Charlemagne, King of the Franks, responsible for much of the current structure of Europe. In the Jewish Encyclopedia, he is noted to have been a clever man, especially clever in his relationship with the cleverest race, the Jews.

Charlemagne permitted them into positions he found useful, such as Business, yet he limited their political and religious status, reducing the negatives they could cause or induce while still taking advantage of their skills. Like his killing of the Saxons, uniting of the Germanics, or adoption of Christianity, this approach with Jews was highly practical and prosperous.

Adolf Hitler, in all his controversies and apparent intolerance towards Jewry, greatly admired the mentality of Charlemagne: “Charlemagne . . . was one of the greatest men in world history. . . . History must be interpreted in terms of the necessities of the time”. —04.02.42

“I do not intend to rescue that race . . . I would like to put it in a position where it is unable to propagate the evil . . .”

Napoleon Bonaparte was the Colossus of the Nineteenth, a reputation he could only attain through thoughtful action. Napoleon reformed every inch of society, led battles unprecedented, and made decisions highly critiqued.

Of such decisions, in religious and racialist circles alike, a most contentious move was the enfranchisement of Jews. Albeit misguided, it did work in big ways. This wasn't a one-way street, Napoleon had statesman Louis Molé probe the activity of the Jewish community, and he took to dismantling the money system in which they were engrained.

Compare to today, in effect, with Trump. DTJ has been the loudest voice against Evil, e.g. his crusade against Fake News, the Deep State, Uniparty, and the way he frustrates the System. Tapping into men like Elon, Kennedy, he has a means to begin “reducing the evil” better than before, an effort we can then inherit and improve.

Neither Trump nor Vance can get rid of Israel, for obvious reasons. The former has explained the difficulty of trying to do so, and understands it has to be dealt with wisely. The latter acknowledges Israel is an issue, likewise opposes war—he says war on their behalf is not in our interest, and encourages mitigating our involvement in their mess such that ‘our allies can advance their own interests’ without distracting us or our resources.

Important economic aims of the potential new Trump Era:

1) Tariffs against our enemies and allies alike. Tariffs are not a solution in themselves, naturally, but they will help to fund improvements and disuade the unwanted. His firm trade rules mitigate much of the drawbacks of tariffs, securing their usefulness.

2) Bring back manufacturing and development, first point helps with this, and punish companies, schools, and institutions responsible for or complicit in negative or foreign influence. Affirm native culture, native jobs, native wealth.

3) Considering ending Income Tax, unburdening the native American population. Self-explanatory, Income Tax egregiously takes away direct income, on top of hidden tax & waste.

4) Doing something about the Federal Reserve. President Trump has interest in either having a say over the activity of the Fed, or outright breaking it. Vance recently has indicated leaning towards Ron Paul (abolitionist).

Notable mentions: cap usury, disenfranchise migrants.

“After years of building up foreign countries, we are finally going to build up our Country, defend our borders, and protect our cities. We will not be invaded. We will not be occupied. We will not be conquered.”

–President Donald J. Trump

“We have to say [“How is this good for Americans”] . . . if [money] is not spent in a way that is beneficial to the American people, it is a misuse of the funds.”

–Anticipated head of the proposed Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk

Promising aims of the potential Trump-Era—whether you like them or not, or believe only 30% or 80% of it will happen, this leans into proper Nationalism. 

Having greatly delegitimised the System, the coming phase is to reduce & repudiate it. Elon hopes to cut up to 80% of the govt, Trump calls to defund & restrict migrants (No Migration without Consent), RFK jr. has told the FDA, CDC, etc. to pack their bags, add to this better staffing, which Kennedy has vouched for, less foreign influence, and a reworked financial system.

Wall Street Journal reports: Trump Plans to Restrict Legal Immigration, exactly as he fought to do First Term—despite complaints of comments in favour of ‘coming legally’ or ‘green cards for grads’, which he ‘supported’ in 2012, 2013, etc... In office, he was a migration minimiser.

2017, he endorsed a major bill to cut legal migration by 50% and eliminate policies that allow for unwanted legal and diverse entry. 2018, he sought to ‘reject shitholes’ and accept ‘nice countries like Norway’. 2019, he had markedly stifled legal migration. Trump rejected legals, decreased the foreign-born, capped refugees to their lowest in decades, and spiked VISA denials to historic highs, all before COVID.

While Congress stiffed many bills, impeded the Wall, and his admin faced never-before-seen lawsuits, explicitly against his migration restriction efforts, hopeful is his term two govt purge & day one blitz, defended by their law firm powerhouse, which would open up big change. From there, we segue in the right direction.

Less than two weeks after my post, Ron Paul has opted to join Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency and Elon has repeatedly replied in agreement or curiousity to posts calling to End the Federal Reserve.

Additionally, this week, it has been confirmed that Kushner will not be in the White House, meanwhile Kennedy and Don Jr., among others, are working to oppose the acceptance of neo-cons into the administration. Doubt less, do more.

Trump explains the benefit of hiring someone you may otherwise disagree with, taking advantage of their useful quality without allowing the undesirable quality to take over. He used John Bolton, a known war-monger & regime changer, which Bolton is proud of, to prevent wars.

It was an effective play, to the point of Bolton leaving in annoyance because Trump refused to start any wars and succeeded at improving peace relations. It can come off as questionable to allow someone dislikeable into a position of relative importance; the point is not to empower them, but to use them for your own power.

