So if a woman doesn’t serve her husband, but instead he acts like a servant to her, then this means that she is the protector and maintainer over him.” [End Quote]

He also said:

"For indeed Allāh obligated him to spend on her, to clothe her, and to provide her with a place of dwelling in exchange for his enjoying her and her serving him, as well as what the habits of the spouses call for. Likewise, the binding marriage agreements require that the spouses live in kindness. And kindness means a woman’s serving (her husband) and taking care of the inner affairs of the household.”

^*^*^*SALAT ALDUHA made simple ^*^*^*

-Reward: equals 360 charities
-Minimum: 2 units (Rakat)
-Maximum : unlimited (Rakat)
-Timing: from approximately 10-15 minutes after sunrise to approximately 10 minutes before Thuhur.
-How: every 2 units (Rakat) independent with a Tasleem
-Other names: salah of Al-Awwabin is Salat al-Duha

Ayisha (Radia Allahu Anha) used to pray 8 units (Rakat) for SALAT ALDUHA and say:
If both my parents were to return to life, I would not leave SALAT ALDUHA to go see them!

(Shaykh Ahmad added:)
I try to keep the statuses short and simple so that it will not confuse anyone, however many asked:

Isn't there a limit of 8 rakat on Salat al-Duha?

Some said 8 is the limit and other Ulama said 12, that is a educated ijtihad by Ulama and there is no proof to limit it.

The correct opinion is there is {NO} limit as I stated.

-Ishaq Ibn Rahawieh said it was narrated to us that the Prophet (salah Allahu alyhi wasalam) performed 2 rakat sometimes, and other days he performed 4 and sometimes it was 8 to make it easy on this Ummah.

Saeed ibn Mansoor narrated that Abu Saeed Akhudry used to to keep offering his duha until near Duhur.

In another narration in the book of Zuhud, Alhassan Albasry said Abu Saeed was among the most who used to pursue the ibadat and used to keep offering Duha for nearly the entire duha time (meaning from near sunrise to near Thuhur).

Saeed Ibn Mansoor said Aiysha (radia Allahu Anha) used to close her door and offer her Duha for a very long time.

A man asked al-Hassan al-Basry: Did the Sahabah perform Duha?
He said: Yes, some prayed 2, some prayed 4 and some kept on doing more until near Thuhur.

al-Suyooty said Ibrahim narrated that a man asked al-Aswad: how many do I pray for Thuhur?
He said: as many as you would like.

Abu Naeem in al-Hulieh narrated that Abd Allah ibn Ghalib used to perform the duha 100 Rakaa.

Al-Hafith Al-Iraqi in his elucidation on (al-Tirmithy) said I never read from a single Sahabah or tabeen that they limited the Dhuaa.

Al-Bajy from the Malikeih in his elucidation on Muwata Malik said: Salat al-Duha is not limited, one should do as much as he is able.

Stronger than all that is the hadith in Saheeh Muslim (The prophet sallah allahu aleih wasalam used to pray salat al-Duha 4 and would add whatever Allah wills)

Shaykh Ahmad Jibril حفظه الله

EXCUSE OF IGNORANCE?

There are many who have overstepped their boundaries, declaring some of the giants of this religion as Kuffār, more specifically, claiming that they “Give the excuse of ignorance.”

Nowadays, the connotation of such a statement, is that of “excusing SHIRK with ignorance.” The Scholars of the past however, and the Scholars of Najd - who revived the Da’wah of Tawheed - discuss this matter in a more holistic way. When scholars such as Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (رحمه الله تعالى) discuss giving the excuse of ignorance - those individuals who can barely recite the Fātiha, take their statements out of context and misapply it. Excuse of ignorance is given in matters of Halal and Haram, and even then, it has conditions that have to be met. Again, when the scholars discuss giving an excuse of ignorance, they are referring to that which is known in the Shari’ah as Halal or Haram, NOT Major Shirk. Major Shirk, there’s no excuse for it - ignorant or not.

Shaykh Ahmad (حفظه الله تعالى) explains it eloquently and concisely, in the following two clips - which we highly recommend you watch and internalize. Please notice the discrepancy in the length of the videos. When discussing the matter where Excuse of Ignorance is given pertaining to matters of Halal and Haram, it’s nearly a 10 minute video, whereas the discussion of Excuse of Ignorance pertaining to Major Shirk is roughly 40 seconds - the matter is CLEAR.

