The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. . . .

[Y]ou have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles. You have in a common cause fought and triumphed together . . . I could wish [my advice would] . . . prevent our nation from running the course which has hitherto marked the destiny of nations.

But, if I may even flatter myself that they may be productive of some partial benefit, some occasional good; that they may now and then recur to moderate the fury of party spirit, to warn against the mischiefs of foreign intrigue, to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism; this hope will be a full recompense for the solicitude for your welfare, by which they have been dictated.

George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796

“All Men are Created Equal”, penned by the great Thomas Jefferson, is a phrase of high fame and historic impact. Lesser known, and worse understood, is the rationale behind his words. Five years after authoring the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote a brilliant work—Notes On the State of Virginia.

Of particular interest is his commentary on race. First addressing the notion that 'race is skin deep', he asks, ‘Is this difference, fixed by Nature, not important?‘. That there is any real distinction at all says a lot of our design.

Jefferson goes on to highlight that physical Beauty is meaningful in animals, it must be so in Humans, and “Besides those of color, figure and hair, there are other physical distinctions proving a difference of race” such as brain, sense, and faculty. Equal in Creation does not and never has meant equal in quality.

What past great men have observed and intuited is ever proven, even when hirtherto neglected by society. Compare, for example, comments from Jefferson's Notes on Virginia to recent studies:

The circumstance of superior beauty is thought worthy attention in the propagation of our horses, dogs, and other domestic animals; why not in that of man?

Physical attractiveness positively correlates with social mobility, mental health, cognitive function, outcome, and status.

A black [acts on] a want of forethought, which prevents their seeing a danger till it be present.

Africans—then Arabs, Latins, East Euros, South Asians—have the poorest time preference.

Comparing them by their faculties...in memory they are equal to the whites; in reason, much inferior

This needs no study.

Many would discard old judgments as outdated prejudice, the present doesn't agree.

Examining human relations within and without the Country, Alexander Hamilton finds that 'foreigners will confuse, corrupt, complicate, and confound a nation with their outside attachments, attitudes, and agendas'. Entry and association could not be a loose affair.

The Founding Fathers and early Congress of the United States, of near absolutely British descent, restricted citizenship to 'free White persons' of good moral character—a limited group even Europe has but a minority of. On this ground, Jefferson argued to remove foreign blood 'beyond the reach of mixture'.

It is a mistake that we hold ideology in such high regard when it is initiative that makes meaningful change happen. For manipulating the broad masses or demarking your friends from enemies, ideological struggle might mean something. As an individual, especially individuals that impress, your effort and that drive behind what you pursue takes priority.

Ideas and doctrines are, like education or religion, subordinate to the man that knows how to use them—if only there are men willing. All tools de jure are sufficient to accomplish our goals; the system, and this is true of any -ism you adopt, lies there to be seized or subverted; which men will take up the effort and occupy its commanding roles?

Irish historian William Lecky wrote, “It is the merit of the Anglo-Saxon race that beyond all others it has produced men of the stamp of a Washington [...] careless, indeed, for glory but very careful of honour; who made the supreme majesty of moral rectitude the guiding principle of their lives”. A man who has authority in himself will do what is right.

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. ... whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the People to alter or to abolish it… it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

—Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence

Our present political position has been achieved in a manner unprecedented in the history of nations. It illustrates the American idea that governments rest on the consent of the governed, and that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish them at will whenever they become destructive of the ends for which they were established.

—Jefferson Davis, Inaugural Address

To my boyish mind one thing alone was clear, that the soldiers as they marched past were all, in that supreme hour, heroes and patriots. Amid many changes that simple belief of boyhood has never altered. ...

But other feelings have in the progress of time altered much. I have learned, and others of my generation... have learned, what the war really meant, and they have also learned to know and to do justice to the men who fought...

[H]owever we differed, or still differ, as to the causes for which we fought then, we accept them as settled, commit them to history, and fight over them no more. ... [W]e hold out our hands freely, frankly, and gladly.

To courage and faith wherever shown we bow in homage with uncovered heads. We respect and honor the gallantry and valor of the brave men who fought... Differ in politics and in... other ways we must and shall in all good-nature, but let us never differ with each other on sectional or State lines, by race or creed.

