“You will own nothing and be happy hungry.” (WEF apologises for any inconvenience caused by a typo in the earlier version of their agenda documentation.)

I have explained the issues with paganism, naturalism and animism here: https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/949 The idea of belonging to a tribe is distinct from tribalism, insofar as one does not identify with the tribe in a special way compared to the rest of humanity. The issue of ‘National Soul’ is that it precludes belonging of non-natives on the basis of rational understanding but only on the basis of familial relations and at the very least on submission to the tribal/cultural norms, which (apart from the laws of sense/logic) are always, invariably dogmatic and of themselves amount to nativist prioritarianism. This is of course not a black a white matter, and there are degrees of ‘priority’ that various tribes may demand, and the word tribe is also used informally, to designate people you know, agree with and like, but I use the term tribe/tribalism only in the sense of traditional, familial, biological relation. There is another issue with tribalism in this stronger sense of the term. Members identifying with traditional, especially ancient tribes, have little if any interest in other cultures, they would rather avoid them and don’t want to study them (insular, escapist behaviour), whereas people who have altogether relinquished or lost any tribal identity seek out other cultures and view them with fascination and awe, they want to get to know them, and I suggest there is a profound lesson in this difference. Tribalism seems to be a form of intoxication, an echo chamber based on energetic animal connection, and i very much understand its attraction, i feel it. It is incredibly powerful, a kind of bliss of belonging, but nevertheless a metaphysical dead end, precluding growth beyond the confines of the norms imposed by the tribal conditioning. Rational consciousness freed from tribalism demands more, seeks more, is ready to grown beyond mere culture and custom into universal being, and this kind of pan-humanist connection is our deepest yearning, our ideal, unbounded by blood, signified in religions by the idea of God.

I do understand the issue of mass migration, when two tribal/cultural systems are forcibly mixed without adequate preparation and the will to transcend the ancient cultural norms in favour of rational deliberation and agreement on the basis of the rules of sense/nonsense. There is also the legitimate issue of ‘economic nationalism’ where migration allows free access to the tax wallet created and owned by others, so mass migration can be (and usually is) parasitic. https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2019/09/25/inclusion-without-belonging-ontology-of-the-migrant/

If you say that tribes have priority on a particular land, that is nativist prioritarianism; another way of saying that nobody else “really” belongs (or can belong). Another interesting test of what a tribal person stands for is how they react when someone says: hey, i wont play along with your stupid customs, i wont say what you want me to say or do what you want me to do, it doesn’t make sense to me, and i dont like it. If a tribal person is offended and hurt, they have just affirmed tribal supremacism and irrationalism. I have visited many many cultures and countries in my life, and the first thing I do is to say NO, i wont accept your invitation for dinner, i wont honour your elders, your art, or you king, it means nothing to me, and if they are offended I explain why i do it, that it is more important to me to reach a genuine understanding, to get to know their true moral character, than to be entertained with cultural pretences and food. I want to know how HUman they are willing to be, whether they will meet me on even ground and abide by common rules, nothing else matters. And that does not mean I despise them, i just expect more, i want them to be more, because I too crave peers.

“Death threats” seem to be the standard PR tactic to manage activist backlash, so this is probably not true. If these threats were real they would amount to a confirmed terrorist threat from transgender activists, and transgender activism would, by the same token, risk being classified as a terrorist movement. Based on these considerations, plus the support for Deves’ views being expressed by Jacinta Price (in front of “uncomfortable looking” Scott Morrison) I infer that this is an intentional electoral strategy, developing association with anti-radical views without taking a direct stance on the issue. In short, playing conservative without openly denouncing the radicals.

It is reasonable to conclude, all things considered, that Ukraine was set up for de-nazification by the western powers and globalists. They armed them, feigned ideological support for the Ukrainian ultranationalists who were waving the Blood and Soil flag (a symbol of “racial purity” used historically by Banderites and SS alike to motivate ethnic cleansing of Belarusians, Latvians, Poles and Jews). In short, other nations gave enough rope to Ukrainian Nazis to suicide by Putin, and it seems few if any of them will be allowed to survive, prohibited by Zelensky from surrendering. This is the only plausible explanation I can see for Israel arming and ostensibly supporting actual Nazis.

