This quote from John Lennon beautifully captures the reason you should be working on making this system obsolete rather than either trying to change it from within or trying to fight it.

What are the government trying to do with the people at the moment? Irritate them into violence….don’t fall for it.

H a v e A L o v e l y
S ☀️ n d a y

@astandintheparkuk

If corporate media promotes a social justice cause, it is not doing so for the sake of social justice, it is doing it to distract from oligarchic control via the strategy of divide & conquer.

@RobinMG

Mass noncompliance is what we need, and to get to that we need mass awareness, and to get to that, we all need to do whatever we can every day to raise awareness that everything the government, the councils, the corporations and the billionaire-funded NGOs are doing is not for their benefit, no matter how much the media deceive them it is.

Nature is pure but every man-made system is corrupt and utterly purposed to give very powerful interests even more power, wealth and control. The more you use it, pay for it, work for it, involve yourself with it, the longer it will continue.

'But if nobody paid tax, how would schools and hospitals get funded?'
Schools that retard children and hospitals that make you sick?

Government bureaucracies that exist solely to take your money and impose rules for no one's benefit except the very powerful?

The Earth gives freely, abundantly and repeatedly. We don't need to reinvent the wheel or money, just our whole attitude towards life, the economy and our places in it.

Everyone should be well off, and things should get easier as time goes on, as more and more skills are learned, and we get more efficient, more productive, quality improves and products last, while services are enjoyed by those who provide them.

Instead we have the opposite; i don't need to describe it because there is a worldwide collective groan from at least three-quarters of mankind, under the weight of an oppressive, corrupt system everywhere, underpinned by a fraudulent banking/money system which is entirely superfluous to a productive and prosperous economy.

I will repeat that: the central banking fiat money system is not only not necessary to a successful economy, but a massive and manufactured obstacle to it. Economies have been successful despite the leech of central banks and their worthless currencies - imagine all the people keeping the wealth of the natural world and their own work, instead of it all flowing upwards. And then passing it on to their children, without any of it being stolen. How many generations before everyone is well off?

Solutions can be found, or ironed out, but before any of that, a change in perspective and attitude is needed so that people see they are being robbed, and it would not take much to stop it.

Hence, we raise awareness every day in every way we can.
Have a good one

❤️
xxx
Darren

🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️

Time to start asking the important questions 'cos this very definitely ain't about 'health' - quite the opposite in fact!

@astandintheparkuk

Does anyone want to guess at how many excess deaths were caused by austerity measures that plunged people into poverty & denied them all sorts of services?

Then consider what the number of deaths could be over the next few years due to the current economic crisis & jab harms?

Next post gives figures ⬇️

Research led by the Glasgow Centre for Population Health and the University of Glasgow, published in October 2022 argued there was a “considerable body of evidence” that the austerity policies pursued by the UK government since 2010 were the main cause of a decline in the rate at which life expectancy has increased. The study characterised austerity as policies that lead to a reduction in spending on social security and public services. The authors of the study also argued the impact of austerity had disproportionately affected women in the UK because they are more likely to be dependent on social security and social services.

The paper cites several previous studies in support of these arguments, including a literature review published by the European Journal of Public Health, ennoscriptd ‘Austerity and health: the impact in the UK and Europe’ (October 2017). This study argued that austerity negatively impacted health by causing increased unemployment, poverty and homelessness. It also argued that austerity policies had a negative impact on healthcare services as a result of reduced funding. It concluded that the impact of these policies was greatest on people who were already vulnerable, such as those with precarious employment or housing or with existing health problems. It also said austerity was associated with worsening mental health, resulting in an increased risk of suicide.

The paper found that the austerity policies pursued by the UK government had had an “immensely damaging” impact on life expectancy overall.

It said approximately 335,000 additional deaths had occurred between 2012 and 2019 compared with what had been previously been predicted.

It also said the change in these trends was greater for people living in the 20% most deprived areas in England, Scotland and Wales.

You read that right. 335,000 excess deaths caused directly by Government.

There's a name for that. It's democide.

Above commentary taken from Lords library here

Report cited here

This is what humanity still needs to realise; exactly what we’re made of.

We have been programmed and brainwashed to believe that we are weak, but we are strong and resilient.

We have been convinced that we are powerless, but we are mighty and powerful.

We were lied about our own biology to make us feel like we are feeble, but we are resistant and self-healing.

We were told there’s nothing beyond the physical, that we are mere mortals on a short journey, but we are eternal souls.

We were deceived about everything; our nature, our history, our creativity, our purpose, our infinity, our connection, our energy, our love… but the biggest lie, the greatest deceipt, the most evil fallacy of all, was to make us believe that God is not within us. That we are not made of his essence, that we are therefore not one in origin, that we are nothing instead of everything, that we are mere drops in the ocean instead of the entire ocean in a drop.