—The Blue & The Gray, Senator H. C. Lodge

That our world might be overpopulated takes the attention of two main reactions: the absolute natalists, believing all life must live and birth control must end, and the misplaced restrictionists, not malthusian but misanthropic or blank slatist. Neither hits the nail needing hit but bangs around it wildly.

A century ago, it was a horror story to recall that Asia holds almost one billion men in total—today, India & China hold one billion each. Every year the East as a whole dumps greater misery onto the global scale, the mixing menagerie south of Texas festers, and then whatever is in Africa. Birthrate matters, not 'we have too few' or 'we have too many', rather, depending on who outweighs whom, we lose or gain value as a species.

Excess of one tends to press upon the entrances of another; for every human domain it takes only a slight misjudgment or manipulation to open the door we'd be better off to keep shut. Someone really invested in the wellbeing of the living has to notice the necessity of distance and discrimination.

Any good deed of consequence involves adequate and intentional bias in who goes where, who gets what, and by whom Earth derives its dominant form of humanity. Quoting a self-aware Japanese politician, Stoddard emphasises, “There is nothing to be proud of in causing a nuisance to others through failure to control [your] population.”

Blessed are few, burdensome are many. Shy a tenth of humankind, far as that exists, is European; this stellar segment has put out eight to nine tenths of human achievement. Within this share still the talented are quite small, teeming throughout a few regions, carried by certain subsets of its nations.

Northwest Europe takes half the greatness; Britain, France, Germany, and Italy take almost three fourths. A list akin to The Five Biggest Ideas in Science shows four of the five have the British on top and all five needed not one non-European. That does not mean none could; it does mean there is no need to import or integrate what you can cultivate at home and should never replace.

“You fight for your own country, and your own group, and your own culture, and your own civilization, at your own level, and in your own way. And when somebody says, ‘Apologize for this, or that’ you say: ‘No. I regret nothing.’”

—Credo, Jonathan Bowden

Crowding of the world, mixing around and messing up living space causes terrible friction between peoples and ruins whatever mutual good was possible between them. Bowden carefully illustrates how distance and discrimination solves all things.

Diversity kills. A 1920s study found that fertility, safety, and satisfaction declined greatly by the influx of immigrants from non-NWE countries into the USA. This tide was linked to a drop in American beauty and fitness, an incline of ‘dumb citizens’ with poorer principles, and undertowed the biggest mistakes in American politics.

A 2020s study found that immigration and demographic change post-1965 induced bad outcomes across the board to an even worse degree than that. To maintain good worthwhile stock, a standard of citizenship has to be raised. And by that common sense, anyone below the bar from outside shall be sent out and their kin strictly kept out.

‘The JQ’ can break you...one may call the race immortal, having survived a hundred fates; another labels it pestilential, felling empires and poisoning all. Whichever you say, they agree. It is no secret; they overdo, do a lot and on 'both sides'. World leaders enthusiastically acknowledge the vast presence and input of Jews without end.

Jewish author M. E. Ravage gloats, ‘We command your history, you fulfill our mission; our customs are your laws, your sustenance our say; even your Bible is made of our words. We divide and direct, you seldom object. We have made an empire in your mind.’ What then can you do? As a start: emancipate yourself of obsession and put down the weakness within you and your people that allows for it.

Edward A. Ross asserts, like the import of morally-impinged blacks, to allow foreigners even for work or study is nationally toxic. Ross says, “Should worst come to worst, it would be better for us to turn our guns upon every vessel bringing [outsiders] to our shores rather than to permit them to land.”

Coupling sufficient efforts of deregulation with deliberate inspiration of citizen well-being, a good government may establish long-term prosperity for its people. President McKinley, by whom American productivity tripled, followed this logic. As did Napoleon, whose France built up Western Europe.

Both leaders enacted tariffs to do so. President Trump using this model is welcomed; a nationalist tactic in an otherwise nation-rotting world. What's needed to secure it now is stricter immigration restriction—the importation of foreigners eats the joy of those who belong.