Forwarded from [DE] NatureFreaks Telegram Talk auf Deutsch / German / Tedesco über Tiere / Natur und Mission Erde / Earth (Discord Kanal)
Gemeinsam unterwegs in eine klimafreundliche Zukunft https://perma.cc/GUB8-7PZ4 ... Ja Sicher SBB! wenn du das glaubst, indem du die Preise MASSIV erhöhst ...
Wieder bzgl.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/659
Bahnfahren ist umweltfreundlich: Rund 10 Prozent der Schweizer Gesamtemissionen können dank der Verkehrsverlagerung auf die Bahn vermieden werden. Dies entspricht rund 5 Millionen Tonnen CO2 pro Jahr https://perma.cc/LF3Q-M787
La Suisse a émis 45,2 millions de tonnes de CO2 en 2021. 31% de ces émissions sont dues aux transports, dont 0,3% seulement au chemin de fer https://perma.cc/P6N2-EMTL
Travelling by train cuts energy consumption by about 75% and CO2 emissions by 95%. You have the power to opt for environmentally friendly rail-based transport. We offer a variety of tools to help you make these decisions ... https://perma.cc/7KR6-7H7L
Energie & Umweltschutz in der Plakatsammlung https://perma.cc/3YWG-3CNE
E-Auto oder Zug? Und ist das E-Velo wirklich so nachhaltig? https://perma.cc/7A72-QDUC
Figure 1 bzgl. 🇸🇪, Figure 2017 bzgl. 🇬🇷
Zudem wäre Zeit die Flugreise Zürich Genf zu verbieten! https://perma.cc/HX8X-RN9H
Eine unnötige 45 Minute Reise (+ boarding / checking / security / waiting / trip to airport / etc. = mehr als 3h Reise) für 100 CHF statt den Zug zu nehmen für 2h 45 min für 88 CHF, bzw. 176 CHF mit Rückfahrt, vs die alten 30-35 CHF https://perma.cc/QP4X-3APM
Aber ja, die Schweiz schläft noch! Natürlich sollten man SBB nehmen, wenn es möglich ist, aber auch SBB sollte BESSERE PREISE ANBIETEN!, vor allem für bestimmte "nicht reiche Gruppen"
Conclusion: it's time to ban the local airplane trips and to create better prices for public transports, because currently they discriminate a lot of groups.
Saying "please use the train" but then always just increase the price make no sense at all! It costs more to do a trip in Switzerland, than take the plane to a random Europe city, which is ridiculous!
Wieder bzgl.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/659
Bahnfahren ist umweltfreundlich: Rund 10 Prozent der Schweizer Gesamtemissionen können dank der Verkehrsverlagerung auf die Bahn vermieden werden. Dies entspricht rund 5 Millionen Tonnen CO2 pro Jahr https://perma.cc/LF3Q-M787
La Suisse a émis 45,2 millions de tonnes de CO2 en 2021. 31% de ces émissions sont dues aux transports, dont 0,3% seulement au chemin de fer https://perma.cc/P6N2-EMTL
Travelling by train cuts energy consumption by about 75% and CO2 emissions by 95%. You have the power to opt for environmentally friendly rail-based transport. We offer a variety of tools to help you make these decisions ... https://perma.cc/7KR6-7H7L
Energie & Umweltschutz in der Plakatsammlung https://perma.cc/3YWG-3CNE
E-Auto oder Zug? Und ist das E-Velo wirklich so nachhaltig? https://perma.cc/7A72-QDUC
Figure 1 bzgl. 🇸🇪, Figure 2017 bzgl. 🇬🇷
Zudem wäre Zeit die Flugreise Zürich Genf zu verbieten! https://perma.cc/HX8X-RN9H
Eine unnötige 45 Minute Reise (+ boarding / checking / security / waiting / trip to airport / etc. = mehr als 3h Reise) für 100 CHF statt den Zug zu nehmen für 2h 45 min für 88 CHF, bzw. 176 CHF mit Rückfahrt, vs die alten 30-35 CHF https://perma.cc/QP4X-3APM
Aber ja, die Schweiz schläft noch! Natürlich sollten man SBB nehmen, wenn es möglich ist, aber auch SBB sollte BESSERE PREISE ANBIETEN!, vor allem für bestimmte "nicht reiche Gruppen"
Conclusion: it's time to ban the local airplane trips and to create better prices for public transports, because currently they discriminate a lot of groups.
Saying "please use the train" but then always just increase the price make no sense at all! It costs more to do a trip in Switzerland, than take the plane to a random Europe city, which is ridiculous!
Climate change, an opportunity for high-speed train manufacturers https://perma.cc/7GA3-4EUP
Rail transport represents 6.4% of the global transportation modal worldwide but less than 1% of CO2 emissions.
For Sweden battery production emissions were higher than the emissions from electricity production. Battery production emissions form a significant share of the overall emissions per pkm and should always be considered when comparing the emissions of electric transportation modes with those of conventional ones.
