Forwarded from 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐤𝟒𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐒𝐄𝐋𝐅
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
Does anyone want to guess at how many excess deaths were caused by austerity measures that plunged people into poverty & denied them all sorts of services?
Then consider what the number of deaths could be over the next few years due to the current economic crisis & jab harms?
Next post gives figures ⬇️
Then consider what the number of deaths could be over the next few years due to the current economic crisis & jab harms?
Next post gives figures ⬇️
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
Research led by the Glasgow Centre for Population Health and the University of Glasgow, published in October 2022 argued there was a “considerable body of evidence” that the austerity policies pursued by the UK government since 2010 were the main cause of a decline in the rate at which life expectancy has increased. The study characterised austerity as policies that lead to a reduction in spending on social security and public services. The authors of the study also argued the impact of austerity had disproportionately affected women in the UK because they are more likely to be dependent on social security and social services.
The paper cites several previous studies in support of these arguments, including a literature review published by the European Journal of Public Health, ennoscriptd ‘Austerity and health: the impact in the UK and Europe’ (October 2017). This study argued that austerity negatively impacted health by causing increased unemployment, poverty and homelessness. It also argued that austerity policies had a negative impact on healthcare services as a result of reduced funding. It concluded that the impact of these policies was greatest on people who were already vulnerable, such as those with precarious employment or housing or with existing health problems. It also said austerity was associated with worsening mental health, resulting in an increased risk of suicide.
The paper found that the austerity policies pursued by the UK government had had an “immensely damaging” impact on life expectancy overall.
It said approximately 335,000 additional deaths had occurred between 2012 and 2019 compared with what had been previously been predicted.
It also said the change in these trends was greater for people living in the 20% most deprived areas in England, Scotland and Wales.
You read that right. 335,000 excess deaths caused directly by Government.
There's a name for that. It's democide.
Above commentary taken from Lords library here
Report cited here
The paper cites several previous studies in support of these arguments, including a literature review published by the European Journal of Public Health, ennoscriptd ‘Austerity and health: the impact in the UK and Europe’ (October 2017). This study argued that austerity negatively impacted health by causing increased unemployment, poverty and homelessness. It also argued that austerity policies had a negative impact on healthcare services as a result of reduced funding. It concluded that the impact of these policies was greatest on people who were already vulnerable, such as those with precarious employment or housing or with existing health problems. It also said austerity was associated with worsening mental health, resulting in an increased risk of suicide.
The paper found that the austerity policies pursued by the UK government had had an “immensely damaging” impact on life expectancy overall.
It said approximately 335,000 additional deaths had occurred between 2012 and 2019 compared with what had been previously been predicted.
It also said the change in these trends was greater for people living in the 20% most deprived areas in England, Scotland and Wales.
You read that right. 335,000 excess deaths caused directly by Government.
There's a name for that. It's democide.
Above commentary taken from Lords library here
Report cited here
House of Lords Library
Mortality rates among men and women: impact of austerity
Improvements in life expectancy have slowed in the UK since the early 2010s. A recent study argued there have been over 300,000 excess deaths during this period, when comparing trends in life expectancy with those from before 2011. The authors of the study…
👍1
Forwarded from LauraAboli (Laura Aboli)
This is what humanity still needs to realise; exactly what we’re made of.
We have been programmed and brainwashed to believe that we are weak, but we are strong and resilient.
We have been convinced that we are powerless, but we are mighty and powerful.
We were lied about our own biology to make us feel like we are feeble, but we are resistant and self-healing.
We were told there’s nothing beyond the physical, that we are mere mortals on a short journey, but we are eternal souls.
We were deceived about everything; our nature, our history, our creativity, our purpose, our infinity, our connection, our energy, our love… but the biggest lie, the greatest deceipt, the most evil fallacy of all, was to make us believe that God is not within us. That we are not made of his essence, that we are therefore not one in origin, that we are nothing instead of everything, that we are mere drops in the ocean instead of the entire ocean in a drop.
It’s time to realise who we are and what we’re made of and start acting accordingly. The power and love of God is within us, there is nothing we cannot do.
❤️❤️❤️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LauraAbolichannel
We have been programmed and brainwashed to believe that we are weak, but we are strong and resilient.
We have been convinced that we are powerless, but we are mighty and powerful.
We were lied about our own biology to make us feel like we are feeble, but we are resistant and self-healing.
We were told there’s nothing beyond the physical, that we are mere mortals on a short journey, but we are eternal souls.
