— 🇮🇱/🇩🇰/🇾🇪 NEW: Shipping company 'Maersk' announces it suspends shipping in the Red Sea after renewed Houthi attacks
The shipping company had just resumed its shipping after the formation of the US-led 'Prosperity Guardian' coalition, but is now tracking back.
The company said they will be avoiding the Red Sea lanes for at least 48 hours following tonight's attack.
@Middle_East_Spectator
The shipping company had just resumed its shipping after the formation of the US-led 'Prosperity Guardian' coalition, but is now tracking back.
The company said they will be avoiding the Red Sea lanes for at least 48 hours following tonight's attack.
@Middle_East_Spectator
🔥274😁76🤣68👍23❤🔥6❤6🤬6🤡5🙏2👏1🐳1
🔗 AFP News Agency (@AFP)
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
FxTwitter / FixupX
AFP News Agency (@AFP)
#BREAKING Xi says China 'will surely be reunified' in New Year's speech
👍169❤🔥49😁20🤡14🍌12⚡6🖕5🤩4👨💻4👎2🙏1
— 🇺🇸/🇾🇪 NEW: At least 10 Houthis were killed today and two wounded when US forces struck their boats in the southern Red Sea, two sources at Yemen’s Hodeida port say - AFP
@Middle_East_Spectator
@Middle_East_Spectator
🤬335🕊57🔥51👍28❤26💔18🖕17👎7😡6🤨3💩1
— 🇮🇱/🇺🇳/🇵🇸 NEW: Israeli troops fired at a U.N. Convoy carrying humanitarian aid in Gaza last week, spokesman says it was an accident
@Middle_East_Spectator
@Middle_East_Spectator
🤬362💩68🤣39🤡31👎6🥴5🤷♀3✍2🌚2😐2🍌1
— 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇾🇪 BREAKING: The United States and the United Kingdom are planning to launch a joint wave of airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen – The Times
Under the plans the U.K. would join with the U.S. and possibly another European country to unleash a salvo of missiles against pre-planned targets, either in the sea or in Yemen itself, where the militants are based.
It is understood that 'an unprecedented statement' is due to be released by the U.K. and the U.S. in the coming hours which will warn the Houthis to stop attacking commercial vessels or face the military might of the West.
@Middle_East_Spectator
Under the plans the U.K. would join with the U.S. and possibly another European country to unleash a salvo of missiles against pre-planned targets, either in the sea or in Yemen itself, where the militants are based.
It is understood that 'an unprecedented statement' is due to be released by the U.K. and the U.S. in the coming hours which will warn the Houthis to stop attacking commercial vessels or face the military might of the West.
@Middle_East_Spectator
💩311🤣58🤬41🖕38👍21❤10🤮10🔥7🎉7🤪6😱4
— 🇬🇧/🇮🇷 NEW: U.K. Foreign Secretary David Cameron called Iranian Foreign Minister Amir Abdollahian
Reportedly, they talked about important regional developments. Iran warned Israel and the United Kingdom of any miscalculations.
@Middle_East_Spectator
Reportedly, they talked about important regional developments. Iran warned Israel and the United Kingdom of any miscalculations.
@Middle_East_Spectator
🥱165👍59😴15🤡11❤8🤮7✍5🤔4💩3🕊1😡1
— 🇾🇪 Yemen's Ansarullah: We confirm the martyrdom of 10 of our soldiers while performing their humanitarian and moral duty in support of Palestine, by preventing Israeli-linked ships from passing through the Red Sea towards occupied Palestine
@Middle_East_Spectator
@Middle_East_Spectator
🫡351😢43❤28🎉16💩14🕊14💔10👍9😁6🤬6🙏6
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
⚓️ 🇺🇸 🇾🇪 The U.S. Navy is Unprepared for a Prolonged War with Yemen pt1
🔶️ Tiny Yemen has surprised the West with its tenacity and ferocity in attacking ships trying to ferry containers and fuel to Israel.
🔶️ Before explaining the risks, you must understand that the U.S. Navy is configured currently as a “Forward-Based Navy” and is not an “Expeditionary Navy.” Anthony Cowden, writing for the Center for International Maritime Security in September, examined this issue in his article, REBALANCE THE FLEET TOWARD BEING A TRULY EXPEDITIONARY NAVY.
