The Bible Was Created by 6 Corporations in the 1600s (Part 1)
In the year 1851, famous English writer Charles Dickens published a book noscriptd "A Child's History of England" which summarizes all of English history. Like all other books written in the midst of the reset, there are several contradictory claims to modern history, but one stands out in particular...
According to the book, in England it was customary to pardon prisoners during the coronation of a Monarch. Five prisoners were pardoned in the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth I in 1559. These were the evangelists Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and also the Apostle Saint Paul, not 2000 years ago but less than 500!
Don't believe me? Go read it for yourself on Chapter 31.
If the Bible is to be attributed to those four men, how could it be remotely as old as we are told? What if it's not?
How can history be generationally accumulated knowledge if it's so inconsistent? What if it's not? What if it's being written for the past 400 years?
In the year 1851, famous English writer Charles Dickens published a book noscriptd "A Child's History of England" which summarizes all of English history. Like all other books written in the midst of the reset, there are several contradictory claims to modern history, but one stands out in particular...
According to the book, in England it was customary to pardon prisoners during the coronation of a Monarch. Five prisoners were pardoned in the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth I in 1559. These were the evangelists Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and also the Apostle Saint Paul, not 2000 years ago but less than 500!
Don't believe me? Go read it for yourself on Chapter 31.
If the Bible is to be attributed to those four men, how could it be remotely as old as we are told? What if it's not?
How can history be generationally accumulated knowledge if it's so inconsistent? What if it's not? What if it's being written for the past 400 years?
👍22🤯8🔥4❤2👎1😁1🤔1💩1
The Bible Was Created by 6 Corporations in the 1600s (Part 2)
Reading this channel, you know that 1000+ years were added to our calendar. With that consideration in mind, and Paul and the evangelists living 500 years ago, how could any Bible such as the Codex Sinaiticus be as old as claimed? According to "A Child's History of England", the prisoners spoke an unknown language, presumably Greek. Maybe it's not a coincidence the King James Bible was written shortly after their pardon, after all they provided oral and or written documents which were translated into English for the first time ever.
That is seemingly the case because in 1604, King James ordered the translation (or rather creation) of the English Bible by six companies;
First Westminster Company: Genesis - Kings
First Cambridge Company: Chronicles - Song of Solomon
First Oxford Company: Isaiah - Malachi
Second Oxford Company: Gospels - Acts of the Apostles & Revelation
Second Westminster Company: Epistles
Second Cambridge Company: Apocrypha
Reading this channel, you know that 1000+ years were added to our calendar. With that consideration in mind, and Paul and the evangelists living 500 years ago, how could any Bible such as the Codex Sinaiticus be as old as claimed? According to "A Child's History of England", the prisoners spoke an unknown language, presumably Greek. Maybe it's not a coincidence the King James Bible was written shortly after their pardon, after all they provided oral and or written documents which were translated into English for the first time ever.
That is seemingly the case because in 1604, King James ordered the translation (or rather creation) of the English Bible by six companies;
First Westminster Company: Genesis - Kings
First Cambridge Company: Chronicles - Song of Solomon
First Oxford Company: Isaiah - Malachi
Second Oxford Company: Gospels - Acts of the Apostles & Revelation
Second Westminster Company: Epistles
Second Cambridge Company: Apocrypha
👍22👏2❤1🔥1💩1🥴1
Mudflood Research, Tartaria, True Aryan History
Who was the Real Christ? He did not live 2000+ years ago. He was neither Jewish nor King of the Jews. He spoke neither Aramaic nor Hebrew. He was not executed in Jerusalem. He was not "Jesus" or "Yeshuah". He was not the "son of God", Yahweh. His name was…
Christ was Executed 900 Years Ago/Romans in Russian Clothing
When analyzing historical paintings we will discover many extreme inconsistencies. If history was not falsified recently, how do these people who lived closer to the past than we do today, not have a greater understanding of it? Full plate armour was a recent invention to the painters who lived in this time, why are they depicting it in an event 1500 years ago? That clothing style looks awfully European. Where's the arid landscape of Jerusalem?
