The speech by Lisa Wilkinson in which she referred to the allegation of rape as a fact, benefited only the accused rapist, a Liberal staffer, not the accuser. What a great way to cause a mistrial if she wanted to do a favour to the Liberal party. Did Lisa make a deal with the Liberals to throw Higgins under the bus? Was she working for them from the start? https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/judge-blasts-wilkinson-s-logies-speech-about-higgins-20220621-p5avd3.html
The Sydney Morning Herald
Trial delayed after Wilkinson’s Logies speech about Higgins
The judge said she was not satisfied any directions to a jury to disregard reporting of Lisa Wilkinson’s speech or any preconceptions they might have about the case would ensure a fair trial.
The purpose of radical social change in relation to sexuality and gender is not to transform but to destroy you. The norms of humanity are not arbitrary, these are not cultural contingencies that can be permanently modified by indoctrination, but are underpinned by at least three hundred thousand years of phenomenological, socially-reflexive conditioning, unconsciously assembled into a common ontological structure, the universal foundation of meaning, which we call the Collective Unconscious. Those who consistently transgress the limits imposed by this structure are bound to dis-integrate mentally, because they sabotage their own capacity for meaning. Respect your disgust, because it protects your integrity in the face of aberration.
Those who are connoscripted against their free will are not soldiers, not army, but hostages.
Forwarded from Frontline Workers Speak Out! 💉❤️🩹 #AU
A_Review_of_COVID19_Vaccination_Manadtes_in_Australian_Residential.pdf
35.6 KB
Dear Friends,
The Futility of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates (Micro Summary)
The whole point of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination is to put a protective ‘ring of vaccination’ around the most vulnerable.
Yet in the most highly vaccinated sector, i.e. Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), we found that mandatory COVID-19 staff vaccination did not:
1. Mitigate or break the nexus between staff and resident infection.
2. Mitigate or break the nexus between infection in the broader community and infection amongst staff and residents in RACFs.
3. Control the scope, scale, and intensity of outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in RACFs.
4. Control the consequences of COVID-19 amongst residents of RACFs, in particular mortality.
At some point in time, epidemiological models, vaccine trials, and pharmaceutical theory must translate into real-world benefits.
And, if this is their picture of success, what does failure look like?
@Beach
Love Courage Justice💜🕊⚖
The Futility of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates (Micro Summary)
The whole point of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination is to put a protective ‘ring of vaccination’ around the most vulnerable.
Yet in the most highly vaccinated sector, i.e. Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), we found that mandatory COVID-19 staff vaccination did not:
1. Mitigate or break the nexus between staff and resident infection.
2. Mitigate or break the nexus between infection in the broader community and infection amongst staff and residents in RACFs.
3. Control the scope, scale, and intensity of outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in RACFs.
4. Control the consequences of COVID-19 amongst residents of RACFs, in particular mortality.
At some point in time, epidemiological models, vaccine trials, and pharmaceutical theory must translate into real-world benefits.
And, if this is their picture of success, what does failure look like?
@Beach
Love Courage Justice💜🕊⚖
Forwarded from Frontline Workers Speak Out! 💉❤️🩹 #AU
A_Review_of_COVID19_Vaccination_Mandates_in_Australian_Residential.pdf
2 MB
Dear Friends,
The Futility of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates (Full Report)
The whole point of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination is to put a protective ‘ring of vaccination’ around the most vulnerable.
Yet in the most highly vaccinated sector, i.e. Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), we found that mandatory COVID-19 staff vaccination did not:
1. Mitigate or break the nexus between staff and resident infection.
2. Mitigate or break the nexus between infection in the broader community and infection amongst staff and residents in RACFs.
3. Control the scope, scale, and intensity of outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in RACFs.
4. Control the consequences of COVID-19 amongst residents of RACFs, in particular mortality.
At some point in time, epidemiological models, vaccine trials, and pharmaceutical theory must translate into real-world benefits.
And, if this is their picture of success, what does failure look like?
@Beach
Love Courage Justice💜🕊⚖
The Futility of COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates (Full Report)
The whole point of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination is to put a protective ‘ring of vaccination’ around the most vulnerable.
Yet in the most highly vaccinated sector, i.e. Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs), we found that mandatory COVID-19 staff vaccination did not:
1. Mitigate or break the nexus between staff and resident infection.
2. Mitigate or break the nexus between infection in the broader community and infection amongst staff and residents in RACFs.
