Fake identity was never a major issue. The identity of people who committed the greatest crimes against humanity, who destroyed nations and stole from all of us for centuries was never in question. They stole, tortured and killed openly, in broad daylight, under the guise of the good, with the blessing of the Church, with the approval of the Human Rights committees, and in compliance with the ‘law’. In short, knowledge of identity was never an obstacle to evil. There were indeed long periods in human history when people were not legally permitted to do what is objectively right, and only by concealing their identity they were able to counter the evils of their times.

This was unexpected. I just noticed:)

Private consumption and spending patterns are proprietary information. Defend it or lose it. If you have a smart meter at home, you can start there; put a time-limited licensing fee on any facility capable of harvesting your proprietary information. I did, and they never installed a smart meter.

It is a personal responsibility to show your face in any social context and not to cause harm to others. We know that self-defacement hurts others, especially children. Face masks dehumanise.

The idea of ‘national soul’ is another core Nazi concept, a remand of tribal, pagan prejudice, which is opposed to any universal conception of humanity, or ‘human soul’. The West is simply Rationality (Aristotle) and pan-humanism (Kant), the only cultural sphere that has consciously attempted to overcome its own tribal prejudice and has become conscious of its own racism (philosophically, if not always in practice), but this western idea has spread all around the world, and every country is now to various degrees Western, because all nations are (at least ostensibly) committed to formal rationality, expressed though modern science and the rules of political discourse, and to pan-humanism. Despite our errors, failures, contradictions, animalistic nostalgia and the remnant, tribal prejudices we all live in a Western world (philosophically speaking), but few have perfected their pan-humanist conduct in social life and politics. The alleged divide between West and East misrepresents territorial and economic interests of different factions of the West as a spiritual or philosophical conflict, which it is not. The only outstanding conflict is between rationality and non-sense, between right vs wrong.

Non-sense can never be Virtue or Duty, and this is why pre-modern spiritual and imperial ethics are collectively defeated by western Rationalism (Immanuel Kant), as a the objectively right ethical framework. This does not negate those dogmas of ancient ethics that happen to coincide with rational ethics, despite their cultural frameworks being procedurally defective (dogmas and spiritual insights violate the principle of sufficient reason and therefore the law of non-contradiction).

When a doctor tells you that your child is in an abnormal state (sickness) you do not accuse them of hating your child; the doctor states a fact. Similarly, when you describe a female pretending to be a male as a female, or male pretending to be a female as a male, or transgenderism as a pathological abnormality of the binary sexual function, it does not follow that you hate that person, or discriminate against facts, but state the facts. We can sympathise with people afflicted with abnormalities without normalising those abnormalities, what would in turn cause harm to healthy people. For example, when females are forced to compete against males in female sports, or strip naked in front of male strangers in a female change-room, this amounts to prejudice against females. To normalise the unhealthy or abnormal is to pathologise and injure that which is healthy.

“You will own nothing and be happy hungry.” (WEF apologises for any inconvenience caused by a typo in the earlier version of their agenda documentation.)

I have explained the issues with paganism, naturalism and animism here: https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/949 The idea of belonging to a tribe is distinct from tribalism, insofar as one does not identify with the tribe in a special way compared to the rest of humanity. The issue of ‘National Soul’ is that it precludes belonging of non-natives on the basis of rational understanding but only on the basis of familial relations and at the very least on submission to the tribal/cultural norms, which (apart from the laws of sense/logic) are always, invariably dogmatic and of themselves amount to nativist prioritarianism. This is of course not a black a white matter, and there are degrees of ‘priority’ that various tribes may demand, and the word tribe is also used informally, to designate people you know, agree with and like, but I use the term tribe/tribalism only in the sense of traditional, familial, biological relation. There is another issue with tribalism in this stronger sense of the term. Members identifying with traditional, especially ancient tribes, have little if any interest in other cultures, they would rather avoid them and don’t want to study them (insular, escapist behaviour), whereas people who have altogether relinquished or lost any tribal identity seek out other cultures and view them with fascination and awe, they want to get to know them, and I suggest there is a profound lesson in this difference. Tribalism seems to be a form of intoxication, an echo chamber based on energetic animal connection, and i very much understand its attraction, i feel it. It is incredibly powerful, a kind of bliss of belonging, but nevertheless a metaphysical dead end, precluding growth beyond the confines of the norms imposed by the tribal conditioning. Rational consciousness freed from tribalism demands more, seeks more, is ready to grown beyond mere culture and custom into universal being, and this kind of pan-humanist connection is our deepest yearning, our ideal, unbounded by blood, signified in religions by the idea of God.