What I find most amusing are these depictions of a bearded Pontius Pilate dressed in medieval Russian clothing, particularly the Murmolka (fur hat), as well as the background people. I don't know about you, but if I were in the middle east I would not be wearing thick furs and steppe clothing.
Perhaps these artists were not told the same version of history that we are today, during their lives it was probably taught that he was executed a mere 200-400 years ago, rather than 1500, and not in Jerusalem.
When analyzing historical paintings we will discover many extreme inconsistencies. If history was not falsified recently, how do these people who lived closer to the past than we do today, not have a greater understanding of it? Full plate armour was a recent invention to the painters who lived in this time, why are they depicting it in an event 1500 years ago? That clothing style looks awfully European. Where's the arid landscape of Jerusalem?
What I find most amusing are these depictions of a bearded Pontius Pilate dressed in medieval Russian clothing, particularly the Murmolka (fur hat), as well as the background people. I don't know about you, but if I were in the middle east I would not be wearing thick furs and steppe clothing.
Perhaps these artists were not told the same version of history that we are today, during their lives it was probably taught that he was executed a mere 200-400 years ago, rather than 1500, and not in Jerusalem.
👍37🤯6❤2😁2🔥1💩1
The Krugolet Was the Original Calendar of the Old Vedic Aryans
Russia was Christianized in the 18th century (occupied territory of Tartaria) by Peter the Great (Roman-Khazar criminal).
In Summer 7207 on the Tartarian calendar, Peter (who spoke German and not Russian) proclaimed that the inhabitants were receiving a "Neuer Gott" (New God), God/Gott in Russian means "year", they were receiving new (((deity))) and a new calendar. He proclaimed that the Roman calendar was now in effect, and the current year was now 1700. The celebration of the new year changed from the Pagan September 1st, to January 1st, this added an extra 4 months to the chronology, 1300¼ years in total.
Krugolet means "Cycle of Summers" on Slavic Sanskrit, and is believed to have counted 7530 summers since recreation of life on Earth (or some other cataclysmic event of mythological proportions). There were only three seasons - Autumn, Winter, and Spring, which formed the complete solar cycle called a Summer.
http://krugolet-online.ru/
Russia was Christianized in the 18th century (occupied territory of Tartaria) by Peter the Great (Roman-Khazar criminal).
In Summer 7207 on the Tartarian calendar, Peter (who spoke German and not Russian) proclaimed that the inhabitants were receiving a "Neuer Gott" (New God), God/Gott in Russian means "year", they were receiving new (((deity))) and a new calendar. He proclaimed that the Roman calendar was now in effect, and the current year was now 1700. The celebration of the new year changed from the Pagan September 1st, to January 1st, this added an extra 4 months to the chronology, 1300¼ years in total.
Krugolet means "Cycle of Summers" on Slavic Sanskrit, and is believed to have counted 7530 summers since recreation of life on Earth (or some other cataclysmic event of mythological proportions). There were only three seasons - Autumn, Winter, and Spring, which formed the complete solar cycle called a Summer.
http://krugolet-online.ru/
👍16🔥3👏2🤔1
Mudflood Research, Tartaria, True Aryan History pinned Deleted message
The Mongol Empire Was a Myth Invented In 1908 by a Mongol Nationalist Named Baavuday Tsend Gun (Part 1)
The book "The Secret History of the Mongols" was a literary work allegedly written shortly after the year 1227 following the death of Genghis Khan, and is the basis for the history of the Mongol Empire and Genghis Khan, it has been widely passed off as fact by historians (namely those of the corrupt Romanov dynasty). Yet there is one very simple problem with this book - it was published in 1908 with not a single shred of evidence of it being any older, the sources Baavuday Tsend Gun cites in his book do not corroborate his story, in fact the sources he used do not seem to exist at all.
