice several hundred years ago.
Science and politics do not play well together, especially when the media is complicit in political propaganda.
At the Freedom Conference today in Waynesville Ohio, I said that I am a “numbers guy.” What does this mean?
It means that I like to track the numbers, following the data, in order to decide where I stand on a topic.
Above are two of several data sets I’ve tracked monthly for decades in order to form my opinions regarding the effect of Covid and Anthropogenic Climate Change.
I recognize that there are important nuances to consider, but these data sets provide useful baselines.
The first graph is from the CDC, and it shows the number of weekly deaths in the United States due to ALL causes for the past few years.
The second graph shows the ENTIRE satellite record of the average global atmospheric temperature. (Credit Dr Roy Spencer)
At present, my working hypotheses are:
1) I’ve been expecting the total number of weekly deaths to drop below normal because Covid and our response to it have killed lots of folks before their time. If the graph remains above average much longer it suggests that the vaccines are doing more harm than good.
2) There is no obvious effect of humans on the average global temperature. The steady temperature rise we see of 1.3 C per 100 years follows the natural historic trend seen since the little ice ice several hundred years ago.
Science and politics do not play well together, especially when the media is complicit in political propaganda.
👍131🔥30🤔12🙏12👏6
"Oregon Lawsuit Update"
I am going to be testifying in Washington County, Oregon this week.
This is an important case, because the SoS and AG have admitted in formal court documents that their machines are wirelessly accessible, and that in addition to their STATE elections being compromised, our NATIONAL elections can also be compromised because the devices are wirelessly accessible* even when they are not connected to local networks.
And Oregon is not alone. Election officials in other states have made similar admissions, not to mention the system vendors themselves.
Of course, this is what we have been saying for twenty months now, despite the false and misleading mantra, “The machines are not connected to the internet.”
Ignorant election officials think that because their machines are not hard wired, or not connected to a local hotspot, or are “air-gapped,” or only connected to “internal secure networks” that their elections are secure.
This reveals so much ignorance on the topic that it makes me question their qualifications or their integrity, and wonder if they are complicit.
The internal modems can simply connect to any convenient hotspot or a local cell tower.
And we know they do… we have electronic recordings of it taking place.
I am going to be testifying in Washington County, Oregon this week.
This is an important case, because the SoS and AG have admitted in formal court documents that their machines are wirelessly accessible, and that in addition to their STATE elections being compromised, our NATIONAL elections can also be compromised because the devices are wirelessly accessible* even when they are not connected to local networks.
And Oregon is not alone. Election officials in other states have made similar admissions, not to mention the system vendors themselves.
Of course, this is what we have been saying for twenty months now, despite the false and misleading mantra, “The machines are not connected to the internet.”
Ignorant election officials think that because their machines are not hard wired, or not connected to a local hotspot, or are “air-gapped,” or only connected to “internal secure networks” that their elections are secure.
This reveals so much ignorance on the topic that it makes me question their qualifications or their integrity, and wonder if they are complicit.
The internal modems can simply connect to any convenient hotspot or a local cell tower.
And we know they do… we have electronic recordings of it taking place.
👍116🔥62🙏32❤1
"Ignorant or Complicit"
The EAC ("Election Assistance Commission") is a federal agency that polices our election equipment vendors.
Here is Politico reporting that the EAC forced ES&S, one of the largest election equipment vendors, to inform eighty-nine of their customers that they had shipped 33,000 voting machines fully equipped with modems.
Folks, we're not making this up. Our elections are completely hacked. Any election official who denies this is either ignorant or complicit.
The EAC ("Election Assistance Commission") is a federal agency that polices our election equipment vendors.
Here is Politico reporting that the EAC forced ES&S, one of the largest election equipment vendors, to inform eighty-nine of their customers that they had shipped 33,000 voting machines fully equipped with modems.
Folks, we're not making this up. Our elections are completely hacked. Any election official who denies this is either ignorant or complicit.
❤78🔥58👍25🙏6🤔2😢2
“WWND”
I’ve often heard the saying, “What would Jesus do.” It’s a useful tool when considering how to respond to a given situation.
But sometimes I prefer, “What would Nellie do.”
Recently, a friend told me that his seventeen year old daughter just had a baby, born out of wedlock.
One response could be, “Wow, I’m sorry. Your daughter really messed up. Didn’t you teach her any morals? What kind of father are you?”
Instead, I said, “Wow. Congratulations! Please tell her for me that I’m proud of her.”
After all, there is now a beautiful new child in the world with a family that loves her and will care for her. And this young girl bravely chose to give a human being a life rather than destroying it. I *am* proud of her.
But what would *Nellie* do?
