The banking system is currently employing an ‘imperfect transfer of purchasing power’ (otherwise known as ‘multiple spending’ of the same dollar, at the same time) to expand the money supply by means of bank-issued accounting tokens and simultaneously derive massive profit from essentially imposing a private tax (interest) on the entire money supply. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3737447 In order to avoid this kind of expropriation of public wealth in a cash based money-system, the banks would need to hold vault-cash to cover all current deposit balances. This would require regular audits, but on the current scale of banking such audits are nearly impossible and therefore can be gamed. The only fool-proof way of preventing the imperfect transfer of purchasing power is via blockchain, where banks would be required to hold the equivalent value of all current deposits in the form of Central Bank Digital Currency, convertible to cash on demand, whereas their retail customers could use either cash or credit tokens issued by their bank (which would then be fully backed by CBDC). The first step to solve the problem is of course to acknowledge the problem. Until then CBDC cannot be seen as a favourable development.
Ssrn
A Monetary Case for Value-added Negative Tax
I address the most fundamental yet routinely ignored issue in economics: that of distributive impact of the monetary system on the real economy. By reexamining
# Collective Unconscious https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty
There is no way that NATO leaders would travel to Ukraine and parade around like sitting ducks without Putin’s approval and protection. Therefore, it appears, there is a degree of collusion between Russia and NATO.
Military leaders would never rely on the belief in the civility and good sense of their (allegedly mad, war criminal) adversary. Logical proofs are more powerful than empirical evidence.
Military leaders would never rely on the belief in the civility and good sense of their (allegedly mad, war criminal) adversary. Logical proofs are more powerful than empirical evidence.
The mystery of public support for vaccine mandates
The main reason for the widespread support for vaccine mandates is not that the majority don’t believe that some people are killed by vaccines, but that they regard these mandated killings as morally justified, as a ‘necessary’ human sacrifice. Where the moral conscience is lacking, no amount of empirical evidence or education will change the afflicted minds. They must suffer the full consequences of their moral error in order to learn.
The main reason for the widespread support for vaccine mandates is not that the majority don’t believe that some people are killed by vaccines, but that they regard these mandated killings as morally justified, as a ‘necessary’ human sacrifice. Where the moral conscience is lacking, no amount of empirical evidence or education will change the afflicted minds. They must suffer the full consequences of their moral error in order to learn.
The speech by Lisa Wilkinson in which she referred to the allegation of rape as a fact, benefited only the accused rapist, a Liberal staffer, not the accuser. What a great way to cause a mistrial if she wanted to do a favour to the Liberal party. Did Lisa make a deal with the Liberals to throw Higgins under the bus? Was she working for them from the start? https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/judge-blasts-wilkinson-s-logies-speech-about-higgins-20220621-p5avd3.html
The Sydney Morning Herald
Trial delayed after Wilkinson’s Logies speech about Higgins
The judge said she was not satisfied any directions to a jury to disregard reporting of Lisa Wilkinson’s speech or any preconceptions they might have about the case would ensure a fair trial.
The purpose of radical social change in relation to sexuality and gender is not to transform but to destroy you. The norms of humanity are not arbitrary, these are not cultural contingencies that can be permanently modified by indoctrination, but are underpinned by at least three hundred thousand years of phenomenological, socially-reflexive conditioning, unconsciously assembled into a common ontological structure, the universal foundation of meaning, which we call the Collective Unconscious. Those who consistently transgress the limits imposed by this structure are bound to dis-integrate mentally, because they sabotage their own capacity for meaning. Respect your disgust, because it protects your integrity in the face of aberration.
Those who are connoscripted against their free will are not soldiers, not army, but hostages.
Forwarded from Frontline Workers Speak Out! 💉❤️🩹 #AU
A_Review_of_COVID19_Vaccination_Manadtes_in_Australian_Residential.pdf
35.6 KB
Dear Friends,
The Futility of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates (Micro Summary)
The whole point of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination is to put a protective ‘ring of vaccination’ around the most vulnerable.