🔶️ Due to the unique geographical position of the U.S., the Navy has the luxury of defending the nation’s interests “over there.” Since World War II, it developed and maintained a navy that was able to project power overseas; to reconstitute its combat power while still at sea or at least far from national shores; and continuously maintain proximity to competitors. This expeditionary character minimized the dependence of the fleet on shore-based and homeland-based infrastructure to sustain operations, allowing the fleet to be more logistically self-sufficient at sea.
🔶️ However, late in the Cold War, the U.S. Navy started to diminish its expeditionary capability, and became more reliant on allied and friendly bases. A key development was subtle but consequential – the vertical launch system (VLS) for the surface fleet’s primary anti-air, anti-submarine, and land-attack weapons. While a very capable system, reloading VLS at sea was problematic and soon abandoned. While an aircraft carrier can be rearmed at sea, surface warships cannot, which constrains the ability of carrier strike groups to sustain forward operations without taking frequent trips back to fixed infrastructure. The Navy is revisiting the issue of reloading VLS at sea, and those efforts should be reinforced.
🔶️ The next step the Navy took away from an expeditionary capability was in the 1990s, when it decommissioned most of the submarine tenders (AS), all of the repair ships (AR), and destroyer tenders (AD), and moved away from Sailor-manned Shore Intermediate Maintenance Centers (SIMA). Not only did this eliminate the ability to conduct intermediate maintenance “over there,” but it destroyed the progression of apprentice-to-journeyman-to-master technician that made the U.S. Navy Sailor one of the premier maintenance resources in the military world. Combat search and rescue, salvage, and battle damage repair are other areas in which the U.S. Navy no longer has sufficient capability for sustaining expeditionary operations.
🔶️ Each U.S. destroyer carries an estimated 90 missiles (perhaps a few more). Their primary mission is to protect the U.S. aircraft carrier they are shielding. What happens when Yemen fires 100 drones/rockets/missiles at a U.S. carrier? The U.S. destroyer, or multiple destroyers will fire their missiles to defeat the threat. Great. Mission accomplished! Only one little problem, as described in the preceding quote — the U.S. Navy got rid of the ship tenders, i.e. those vessels capable of resupplying destroyers with new missiles to replace the expended rounds. In order to reload, that destroyer must sail to the nearest friendly port where the U.S. has stockpiled missiles for resupply.
🔶️ If the destroyer must sail away then the U.S. carrier must follow. It cannot just sit out in the ocean without its defensive screen of ships. The staying power of a U.S. fleet in a combat zone, like Yemen, is a function of how many missiles the Yemenis fire at the U.S. ships.
https://sonar21.com/the-u-s-navy-is-unprepared-for-a-prolonged-war-with-yemen/
🔶️ Tiny Yemen has surprised the West with its tenacity and ferocity in attacking ships trying to ferry containers and fuel to Israel.
🔶️ Before explaining the risks, you must understand that the U.S. Navy is configured currently as a “Forward-Based Navy” and is not an “Expeditionary Navy.” Anthony Cowden, writing for the Center for International Maritime Security in September, examined this issue in his article, REBALANCE THE FLEET TOWARD BEING A TRULY EXPEDITIONARY NAVY.
🔶️ Due to the unique geographical position of the U.S., the Navy has the luxury of defending the nation’s interests “over there.” Since World War II, it developed and maintained a navy that was able to project power overseas; to reconstitute its combat power while still at sea or at least far from national shores; and continuously maintain proximity to competitors. This expeditionary character minimized the dependence of the fleet on shore-based and homeland-based infrastructure to sustain operations, allowing the fleet to be more logistically self-sufficient at sea.
🔶️ However, late in the Cold War, the U.S. Navy started to diminish its expeditionary capability, and became more reliant on allied and friendly bases. A key development was subtle but consequential – the vertical launch system (VLS) for the surface fleet’s primary anti-air, anti-submarine, and land-attack weapons. While a very capable system, reloading VLS at sea was problematic and soon abandoned. While an aircraft carrier can be rearmed at sea, surface warships cannot, which constrains the ability of carrier strike groups to sustain forward operations without taking frequent trips back to fixed infrastructure. The Navy is revisiting the issue of reloading VLS at sea, and those efforts should be reinforced.