She would squeal, “A baby!” Ask to cradle it in her arms, and snuggle and kiss it, cooing.
Nellie beats my response, hands down.
I’ve often heard the saying, “What would Jesus do.” It’s a useful tool when considering how to respond to a given situation.
But sometimes I prefer, “What would Nellie do.”
Recently, a friend told me that his seventeen year old daughter just had a baby, born out of wedlock.
One response could be, “Wow, I’m sorry. Your daughter really messed up. Didn’t you teach her any morals? What kind of father are you?”
Instead, I said, “Wow. Congratulations! Please tell her for me that I’m proud of her.”
After all, there is now a beautiful new child in the world with a family that loves her and will care for her. And this young girl bravely chose to give a human being a life rather than destroying it. I *am* proud of her.
But what would *Nellie* do?
She would squeal, “A baby!” Ask to cradle it in her arms, and snuggle and kiss it, cooing.
Nellie beats my response, hands down.
❤227👍17🔥13😁1
Write-in candidate...
Usherforohio.com
Vote in-person on election day, and write in Marshall Usher for governor!
Super qualified, grassroots. We gotta dump Dewine, and put someone in charge who respects liberty.
Usherforohio.com
Vote in-person on election day, and write in Marshall Usher for governor!
Super qualified, grassroots. We gotta dump Dewine, and put someone in charge who respects liberty.
❤115🔥31👍24
“Oregon Trial Update”
As an expert witness, I had a front row seat all day today in an Oregon court.
Attorney Steve Joncus did a great job, and I learned a lot. I was passing him notes all day, and it was fun watching him convert my suggestions and questions into legally correct ones.
I testify tomorrow last, after about four others.
Some really good things happened today…
For example, the county election manager for 33 years said that she knew how to turn the modems in her voting machines on and off… and it didn’t require a password.
She also said that she’d never found any fraud in any of her elections… she wouldn’t even know where to start.
I’ve seen this a lot across the country. Very sweet government employees who would be great babysitters for your children, but shouldn’t be running our elections.
It’s shocking that none of the other side and their “expert” witnesses had seen the movie 2000 mules, and didn’t even know who Tina Peters is.
Think about that… people in charge of our elections who are completely oblivious of what is going on in our country.
As an expert witness, I had a front row seat all day today in an Oregon court.
Attorney Steve Joncus did a great job, and I learned a lot. I was passing him notes all day, and it was fun watching him convert my suggestions and questions into legally correct ones.
I testify tomorrow last, after about four others.
Some really good things happened today…
For example, the county election manager for 33 years said that she knew how to turn the modems in her voting machines on and off… and it didn’t require a password.
She also said that she’d never found any fraud in any of her elections… she wouldn’t even know where to start.
I’ve seen this a lot across the country. Very sweet government employees who would be great babysitters for your children, but shouldn’t be running our elections.
It’s shocking that none of the other side and their “expert” witnesses had seen the movie 2000 mules, and didn’t even know who Tina Peters is.
Think about that… people in charge of our elections who are completely oblivious of what is going on in our country.
👍172😢79🔥29🤯20🙏14🤔1
“Oregon Lawsuit, II”
The lawsuit In which I am testifying in Oregon concerns some local citizens who were given an election file by a local clerk.
When the Secretary of State found out, she instructed the Oregon Attorney General to file a protective order prohibiting the citizen from sharing the file with anyone, claiming that it would compromise the integrity of Oregon elections and any other state that uses such election systems, because they can be accessed wirelessly, even when they are not connected to local networks.
This lawsuit is an effort by state and local officials to enforce the protective order, claiming that what the citizens received was protected by intellectual property rights.
Such lawsuits are important, because they allow us to enter important facts into the legal record. (Like the fact that the election machines have modems in them that the clerk can turn on and off without a password.)
And the *process* is more important than the actual legal outcome, because evidence of fraud is now formally entered into the public legal record. People can no longer claim that “there is no evidence of election fraud,” because there are now multiple lawsuits and formal court records containing lots of evidence (e.g. depernolaw.com)
The lawsuit In which I am testifying in Oregon concerns some local citizens who were given an election file by a local clerk.
When the Secretary of State found out, she instructed the Oregon Attorney General to file a protective order prohibiting the citizen from sharing the file with anyone, claiming that it would compromise the integrity of Oregon elections and any other state that uses such election systems, because they can be accessed wirelessly, even when they are not connected to local networks.
This lawsuit is an effort by state and local officials to enforce the protective order, claiming that what the citizens received was protected by intellectual property rights.
Such lawsuits are important, because they allow us to enter important facts into the legal record. (Like the fact that the election machines have modems in them that the clerk can turn on and off without a password.)