Yet in the most highly vaccinated sector, i.e. Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), we found that mandatory COVID-19 staff vaccination did not:
1. Mitigate or break the nexus between staff and resident infection.
2. Mitigate or break the nexus between infection in the broader community and infection amongst staff and residents in RACFs.
3. Control the scope, scale, and intensity of outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in RACFs.
4. Control the consequences of COVID-19 amongst residents of RACFs, in particular mortality.
At some point in time, epidemiological models, vaccine trials, and pharmaceutical theory must translate into real-world benefits.
And, if this is their picture of success, what does failure look like?
@Beach
Love Courage Justice💜🕊⚖
The Futility of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates (Micro Summary)
The whole point of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination is to put a protective ‘ring of vaccination’ around the most vulnerable.
Yet in the most highly vaccinated sector, i.e. Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), we found that mandatory COVID-19 staff vaccination did not:
1. Mitigate or break the nexus between staff and resident infection.
2. Mitigate or break the nexus between infection in the broader community and infection amongst staff and residents in RACFs.
3. Control the scope, scale, and intensity of outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in RACFs.
4. Control the consequences of COVID-19 amongst residents of RACFs, in particular mortality.
At some point in time, epidemiological models, vaccine trials, and pharmaceutical theory must translate into real-world benefits.
And, if this is their picture of success, what does failure look like?
@Beach
Love Courage Justice💜🕊⚖
Forwarded from Frontline Workers Speak Out! 💉❤️🩹 #AU
A_Review_of_COVID19_Vaccination_Mandates_in_Australian_Residential.pdf
2 MB
Dear Friends,
The Futility of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates (Full Report)
The whole point of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination is to put a protective ‘ring of vaccination’ around the most vulnerable.
Yet in the most highly vaccinated sector, i.e. Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), we found that mandatory COVID-19 staff vaccination did not:
1. Mitigate or break the nexus between staff and resident infection.
2. Mitigate or break the nexus between infection in the broader community and infection amongst staff and residents in RACFs.
3. Control the scope, scale, and intensity of outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in RACFs.
4. Control the consequences of COVID-19 amongst residents of RACFs, in particular mortality.
At some point in time, epidemiological models, vaccine trials, and pharmaceutical theory must translate into real-world benefits.
And, if this is their picture of success, what does failure look like?
@Beach
Love Courage Justice💜🕊⚖
The Futility of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates (Full Report)
The whole point of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination is to put a protective ‘ring of vaccination’ around the most vulnerable.
Yet in the most highly vaccinated sector, i.e. Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), we found that mandatory COVID-19 staff vaccination did not:
1. Mitigate or break the nexus between staff and resident infection.
2. Mitigate or break the nexus between infection in the broader community and infection amongst staff and residents in RACFs.
3. Control the scope, scale, and intensity of outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in RACFs.
4. Control the consequences of COVID-19 amongst residents of RACFs, in particular mortality.
At some point in time, epidemiological models, vaccine trials, and pharmaceutical theory must translate into real-world benefits.
And, if this is their picture of success, what does failure look like?
@Beach
Love Courage Justice💜🕊⚖
Forwarded from janedoe
the first step seems to have been to get all the ''experts'' in psychology and sociology to reduce the status of adults in society by describing them as behind the times, in thrall to outdated values and morals, and with nothing beneficial to offer youth in a time of ''unprecedented social and technological change'' which they have been spruiking apparently since the mid-1800s. next step was the experts described the many ways that adults have harmed youth (eg authoritarian parenting styles apparently led to young people being drawn to fascism, or adults insisting on old fashioned moral and behavioural codes and preventing youth from ''freely expressing themselves''). then the argument goes, that once adulthood is seen as deeply problematic and with no moral authority, young people are bereft of any clear pathway to adulthood (and also may lack the motivation to even take a pathway to adulthood). this created the ''generation gap'' and the first academic discussions of a ''youth identity crisis'' in the 1940s. it seems to have just gone on from there