It’s time to realise who we are and what we’re made of and start acting accordingly. The power and love of God is within us, there is nothing we cannot do.
❤️❤️❤️

https://news.1rj.ru/str/LauraAbolichannel

From my colleague in Australia, Elizabeth Hart, independent researcher.
Looks like Australian injectors do not have liability protection, which they do in several countries, especially USA.
If correct, gene-based injection victims or their relatives ought to seek redress in court. It could be awkward for the authorities. They can’t protect individuals from their legal failings. Yet they don’t want a precedent to be set.
Best wishes
Mike


Hi Mike - Charles Kovess kindly invited me onto his TNT Mind Medicine program recently to discuss the Covid vax debacle, starts around seven minutes in on this link: https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/elizabeth-hart-on-mind-medicine-with-charles-kovess-24-june-2023/ (Charles' intro to his program also includes reference to other interesting topics...)


We had a broad-ranging discussion on the disastrous Covid vaccination issue, particularly about voluntary informed consent in Australia and vaccination mandates. 

I’ve transcribed the last bit of our discussion, during which Charles highlights ‘valid consent’ - please see trannoscript excerpt below.

Our discussion referred to my recent notification/complaint to AHPRA, the regulator of medical practitioners, about Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the violation of voluntary informed consent via Covid vaccination mandates, at the behest of then Australian prime minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet, see: Notification to AHPRA re medical practitioner Paul Kelly... 16 June 2023.

A catastrophe is looming for the medical profession when people wake up to what's been done to them via vaccination mandates - vaccination without valid/voluntary informed consent... 

Please see trannoscript excerpt below.

Elizabeth

Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net 

TNT Radio discussion excerpt:

Charles Kovess: We've got four minutes left, what about the liability of doctors now, what about people that have been harmed by these Covid jabs? And with no informed consent. What's your advice to people who have either lost loved ones, or who have been, had serious adverse events? What's the liability of the doctors?

Elizabeth Hart: Well I mean it's clear, they're supposed to be getting informed consent, we've got that in writing, I've got it in writing from the government. Because my colleague Emma McArthur and I, we asked for clarification from both the Morrison Government, and now the Albanese Government - do they have protection? Because that's what the Morrison Government announced. And they had to confess that, no, they don't have it. There's a vaccine claims scheme, but the individual practitioners do not have liability protection. Now the way the courts are at the moment, which is highly biased and skewed - what we need is, we need this out in the court of public opinion. For people to find out what is going on, about what we've been talking about today, about how informed consent has been trashed. That's what we need, to get this talked about. And I've written to the medical insurers, as well as these doctors' organisations, and I've made it clear to them what's going on. These people - I think it's negligence that they're just ignoring what I'm saying.

Charles Kovess: Elizabeth, I want to take it one step further, ok. And here's an important distinction that I bring to your attention, and to listeners' attention. A patient can only be jabbed if they have given informed, voluntary informed consent. But, a doctor is only allowed to jab someone if they have valid consent, ok. An important distinction in terms. So as a matter of law I'm telling you this. So, a valid consent. So, first the patient has to give informed consent. And the patient might say, "look, I'm here, I know this is risky, but I'm having it" and then he says, or she says, to the doctor, "but I'm here under coercion...I'm here under coercion". Now suddenly, that means that the doctor has not got valid consent.

 Now, that is where I urge every single person who told their doctor or their health professional that they're here under coercion, that they should complain to AHPRA about that injecting person. Because they broke the law applying to them - they're not allowed to just jab someone without valid consent.

Elizabeth Hart: That's the major point - once they knew the person was there under a mandate, they should have stood back and said "I can't do this under a mandate".

Charles Kovess: “I can't do this by law. I cannot do this.”

Elizabeth Hart: But this is important, if we can just fit this in, because it's really important. We're talking about doctors here - it's often not going to be doctors. It's often going to be nurses and pharmacists. And this is a much more subtle thing that we've got to get into, to think about Rogers v Whitaker. This is not a medical expert discussing a medical intervention with a patient. These people aren't 'patients'. Most of the people were not going to be badly affected by Covid. They've been called upon and dictated to by governments and employers and what have you to front up in front of a practitioner. This is complicated now. We've got to say these practitioners have been sort of menaced into giving these interventions themselves. AHPRA has threatened these practitioners not to question anything. This has all got to be teased out for the public. It's really quite complicated. But those practitioners are not qualified to get informed consent, because they're not, nobody is an expert in Covid, and nobody is an expert in Covid injections.

Charles Kovess: Well, well they could arguably say, it's informed, "I know I'm taking the risk, but I have to keep my job". As soon as they say "I have to keep my job", then there's no valid consent from the doctor's perspective. Now, we've got one more minute, what do you, in fact I've got 30 seconds with you, what do you say about these public servants, these bureaucrats, who refuse to answer your questions? Or ministers of government! They're our servants Elizabeth, how dare they not answer your letters!

Elizabeth Hart: They've got to be accountable. And I'm coming for them. I'm going after the individuals who are accountable. That's what we've got to do. Hold them to account. 

Charles Kovess: Absolutely. Everybody, we have to hold them to account. And these, the fraud that's been perpetrated on humanity is so egregious, we all have to decide - do not comply, because these government bodies, these public servants are not acting lawfully.

Do you see it, yet?