I do understand the issue of mass migration, when two tribal/cultural systems are forcibly mixed without adequate preparation and the will to transcend the ancient cultural norms in favour of rational deliberation and agreement on the basis of the rules of sense/nonsense. There is also the legitimate issue of ‘economic nationalism’ where migration allows free access to the tax wallet created and owned by others, so mass migration can be (and usually is) parasitic. https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2019/09/25/inclusion-without-belonging-ontology-of-the-migrant/

If you say that tribes have priority on a particular land, that is nativist prioritarianism; another way of saying that nobody else “really” belongs (or can belong). Another interesting test of what a tribal person stands for is how they react when someone says: hey, i wont play along with your stupid customs, i wont say what you want me to say or do what you want me to do, it doesn’t make sense to me, and i dont like it. If a tribal person is offended and hurt, they have just affirmed tribal supremacism and irrationalism. I have visited many many cultures and countries in my life, and the first thing I do is to say NO, i wont accept your invitation for dinner, i wont honour your elders, your art, or you king, it means nothing to me, and if they are offended I explain why i do it, that it is more important to me to reach a genuine understanding, to get to know their true moral character, than to be entertained with cultural pretences and food. I want to know how HUman they are willing to be, whether they will meet me on even ground and abide by common rules, nothing else matters. And that does not mean I despise them, i just expect more, i want them to be more, because I too crave peers.

“Death threats” seem to be the standard PR tactic to manage activist backlash, so this is probably not true. If these threats were real they would amount to a confirmed terrorist threat from transgender activists, and transgender activism would, by the same token, risk being classified as a terrorist movement. Based on these considerations, plus the support for Deves’ views being expressed by Jacinta Price (in front of “uncomfortable looking” Scott Morrison) I infer that this is an intentional electoral strategy, developing association with anti-radical views without taking a direct stance on the issue. In short, playing conservative without openly denouncing the radicals.

It is reasonable to conclude, all things considered, that Ukraine was set up for de-nazification by the western powers and globalists. They armed them, feigned ideological support for the Ukrainian ultranationalists who were waving the Blood and Soil flag (a symbol of “racial purity” used historically by Banderites and SS alike to motivate ethnic cleansing of Belarusians, Latvians, Poles and Jews). In short, other nations gave enough rope to Ukrainian Nazis to suicide by Putin, and it seems few if any of them will be allowed to survive, prohibited by Zelensky from surrendering. This is the only plausible explanation I can see for Israel arming and ostensibly supporting actual Nazis.

Elon Musk has released his Hyperloop “white paper” (a few rough drawings of a pneumatically suspended vehicle in a vacuum tunnel, with no calculations to speak of to back up the design, with an aerodynamically nonsensical compressor/fan on the nose:)) about one year after I published my HSTV design. Another US consortium has subsequently scooped up my IP for the ‘through-vaccum’ air supply valve, under the guise of collaboration, then ghosted me. I wonder… https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/1275

What is the difference between Fascism and Communism?

Communists kill the most competent people first, then work their way down.

Fascists kill the least competent people first, then work their way up.

Next on TEDx: “Necrophilia is a natural sexual orientation, you bigots!”

There is no redemption possible for NSA Twitter.