It is claimed that "The Secret History of the Mongols" was rediscovered as an addendum originally inside another mysterious book called the "The Secret History of the Yuan dynasty" written in Chinese, however not a single copy of this book can be found. The source he cites is a non-existant book that nobody can read and nobody has ever seen before. Cross referencing sources is important in real research yet on close inspection Baavuday's book has only made up sources.
How can a book written in 1908 accurately describe events in the 1200s without sources to earlier writings? There are NO other books on Genghis Khan's life written before the 1908 publishing of "The Secret History of the Mongols." Temujin or Genghis Khan is hardly mentioned in earlier Chinese manunoscripts. Nothing is known of Temujin's life outside of that one book published in 1908. Yet historians consider this book by a 20th century Mongolian nationalist to be the ultimate authority on Genghis Khan's life.
This is what our history is based on. One book written by one man in the 20th century. The original Chinese texts are nowhere to be found so it basically a fairy tale. It is not backed up by any hard evidence so by definition it is a work of fiction.
But for the sake of argument let's assume "The Secret History of the Mongols" to be legitimate. We still run into several issues with mainstream chronological history:
1. Genghis Khan isn't even a proper name it just means "Great Khan" (Great King).
2. There is not a single period coin depicting the name Genghis Khan or Temujin.
3. The Mongol coins that do use the word "Khan" are in plural, referring to "Khans".
4. There are no statues of Genghis Khan older than 200 years.
5. There are no direct written accounts by Genghis Khan or his generals
6. Genghis Khan constructed no military fortifications and founded no cities.
7. There are no trade pacts or treaties with Genghis Khan.
8. No contemporary leader ever references a Genghis Khan.
9. There are no period maps of Genghis Khan's conquests. (only modern graphical approximations exist).
10. Genghis Khan has no real tomb. Only monuments that were constructed centuries later exist.
11. The battlements on the Great wall of China face the wrong direction. Rather than pointing North they face South.
12. When Marco Polo visited the court of Kublai Khan he was described as a white man living in a Western styled palace. The ruin of Kublai Khan's palace can be seen here https://i.imgur.com/PSLvdw4.jpg.
This building was destroyed by Westerners in the second opium war, it resembles the exact style of "Western" "Tartarian" "Neoclassical" "Greek" architecture, megalithic in nature being constructed out of large stone, how was this accomplished by a nomadic horse-back people?
13. There are other books that describe a great "Khan" of the Moguls and his sons as men with blonde hair and blue eyes. Translators of the Golden book were pressured into inserting fictitious names (See here). Mogul is not to be confused with Mongolia.
The book "The Secret History of the Mongols" was a literary work allegedly written shortly after the year 1227 following the death of Genghis Khan, and is the basis for the history of the Mongol Empire and Genghis Khan, it has been widely passed off as fact by historians (namely those of the corrupt Romanov dynasty). Yet there is one very simple problem with this book - it was published in 1908 with not a single shred of evidence of it being any older, the sources Baavuday Tsend Gun cites in his book do not corroborate his story, in fact the sources he used do not seem to exist at all.
It is claimed that "The Secret History of the Mongols" was rediscovered as an addendum originally inside another mysterious book called the "The Secret History of the Yuan dynasty" written in Chinese, however not a single copy of this book can be found. The source he cites is a non-existant book that nobody can read and nobody has ever seen before. Cross referencing sources is important in real research yet on close inspection Baavuday's book has only made up sources.
How can a book written in 1908 accurately describe events in the 1200s without sources to earlier writings? There are NO other books on Genghis Khan's life written before the 1908 publishing of "The Secret History of the Mongols." Temujin or Genghis Khan is hardly mentioned in earlier Chinese manunoscripts. Nothing is known of Temujin's life outside of that one book published in 1908. Yet historians consider this book by a 20th century Mongolian nationalist to be the ultimate authority on Genghis Khan's life.
This is what our history is based on. One book written by one man in the 20th century. The original Chinese texts are nowhere to be found so it basically a fairy tale. It is not backed up by any hard evidence so by definition it is a work of fiction.