And the *process* is more important than the actual legal outcome, because evidence of fraud is now formally entered into the public legal record. People can no longer claim that “there is no evidence of election fraud,” because there are now multiple lawsuits and formal court records containing lots of evidence (e.g. depernolaw.com)
👍155🔥83🙏10
“Oregon Case 2nd Day”
The second day of testimony in the Sippel v Sec of State trial concluded today, and after a few more legal details the judge will give her ruling whether or not the data given to Tim Sippel can be shared publicly.
We heard excellent testimony from several witnesses, starting with the defendant Tim Sippel, who is a talented computer dude. He explained all the analyses he’s done to date on the data the state was arguing he was not supposed to have been given. Sippel has discovered and submitted lots of issues to the county, and they have so far been unresponsive.
There were some important take-always from his testimony.
1) He also had trouble reconciling the county numbers with the SoS numbers.
2) Nearly every ballot is imprinted with a unique identifier (QR code). In other words, the ballots are not anonymous.
3) His analysis of the ballot images differs from Clear Ballot’s analysis by 8000 ballots, and many of the scanned ballots were clearly not from the official printer.
No wonder the state doesn’t want people to see these data… they start asking questions.
Why should it take computer wizards to evaluate the accuracy of our elections?
No election system should be used that a typical high school student could not completely understand and execute. Because most of our election officials are even less proficient than the typical high school student today when it comes to modern technology.
The second day of testimony in the Sippel v Sec of State trial concluded today, and after a few more legal details the judge will give her ruling whether or not the data given to Tim Sippel can be shared publicly.
We heard excellent testimony from several witnesses, starting with the defendant Tim Sippel, who is a talented computer dude. He explained all the analyses he’s done to date on the data the state was arguing he was not supposed to have been given. Sippel has discovered and submitted lots of issues to the county, and they have so far been unresponsive.
There were some important take-always from his testimony.
1) He also had trouble reconciling the county numbers with the SoS numbers.
2) Nearly every ballot is imprinted with a unique identifier (QR code). In other words, the ballots are not anonymous.
3) His analysis of the ballot images differs from Clear Ballot’s analysis by 8000 ballots, and many of the scanned ballots were clearly not from the official printer.
No wonder the state doesn’t want people to see these data… they start asking questions.
Why should it take computer wizards to evaluate the accuracy of our elections?
No election system should be used that a typical high school student could not completely understand and execute. Because most of our election officials are even less proficient than the typical high school student today when it comes to modern technology.
🔥173👍46🙏32❤17
🔥43👏8👍2
“Oregon Case, Dr Frank”
The SoS and County attorneys fought hard to keep me out of the witness stand, claiming that I was not qualified. (LoL)
So we had a separate mini-trial before my testimony where my qualifications were argued. The plaintiffs conceded that I was qualified in mathematics and statistics but not qualified to analyze elections because I did not have a degree in Political Science.
It took great discipline and restraint for me to refrain from saying in the stand that my degrees were in *real* science.
Nevertheless, much of my evidence of fraud made it into the formal court records.
And the silly Stanford Poli-Sci professor admitted that he’d been able to reproduce my work, but implied that my explanation was wrong.
I assured everyone in the court that math works the same in physics as it does in social sciences. At least it used to.
According to modern social “scientists,” math is racist.
Quoting Lincoln, “How many legs does a dog have if you call it’s tail a leg? Four. Calling the tail a leg doesn’t make it a leg.”
The SoS and County attorneys fought hard to keep me out of the witness stand, claiming that I was not qualified. (LoL)
So we had a separate mini-trial before my testimony where my qualifications were argued. The plaintiffs conceded that I was qualified in mathematics and statistics but not qualified to analyze elections because I did not have a degree in Political Science.
It took great discipline and restraint for me to refrain from saying in the stand that my degrees were in *real* science.
Nevertheless, much of my evidence of fraud made it into the formal court records.
And the silly Stanford Poli-Sci professor admitted that he’d been able to reproduce my work, but implied that my explanation was wrong.
I assured everyone in the court that math works the same in physics as it does in social sciences. At least it used to.
According to modern social “scientists,” math is racist.
Quoting Lincoln, “How many legs does a dog have if you call it’s tail a leg? Four. Calling the tail a leg doesn’t make it a leg.”
👍107👏24😁21🔥13❤6
"Mathematics is Instinct"
Someone commented on one of my posts that mathematics is fundamental to our lives. I AGREE!
In fact, we understood and used math concepts even before we understood verbal language...
- As an infant is nursing, we learn the concept of "more."
- As an infant in nursing, we learn to count "one, two."
Our mothers are our first math teachers.
