Write-in candidate...

Usherforohio.com

Vote in-person on election day, and write in Marshall Usher for governor!

Super qualified, grassroots. We gotta dump Dewine, and put someone in charge who respects liberty.

“Oregon Trial Update”

As an expert witness, I had a front row seat all day today in an Oregon court.

Attorney Steve Joncus did a great job, and I learned a lot. I was passing him notes all day, and it was fun watching him convert my suggestions and questions into legally correct ones.

I testify tomorrow last, after about four others.

Some really good things happened today…

For example, the county election manager for 33 years said that she knew how to turn the modems in her voting machines on and off… and it didn’t require a password.

She also said that she’d never found any fraud in any of her elections… she wouldn’t even know where to start.

I’ve seen this a lot across the country. Very sweet government employees who would be great babysitters for your children, but shouldn’t be running our elections.

It’s shocking that none of the other side and their “expert” witnesses had seen the movie 2000 mules, and didn’t even know who Tina Peters is.

Think about that… people in charge of our elections who are completely oblivious of what is going on in our country.

The courtroom was packed, so they set up streaming in an adjacent hall.

“Oregon Lawsuit, II”

The lawsuit In which I am testifying in Oregon concerns some local citizens who were given an election file by a local clerk.

When the Secretary of State found out, she instructed the Oregon Attorney General to file a protective order prohibiting the citizen from sharing the file with anyone, claiming that it would compromise the integrity of Oregon elections and any other state that uses such election systems, because they can be accessed wirelessly, even when they are not connected to local networks.

This lawsuit is an effort by state and local officials to enforce the protective order, claiming that what the citizens received was protected by intellectual property rights.

Such lawsuits are important, because they allow us to enter important facts into the legal record. (Like the fact that the election machines have modems in them that the clerk can turn on and off without a password.)

And the *process* is more important than the actual legal outcome, because evidence of fraud is now formally entered into the public legal record. People can no longer claim that “there is no evidence of election fraud,” because there are now multiple lawsuits and formal court records containing lots of evidence (e.g. depernolaw.com)

“Oregon Case 2nd Day”

The second day of testimony in the Sippel v Sec of State trial concluded today, and after a few more legal details the judge will give her ruling whether or not the data given to Tim Sippel can be shared publicly.

We heard excellent testimony from several witnesses, starting with the defendant Tim Sippel, who is a talented computer dude. He explained all the analyses he’s done to date on the data the state was arguing he was not supposed to have been given. Sippel has discovered and submitted lots of issues to the county, and they have so far been unresponsive.

There were some important take-always from his testimony.
1) He also had trouble reconciling the county numbers with the SoS numbers.
2) Nearly every ballot is imprinted with a unique identifier (QR code). In other words, the ballots are not anonymous.
3) His analysis of the ballot images differs from Clear Ballot’s analysis by 8000 ballots, and many of the scanned ballots were clearly not from the official printer.

No wonder the state doesn’t want people to see these data… they start asking questions.

Why should it take computer wizards to evaluate the accuracy of our elections?

No election system should be used that a typical high school student could not completely understand and execute. Because most of our election officials are even less proficient than the typical high school student today when it comes to modern technology.

My recent talk in Redding California.

https://youtu.be/fVKKfcX9SXM

“Oregon Case, Dr Frank”

The SoS and County attorneys fought hard to keep me out of the witness stand, claiming that I was not qualified. (LoL)

So we had a separate mini-trial before my testimony where my qualifications were argued. The plaintiffs conceded that I was qualified in mathematics and statistics but not qualified to analyze elections because I did not have a degree in Political Science.

It took great discipline and restraint for me to refrain from saying in the stand that my degrees were in *real* science.

Nevertheless, much of my evidence of fraud made it into the formal court records.

And the silly Stanford Poli-Sci professor admitted that he’d been able to reproduce my work, but implied that my explanation was wrong.

I assured everyone in the court that math works the same in physics as it does in social sciences. At least it used to.

According to modern social “scientists,” math is racist.

Quoting Lincoln, “How many legs does a dog have if you call it’s tail a leg? Four. Calling the tail a leg doesn’t make it a leg.”

"Mathematics is Instinct"

Someone commented on one of my posts that mathematics is fundamental to our lives. I AGREE!

In fact, we understood and used math concepts even before we understood verbal language...

- As an infant is nursing, we learn the concept of "more."
- As an infant in nursing, we learn to count "one, two."

Our mothers are our first math teachers.

Oregon attorney Steve Joncus was the attorney on with me tonight on Frank Speech.

Patriot attorneys are rare and valuable to our movement!

They have several more important upcoming cases in the state of Oregon.

You can read about their lawsuits on freeoregon.us/lawsuits

If you want to support their work, please donate at freeoregon.us/donate

I just donated $100. Lawsuits like this are *critical* around the US, as they shine light on the corruption in our government and our elections, introduce formal evidence of fraud into the legal literature, and apply pressure on our election officials. This is causing them to make mistakes and embarrassing admissions confirming what those of us in the election reform movement have been claiming all along.

"QR Codes on Ballots"

Oregon ballots are not anonymous. This is illegal in the state of Oregon, yet their all-mail system permits identification of voters from ballots.

Proof:

P1) Printing companies receive large orders to print and mail ballots to Oregon voters.

P2) Printing companies are given lists of voter names and addresses, and which ballot style is to be used for each name and address.

P3) Printing companies print ballots with unique QR codes on each ballot. Thus, every printed ballot is unique.

P4) Printing companies print envelopes with unique addresses on them. Thus, every addressed envelope is unique.