Hitler's use of Hjalmar Schacht, a devout Capitalist, is a comparable case. Schacht was not a National Socialist, he actually did not like most aspects of National Socialism. Schacht was the main man responsible for the ‘Economic Miracle’ of Germany, had the highest recorded IQ of any NSDAP figure, and did not even like the ideology. That was a worthwhile compromise.

Stephen Miller outlines the coming migration policy:

Seal the border, deport all the illegals. ... [Then] add safe thirds, remain in Mexico. Finish the wall. Robust prosecutions of illegal aliens, interior repatriation flights into Mexico, not back to the north of Mexico. Re-implement Title 42, 212 Fs, Travel Ban . . . bring those back and add new ones on top of that.

Establish large scale staging grounds for removal flights: grab migrants, move them to the staging grounds, federal law enforcement ships them off on planes back home.

Deputize the National Guard to carry out immigration enforcement, deploy the military to the southern border, not just with a mission to observe but with an impedance and denial mission.

In other words, you reassert the fundamental constitutional principle that you don't have a right to enter into our sovereign territory to even request the asylum claim. The military has the right to establish a fortress position on the border, and to say no one can cross here at all.

The ‘Left’ historically has made headway through unrest at the bottom aided by investment from the top. Notorious for this in recent decades is George Soros. Soros actively finances leftist activism, cultural change, and progressivism, his social engineering empire spans outside of the US and into Europe.

Elon Musk has shown this strategy to be viable in our favour. He began with purchasing one of the grandest social media platforms, turning it into a freer speech platform. Using this digital town square, he exposes and normalises important subjects, including confronting the ADL and sharing pro-White rhetoric.

During the Election, Elon's platform was instrumental in keeping the public aware, engaged. Elon himself staged voter giveaways and personally campaigned for the President. Since then, Elon has pledged to advise Trump closely, threatened to punish disloyalty in Congress, is working to replace bad DA's, is advocating wise foreign policy, and formed DOGE to shrink the government. Systemic revolution.

Joe Biden's administration was simultaneously the most Catholic, most Jewish, and least White in American history. Contrary to the memes of his detractors, the administration of First Term Trump was the Whitest in four decades, his judiciary the Whitest in three, and his migration policy the best since 1965.

Thus far, the second Trump administration is headed to again be the Whitest this century and the least Jewish in our lifetime. Some remark that, despite being so White, most of them are ‘Zionists’—the overwhelming majority of adult White Christians are ‘Zionists’. Hard to avoid. These White Christians are still the most anti-migrant demographic, and lean against the System.

Until the younger generation comes to fore, which is less fond of Israel, but also far less White, the adult generation still has its turn. The efforts of men like Elon or Stephen Miller provides a platform to push farther. Notably, the GOP has been overhauled and conservatism turned more paleo, opportune for a better transition.

TRUE!!

Bannon: ‘The real beating heart of the country's problem is legal immigration . . . they're over 20% of the country’

Miller: ‘Look at the immigration wave from 1880 to 1920, the foreign-born population doubled, so there was zero immigration growth for the next half century. . .from 1972 to today, we have 60 million foreigners. It's scary.

. . .We should follow America's history. And the history of America is that an immigration on period is followed by an immigration off period.’

“Just because something is legal, doesn't mean it's good.”

Stephen Miller is a consistent hardliner against migration. While illegal migration is nasty, it can be cut & reversed with less resistance than the legal invasion.

Legal migration must be dealt with using an array of reforms and enforcement. His list includes restricting, then ending, H1-Bs. Punishing corps that import foreigners, bar unnecessary outsourcing. This radically reduces the displacement brought by big business.

Suspend refugee resettlement, block undesirable nations, establish an ideological filter & culture check to protect native heritage. Terminate unwanted ‘legal’ programmes, ban China and low-IQ nations such as Haiti, and ‘turbocharge’ denaturalization.

Stephen Miller, aligned with the principles set by President Coolidge, who signed the Immigration Act of 1924, has been appointed Deputy Chief of Staff for policy, Presidential Assistant, and DHS advisor. In this role, he intends to enact mass deportation and halt mass migration.

Flexible critical thinking is a must have when working in government, business, or otherwise. As the coming Administration forms, many names are tossed around—several being false or fakeout rumours—and a wide range of intense reactions ring out.

This overreaction tendency fuels speculation—sometimes blackpilling if underinformed—and is a big part of why some people do things, while others only observe. A recent example is the Gaetz saga: a Trump loyalist nominated to AG, hit with accusations and resistance, subsequently withdraws.

A few critics took this as the Admin already buckling under pressure, despite Gaetz himself saying he will serve in a different position, his replacement being just as good, and the Agenda still on track. When a deal falls through, you aren't supposed to fall with it as the Right tends to do; you're supposed to compromise, then coordinate to make it work in your favour.

Otto Weininger observed that the ‘purest Aryans are seldom Antisemites’ even though generally at odds with aspects of Jewry, while the most aggressive Antisemites tend to act like Jews or worse, often calling the former ‘philosemites’.

An occasionally jew-critical but relatively jew-cooperative person that changes things for the better is preferable to one whose focus is more on being against a group than helping their own. Those defined by what they oppose are part of the problem.