We were deceived about everything; our nature, our history, our creativity, our purpose, our infinity, our connection, our energy, our love… but the biggest lie, the greatest deceipt, the most evil fallacy of all, was to make us believe that God is not within us. That we are not made of his essence, that we are therefore not one in origin, that we are nothing instead of everything, that we are mere drops in the ocean instead of the entire ocean in a drop.
It’s time to realise who we are and what we’re made of and start acting accordingly. The power and love of God is within us, there is nothing we cannot do.
❤️❤️❤️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LauraAbolichannel
❤1
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
From my colleague in Australia, Elizabeth Hart, independent researcher.
Looks like Australian injectors do not have liability protection, which they do in several countries, especially USA.
If correct, gene-based injection victims or their relatives ought to seek redress in court. It could be awkward for the authorities. They can’t protect individuals from their legal failings. Yet they don’t want a precedent to be set.
Best wishes
Mike
Hi Mike - Charles Kovess kindly invited me onto his TNT Mind Medicine program recently to discuss the Covid vax debacle, starts around seven minutes in on this link: https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/elizabeth-hart-on-mind-medicine-with-charles-kovess-24-june-2023/ (Charles' intro to his program also includes reference to other interesting topics...)
We had a broad-ranging discussion on the disastrous Covid vaccination issue, particularly about voluntary informed consent in Australia and vaccination mandates.
I’ve transcribed the last bit of our discussion, during which Charles highlights ‘valid consent’ - please see trannoscript excerpt below.
Our discussion referred to my recent notification/complaint to AHPRA, the regulator of medical practitioners, about Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the violation of voluntary informed consent via Covid vaccination mandates, at the behest of then Australian prime minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet, see: Notification to AHPRA re medical practitioner Paul Kelly... 16 June 2023.
A catastrophe is looming for the medical profession when people wake up to what's been done to them via vaccination mandates - vaccination without valid/voluntary informed consent...
Please see trannoscript excerpt below.
Elizabeth
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
TNT Radio discussion excerpt:
Charles Kovess: We've got four minutes left, what about the liability of doctors now, what about people that have been harmed by these Covid jabs? And with no informed consent. What's your advice to people who have either lost loved ones, or who have been, had serious adverse events? What's the liability of the doctors?
Elizabeth Hart: Well I mean it's clear, they're supposed to be getting informed consent, we've got that in writing, I've got it in writing from the government. Because my colleague Emma McArthur and I, we asked for clarification from both the Morrison Government, and now the Albanese Government - do they have protection? Because that's what the Morrison Government announced. And they had to confess that, no, they don't have it. There's a vaccine claims scheme, but the individual practitioners do not have liability protection. Now the way the courts are at the moment, which is highly biased and skewed - what we need is, we need this out in the court of public opinion. For people to find out what is going on, about what we've been talking about today, about how informed consent has been trashed. That's what we need, to get this talked about. And I've written to the medical insurers, as well as these doctors' organisations, and I've made it clear to them what's going on. These people - I think it's negligence that they're just ignoring what I'm saying.
Charles Kovess: Elizabeth, I want to take it one step further, ok. And here's an important distinction that I bring to your attention, and to listeners' attention. A patient can only be jabbed if they have given informed, voluntary informed consent. But, a doctor is only allowed to jab someone if they have valid consent, ok. An important distinction in terms. So as a matter of law I'm telling you this. So, a valid consent. So, first the patient has to give informed consent. And the patient might say, "look, I'm here, I know this is risky, but I'm having it" and then he says, or she says, to the doctor, "but I'm here under coercion...I'm here under coercion". Now suddenly, that means that the doctor has not got valid consent.
Looks like Australian injectors do not have liability protection, which they do in several countries, especially USA.
If correct, gene-based injection victims or their relatives ought to seek redress in court. It could be awkward for the authorities. They can’t protect individuals from their legal failings. Yet they don’t want a precedent to be set.
Best wishes
Mike
Hi Mike - Charles Kovess kindly invited me onto his TNT Mind Medicine program recently to discuss the Covid vax debacle, starts around seven minutes in on this link: https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/elizabeth-hart-on-mind-medicine-with-charles-kovess-24-june-2023/ (Charles' intro to his program also includes reference to other interesting topics...)
We had a broad-ranging discussion on the disastrous Covid vaccination issue, particularly about voluntary informed consent in Australia and vaccination mandates.
I’ve transcribed the last bit of our discussion, during which Charles highlights ‘valid consent’ - please see trannoscript excerpt below.
Our discussion referred to my recent notification/complaint to AHPRA, the regulator of medical practitioners, about Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the violation of voluntary informed consent via Covid vaccination mandates, at the behest of then Australian prime minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet, see: Notification to AHPRA re medical practitioner Paul Kelly... 16 June 2023.