But for the sake of argument let's assume "The Secret History of the Mongols" to be legitimate. We still run into several issues with mainstream chronological history:
1. Genghis Khan isn't even a proper name it just means "Great Khan" (Great King).
2. There is not a single period coin depicting the name Genghis Khan or Temujin.
3. The Mongol coins that do use the word "Khan" are in plural, referring to "Khans".
4. There are no statues of Genghis Khan older than 200 years.
5. There are no direct written accounts by Genghis Khan or his generals
6. Genghis Khan constructed no military fortifications and founded no cities.
7. There are no trade pacts or treaties with Genghis Khan.
8. No contemporary leader ever references a Genghis Khan.
9. There are no period maps of Genghis Khan's conquests. (only modern graphical approximations exist).
10. Genghis Khan has no real tomb. Only monuments that were constructed centuries later exist.
11. The battlements on the Great wall of China face the wrong direction. Rather than pointing North they face South.
12. When Marco Polo visited the court of Kublai Khan he was described as a white man living in a Western styled palace. The ruin of Kublai Khan's palace can be seen here https://i.imgur.com/PSLvdw4.jpg.
This building was destroyed by Westerners in the second opium war, it resembles the exact style of "Western" "Tartarian" "Neoclassical" "Greek" architecture, megalithic in nature being constructed out of large stone, how was this accomplished by a nomadic horse-back people?
13. There are other books that describe a great "Khan" of the Moguls and his sons as men with blonde hair and blue eyes. Translators of the Golden book were pressured into inserting fictitious names (See here). Mogul is not to be confused with Mongolia.
👍28❤6🤯4🎉4🔥2
The Mongol Empire Was a Myth Invented In 1908 by a Mongol Nationalist Named Baavuday Tsend Gun (Part 2)
(Part 1)
And ultimately the biggest rebuttal is that, this so called Mongol Empire was according to historians was the BIGGEST on the planet, and supposedly brought forth such a scale of death and destruction that it lead to ecological change - today from them remains what? Mongolia is one of the least populated countries in Asia, eclipsed by both of it's neighbors hundreds of times over.
So Where are all the foreign Mongol loanwords in Russian? The Mongolian language has dozens of Russian words for every one supposed Mongol word in Russian. Contrary to the claims of Fascist WW2 propaganda, there is in fact no evidence to support Mongolian genetics in Eastern Europeans, only the opposite of Mongols in fact being partly Russian, this can be attested not only through genetic study, but through the visual phenotype of many Mongolian people who often (though not necessarily commonly) resemble Europeans, even sometimes having blue or green eyes and lighter hair.
If the Mongol Empire were real, then it was the ONLY one to not leave a single, linguistic, genetic, cultural, or archeological trace. The myth of the Mongol Empire is one of complete delusion from one delusional zealous nationalist named Baavuday Tsend Gun
Lastly I would like to add that I write all of this without any hostility towards Mongolia or it's people and traditions. I am merely exposing the flaws of Jesuit history and the Scaligerian chronology. The word Mongol is not of Mongolian origin and was only recently introduced, the Mongols who live in modern day Mongolia have never called themselves such, but rather by their local ethnic names such as Oirats and Khalka. If you want to know who Genghis Khan really was (He was a White Russian), and the Real Mongol Empire (Tartaria), read these posts. The Mongol Empire was nothing more than a country called "Tartaria" by westerners. Tartaria was inhabited predominantly by Pagan Slavs, but also Turks Huns, Bulgars, Balts, Finns, Uralics, among hundreds of many other Pagan ethnic groups who had banded together to defend against the invaders. The real hostility here is against Slavic/Aryan people by the enemies who have been relentlessly destroying true history for the past millennia.
