Caption this 🙃

Every time I look at Western governments what I see is like a garden of Eden, except there's a whole truckload of Eves continuously doing whatever the serpent tells them to do.

The only way for the West to compete with China in the long term, is to adopt Chinese-style anarcho-capitalist economic policies such as:
- Abolishing environmental regulations.
- Abolishing building codes.
- Abolishing OHS.
- Abolishing patent law.

Intellectual property is the biggest hindrance to economic growth. In China competition is ruthless.
The moment someone invents something, someone copies it and makes it better and cheaper, resulting in low cost and superior products.
Patents and copyright doesn't incentivize innovation whatsoever.

Encore.

This is not right, the parents reserve the rights to deny their child ANY medication for ANY reason.
The only religion here is medical fascism. Inaction is inherently amoral.

The Axiom of Inaction can be easily derived using first order logic.

1. Inaction is the negation of action.
2. Negation of action is an action that does not exist.
3. Non-existent objects cannot exhibit characteristics.
4. Morality and its negation are subsets of characteristics.
5. The complement of (morality ⋃ immorality) is by definition "amoral."
Hence. Inaction is amoral.

It's not immoral to let a baby starve. It is however immoral to steal food from someone else to feed the baby.

Conjecture:
The natural enemy of inaction is the Karen or the activist.
These types will conjure up action to negate perceived injustices or "things they don't like" that arise from government inaction.

This is a valid critique of libertarianism as these personality types will inevitably increase the size of government and introduce disorder to the system.

To sustain a libertarian system, these people must either then be:
1. Genocided (not applicable since murder is immoral).
2. Made to be politically irrelevant through an anti-democratic Monarchy guided by inaction.

I don't understand why a "new law" is required for this.
Shouldn't laws be repealed to attain the same ends?

Keep in mind this whole ordeal was over $1 Sauce. Kind of reminds me of this.

Follow @RealVincentJames

Rights should only apply to those who can (or will be able to) reciprocate said rights, which these humanoids are evidently incapable of performing.
Ergo, they are not deserving of equal rights and should be regarded as what they are: wildlife trespassing and causing property damage.

It's amazing, the difference a few hundred CCs worth of brain volume can make.

I currently have no opinion on the shooting of Shinzo Abe.

But communists are celebrating.