A catastrophe is looming for the medical profession when people wake up to what's been done to them via vaccination mandates - vaccination without valid/voluntary informed consent...
Please see trannoscript excerpt below.
Elizabeth
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
TNT Radio discussion excerpt:
Charles Kovess: We've got four minutes left, what about the liability of doctors now, what about people that have been harmed by these Covid jabs? And with no informed consent. What's your advice to people who have either lost loved ones, or who have been, had serious adverse events? What's the liability of the doctors?
Elizabeth Hart: Well I mean it's clear, they're supposed to be getting informed consent, we've got that in writing, I've got it in writing from the government. Because my colleague Emma McArthur and I, we asked for clarification from both the Morrison Government, and now the Albanese Government - do they have protection? Because that's what the Morrison Government announced. And they had to confess that, no, they don't have it. There's a vaccine claims scheme, but the individual practitioners do not have liability protection. Now the way the courts are at the moment, which is highly biased and skewed - what we need is, we need this out in the court of public opinion. For people to find out what is going on, about what we've been talking about today, about how informed consent has been trashed. That's what we need, to get this talked about. And I've written to the medical insurers, as well as these doctors' organisations, and I've made it clear to them what's going on. These people - I think it's negligence that they're just ignoring what I'm saying.
Charles Kovess: Elizabeth, I want to take it one step further, ok. And here's an important distinction that I bring to your attention, and to listeners' attention. A patient can only be jabbed if they have given informed, voluntary informed consent. But, a doctor is only allowed to jab someone if they have valid consent, ok. An important distinction in terms. So as a matter of law I'm telling you this. So, a valid consent. So, first the patient has to give informed consent. And the patient might say, "look, I'm here, I know this is risky, but I'm having it" and then he says, or she says, to the doctor, "but I'm here under coercion...I'm here under coercion". Now suddenly, that means that the doctor has not got valid consent.
Podbean
Login to your Podbean Account | Podbean
Log into Podbean to start podcasting. Get everything you need for a successful podcast.
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Now, that is where I urge every single person who told their doctor or their health professional that they're here under coercion, that they should complain to AHPRA about that injecting person. Because they broke the law applying to them - they're not allowed to just jab someone without valid consent.
Elizabeth Hart: That's the major point - once they knew the person was there under a mandate, they should have stood back and said "I can't do this under a mandate".
Charles Kovess: “I can't do this by law. I cannot do this.”
Elizabeth Hart: But this is important, if we can just fit this in, because it's really important. We're talking about doctors here - it's often not going to be doctors. It's often going to be nurses and pharmacists. And this is a much more subtle thing that we've got to get into, to think about Rogers v Whitaker. This is not a medical expert discussing a medical intervention with a patient. These people aren't 'patients'. Most of the people were not going to be badly affected by Covid. They've been called upon and dictated to by governments and employers and what have you to front up in front of a practitioner. This is complicated now. We've got to say these practitioners have been sort of menaced into giving these interventions themselves. AHPRA has threatened these practitioners not to question anything. This has all got to be teased out for the public. It's really quite complicated. But those practitioners are not qualified to get informed consent, because they're not, nobody is an expert in Covid, and nobody is an expert in Covid injections.
Charles Kovess: Well, well they could arguably say, it's informed, "I know I'm taking the risk, but I have to keep my job". As soon as they say "I have to keep my job", then there's no valid consent from the doctor's perspective. Now, we've got one more minute, what do you, in fact I've got 30 seconds with you, what do you say about these public servants, these bureaucrats, who refuse to answer your questions? Or ministers of government! They're our servants Elizabeth, how dare they not answer your letters!
Elizabeth Hart: They've got to be accountable. And I'm coming for them. I'm going after the individuals who are accountable. That's what we've got to do. Hold them to account.
Charles Kovess: Absolutely. Everybody, we have to hold them to account. And these, the fraud that's been perpetrated on humanity is so egregious, we all have to decide - do not comply, because these government bodies, these public servants are not acting lawfully.
Elizabeth Hart: That's the major point - once they knew the person was there under a mandate, they should have stood back and said "I can't do this under a mandate".
Charles Kovess: “I can't do this by law. I cannot do this.”