Elon Musk has released his Hyperloop “white paper” (a few rough drawings of a pneumatically suspended vehicle in a vacuum tunnel, with no calculations to speak of to back up the design, with an aerodynamically nonsensical compressor/fan on the nose:)) about one year after I published my HSTV design. Another US consortium has subsequently scooped up my IP for the ‘through-vaccum’ air supply valve, under the guise of collaboration, then ghosted me. I wonder… https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/1275

What is the difference between Fascism and Communism?

Communists kill the most competent people first, then work their way down.

Fascists kill the least competent people first, then work their way up.

Next on TEDx: “Necrophilia is a natural sexual orientation, you bigots!”

There is no redemption possible for NSA Twitter.

Twitter is a virtual space where humans can share their thoughts with one another. At USD 44 Billion price tag, what else does it do?

Based on the recent valuation of Twitter at USD44 Billion, and considering there are 200 million active users, the price is roughy $220 per user. Elon Musk has effectively paid enough to have sex with each and every one of Twitter users (street price), but those users (despite being used) will not see this money; Twitter shareholders (the pimps: Vanguard, Blackrock etc) will. Or did he just buy your soul? 🔥

Inflation is not an organic, unavoidable consequence of “the market”; it is a policy decision. It is always intentional because inflation is a transfer of wealth from the entire economy to the banks… but first some basics. There are only two parameters that control inflation: a) the total volume of trade in a given period of time b) the total supply of money in the economy that is available to consumers. A third theoretical parameter is the velocity of money, but the changes in velocity are negligible in any relatively stable economy. In simple terms, the entire supply of money “chases” all the goods and services in the economy. If the same volume of money chases fewer good, prices go up. If more money chases the same supply of goods, prices go up. Assuming that the rate of consumption remains constant or growing, and there is significant price inflation, this unequivocally proves that banks are issuing more credit, therefore charging more interest. All the money in circulation with the exception of cash is just someone’s debt to the banking system, which attracts interest. It follows that all inflation under zero or positive growth is the gross profit of the banks. Banks decide how much and under what conditions they will issue credit, and bank credit is the M3 money supply (the money you “keep” in your bank account, which is 98% of all money in use, is made by the banks, at interest).

Causes of Inflation

CPI/Inflation is an aggregate measure for the entire economy, with only some “volatile” goods excluded. Let us assume a fixed amount of money in circulation. If, for example, the price of fertiliser goes up because of military conflict in Ukraine, this means that more money is directed towards buying fertiliser, leaving less money for other goods and services, and thus lowering the prices of those other goods and services. The net effect is still zero overall inflation. For inflation to rise due to supply chain issues there must be a disruption to all core supply chains, not just one. Covid restrictions have achieved that, but there is also an inexplicable policy shift among international shipping companies or seaport authorities to slow down supply chains. Even local supply chains are still inexplicably restricted. In addition, the glowing real estate prices force buyers to borrow ever more money to own a home, which has a direct effect of inflating the money supply: 98% of money in circulation is bank credit that someone took out and spent, but no matter where in the economy this money is, it attracts interest payable to the banks. This second factor is definitely a bank lending policy decision, with the loan guarantee scheme by the Government adding fuel to the fire. Everything is set up to justify a rapid increase of interest rates; again, this is a policy decision to decimate debtors, and the government, RBA or the banks are not telling the truth about the real reasons inflation is high. They are doing it, and they will raise interest rates, and anyone with debt will suffer like in the Great Depression. It will be slaughter… Unless there is another agenda, monetary substitution with a new sovereign currency, but we wont know until the day this happens.

Why would anyone invest hundreds of hours of their time to create content and grow a community on a platform that can lock you out at a drop of a hat if they dont like you. Twitter cannot be trusted.

EpiPen will not fix the public acquiescence to the removal of the right to free medical contents from their own children and from future generations. There must be consequences. They must atone.

Compliance with vaccine mandates is a blood bond, a collective crime of acquiescence to the removal of the right to free medical consent from our children and future generations, and if this moral wrong is to be normalised for the future generations then those who teach children must be themselves guilty but in denial, must be complicit but believe that what they did was right, so that they themselves will want to normalise their crime to evade the realisation of guilt and the associated liability.