P5a) Printing companies must place ballots with unique QR codes into the correct envelopes with unique addresses on them based upon the particular ballot style corresponding to a particular voter.

P5b) Printing companies cannot randomly place each unique ballot into a random envelope because there are specific ballot styles required for specific addresses.

C1) Printing companies must carefully and deliberately place each unique ballot into each unique envelope based upon the specific ballot style required for each specific address.

C2) If printing companies use an automated system to place unique ballots into unique envelopes, then the automated system could easily track how each unique ballot went into each unique envelope, and to which unique address.

C3) If printing companies use a manual system to place unique ballots into unique envelopes, then someone could manually keep track of which unique ballot went into each unique envelope, and to which unique address.

C4) Oregon ballots are not anonymous.

Please tell me what is wrong with this logic.
And... tell me how many other states use such systems.

And, since the ballot scanners can read the QR codes... the ballot scanners could also know who a voter was when their ballot was being scanned.

Wouldn't it be much easier to just Vote Amish?

All paper, no machines. Single-day with photo ID and hand-count.

"Oregon Case Take-Aways"

It was a very productive week in Oregon at the trial in Washington County! I testified in the case where the SoS and County Officials were demanding that a local citizen not publicly share an election system file that was given to him by county election officials (the backup file for the 2020 General Election).

Here are my take-aways:

1) Oregon election officials are technically incompetent (County Clerk, AD, SoS). They have little understanding of the systems they manage, and little understanding of how vulnerable and porous their network security is.

2) The Oregon AG admitted in formal court documents that their election systems are accessible wirelessly even when they are not connected to local networks.

3) The Washington County clerk (retiring after 33 yrs) testified that she could turn on the modems on her election machines (the ones that are supposedly "air-gapped") with a few mouse clicks and without a password. (After all, they are just an off-the-shelf Dell laptop.)

4) Washington County election networks are using older, long-ago-hacked, security protocols.

5) Social 'sciences' use different mathematics than standard mathematics and statistical methods. (Math is racist, and counting ballots can only be performed by someone who has been trained as a political scientist.)

6) Oregon voters are using ballots that are not anonymous.

7) Oregon election officials are afraid to let the public inspect their systems, files, and procedures. Instead of making their election systems more transparent and auditable, Oregon election officials are trying to hide everything. (Of course, that increases the public trust in their processes.)

After careful inspection of election systems, results, and dozens of meetings with election officials in 43 states, I am sad to say that most of the above points apply to every state.

We need to "Vote Amish." All paper, no machines. Single day of voting on paper ballots with photo ID and paper poll books. Hand counting and reporting of tallies in traceable, transparent, and auditable ways.

There has not been a single "full forensic audit" of the 2020 general election anywhere in the US.

Mostly just lots of fruitless screaming and yelling demanding them without the prerequisite evidence to obtain one.

Strategy matters.

Audits are not the objective, but a possible means to it.

I spend nearly every day of my life equipping citizens with the tools they need to take back our elections from the establishment, which is the goal.

We need to keep our eyes on the prize.

"Lexington, Massachusetts"

I spoke to a capacity crowd in Massachusetts this weekend!

Saturday night I presented most of the election stuff, and Sunday morning I gave my testimony, my science and faith talk, and a shorter talk on the election.

The audience was comprised of fabulous patriots, living precisely where the Black Robe Regiment led the battle where the first "shot heard 'round the world" was fired.

A battle to reclaim the liberty granted to us by God, and infringed upon by our tyrannical governments.

America is the last beacon of freedom in the world. I challenged the Lexington patriots to fire a second shot... sans bullets.

O Lord, hear our prayer.

"The FBI Took My Phone, Update"

The FBI tracked down Mike Lindell last Tuesday in a Hardee's drive through and took his phone.

The next day they stopped me exiting an airplane at the airport and took mine.

They had federal warrants to do this, issued from a Colorado federal court.

I still don't have mine back, but the agents promised me they would return it once they'd taken a forensic image of it.

Oh, the irony...

I don't have it back yet, but I've been out of town.

And I had to buy a new phone.

“What You Say Matters.”

A former employee sued me once. His claim was groundless, and he knew it. He said, “You’ll settle, because that’s the way the system works. I was sued this way once, so now it’s my turn.”

Well, I wasn’t gonna pay, based upon the principle of the thing. So we went to court.

My father just happened to be visiting me on the day of the trial, so he accompanied me to the courthouse.

While we were waiting outside the courtroom before the trial (while the attorneys haggled) my father confronted my former employee. He said, “My son is the most honest person I know.” And then proceeded to scold him for his lack of integrity.

The thing is, I could not care less about the small settlement I ended up paying.

What I will never forget as long as I live is hearing my father passionately telling someone else that I was the most honest person he knew.

Words are very, very powerful things.

And that single phrase has influenced my life ever since… I want to continue to be the most honest person my father has ever known.

Parents, think hard on this.

Your children will aspire to be what you challenge them to be; make sure they know the potential you see in them.

And speak to them, and about them accordingly.

And speak to others, and about them accordingly.

YouTube took my presentations in Shasta County down. Here they are on Rumble.

https://rumble.com/v1k4zlp-election-fraud-in-northern-california.html?fbclid=IwAR3iYfPrv-7d-V9baqh8heiZUSMpuFA6inIK8eSsUOTMPW5OU48HiaP_9YA

YouTube took my presentations in Shasta County down. Here they are on Rumble.

https://rumble.com/v1l097x-dr.-douglas-frank-visits-shasta-county.html