Elizabeth Hart: But this is important, if we can just fit this in, because it's really important. We're talking about doctors here - it's often not going to be doctors. It's often going to be nurses and pharmacists. And this is a much more subtle thing that we've got to get into, to think about Rogers v Whitaker. This is not a medical expert discussing a medical intervention with a patient. These people aren't 'patients'. Most of the people were not going to be badly affected by Covid. They've been called upon and dictated to by governments and employers and what have you to front up in front of a practitioner. This is complicated now. We've got to say these practitioners have been sort of menaced into giving these interventions themselves. AHPRA has threatened these practitioners not to question anything. This has all got to be teased out for the public. It's really quite complicated. But those practitioners are not qualified to get informed consent, because they're not, nobody is an expert in Covid, and nobody is an expert in Covid injections.
Charles Kovess: Well, well they could arguably say, it's informed, "I know I'm taking the risk, but I have to keep my job". As soon as they say "I have to keep my job", then there's no valid consent from the doctor's perspective. Now, we've got one more minute, what do you, in fact I've got 30 seconds with you, what do you say about these public servants, these bureaucrats, who refuse to answer your questions? Or ministers of government! They're our servants Elizabeth, how dare they not answer your letters!
Elizabeth Hart: They've got to be accountable. And I'm coming for them. I'm going after the individuals who are accountable. That's what we've got to do. Hold them to account.
Charles Kovess: Absolutely. Everybody, we have to hold them to account. And these, the fraud that's been perpetrated on humanity is so egregious, we all have to decide - do not comply, because these government bodies, these public servants are not acting lawfully.
Forwarded from Chief Nerd
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥 Robert F. Kennedy Jr Calls Out Bill Gates & Peter Hotez at PorcFest 2023 for Their 'Pump-and-Dump' Scheme
"That same week Bill Gates, who was overseeing this [Event 201] simulation, bought 1.1 Million shares of BioNTech vaccine which later became the Pfizer vaccine. He then sold almost all that stock, 87%, two years later at a $242,000,000 profit. And a week after that he announced the vaccine didn't work. That's what you call a 'pump-and-dump' scheme."
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1672949155998707713
https://rumble.com/v2wd3qo--rfk-jr-calls-out-bill-gates-and-peter-hotez-at-porcfest-2023-for-their-pum.html
@ChiefNerd
"That same week Bill Gates, who was overseeing this [Event 201] simulation, bought 1.1 Million shares of BioNTech vaccine which later became the Pfizer vaccine. He then sold almost all that stock, 87%, two years later at a $242,000,000 profit. And a week after that he announced the vaccine didn't work. That's what you call a 'pump-and-dump' scheme."
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1672949155998707713
https://rumble.com/v2wd3qo--rfk-jr-calls-out-bill-gates-and-peter-hotez-at-porcfest-2023-for-their-pum.html
@ChiefNerd
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
Don't give up!
You can begin to exit the system and start reclaiming and living in sovereignty. It just takes a little effort before it becomes natural.
Top tips to promote living in freedom:
1. Use cash as much as possible and use it locally. Not only does it help you budget but it keeps cash king
2. Commit to talking control and personal responsibility for your own health. Take some exercise, meditate, get enough sleep, and watch what you put into and onto your body. The less interaction you have with pharma sponsored medical agencies the better.
3. Look for alternative health practitioners to support you if you do ever become unwell, or better still study to become one yourself. Consider homeopathy, herbalism, naturopathy, functional medicine, German new medicine, essential oil remedies and bach flower remedies to name but a few.
4. Connect with and buy from or use the services of freedom supporting groups. There are many food alliances now, as well as the peoples health alliance, that can connect you to like minded individuals, and alternative health practitioners.
5. Form your own groups or connections where you can. Even if you only find one other like minded person near you, its better than being alone. Try to grow your connections into a community and then consider trading with each other. You can trade skills, food, services, kindness credits etc.
6. Grow as much of your own food as you can. Gardening is good exercise, therapeutic, and rewarding. Knowing where your food has come from and what is in it, is very important to your health.
7. If you have children and are able to home school, do. Schools are indoctrination camps, no matter how "nice" you think the teachers are. I am proud to say that we are the only local business that I know of that offers staff flexibility in their roles to enable them to homeschool children. If you have a business, consider such a flexibility initiative too. Let's support each other.
8. Be a conscious consumer. Stop giving money to Amazon because it is convenient. Convenience is the death knell of freedom. These people only understand money and control so starve them of both. Also, break free of the marketing and brain washing that is designed to make us keep purchasing stuff we do not need. Lots of things can be upcycled or refurbished/repurposed.
9. Learn a new skill that might be useful to you. This could be sewing, foraging, archery, cooking, woodworking, fixing engines, repairing roofs. Anything! You get the idea. In addition to this have a basic store of items that would be needed in a short term worst case scenario such as batteries, oil lamps, tinned food, first aid kit, basic camping equipment, extra water and purification methods, a store of fuel, a generator if you can afford one, spare blankets etc. Having these things simply means you don't need to worry about "what if".