🔶️ The next step the Navy took away from an expeditionary capability was in the 1990s, when it decommissioned most of the submarine tenders (AS), all of the repair ships (AR), and destroyer tenders (AD), and moved away from Sailor-manned Shore Intermediate Maintenance Centers (SIMA). Not only did this eliminate the ability to conduct intermediate maintenance “over there,” but it destroyed the progression of apprentice-to-journeyman-to-master technician that made the U.S. Navy Sailor one of the premier maintenance resources in the military world. Combat search and rescue, salvage, and battle damage repair are other areas in which the U.S. Navy no longer has sufficient capability for sustaining expeditionary operations.
🔶️ Each U.S. destroyer carries an estimated 90 missiles (perhaps a few more). Their primary mission is to protect the U.S. aircraft carrier they are shielding. What happens when Yemen fires 100 drones/rockets/missiles at a U.S. carrier? The U.S. destroyer, or multiple destroyers will fire their missiles to defeat the threat. Great. Mission accomplished! Only one little problem, as described in the preceding quote — the U.S. Navy got rid of the ship tenders, i.e. those vessels capable of resupplying destroyers with new missiles to replace the expended rounds. In order to reload, that destroyer must sail to the nearest friendly port where the U.S. has stockpiled missiles for resupply.
🔶️ If the destroyer must sail away then the U.S. carrier must follow. It cannot just sit out in the ocean without its defensive screen of ships. The staying power of a U.S. fleet in a combat zone, like Yemen, is a function of how many missiles the Yemenis fire at the U.S. ships.
https://sonar21.com/the-u-s-navy-is-unprepared-for-a-prolonged-war-with-yemen/
👍193🤡22❤14💩13🔥11🎉2👎1
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
⚓️ 🇺🇸 🇾🇪 The U.S. Navy is Unprepared for a Prolonged War with Yemen pt2
🔶️ Each of the Aegis missiles, as I noted in my previous post, cost at least $500,000 dollars. A retired U.S. DOD official told me today that the actual cost is $2 million dollars. If Yemen opts to use drone swarms to saturate the battle space around a carrier, then the United States will firing very expensive missiles to destroy relatively inexpensive drones. This brings up another critical vulnerability — the U.S. only has a limited supply of these air defense missiles and does not have the industrial capability in place and operating to produce new ones rapidly to make up the deficit.
🔶️ Then there is the problem of finding the mobile missile platforms in Yemen. Remember the problems the United States had in Iraq in 1991 trying to find and destroy SCUD missile launch systems? While ISR systems are better today, there is still no guarantee of being able to locate and destroy in a timely manner. The Yemenis have more than 8 years experience dealing with U.S. ISR and U.S. drone attacks. On November 9th the Yemenis shot down a MQ-9 Reaper drone. That baby costs a little more than $30 million dollars.
🔶️ Here is the bottomline. The United States flotilla, along with its allies, can do some damage to Yemen but are unlikely to achieve a decisive victory. Yemen, for its part, can inflict some serious damage to some of the ships — maybe even sink one or two — and by doing so, score a moral victory that will fuel doubts about America’s naval capabilities and staying power. Perhaps this explains why the U.S. has been so slow to respond to the attacks launched by Yemen.
https://sonar21.com/the-u-s-navy-is-unprepared-for-a-prolonged-war-with-yemen/
🔶️ Each of the Aegis missiles, as I noted in my previous post, cost at least $500,000 dollars. A retired U.S. DOD official told me today that the actual cost is $2 million dollars. If Yemen opts to use drone swarms to saturate the battle space around a carrier, then the United States will firing very expensive missiles to destroy relatively inexpensive drones. This brings up another critical vulnerability — the U.S. only has a limited supply of these air defense missiles and does not have the industrial capability in place and operating to produce new ones rapidly to make up the deficit.
🔶️ Then there is the problem of finding the mobile missile platforms in Yemen. Remember the problems the United States had in Iraq in 1991 trying to find and destroy SCUD missile launch systems? While ISR systems are better today, there is still no guarantee of being able to locate and destroy in a timely manner. The Yemenis have more than 8 years experience dealing with U.S. ISR and U.S. drone attacks. On November 9th the Yemenis shot down a MQ-9 Reaper drone. That baby costs a little more than $30 million dollars.
