The Mongol Empire Was a Myth Invented In 1908 by a Mongol Nationalist Named Baavuday Tsend Gun (Part 1)

The book "The Secret History of the Mongols" was a literary work allegedly written shortly after the year 1227 following the death of Genghis Khan, and is the basis for the history of the Mongol Empire and Genghis Khan, it has been widely passed off as fact by historians (namely those of the corrupt Romanov dynasty). Yet there is one very simple problem with this book - it was published in 1908 with not a single shred of evidence of it being any older, the sources Baavuday Tsend Gun cites in his book do not corroborate his story, in fact the sources he used do not seem to exist at all.

It is claimed that "The Secret History of the Mongols" was rediscovered as an addendum originally inside another mysterious book called the "The Secret History of the Yuan dynasty" written in Chinese, however not a single copy of this book can be found. The source he cites is a non-existant book that nobody can read and nobody has ever seen before. Cross referencing sources is important in real research yet on close inspection Baavuday's book has only made up sources.

How can a book written in 1908 accurately describe events in the 1200s without sources to earlier writings? There are NO other books on Genghis Khan's life written before the 1908 publishing of "The Secret History of the Mongols." Temujin or Genghis Khan is hardly mentioned in earlier Chinese manunoscripts. Nothing is known of Temujin's life outside of that one book published in 1908. Yet historians consider this book by a 20th century Mongolian nationalist to be the ultimate authority on Genghis Khan's life.

This is what our history is based on. One book written by one man in the 20th century. The original Chinese texts are nowhere to be found so it basically a fairy tale. It is not backed up by any hard evidence so by definition it is a work of fiction.

But for the sake of argument let's assume "The Secret History of the Mongols" to be legitimate. We still run into several issues with mainstream chronological history:
1. Genghis Khan isn't even a proper name it just means "Great Khan" (Great King).
2. There is not a single period coin depicting the name Genghis Khan or Temujin.
3. The Mongol coins that do use the word "Khan" are in plural, referring to "Khans".
4. There are no statues of Genghis Khan older than 200 years.
5. There are no direct written accounts by Genghis Khan or his generals
6. Genghis Khan constructed no military fortifications and founded no cities.
7. There are no trade pacts or treaties with Genghis Khan.
8. No contemporary leader ever references a Genghis Khan.
9. There are no period maps of Genghis Khan's conquests. (only modern graphical approximations exist).
10. Genghis Khan has no real tomb. Only monuments that were constructed centuries later exist.
11. The battlements on the Great wall of China face the wrong direction. Rather than pointing North they face South.
12. When Marco Polo visited the court of Kublai Khan he was described as a white man living in a Western styled palace. The ruin of Kublai Khan's palace can be seen here https://i.imgur.com/PSLvdw4.jpg.
This building was destroyed by Westerners in the second opium war, it resembles the exact style of "Western" "Tartarian" "Neoclassical" "Greek" architecture, megalithic in nature being constructed out of large stone, how was this accomplished by a nomadic horse-back people?
13. There are other books that describe a great "Khan" of the Moguls and his sons as men with blonde hair and blue eyes. Translators of the Golden book were pressured into inserting fictitious names (See here). Mogul is not to be confused with Mongolia.

The Mongol Empire Was a Myth Invented In 1908 by a Mongol Nationalist Named Baavuday Tsend Gun (Part 2)
(Part 1)

And ultimately the biggest rebuttal is that, this so called Mongol Empire was according to historians was the BIGGEST on the planet, and supposedly brought forth such a scale of death and destruction that it lead to ecological change - today from them remains what? Mongolia is one of the least populated countries in Asia, eclipsed by both of it's neighbors hundreds of times over.

So Where are all the foreign Mongol loanwords in Russian? The Mongolian language has dozens of Russian words for every one supposed Mongol word in Russian. Contrary to the claims of Fascist WW2 propaganda, there is in fact no evidence to support Mongolian genetics in Eastern Europeans, only the opposite of Mongols in fact being partly Russian, this can be attested not only through genetic study, but through the visual phenotype of many Mongolian people who often (though not necessarily commonly) resemble Europeans, even sometimes having blue or green eyes and lighter hair.

If the Mongol Empire were real, then it was the ONLY one to not leave a single, linguistic, genetic, cultural, or archeological trace. The myth of the Mongol Empire is one of complete delusion from one delusional zealous nationalist named Baavuday Tsend Gun

Lastly I would like to add that I write all of this without any hostility towards Mongolia or it's people and traditions. I am merely exposing the flaws of Jesuit history and the Scaligerian chronology. The word Mongol is not of Mongolian origin and was only recently introduced, the Mongols who live in modern day Mongolia have never called themselves such, but rather by their local ethnic names such as Oirats and Khalka. If you want to know who Genghis Khan really was (He was a White Russian), and the Real Mongol Empire (Tartaria), read these posts. The Mongol Empire was nothing more than a country called "Tartaria" by westerners. Tartaria was inhabited predominantly by Pagan Slavs, but also Turks Huns, Bulgars, Balts, Finns, Uralics, among hundreds of many other Pagan ethnic groups who had banded together to defend against the invaders. The real hostility here is against Slavic/Aryan people by the enemies who have been relentlessly destroying true history for the past millennia.

