The Axiom of Inaction can be easily derived using first order logic.
1. Inaction is the negation of action.
2. Negation of action is an action that does not exist.
3. Non-existent objects cannot exhibit characteristics.
4. Morality and its negation are subsets of characteristics.
5. The complement of (morality ⋃ immorality) is by definition "amoral."
Hence. Inaction is amoral.
It's not immoral to let a baby starve. It is however immoral to steal food from someone else to feed the baby.
1. Inaction is the negation of action.
2. Negation of action is an action that does not exist.
3. Non-existent objects cannot exhibit characteristics.
4. Morality and its negation are subsets of characteristics.
5. The complement of (morality ⋃ immorality) is by definition "amoral."
Hence. Inaction is amoral.
It's not immoral to let a baby starve. It is however immoral to steal food from someone else to feed the baby.
Conjecture:
The natural enemy of inaction is the Karen or the activist.
These types will conjure up action to negate perceived injustices or "things they don't like" that arise from government inaction.
This is a valid critique of libertarianism as these personality types will inevitably increase the size of government and introduce disorder to the system.
To sustain a libertarian system, these people must either then be:
1. Genocided (not applicable since murder is immoral).
2. Made to be politically irrelevant through an anti-democratic Monarchy guided by inaction.
The natural enemy of inaction is the Karen or the activist.
These types will conjure up action to negate perceived injustices or "things they don't like" that arise from government inaction.
This is a valid critique of libertarianism as these personality types will inevitably increase the size of government and introduce disorder to the system.
To sustain a libertarian system, these people must either then be:
1. Genocided (not applicable since murder is immoral).
2. Made to be politically irrelevant through an anti-democratic Monarchy guided by inaction.
Forwarded from Vincent James
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Keep in mind this whole ordeal was over $1 Sauce. Kind of reminds me of this.
Follow @RealVincentJames
Follow @RealVincentJames
💩1
Rights should only apply to those who can (or will be able to) reciprocate said rights, which these humanoids are evidently incapable of performing.
Ergo, they are not deserving of equal rights and should be regarded as what they are: wildlife trespassing and causing property damage.
It's amazing, the difference a few hundred CCs worth of brain volume can make.
Ergo, they are not deserving of equal rights and should be regarded as what they are: wildlife trespassing and causing property damage.
It's amazing, the difference a few hundred CCs worth of brain volume can make.
I currently have no opinion on the shooting of Shinzo Abe.
But communists are celebrating.
But communists are celebrating.
Forwarded from 🇦🇺AussieCossack🇷🇺
All doctors are either fascists or socialists themselves, or are enablers of it.
As long as you have a medical license, you're submitting to a monopoly on the distribution of drugs and the legal consensual dismemberment of human bodies.
I would rather buy my prenoscriptions from backalley Joe over any socialist idiot who has a medical license.
As long as you have a medical license, you're submitting to a monopoly on the distribution of drugs and the legal consensual dismemberment of human bodies.
I would rather buy my prenoscriptions from backalley Joe over any socialist idiot who has a medical license.
The self-governing race is the master race.
Races that require oppressive governments to police morality are inferior races.
Races that require oppressive governments to police morality are inferior races.
The Libertarian Traditionalist pinned «The self-governing race is the master race. Races that require oppressive governments to police morality are inferior races.»
Leftist: Anarcho-capitalism is just feudalism.
Traditionalist: Yes
Traditionalist: Yes