Trump's policy proposals for next term: revoke benefits from illegals, end birthright citizenship, end chain migration, suspend refugee resettlement, block Islamic countries + Socialist countries (all of which are brown), end DEI (DEI is anti-White), put tarriffs on China et al. (that is for White industry and labour), end the Department of Education (therefore neutering a big propaganda institution), cut off illegal immigration (therefore slowing displacement). This is not to mention his great economy and fight against the cartels.

President Trump acknowledges that many of his first-term promises were impeded or outright canceled, he trusted the wrong people. He could not drain the swamp on his own and he was surrounded by subversion, which is why he has now employed Elon Musk and RFK Jr. to assist him with the great task—remember, Musk's purchase of Twitter has given us a great win for speech and exposure. Even if you dislike all three of these men, the opportunity, not your opinion, is what matters most.

Being realistic: you will never rehabilitate Hitler in the history of common minds, you cannot ‘redpill the masses’ to the extreme extent some wish to. You have no need to. There is no need to mass-reproduce “The Greatest Story Never Told” or whichever narrative you feel emotionally attached to.

It is in fact counterproductive to accept the regressive focus our opponent sets. In 1950 and prior, the average American was already morally and mentally where we want to be, the ‘Holocaust’ talk hadn't even become relevant until decades later—let it die on its own. Our better path to energising the masses is using what rhetoric and policy that actually reaches them.

Post-60s mythology can be defeated well by deconstructing its core, such as the MLK Jr. rooted ideology. Dulling MLKism & leftism alone neuters the control well enough for patriotic, nativist, restrictionist, and community sentiment to flourish. In this way, we destroy and derail the system where we must, and turn parts in our favour where we can.

The system is a massive network, not a monolith. It is a consistent force of pressure, and such pressure cannot be done-away with by a pen stroke.

Consider that there are tens of thousands of employees accompanied by massive business interests and relentless foreign interests. Our Congress has 535 members, each member having up to 25 lobbyists around them. Over a third of former congressmen become lobbyists and many lobbyists seek election as various politicians.

Add to this the biased and manipulative Media, enemy of the people, and the ever-growing financial system. All this is defended by intense regulations and litigations, a legal system we have barely begun to tackle. If you wish to act, find a role and support whatever helps.

“[The Palestinian leader] was so nice, couldn't have been nicer . . . after meeting with Bibi for 3 minutes, I said ‘You don't want to make a deal do you?’ and he said ‘Well uh uh uh’, and the fact is, I don't think Bibi ever wanted to make a deal”.

Trump recognises that Netanyahu, Israel, is the main problem regarding stability in the Middle East. Contrary to memetic rhetoric of him serving their interests wholeheartedly, Trump refused to start any new wars and even intervened to prevent them.

In his own words, Israel needs to pay us back, and he hopes to leverage the aid we have given them since 1948 (regardless of who has been president) in our favour.

That said, the Israel lobby is so immense, a president cannot merely ‘reject’ them, they have threatened former presidents and give 10x more support to Trump's opponents. His strongest base, White Christians, largely supports Israel, and the greatest anti-Zionist camp is very anti-White. This means a balance has to be struck between tempering the problem state and dealing with the third-world.

Proposals of a travel ban, death penalty and deportation of violent anti-Semites—none of whom are our concern—and an enforced ideological filter works in our favour against radical leftists and foreign undesirables. In tandem with banning refugees, especially those from the brown zone, adjusting the conditions of all foreign aid, and strong peace-keeping, this is taking good advantage of an otherwise impossible situation.

Points against Accelerationism:

1) Political Solutions do exist, they are not the sole solution, obviously nothing so complex is univariate. A ‘political solution’ opens up opportunities and gives us more to work with, that is worth the effort.

2) The world is deeply diverse, to the tune of billions, and Whites would remain a divided race, unlikely to be united by their skin colour and instead split over ideology and priorities in such a scenario.

3) Collapse is unlikely and the cases we have of it only indicate status quo shedding skin to start again. The Soviet Union may have fell, its Eastern Bloc prevails and the non-Western alliance recouped.

4) Were the US dollar to collapse, the US unable to pay its debts, or the EU to fail, this would shift the power dynamic of nations, but not reduce ‘Woke’, anti-Whiteness—which the East supports—or provide any better chances.