والحمدلله رب العالمين

PART I: https://youtu.be/Q08OoXnLgfc
PART II: https://youtu.be/r_-bWFlNaFc

_________

t.me/explanationof40hadith

Rights of the Husband #6 - Disciplining

Allah has instructed men to live with their wives honorably, and to treat them kindly, and He specifically enjoined this upon a man, even if he hates his wife, when He said:

وَعَاشِرُوهُنَّ بِٱلْمَعْرُوفِ ۚ فَإِن كَرِهْتُمُوهُنَّ فَعَسَىٰٓ أَن تَكْرَهُوا۟ شَيْـًٔا وَيَجْعَلَ ٱللَّهُ فِيهِ خَيْرًا كَثِيرًا

“and live with them honorably. If you dislike them, it may be that you dislike a thing and Allāh brings through it a great deal of good” [an-Nisā’]

The Messenger ﷺ also emphasized the rights of the women greatly and admonished men to beware regarding their treatment to women. He ﷺ said: “Fear Allāh with regard to women, for you have taken them as a trust from Allāh and intimacy with them has become permissible to you by the words of Allāh. [Muslim]

Allāh also says:

وَلَهُنَّ مِثْلُ ٱلَّذِى عَلَيْهِنَّ بِٱلْمَعْرُوفِ ۚ وَلِلرِّجَالِ عَلَيْهِنَّ دَرَجَةٌ ۗ وَٱللَّهُ عَزِيزٌ حَكِيمٌ

And they (women) have rights (over their husbands) similar (to those of their husbands) over them, but men have a degree (of responsibility) over them [al-Baqarah]

Ibn 'Abbās (رضي الله عنه) said concerning the Āyah: It is their (womens) right to good companionship and proper treatment on the part of their husbands, and their duty to obey and do what their husbands tell them to do.

Ibn Zayd said: Fear Allāh with regard to them (wives) just as they should fear Allāh with regard to you.

Allāh عز و جل has made men leaders and maintainers of women, and therefore He has given them a degree of authority over them. Included within this authority is the right to discipline them as needed. In His great wisdom, Allāh has revealed that discipline of a woman should be done in stages. He سبحانه says:

وَٱلَّـٰتِى تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَٱهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِى ٱلْمَضَاجِعِ وَٱضْرِبُوهُنَّ ۖ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلَا تَبْغُوا۟ عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلًا ۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا

“As to those women on whose part you see ill‑conduct, admonish them (first), (next) refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allāh is Ever Most High, Most Great” [an-Nisa’]

So when a woman is wrongfully disobedient to her husband or neglecting his rights, he has permission to discipline her, firstly through verbal admonition, and if that is ineffective, he forsakes her bed, and if that proves ineffective, he is permitted to lightly strike her as a last resort.

"Lightly" must be emphasized here, as many use this Āyah wrongfully to commit oppression against their wives. Beating her harshly and violently, or striking her with a force that would cause her any pain or injury, is totally impermissible and Islām does not condone it.

Al-Hasan al-Basri said about the Āyah: this means that it should not cause pain.

Ibn ‘Abbās (رضي الله عنه) said: Forsake her in her bed, and if she mends her ways (this is good), but if not, then Allāh has given permission for you to hit her in a way that is not painful.

‘Atā’ said: I said to Ibn ‘Abbās, what is the kind of hitting that is not harsh? He said, Hitting with a siwāk and the like. (The siwāk is a small, thin stick used to clean teeth)

The purpose of striking is not to release anger or to take revenge on the wife, but rather to make her realize the severity of her transgression. For most women, harsh words often do this job, or being shunned in bed, as women are very soft and such measures affect their hearts greatly. In cases where those measures have no effect, a light strike is permitted.

Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Rahmān al-Sa’di (رحمه الله) said:

“As to those women on whose part you see ill‑conduct” means: who refuse to obey their husbands in word or in deed; he may discipline her by using the lightest means then the next lightest.

“admonish them” means: explain the ruling of Allāh with regard to obeying and disobeying the husband, and encourage her to be obedient, and warn her against disobedience. If that produces the desired results, all well and good, otherwise the husband should refuse to share her bed, by not sleeping with her or being intimate with her, to whatever extent will produce the desired result. Otherwise he may hit her in a way that is not severe and that does not cause injury. If one of these methods produces the desired result, then

فَلَا تَبْغُوا۟ عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلًا “seek not against them means (of annoyance)” i.e., you have got what you wanted, so stop pursuing rebuking her for what is past and seeking out faults mention of which will cause harm and provoke evil. [Tafseer al-Sa’di]

Here, we see Erich Hagelstein (aka Charles Mountmaggot IV) admitting to the fact that Suleiman Anwar in fact sought judgement to change his name legally - performed Tahakum to the Taghut for no reason, as well as allegedly “Making Tawbah,” from seeking Tahakum to the Taghut for petty civil matters for all those years. Keep in mind his most recent case ended in 2018. He’s been advertising himself as an Imam of 30+ years, during the time of committing all these actions of clear Kufr.

Not to mention him snitching against a brother to the FBI for being an “extremist,” as well as testifying against a believer in front of the courts of the Tawagheet. Or his recent action of mailing a letter to an employer of a brother who aided in his exposure, claiming he was a “student of a radical Islamic preacher” (calling The Tawheed he claims to follow as radical, is Kufr). These are all actions of Kufr and Riddah, and to add onto that, he’s persisted on his claim that he’s a person of knowledge.

Given his false claim, as well as the way he presented himself as someone of Islamic knowledge, it is therefore obligatory that this “Tawbah” that he has allegedly done, be PUBLIC, along with making things right.

Proof is in the Ayah of Allah:

Al-Baqarah 2:160

إِلَّا ٱلَّذِينَ تَابُواْ وَأَصۡلَحُواْ وَبَيَّنُواْ فَأُوْلَٰٓئِكَ أَتُوبُ عَلَيۡهِمْۚ وَأَنَا ٱلتَّوَّابُ ٱلرَّحِيمُ

Except those who repent and do righteous deeds, and openly declare (the truth which they concealed). These, I will accept their repentance. And I am the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful.