10. Free yourself of debt as much as you can. Do you really need that subnoscription to Netflix. Do you really need satellite TV or any TV at all? Have you cancelled your TV licence? Go through your bank statement and commit to ending payments for things that you simply do not need in order to live an enjoyable life, especially if those payments are to companies supporting the current state of affairs.
Finally, don't forget to smile and live. Most of the point of what they are doing is to strip every bit of joy out of your life. You can easily stop that from happening by finding joy in the things that you do, and doing things that bring you joy.
You can begin to exit the system and start reclaiming and living in sovereignty. It just takes a little effort before it becomes natural.
Top tips to promote living in freedom:
1. Use cash as much as possible and use it locally. Not only does it help you budget but it keeps cash king
2. Commit to talking control and personal responsibility for your own health. Take some exercise, meditate, get enough sleep, and watch what you put into and onto your body. The less interaction you have with pharma sponsored medical agencies the better.
3. Look for alternative health practitioners to support you if you do ever become unwell, or better still study to become one yourself. Consider homeopathy, herbalism, naturopathy, functional medicine, German new medicine, essential oil remedies and bach flower remedies to name but a few.
4. Connect with and buy from or use the services of freedom supporting groups. There are many food alliances now, as well as the peoples health alliance, that can connect you to like minded individuals, and alternative health practitioners.
5. Form your own groups or connections where you can. Even if you only find one other like minded person near you, its better than being alone. Try to grow your connections into a community and then consider trading with each other. You can trade skills, food, services, kindness credits etc.
6. Grow as much of your own food as you can. Gardening is good exercise, therapeutic, and rewarding. Knowing where your food has come from and what is in it, is very important to your health.
7. If you have children and are able to home school, do. Schools are indoctrination camps, no matter how "nice" you think the teachers are. I am proud to say that we are the only local business that I know of that offers staff flexibility in their roles to enable them to homeschool children. If you have a business, consider such a flexibility initiative too. Let's support each other.
8. Be a conscious consumer. Stop giving money to Amazon because it is convenient. Convenience is the death knell of freedom. These people only understand money and control so starve them of both. Also, break free of the marketing and brain washing that is designed to make us keep purchasing stuff we do not need. Lots of things can be upcycled or refurbished/repurposed.
9. Learn a new skill that might be useful to you. This could be sewing, foraging, archery, cooking, woodworking, fixing engines, repairing roofs. Anything! You get the idea. In addition to this have a basic store of items that would be needed in a short term worst case scenario such as batteries, oil lamps, tinned food, first aid kit, basic camping equipment, extra water and purification methods, a store of fuel, a generator if you can afford one, spare blankets etc. Having these things simply means you don't need to worry about "what if".
10. Free yourself of debt as much as you can. Do you really need that subnoscription to Netflix. Do you really need satellite TV or any TV at all? Have you cancelled your TV licence? Go through your bank statement and commit to ending payments for things that you simply do not need in order to live an enjoyable life, especially if those payments are to companies supporting the current state of affairs.
Finally, don't forget to smile and live. Most of the point of what they are doing is to strip every bit of joy out of your life. You can easily stop that from happening by finding joy in the things that you do, and doing things that bring you joy.
👍1
Forwarded from The People’s Health Alliance UK
We saw what happened 3 years ago.
Many of us felt attacked and our health threatened.
Don’t feel like that again. Do what you must to protect yourself and your family.
We’ve got solutions.
Find out more now and feel content you are supported. 🌟🔥🌟
my-medical-choice.org
Please remember to use referral code ‘PHAMMC’ when signing up.
Many of us felt attacked and our health threatened.
Don’t feel like that again. Do what you must to protect yourself and your family.
We’ve got solutions.
Find out more now and feel content you are supported. 🌟🔥🌟
my-medical-choice.org
Please remember to use referral code ‘PHAMMC’ when signing up.
Forwarded from Tommy Robinson News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Andrew Bridgen tried to get his “Child Protection Bill” in motion in parliament which seeks to prevent children from being socially "transitioned" without their parents knowledge in school.
Not only did Labour block it, many "conservatives" did too!
Calling Andrew a "conspiracy theorist" and "far right" as they went, absolutely sickening!
Not only did Labour block it, many "conservatives" did too!
Calling Andrew a "conspiracy theorist" and "far right" as they went, absolutely sickening!
Department of Health and Social Care - Tweet - https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1673292524889284608?s=20
See comments and replies....
See comments and replies....