Recorded history is only 1000 years old and the current year is 722. All of human history happened only recently in the middle ages. Everything you have been taught is a lie!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_History_of_the_Mongols
(Part 1)
And ultimately the biggest rebuttal is that, this so called Mongol Empire was according to historians was the BIGGEST on the planet, and supposedly brought forth such a scale of death and destruction that it lead to ecological change - today from them remains what? Mongolia is one of the least populated countries in Asia, eclipsed by both of it's neighbors hundreds of times over.
So Where are all the foreign Mongol loanwords in Russian? The Mongolian language has dozens of Russian words for every one supposed Mongol word in Russian. Contrary to the claims of Fascist WW2 propaganda, there is in fact no evidence to support Mongolian genetics in Eastern Europeans, only the opposite of Mongols in fact being partly Russian, this can be attested not only through genetic study, but through the visual phenotype of many Mongolian people who often (though not necessarily commonly) resemble Europeans, even sometimes having blue or green eyes and lighter hair.
If the Mongol Empire were real, then it was the ONLY one to not leave a single, linguistic, genetic, cultural, or archeological trace. The myth of the Mongol Empire is one of complete delusion from one delusional zealous nationalist named Baavuday Tsend Gun
Lastly I would like to add that I write all of this without any hostility towards Mongolia or it's people and traditions. I am merely exposing the flaws of Jesuit history and the Scaligerian chronology. The word Mongol is not of Mongolian origin and was only recently introduced, the Mongols who live in modern day Mongolia have never called themselves such, but rather by their local ethnic names such as Oirats and Khalka. If you want to know who Genghis Khan really was (He was a White Russian), and the Real Mongol Empire (Tartaria), read these posts. The Mongol Empire was nothing more than a country called "Tartaria" by westerners. Tartaria was inhabited predominantly by Pagan Slavs, but also Turks Huns, Bulgars, Balts, Finns, Uralics, among hundreds of many other Pagan ethnic groups who had banded together to defend against the invaders. The real hostility here is against Slavic/Aryan people by the enemies who have been relentlessly destroying true history for the past millennia.
Recorded history is only 1000 years old and the current year is 722. All of human history happened only recently in the middle ages. Everything you have been taught is a lie!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_History_of_the_Mongols
Telegram
Mudflood Research, Tartaria, True Aryan History
The Mongol Empire Was a Myth Invented In 1908 by a Mongol Nationalist Named Baavuday Tsend Gun (Part 1)
The book "The Secret History of the Mongols" was a literary work allegedly written shortly after the year 1227 following the death of Genghis Khan, and…
The book "The Secret History of the Mongols" was a literary work allegedly written shortly after the year 1227 following the death of Genghis Khan, and…
👍23🔥2🎉2❤1
Forwarded from Thuletide
The Greater Tatary / Tatarian Empire psyop is one of the most perniciously anti-White things I've come across in a while.
It attributes European achievements to an ancient proto-NWO civilization called the "Tatarian Empire" and uses European colonial architecture as proof that this "Tartarian Empire" was global.
The psyop claims that White people couldn't possibly have built neo-classical architecture in the 1800s (because they still used horses and carts, or something) and uses examples of early industrial development as proof that the "Tartarian Empire" was technologically advanced.
It also claims that the Globalists who have been tearing down European architecture and destroying our history for the last eight decades aren't doing it because they're anti-White, but because they are, for some reason, trying to cover up this mythical "Tatarian Empire."
Video from: https://twitter.com/AndTartary/status/1585246615425536000
It attributes European achievements to an ancient proto-NWO civilization called the "Tatarian Empire" and uses European colonial architecture as proof that this "Tartarian Empire" was global.
The psyop claims that White people couldn't possibly have built neo-classical architecture in the 1800s (because they still used horses and carts, or something) and uses examples of early industrial development as proof that the "Tartarian Empire" was technologically advanced.
It also claims that the Globalists who have been tearing down European architecture and destroying our history for the last eight decades aren't doing it because they're anti-White, but because they are, for some reason, trying to cover up this mythical "Tatarian Empire."
Video from: https://twitter.com/AndTartary/status/1585246615425536000
👍25🔥2❤1👎1😢1