Recorded history is only 1000 years old and the current year is 722. All of human history happened only recently in the middle ages. Everything you have been taught is a lie!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_History_of_the_Mongols

Is Tartaria an "Anti-White" Psyop?
(Original Post Here)

The author of this channel, Thuletide, claims that Tartaria must be an "anti-White psyop" because of his very poor and misinformed understanding of what the theory is, which he summarizes as "White people couldn't have possibly built neo-classical architecture in the 1800s because of the lower technology, therefore European ingenuity is attributed to a global civilization" (Not his belief, but how he wrongly interprets the theory). Furthermore he draws a parallel between Tartaria, and the WEF proposed New World Order, a global empire that maintains peace, with free food and energy, which he then concludes that this theory is used to promote such New World Order. Let's explore this argument.

Before I proceed I must warn this information may be perceived as offensive to non-Aryan readers, but this is simply the truth and must not be taken in any harsh way. On first glance it seems as if there is no racial element to this theory - which is simply not the case after further investigation.

TARTARIA was the largest country to ever exist until it was annihilated by the Roman Empire in the 19th century. It was the empire of Aryans, which stretched from South America, through India to Europe, covering an area of tens of millions of square kilometers. In order to coverup the existence of this empire, Jesuit historians, namely Joseph Scaliger, have falsely documented this Empire under several different names, stretching them over 5 different millennia, some examples include, The Golden Horde, Babylonians, Huns, Egyptians, Scythia, and even Proto Indo Europeans or the "Aryans" of the Hindu Vedas. From extensive research it can only be concluded that all of these Empires, which we are told existed between five to one thousand years ago, all in fact existed at the same time and were one unified Empire which in the middle ages was known as "Tartaria".

This was a country founded by Aryans thousands of years ago who migrated southwards into Asia following a cataclysm after having landed on Earth in the North Pole, which was a continent known to them as "Da'Aria" on ancient Rus-Sanskrit language, by other cultures it was known under several other names such as "Hyperborea" by the Greeks, "Thule" by the Germanics, "Shambhala" by the Tibetans, among many more. Sometime in the 17th century this continent was wiped off the maps, not new maps were being forged which maliciously neglected to include this land.

These Aryans colonized the entire planet, establishing a global empire. That's why all around the world all of the indigenous non-white cultures have old legends about white gods, Aryans that came to them and showed them how to build cities, and shared knowledge with them, such as the Mayan God Votan, known by the same name as the Germanics, a traveler God who is the most wise. That's why ancient rulers everywhere were tall, fair skinned, and mostly blond, blue eyes. You can find them among the ruling class of ancient India, China, Persia, Armenia, Sumeria, Egypt, and other non-white cultures. Then there the Chachapoya of Peru the tall white race (Peru was named after Perun). All of the gods, goddesses, great rulers, heroes and warriors of Ancient Greece are specifically described as white skin, blonde hair, blue eyes. So to claim that this theory is in any way anti-white, is just as ludicrous as claiming that the history of Western Colonialism in the 15th-19th centuries is, which on the surface appears to be the same narrative, until one realizes that Western Colonialism was really Rothschild-Jesuit expansionism, under the guise of European imperialism, not led by Europeans, but by the (((Bible people))), in a campaign to take over colonized lands of Tartaria.

Lastly, what I find most ironic is that the author of this channel, Thuletide, a Pagan, favours the version of history created by the Vatican, which has been completely unfavourable towards Aryans in general. The entirety of modern history is the work of just a handful of Jesuit priests between the 17th and 19th centuries, who speak absolute lies regarding out ancestors. The core tenant of the church is that our ancestors were some primitive degenerate subhuman savages living in mudhuts, then we were "enlightened" by a Jewish religion which civilized us - this is one of the most blasphemous claims one can make against our ancestors. Christianity has stolen credit for creating civilization in Europe, claiming that they created all of the cathedrals and architecture, when in reality it was stolen from us Aryans who understood high technology and atmospheric power generation. They want to steal Aryan ingenuity and attribute it to the Jewish religion. This is what parasites do.

The Yezidis in Iraq are an ancient Indo-Aryan ethnic group, often called the “blonde blood line”. They are infamous for their religion of "Yezidism", for which they have been the subject of genocide and slavery by Muslim invaders.

The Yezidis know their god as SATAN (Shaitan), however due to centuries of Muslim persecution they are forbidden to speak this name out of fear, they refer to Satan under numerous names such as "Melek Tawus" and "Ankar". They are forbidden to share knowledge with outsiders and most practice occurs in secret, though some of their beliefs are found in the Al-Jilwah, also known as the Black Book of Satan. They state that they migrated many centuries ago from Northern India into the Near East, and were part of ancient civilizations.

Much like the Slavo-Aryan calendar, the Yezidi calendar is over seven thousand years old and they follow the old Pagan ways. They also worship the Sun God whom they call Shamash, also known as Dazhbog to the Slavs, the Greek Apollo, or Azazel in the Bible.