Forwarded from TARKH PERUNOVICH
I mean it's not the cult of science.
By scientism I refer to the "new science" - all of the science created in the 1800s to 1900s. after they destroyed all knowledge and memory of the old world, they rewrote a new version of the knowledge for the new world.
Flawed periodic tables. They added 3 new non existant unviersal forces "gravity" "nuclear strong and weak forces". Einstein's bullshit theories.
They literally lied about everything about science. The science we used today is not the same as 300 years ago. We're talking down to the atomic level it's fabricated.
By scientism I refer to the "new science" - all of the science created in the 1800s to 1900s. after they destroyed all knowledge and memory of the old world, they rewrote a new version of the knowledge for the new world.
Flawed periodic tables. They added 3 new non existant unviersal forces "gravity" "nuclear strong and weak forces". Einstein's bullshit theories.
They literally lied about everything about science. The science we used today is not the same as 300 years ago. We're talking down to the atomic level it's fabricated.
👍2
The colosseum seems not in better shape than the surrounding buildings. Leads one to question whether or not this structure is as old as they say.
Perhaps the damage on the colosseum occurred much more recently than they say in the museums - being a fully intact, operating structure not 200 years ago. As opposed to being damaged in 1349 by an Earthquake as they claim.
Perhaps the damage on the colosseum occurred much more recently than they say in the museums - being a fully intact, operating structure not 200 years ago. As opposed to being damaged in 1349 by an Earthquake as they claim.
On that note; strange is it not that all paintings from the turn of the 18th to 19th century *always* depict cities in ruins? Covered in plant life and soil, rubble everywhere, and of course people wearing drapery and torn clothing wandering around aimlessly - refugees stumbling upon the lands of those who came before.
If these photos are truly depictions of ancient times, 2000 years ago, why such poor maintenance back then? Weren't these buildings recently built? Why so much foliage? Why is it all destroyed?
One could only conclude that these paintings are depictions of the present time when these paintings were created, in the early 1800s (and late 1700s). Those people wandering around are only 200 hundred years old.
If these photos are truly depictions of ancient times, 2000 years ago, why such poor maintenance back then? Weren't these buildings recently built? Why so much foliage? Why is it all destroyed?
One could only conclude that these paintings are depictions of the present time when these paintings were created, in the early 1800s (and late 1700s). Those people wandering around are only 200 hundred years old.
"Ancient" Rome was only dug out in the 1930s!
https://www.stolenhistory.org/threads/excavation-of-rome-archaeologists-are-silent.1405/
https://www.stolenhistory.org/threads/excavation-of-rome-archaeologists-are-silent.1405/
200 year old buildings, buried beneath the soil. Not a mention in history, not a single reference of any phenomena to cause this "gradual accumulation of soil".
Do not listen to so called archeologists who have dubbed this the cultural layer.
All that we can say for certain is that this burial of the building, occurred very quickly, and over time as claimed.
This is only one example, there are buildings that go multiple stories underground, tens of metres.
Do not listen to so called archeologists who have dubbed this the cultural layer.
All that we can say for certain is that this burial of the building, occurred very quickly, and over time as claimed.
This is only one example, there are buildings that go multiple stories underground, tens of metres.
There's more truth in fairy tales than in history books.