Someone commented on one of my posts that mathematics is fundamental to our lives. I AGREE!
In fact, we understood and used math concepts even before we understood verbal language...
- As an infant is nursing, we learn the concept of "more."
- As an infant in nursing, we learn to count "one, two."
Our mothers are our first math teachers.
👍78❤43😁34🔥3🥰2
Oregon attorney Steve Joncus was the attorney on with me tonight on Frank Speech.
Patriot attorneys are rare and valuable to our movement!
They have several more important upcoming cases in the state of Oregon.
You can read about their lawsuits on freeoregon.us/lawsuits
If you want to support their work, please donate at freeoregon.us/donate
I just donated $100. Lawsuits like this are *critical* around the US, as they shine light on the corruption in our government and our elections, introduce formal evidence of fraud into the legal literature, and apply pressure on our election officials. This is causing them to make mistakes and embarrassing admissions confirming what those of us in the election reform movement have been claiming all along.
Patriot attorneys are rare and valuable to our movement!
They have several more important upcoming cases in the state of Oregon.
You can read about their lawsuits on freeoregon.us/lawsuits
If you want to support their work, please donate at freeoregon.us/donate
I just donated $100. Lawsuits like this are *critical* around the US, as they shine light on the corruption in our government and our elections, introduce formal evidence of fraud into the legal literature, and apply pressure on our election officials. This is causing them to make mistakes and embarrassing admissions confirming what those of us in the election reform movement have been claiming all along.
❤98👍33🔥13😁1
"QR Codes on Ballots"
Oregon ballots are not anonymous. This is illegal in the state of Oregon, yet their all-mail system permits identification of voters from ballots.
Proof:
P1) Printing companies receive large orders to print and mail ballots to Oregon voters.
P2) Printing companies are given lists of voter names and addresses, and which ballot style is to be used for each name and address.
P3) Printing companies print ballots with unique QR codes on each ballot. Thus, every printed ballot is unique.
P4) Printing companies print envelopes with unique addresses on them. Thus, every addressed envelope is unique.
P5a) Printing companies must place ballots with unique QR codes into the correct envelopes with unique addresses on them based upon the particular ballot style corresponding to a particular voter.
P5b) Printing companies cannot randomly place each unique ballot into a random envelope because there are specific ballot styles required for specific addresses.
C1) Printing companies must carefully and deliberately place each unique ballot into each unique envelope based upon the specific ballot style required for each specific address.
C2) If printing companies use an automated system to place unique ballots into unique envelopes, then the automated system could easily track how each unique ballot went into each unique envelope, and to which unique address.
C3) If printing companies use a manual system to place unique ballots into unique envelopes, then someone could manually keep track of which unique ballot went into each unique envelope, and to which unique address.
C4) Oregon ballots are not anonymous.
Please tell me what is wrong with this logic.
And... tell me how many other states use such systems.
And, since the ballot scanners can read the QR codes... the ballot scanners could also know who a voter was when their ballot was being scanned.
Wouldn't it be much easier to just Vote Amish?
All paper, no machines. Single-day with photo ID and hand-count.
Oregon ballots are not anonymous. This is illegal in the state of Oregon, yet their all-mail system permits identification of voters from ballots.
Proof:
P1) Printing companies receive large orders to print and mail ballots to Oregon voters.
P2) Printing companies are given lists of voter names and addresses, and which ballot style is to be used for each name and address.
P3) Printing companies print ballots with unique QR codes on each ballot. Thus, every printed ballot is unique.
P4) Printing companies print envelopes with unique addresses on them. Thus, every addressed envelope is unique.
P5a) Printing companies must place ballots with unique QR codes into the correct envelopes with unique addresses on them based upon the particular ballot style corresponding to a particular voter.
P5b) Printing companies cannot randomly place each unique ballot into a random envelope because there are specific ballot styles required for specific addresses.
C1) Printing companies must carefully and deliberately place each unique ballot into each unique envelope based upon the specific ballot style required for each specific address.
C2) If printing companies use an automated system to place unique ballots into unique envelopes, then the automated system could easily track how each unique ballot went into each unique envelope, and to which unique address.
C3) If printing companies use a manual system to place unique ballots into unique envelopes, then someone could manually keep track of which unique ballot went into each unique envelope, and to which unique address.
C4) Oregon ballots are not anonymous.
Please tell me what is wrong with this logic.
And... tell me how many other states use such systems.
And, since the ballot scanners can read the QR codes... the ballot scanners could also know who a voter was when their ballot was being scanned.
Wouldn't it be much easier to just Vote Amish?
All paper, no machines. Single-day with photo ID and hand-count.
👍128👏24🔥20❤15