Channel name was changed to «Mudflood Research, Tartaria»
Forwarded from TARKH PERUNOVICH
Well you need to understand why the claim that animals evolved from one another exists. It comes from the fact that almost all life on Earth shares more than half of it's genetic material. All mammals share 90% of their DNA with one another. Even with plants it's around 50%.
They say that this is proof that have a common origin, that we must have evolved from the same source, but why?
Saying that common DNA is proof of evolution is literally an assumption. People who say this don't consider that there can be other reasons for why this DNA is shared, they assume evolution is the only theory that can explain this and thus it must be true.
Common DNA does not mean common origin. All it means is just that; common DNA.
To me it simply means that the genetic engineers of this realm borrowed the genetic coding between various lifeforms to repopulate it. Perhaps using various templates for lifeforms, importing DNA from one lifeform to another. They most likely created many creatures some thousands of years ago to populate the Earth, and then let natural selection do it's work, meaning that many of these creatures most likely died, others adapted. They're also designed to have their DNA be chimeric, break itself and mutate, to create new subspecies. It's not like they created every single subspecies that we see today of course, given a span of thousands of years I'm certain they could have come about naturally.
They say that this is proof that have a common origin, that we must have evolved from the same source, but why?
Saying that common DNA is proof of evolution is literally an assumption. People who say this don't consider that there can be other reasons for why this DNA is shared, they assume evolution is the only theory that can explain this and thus it must be true.
Common DNA does not mean common origin. All it means is just that; common DNA.
To me it simply means that the genetic engineers of this realm borrowed the genetic coding between various lifeforms to repopulate it. Perhaps using various templates for lifeforms, importing DNA from one lifeform to another. They most likely created many creatures some thousands of years ago to populate the Earth, and then let natural selection do it's work, meaning that many of these creatures most likely died, others adapted. They're also designed to have their DNA be chimeric, break itself and mutate, to create new subspecies. It's not like they created every single subspecies that we see today of course, given a span of thousands of years I'm certain they could have come about naturally.
Forwarded from TARKH PERUNOVICH
I mean it's not the cult of science.
By scientism I refer to the "new science" - all of the science created in the 1800s to 1900s. after they destroyed all knowledge and memory of the old world, they rewrote a new version of the knowledge for the new world.
Flawed periodic tables. They added 3 new non existant unviersal forces "gravity" "nuclear strong and weak forces". Einstein's bullshit theories.
They literally lied about everything about science. The science we used today is not the same as 300 years ago. We're talking down to the atomic level it's fabricated.
By scientism I refer to the "new science" - all of the science created in the 1800s to 1900s. after they destroyed all knowledge and memory of the old world, they rewrote a new version of the knowledge for the new world.
Flawed periodic tables. They added 3 new non existant unviersal forces "gravity" "nuclear strong and weak forces". Einstein's bullshit theories.
They literally lied about everything about science. The science we used today is not the same as 300 years ago. We're talking down to the atomic level it's fabricated.
👍2
The colosseum seems not in better shape than the surrounding buildings. Leads one to question whether or not this structure is as old as they say.
Perhaps the damage on the colosseum occurred much more recently than they say in the museums - being a fully intact, operating structure not 200 years ago. As opposed to being damaged in 1349 by an Earthquake as they claim.
Perhaps the damage on the colosseum occurred much more recently than they say in the museums - being a fully intact, operating structure not 200 years ago. As opposed to being damaged in 1349 by an Earthquake as they claim.
On that note; strange is it not that all paintings from the turn of the 18th to 19th century *always* depict cities in ruins? Covered in plant life and soil, rubble everywhere, and of course people wearing drapery and torn clothing wandering around aimlessly - refugees stumbling upon the lands of those who came before.
If these photos are truly depictions of ancient times, 2000 years ago, why such poor maintenance back then? Weren't these buildings recently built? Why so much foliage? Why is it all destroyed?
One could only conclude that these paintings are depictions of the present time when these paintings were created, in the early 1800s (and late 1700s). Those people wandering around are only 200 hundred years old.
If these photos are truly depictions of ancient times, 2000 years ago, why such poor maintenance back then? Weren't these buildings recently built? Why so much foliage? Why is it all destroyed?
One could only conclude that these paintings are depictions of the present time when these paintings were created, in the early 1800s (and late 1700s). Those people wandering around are only 200 hundred years old.
"Ancient" Rome was only dug out in the 1930s!
https://www.stolenhistory.org/threads/excavation-of-rome-archaeologists-are-silent.1405/
https://www.stolenhistory.org/threads/excavation-of-rome-archaeologists-are-silent.1405/
200 year old buildings, buried beneath the soil. Not a mention in history, not a single reference of any phenomena to cause this "gradual accumulation of soil".
Do not listen to so called archeologists who have dubbed this the cultural layer.
All that we can say for certain is that this burial of the building, occurred very quickly, and over time as claimed.
This is only one example, there are buildings that go multiple stories underground, tens of metres.
Do not listen to so called archeologists who have dubbed this the cultural layer.
All that we can say for certain is that this burial of the building, occurred very quickly, and over time as claimed.
This is only one example, there are buildings that go multiple stories underground, tens of metres.