🔶️ Here is the bottomline. The United States flotilla, along with its allies, can do some damage to Yemen but are unlikely to achieve a decisive victory. Yemen, for its part, can inflict some serious damage to some of the ships — maybe even sink one or two — and by doing so, score a moral victory that will fuel doubts about America’s naval capabilities and staying power. Perhaps this explains why the U.S. has been so slow to respond to the attacks launched by Yemen.
https://sonar21.com/the-u-s-navy-is-unprepared-for-a-prolonged-war-with-yemen/
👍214❤23❤🔥16🤣14🖕9🤡7🔥6🆒3👎2🙏2🕊2
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global
⚓️ 🇺🇸 🇾🇪 The U.S. Navy is Unprepared for a Prolonged War with Yemen pt2 🔶️ Each of the Aegis missiles, as I noted in my previous post, cost at least $500,000 dollars. A retired U.S. DOD official told me today that the actual cost is $2 million dollars. If…
— A very detailed and interesting analysis. Worth the read.
👍197💩22❤8🤣5🤡3😐3🕊2😁1🎉1💯1
— 🇮🇱/🇱🇧 NEW: Virtually all Israeli cabinet ministers are urging Netanyahu for decisive action against Hezbollah in Lebanon; the pressure is mounting, but the Prime Minister wants to wait till all options are exhausted
@Middle_East_Spectator
@Middle_East_Spectator
🤣256💩62🤔17🖕13😁7🥱7👍5❤3😈3🤡2
— 🇫🇷/🇺🇸/🇬🇧 NEW: France will reportedly join in the US + UK military coalition which will carry out airstrikes against Yemen
@Middle_East_Spectator
@Middle_East_Spectator
💩368🖕115🤬22👍21🥱15🎉11🤮9❤4😁4🤔2😈1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
— 🇱🇧 Hezbollah's Elite 'Ridwan' Special Forces have released a new video
The video was uploaded with the following verse from the Holy Quran:
'Say, “Are you awaiting anything to befall us except one of the two best things: ˹victory or martyrdom˺?
But We are awaiting Allah to afflict you with torment either from Him or at our hands. So keep waiting! We too are waiting with you.” (9:52)
@Middle_East_Spectator
The video was uploaded with the following verse from the Holy Quran:
'Say, “Are you awaiting anything to befall us except one of the two best things: ˹victory or martyrdom˺?
But We are awaiting Allah to afflict you with torment either from Him or at our hands. So keep waiting! We too are waiting with you.” (9:52)
@Middle_East_Spectator
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥334❤59🤡28👍22❤🔥8🥱6👎5🙏5🤨4😁2🦄2
Forwarded from Middle East Spectator — MES
Disclaimer: We denounce violence and terrorism of any kind, anything shared is purely for journalistic purposes.
🤣270👍74🤓59🤡35🗿17☃8💩8🖕7🙈7❤4💯3
Middle East Spectator — MES
— 🇬🇧/🇮🇷 NEW: U.K. Foreign Secretary David Cameron called Iranian Foreign Minister Amir Abdollahian Reportedly, they talked about important regional developments. Iran warned Israel and the United Kingdom of any miscalculations. @Middle_East_Spectator
Sorry guys, his name is David, not James Cameron. Lol, my apologies.
🤣256😁32🤡9👍8💩4❤2✍2🌚1🍓1
— 🇮🇷 NEW: The IRIS 'Alborz' warship has entered the Red Sea near Yemen as part of Iran's 94th Naval flotilla
@Middle_East_Spectator
@Middle_East_Spectator
🔥519❤🔥81👏54❤30🤡28👍18😱8🤮5😁3🏆3🆒2
— 🇮🇱/🇵🇸 NEW: About an hour ago, in the first minute of the New Year 2024, Al-Qassam launched a large rocket barrage into Israel
@Middle_East_Spectator
@Middle_East_Spectator
🔥444🎉130❤61🫡35👍19🍾14🥰12🖕12😢8🤡6🙏3
— Well, I just found out that it is ILLEGAL in Israel to get a DNA test
I wonder why 😁
@Middle_East_Spectator
I wonder why 😁
@Middle_East_Spectator
🤣751😁52🤡46🤔33🤯10🖕8🌚4🥱3🌭3👎2😈1