Sweden (and Norway ...), benefiting from the low emissions in electricity production. The same accounts for electric cars and electric coaches on routes in Sweden that show lower emissions than their conventional counterparts.
Using electric modes to Estonia is not recommended because they produce higher emissions than conventional modes do, exceeding even those of conventional aircraft.
The carbon intensities of electricity consumed from the Finnish, Swedish and Estonian grid were obtained from Moro and Lonza (2018): 211 g CO2-eq kWh−1 in Finland, 47 g CO2-eq kWh−1 in Sweden, and 944 g CO2-eq kWh−1 in Estonia.
Learn more about car, ship, train, bus, aviation pollution on
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/509
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PolestarTelegram
or by searching this channel, checking previous posts
Rail transport represents 6.4% of the global transportation modal worldwide but less than 1% of CO2 emissions.
For Sweden battery production emissions were higher than the emissions from electricity production. Battery production emissions form a significant share of the overall emissions per pkm and should always be considered when comparing the emissions of electric transportation modes with those of conventional ones.
Sweden (and Norway ...), benefiting from the low emissions in electricity production. The same accounts for electric cars and electric coaches on routes in Sweden that show lower emissions than their conventional counterparts.
Using electric modes to Estonia is not recommended because they produce higher emissions than conventional modes do, exceeding even those of conventional aircraft.
The carbon intensities of electricity consumed from the Finnish, Swedish and Estonian grid were obtained from Moro and Lonza (2018): 211 g CO2-eq kWh−1 in Finland, 47 g CO2-eq kWh−1 in Sweden, and 944 g CO2-eq kWh−1 in Estonia.
Learn more about car, ship, train, bus, aviation pollution on
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/509
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PolestarTelegram
or by searching this channel, checking previous posts
Scientists estimate that by 2095 forest services will decrease on average by 52% in Europe’s Mediterranean area https://perma.cc/7Q7F-CQBQ
The results suggest that without active human intervention, the services that forest provide in Europe will on average decrease by 15% until 2095. Under a high carbon emission scenario, the average decline would be 23% for Europe and up to 70% for the Mediterranean area. Soil protection and fuelwood will be the most affected services in the Mediterranean region with an average loss of 53% to 57%.
The EU 2022 wildfire season was the second worst on record https://perma.cc/CN82-9N5E
Excluding war-torn Ukraine, Spain was the most affected by wildfires with a total of 315 705 ha. This is three-and-a-half more than in 2021.
The total burnt surface in these protected areas in 2022 reached 365 308 ha, the highest amount mapped in the last ten years. The damage was particularly concentrated in three countries: Spain, Romania and Portugal. Together, they accounted for over 75% of the total area burnt in protected areas.
Looking just at the EU, in 2022, fires were mapped in 26 of the EU27 countries (all except Luxembourg), burning 837 212 ha in total. This represents 86% more than the 449 342 ha recorded in 2021.
The results suggest that without active human intervention, the services that forest provide in Europe will on average decrease by 15% until 2095. Under a high carbon emission scenario, the average decline would be 23% for Europe and up to 70% for the Mediterranean area. Soil protection and fuelwood will be the most affected services in the Mediterranean region with an average loss of 53% to 57%.
The EU 2022 wildfire season was the second worst on record https://perma.cc/CN82-9N5E
Excluding war-torn Ukraine, Spain was the most affected by wildfires with a total of 315 705 ha. This is three-and-a-half more than in 2021.
The total burnt surface in these protected areas in 2022 reached 365 308 ha, the highest amount mapped in the last ten years. The damage was particularly concentrated in three countries: Spain, Romania and Portugal. Together, they accounted for over 75% of the total area burnt in protected areas.
Looking just at the EU, in 2022, fires were mapped in 26 of the EU27 countries (all except Luxembourg), burning 837 212 ha in total. This represents 86% more than the 449 342 ha recorded in 2021.
Forwarded from RussianTelegramFreaks: Russian Telegram Freaks from Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan (Україна, Россия, тик-ток)
Russia is the world’s largest exporter of oil and gas combined and the fourth biggest CO2 emitter, so it’s efforts in mitigating CO2 emissions are globally significant in curbing climate change. However, the existing emission inventories only present national CO2 emissions; the subnational emission details are missing. In addition, the emission factors are not country-specific and energy activity data by fossil energy types and sectors are not sufficiently detailed.
Since existing emission inventories of Russia do not provide detailed emissions by energy types and socio-economic sectors, a further comparison of the emissions by energy types and by socio-economic sectors cannot be made.
Overall, Russia’s energy structure is relatively stable from 2005 to 2019.
Since existing emission inventories of Russia do not provide detailed emissions by energy types and socio-economic sectors, a further comparison of the emissions by energy types and by socio-economic sectors cannot be made.
Overall, Russia’s energy structure is relatively stable from 2005 to 2019.