Every right wing woman should agree with “Repeal the 19th” because society would massively improve in the direction you purport to desire without any need of your vote whatsoever.

When women are allowed to vote as a bloc it always yields the same civilization destroying results: baby murder, population collapse, open borders and sodomy.

I don't think it's natural for women to support abortion. This issue used to be flipped, where men were not more likely to be pro choice and women more likely to be pro life.

Women are just easier to manipulate, so whatever the dominant culture wants... They'll go with en masse.

Theoretically, this does mean that in a society with a better ruling class, women would perhaps vote better than men. But I'd like to think that in a society with a better ruling class, voting wouldn't happen anyways, and so this is irrelevant. But even if that were true, they'd probably poll better!

*Edit* corrected my stupid typo. I've gotten more decent at catching those for channel posts, but missed that one

The abyss is calling them; do you really think telling them to resist those primordial urges will be effective?

For those who use app store version and can't see post

"imagine if the shoe were on the other foot," cries every rightoid who hasn't yet realized that he's on the losing team

If you helping other people is in any way tied to them treating you better afterwards, you're doing it wrong

Mike's Money tip of the day:
Install card readers ANYWHERE that people might enjoy existing for free.
*Only works in America
**Start in Ohio

This is the worst thing I have ever seen

Attention citizens!

Worried about the pitfalls of democracy? Introducing our revolutionary system: The Representative Republic™!

We've taken all your concerns and cleverly relocated them:

- Tyranny of the Majority
- - 51% determine policy? Horrifying! Won't someone please think of the children?
- - 51% determine who makes policy? Perfectly sensible!

- Uneducated Masses Making Decisions
- - Uninformed rabble choosing laws? Pure retardation. What sensible person would want this?
- - Uninformed rabble choosing lawmakers? A stroke of genius!

- Emotional Decision Making
- - People voting based on passions? Dangerous! Don't you desire a more rational mechanism?
- - People electing representatives based on passions? The pinnacle of reason!

- Manipulation by Demagogues
- - Charismatic figures swaying the masses on issues? Terrifying! Why would anybody trust the easily manipulated masses?
- - Charismatic figures having the ability to become candidates and thereby obtain a direct role in the very center of the process? The height of Western science! Heil Newton!

The Representative Republic™: Why solve issues when you can simply obscure them? It's just good governance!

Live video of me engaging in the valiant struggle to enlighten a particularly stubborn channel member — a poor, misguided soul — regarding the transcendent perfection of Neapolitan Pizza and save him from a lifetime of inferior pizza

24 hour ban on insults of other chat members in chat is in place now. Insulting another member, even if justified, will result in being muted for 72 hours.

Ban logical fallacies next!