We operate better with greater hope than worse suffering and should heed openings to empower ourselves and displace the rest.

Charlemagne, King of the Franks, responsible for much of the current structure of Europe. In the Jewish Encyclopedia, he is noted to have been a clever man, especially clever in his relationship with the cleverest race, the Jews.

Charlemagne permitted them into positions he found useful, such as Business, yet he limited their political and religious status, reducing the negatives they could cause or induce while still taking advantage of their skills. Like his killing of the Saxons, uniting of the Germanics, or adoption of Christianity, this approach with Jews was highly practical and prosperous.

Adolf Hitler, in all his controversies and apparent intolerance towards Jewry, greatly admired the mentality of Charlemagne: “Charlemagne . . . was one of the greatest men in world history. . . . History must be interpreted in terms of the necessities of the time”. —04.02.42

“I do not intend to rescue that race . . . I would like to put it in a position where it is unable to propagate the evil . . .”

Napoleon Bonaparte was the Colossus of the Nineteenth, a reputation he could only attain through thoughtful action. Napoleon reformed every inch of society, led battles unprecedented, and made decisions highly critiqued.

Of such decisions, in religious and racialist circles alike, a most contentious move was the enfranchisement of Jews. Albeit misguided, it did work in big ways. This wasn't a one-way street, Napoleon had statesman Louis Molé probe the activity of the Jewish community, and he took to dismantling the money system in which they were engrained.

Compare to today, in effect, with Trump. DTJ has been the loudest voice against Evil, e.g. his crusade against Fake News, the Deep State, Uniparty, and the way he frustrates the System. Tapping into men like Elon, Kennedy, he has a means to begin “reducing the evil” better than before, an effort we can then inherit and improve.

Neither Trump nor Vance can get rid of Israel, for obvious reasons. The former has explained the difficulty of trying to do so, and understands it has to be dealt with wisely. The latter acknowledges Israel is an issue, likewise opposes war—he says war on their behalf is not in our interest, and encourages mitigating our involvement in their mess such that ‘our allies can advance their own interests’ without distracting us or our resources.

Important economic aims of the potential new Trump Era:

1) Tariffs against our enemies and allies alike. Tariffs are not a solution in themselves, naturally, but they will help to fund improvements and disuade the unwanted. His firm trade rules mitigate much of the drawbacks of tariffs, securing their usefulness.

2) Bring back manufacturing and development, first point helps with this, and punish companies, schools, and institutions responsible for or complicit in negative or foreign influence. Affirm native culture, native jobs, native wealth.

3) Considering ending Income Tax, unburdening the native American population. Self-explanatory, Income Tax egregiously takes away direct income, on top of hidden tax & waste.

4) Doing something about the Federal Reserve. President Trump has interest in either having a say over the activity of the Fed, or outright breaking it. Vance recently has indicated leaning towards Ron Paul (abolitionist).

Notable mentions: cap usury, disenfranchise migrants.

“After years of building up foreign countries, we are finally going to build up our Country, defend our borders, and protect our cities. We will not be invaded. We will not be occupied. We will not be conquered.”

–President Donald J. Trump

“We have to say [“How is this good for Americans”] . . . if [money] is not spent in a way that is beneficial to the American people, it is a misuse of the funds.”

–Anticipated head of the proposed Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk

Promising aims of the potential Trump-Era—whether you like them or not, or believe only 30% or 80% of it will happen, this leans into proper Nationalism. 

Having greatly delegitimised the System, the coming phase is to reduce & repudiate it. Elon hopes to cut up to 80% of the govt, Trump calls to defund & restrict migrants (No Migration without Consent), RFK jr. has told the FDA, CDC, etc. to pack their bags, add to this better staffing, which Kennedy has vouched for, less foreign influence, and a reworked financial system.

Wall Street Journal reports: Trump Plans to Restrict Legal Immigration, exactly as he fought to do First Term—despite complaints of comments in favour of ‘coming legally’ or ‘green cards for grads’, which he ‘supported’ in 2012, 2013, etc... In office, he was a migration minimiser.