His alleged Tawbah isn’t accepted by Allah, unless those three conditions are met: 1)Tawbah, 2)Made things right, and 3)Make apparent their error.

So, when brothers asked him to return the money he took as donations and apologize, and make a public declaration admitting and declaring the error of his past - this is inline with the Qur’an and Sunnah…not “extortion” as this delusional احمق tried to make it.

We ask Allah to protect the Muslims from his delusion and perversion.

Go through this channel for proof of the deviancy and crimes of Suleiman Anwar ⬇️

EXPOSURE TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUBJECT #1: Suleiman Anwar Bengharsa (aka David Boscarino) - The Fake Sheikh

1) Introduction

2) False Premise of Making Takfir of the Brother being slandered by Suleiman Anwar

3) Evidence from the Sunnah Citing the permissibility of engaging with Harbis on Civil Matters

4) Who is Suleiman Anwar (by way of the horses mouth)?

5) Suleiman Anwar's Ignorance of the Most Basic Aspects of Al-Kufr Bi-Taghut

6) Suleiman Anwar's Hujjah for his Legit-ness is News Paper Articles (ironically)

7) Suleiman Anwar was Employed by the US Federal Government (and fired for Plagiarism) in 2006

8) Suleiman Anwar's statement on Plagiarizing

9) Suleiman Anwar's extensive history of voluntary Tahākum to the Taghut for petty matters

10) Evidence that voluntary Tahākum whilst not under Ikrah is Major Shirk

11) Suleiman Anwar dodgy Fatwa filled with Irjā, allowing voluntary Tahākum

12) Suleiman Anwar Testifying that his ex-wife's husband (Ali Asad Chandia) is a radical and extremist

13) Suleiman Anwar's abundance of wealth

14) Evidence from the Sunnah prohibiting Sadaqa for the wealthy

15) Suleiman Anwa's shameless requests for donations

16) Suleiman Anwar's contradiction of claiming he doesn't ask for donations to teach, then asks for donations to "teach" months later

17) Suleiman Anwar legally changes name to David Boscarino

18) Every piece of evidence (minus the audio obtained from a study program the brother wasn't even in) was obtained by way of Google, not "Infiltration" as he falsely and arrogantly claims

19) Suleiman Anwar plagiarizes majority of Audio Lecture from the study program where he charged $200 (AUDIO INCLUDED)

20) Sketchy and Informant-like "Study Program" questionnaire (asking for full legal name and location)

21) Suleiman Anwar attempted Blackmail of a brother, by way of targeting his sister

22) Statement by Ali Asad Chandia after these threats and attempts at blackmail were showed to him (AUDIO INCLUDED)

23) Suleiman Anwar lying to his loyal steed, telling him he hired someone to dig up information on the brother, by the testimony of his own Loyal Steed Erich Hagelstein (HINT: Another fake personality by Suleiman Anwar)

24) Exclusive Major Dawah Accounts Statements on Suleiman Anwar and the brother and sister being slandered

- Ahlu Al-Tawheed Publications

- Haqq Hurts Hypocrites 2020

- Haqq Hurts Hypocrites 2021

- Lanterns of Tawheed & Al-Qawāreer

- Project Guiding Light

25) Emailing the other sister of the brother with channel links to their alleged "exposure"

26) Trying to intimidate the brother, and instead gets the nice news that Ali Asad Chandia sent us an audio about him

27) Blackmail of Ali Asad Chandia once Suleiman Anwar knew of our contact with him

28) Baseless accusation that Shielding Muslims had anything to do with Saabir Miahs arrest

29) The case of sister Aminah AmatuAllah (فك الله اسرها)

30) Refuting the pathetic Claim of ties to the FBI against the brother

31) Feats of Hypocrisy

32) Suleiman Anwar (September 2017) making Takfir of himself (October 2017)

33) Suleiman Anwar fabricates Dawah history to self identify as an Imam for 25 years (in 2007), a year after he gets fired from working for the US Government (2006)

34) Suleiman Anwar has letter calling the brother a radical extremist, mailed to his employer

35) Suleiman Anwar allegedly got his phantom Islamic degrees taken away by the FBI during a raid, that of course is a lie (ARTICLE LINKED)

36) Explosive testimony from Ex-Wife (SHOCKING)

37) Explosive testimony from witnesses and victims (SHOCKING)

38) Refuting the broken record of accusing the brother of "Aiding the Mushrikeen against the Muslims."

39) Blatant Lies - Suleiman Anwar Refuting Himself (AUDIO INCLUDED)

40) Proving our Point!

41) PROOF Suleiman Anwar blackmailing Muslims (EMAILS INCLUDED)

42) More Proof Suleiman Anwar is David Di Maria

43) Parting Statement from Ali Asad Chandia (AUDIO INCLUDED)

43) Suleiman Anwar’s own fan boy (Erich Hagelstein) admitting to Suleiman Anwar’s crimes