3. Control the scope, scale, and intensity of outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 in RACFs.
4. Control the consequences of COVID-19 amongst residents of RACFs, in particular mortality.
At some point in time, epidemiological models, vaccine trials, and pharmaceutical theory must translate into real-world benefits.
And, if this is their picture of success, what does failure look like?
@Beach
Love Courage Justice💜🕊⚖
Forwarded from janedoe
the first step seems to have been to get all the ''experts'' in psychology and sociology to reduce the status of adults in society by describing them as behind the times, in thrall to outdated values and morals, and with nothing beneficial to offer youth in a time of ''unprecedented social and technological change'' which they have been spruiking apparently since the mid-1800s. next step was the experts described the many ways that adults have harmed youth (eg authoritarian parenting styles apparently led to young people being drawn to fascism, or adults insisting on old fashioned moral and behavioural codes and preventing youth from ''freely expressing themselves''). then the argument goes, that once adulthood is seen as deeply problematic and with no moral authority, young people are bereft of any clear pathway to adulthood (and also may lack the motivation to even take a pathway to adulthood). this created the ''generation gap'' and the first academic discussions of a ''youth identity crisis'' in the 1940s. it seems to have just gone on from there
THE AUSTRALIAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DEFINITION OF 'WOMAN'
“The frameworks adopted to define a person's gender include chromosomal makeup, the gender assigned at birth, and the gender with which a person identifies. The Department of Health does not adopt a single definition.”
I would like to ask for some clarification:
1. How does the department determine gender when the chromosomal makeup is that of a MALE but the person identifies as a WOMAN?
2. How does the department determine gender of deceased people, whose legal identity and gender preferences are unknown?
3. Does gender self-identification trump the evidence of chromosomal makeup?
4. If gender can have multiple definitions then why doesn’t the Department assign multiple gender identities to a person?
“The frameworks adopted to define a person's gender include chromosomal makeup, the gender assigned at birth, and the gender with which a person identifies. The Department of Health does not adopt a single definition.”
I would like to ask for some clarification:
1. How does the department determine gender when the chromosomal makeup is that of a MALE but the person identifies as a WOMAN?
2. How does the department determine gender of deceased people, whose legal identity and gender preferences are unknown?
3. Does gender self-identification trump the evidence of chromosomal makeup?
4. If gender can have multiple definitions then why doesn’t the Department assign multiple gender identities to a person?
The term “patriarchy” was weaponised to make you hate your father and those who have the will to protect you with their own life, instead of the sociopathic aristocracy.
Forwarded from Normal (Michael Kowalik)
1. The Government: We must stop hate to make the world a better place (ie safer for us to feed off your work).
2. The Progressive Revolutionary: We must fight the Patriarchy. How? Make us the government and give us more power to stop hate and make the world a better place (ie safer for us to feed off your work)
3. The Progressive Revolutionay Government: We must stop hate to make the world a better place (ie safer for us to feed off your work).
4. Give us back our freedom, we are oppressed and starving! We want New Government…
5. The Government… 🥂
2. The Progressive Revolutionary: We must fight the Patriarchy. How? Make us the government and give us more power to stop hate and make the world a better place (ie safer for us to feed off your work)
3. The Progressive Revolutionay Government: We must stop hate to make the world a better place (ie safer for us to feed off your work).
4. Give us back our freedom, we are oppressed and starving! We want New Government…
5. The Government… 🥂
LA, Seattle and SF birthing persons demand the recognition of an imaginary constitutional right to abortion by committing to monastic life in the service of Christ. “We will all just become pious nuns if you do not accept our demands” whispered the heavily tattooed spokesperson for the movement named Mary Magdalene, holding her hands in the Amen position and then making the sign of the cross towards the Vice correspondent. Mary refused to define ‘Woman’ and preferred to stick with the more inclusive term ‘birthing person’.
https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2019/07/02/respect-the-limit-of-abortion-rights/ An earlier version of this article was published in Quadrant magazine, September 2019: https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2019/09/the-logical-limit-of-rights-to-abortion/
Cultural Analysis & Philosophy
Respect – the Limit of Abortion Rights
The abortion debate is focussed almost exclusively on whether abortion is morally permissible or not, with the implicit assumption that if it is permissible then the foetus has no moral status and …
Forwarded from SURVIVAL FILES INFO DUMP 2