2017, he endorsed a major bill to cut legal migration by 50% and eliminate policies that allow for unwanted legal and diverse entry. 2018, he sought to ‘reject shitholes’ and accept ‘nice countries like Norway’. 2019, he had markedly stifled legal migration. Trump rejected legals, decreased the foreign-born, capped refugees to their lowest in decades, and spiked VISA denials to historic highs, all before COVID.

While Congress stiffed many bills, impeded the Wall, and his admin faced never-before-seen lawsuits, explicitly against his migration restriction efforts, hopeful is his term two govt purge & day one blitz, defended by their law firm powerhouse, which would open up big change. From there, we segue in the right direction.

Less than two weeks after my post, Ron Paul has opted to join Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency and Elon has repeatedly replied in agreement or curiousity to posts calling to End the Federal Reserve.

Additionally, this week, it has been confirmed that Kushner will not be in the White House, meanwhile Kennedy and Don Jr., among others, are working to oppose the acceptance of neo-cons into the administration. Doubt less, do more.

Trump explains the benefit of hiring someone you may otherwise disagree with, taking advantage of their useful quality without allowing the undesirable quality to take over. He used John Bolton, a known war-monger & regime changer, which Bolton is proud of, to prevent wars.

It was an effective play, to the point of Bolton leaving in annoyance because Trump refused to start any wars and succeeded at improving peace relations. It can come off as questionable to allow someone dislikeable into a position of relative importance; the point is not to empower them, but to use them for your own power.

Hitler's use of Hjalmar Schacht, a devout Capitalist, is a comparable case. Schacht was not a National Socialist, he actually did not like most aspects of National Socialism. Schacht was the main man responsible for the ‘Economic Miracle’ of Germany, had the highest recorded IQ of any NSDAP figure, and did not even like the ideology. That was a worthwhile compromise.

Stephen Miller outlines the coming migration policy:

Seal the border, deport all the illegals. ... [Then] add safe thirds, remain in Mexico. Finish the wall. Robust prosecutions of illegal aliens, interior repatriation flights into Mexico, not back to the north of Mexico. Re-implement Title 42, 212 Fs, Travel Ban . . . bring those back and add new ones on top of that.

Establish large scale staging grounds for removal flights: grab migrants, move them to the staging grounds, federal law enforcement ships them off on planes back home.

Deputize the National Guard to carry out immigration enforcement, deploy the military to the southern border, not just with a mission to observe but with an impedance and denial mission.

In other words, you reassert the fundamental constitutional principle that you don't have a right to enter into our sovereign territory to even request the asylum claim. The military has the right to establish a fortress position on the border, and to say no one can cross here at all.

The ‘Left’ historically has made headway through unrest at the bottom aided by investment from the top. Notorious for this in recent decades is George Soros. Soros actively finances leftist activism, cultural change, and progressivism, his social engineering empire spans outside of the US and into Europe.

Elon Musk has shown this strategy to be viable in our favour. He began with purchasing one of the grandest social media platforms, turning it into a freer speech platform. Using this digital town square, he exposes and normalises important subjects, including confronting the ADL and sharing pro-White rhetoric.

During the Election, Elon's platform was instrumental in keeping the public aware, engaged. Elon himself staged voter giveaways and personally campaigned for the President. Since then, Elon has pledged to advise Trump closely, threatened to punish disloyalty in Congress, is working to replace bad DA's, is advocating wise foreign policy, and formed DOGE to shrink the government. Systemic revolution.

Joe Biden's administration was simultaneously the most Catholic, most Jewish, and least White in American history. Contrary to the memes of his detractors, the administration of First Term Trump was the Whitest in four decades, his judiciary the Whitest in three, and his migration policy the best since 1965.

Thus far, the second Trump administration is headed to again be the Whitest this century and the least Jewish in our lifetime. Some remark that, despite being so White, most of them are ‘Zionists’—the overwhelming majority of adult White Christians are ‘Zionists’. Hard to avoid. These White Christians are still the most anti-migrant demographic, and lean against the System.

Until the younger generation comes to fore, which is less fond of Israel, but also far less White, the adult generation still has its turn. The efforts of men like Elon or Stephen Miller provides a platform to push farther. Notably, the GOP has been overhauled and conservatism turned more paleo, opportune for a better transition.