Carbon dioxide (CO2) Facts on Telegram by GRT : the true behind global greenhouse gas emissions / planet pollution – Telegram
Gemeinsam unterwegs in eine klimafreundliche Zukunft https://perma.cc/GUB8-7PZ4 ... Ja Sicher SBB! wenn du das glaubst, indem du die Preise MASSIV erhöhst ...

Wieder bzgl.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/659

Bahnfahren ist umweltfreundlich: Rund 10 Prozent der Schweizer Gesamtemissionen können dank der Verkehrsverlagerung auf die Bahn vermieden werden. Dies entspricht rund 5 Millionen Tonnen CO2 pro Jahr https://perma.cc/LF3Q-M787

La Suisse a émis 45,2 millions de tonnes de CO2 en 2021. 31% de ces émissions sont dues aux transports, dont 0,3% seulement au chemin de fer https://perma.cc/P6N2-EMTL

Travelling by train cuts energy consumption by about 75% and CO2 emissions by 95%. You have the power to opt for environmentally friendly rail-based transport. We offer a variety of tools to help you make these decisions ... https://perma.cc/7KR6-7H7L

Energie & Umweltschutz in der Plakatsammlung https://perma.cc/3YWG-3CNE

E-Auto oder Zug? Und ist das E-Velo wirklich so nachhaltig? https://perma.cc/7A72-QDUC

Figure 1 bzgl. 🇸🇪, Figure 2017 bzgl. 🇬🇷

Zudem wäre Zeit die Flugreise Zürich Genf zu verbieten! https://perma.cc/HX8X-RN9H
Eine unnötige 45 Minute Reise (+ boarding / checking / security / waiting / trip to airport / etc. = mehr als 3h Reise) für 100 CHF statt den Zug zu nehmen für 2h 45 min für 88 CHF, bzw. 176 CHF mit Rückfahrt, vs die alten 30-35 CHF https://perma.cc/QP4X-3APM

Aber ja, die Schweiz schläft noch! Natürlich sollten man SBB nehmen, wenn es möglich ist, aber auch SBB sollte BESSERE PREISE ANBIETEN!, vor allem für bestimmte "nicht reiche Gruppen"

Conclusion: it's time to ban the local airplane trips and to create better prices for public transports, because currently they discriminate a lot of groups.

Saying "please use the train" but then always just increase the price make no sense at all! It costs more to do a trip in Switzerland, than take the plane to a random Europe city, which is ridiculous!
Climate change, an opportunity for high-speed train manufacturers https://perma.cc/7GA3-4EUP

Rail transport represents 6.4% of the global transportation modal worldwide but less than 1% of CO2 emissions.

For Sweden battery production emissions were higher than the emissions from electricity production. Battery production emissions form a significant share of the overall emissions per pkm and should always be considered when comparing the emissions of electric transportation modes with those of conventional ones.

Sweden (and Norway ...), benefiting from the low emissions in electricity production. The same accounts for electric cars and electric coaches on routes in Sweden that show lower emissions than their conventional counterparts.

Using electric modes to Estonia is not recommended because they produce higher emissions than conventional modes do, exceeding even those of conventional aircraft.

The carbon intensities of electricity consumed from the Finnish, Swedish and Estonian grid were obtained from Moro and Lonza (2018): 211 g CO2-eq kWh−1 in Finland, 47 g CO2-eq kWh−1 in Sweden, and 944 g CO2-eq kWh−1 in Estonia.

Learn more about car, ship, train, bus, aviation pollution on
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/509
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PolestarTelegram
or by searching this channel, checking previous posts