“Every Jew . . . is engaged in some decisive and immediate pursuit of a goal.” Goethe

Jews are evidently the most consequential people there is, having a presence in practically every pursuit available, including anti-Semitism. The first great charge against Jewry in the Middle Ages was by Nicholas Donin, a Jew-became-Christian, whose exposé against the Talmud led to mass burnings of the document in France.

It was another Jew, Pablo Christiani, that instigated scrutiny of the Talmud in Spain. Likewise, in Germany, Johannes Pfefferkorn, Jewish, was the most vocal critic of Talmudic practices; usury, rituals, etc. Such a consistent pattern of Jews against Jewry proves the Question is more complex than any concerted plan.

It makes sense that Bobby Fischer is quoted more than Theodor Fritsch, Marx more than Mussolini. Holocaust Skepticism, too, has many Jews. Whether Jewish energy is invested more efficiently, or it's something neurotic, understanding Jewishness, without dogma, is necessary to address it.

Trump on migrant camps: "I don't care. I'll do whatever it takes to get them out."

He adds that any country refusing to take migrants back will be cut off from American business and tariffed substantially.

https://x.com/atrupar/status/1867324966586527961

Stephen Miller has declared Mass Deportation as the utmost priority of the coming admin. Trump hopes to remove every illegal within his term. Beyond that, he seeks to end birthright and induce mass remigration, revoking benefits, suspending refugees, and crushing crime.

More concerning is the question of legal migration, for which Stephen Miller has strong proposals to restrict and filter entry, while Trump himself has stated “we’re going to make it very easy for people to come in [if they] pass the test. . . . They have to love our country. They can’t come out of prisons. . .”

Blocking the criminal, the unAmerican, the useless, etc. as planned will massively improve the complexion of migration—still, what is most desired is a total moratorium. Musk, Vivek, Thiel, Vance and thensome agree with strict, selective entry, but wish to accept ‘high merit’ types.

Our internal battle, then, is to rally around & introduce more Millers into seats of power, in order to make things better and achieve a greater ban.

Elon Musk has repeatedly endorsed merit migration, expediting “talented, honest, hard-working” people. This in theory is sound; actual America was formed by a very selective migration of thoroughbred settlers. Elon's three measures would demonstrably exclude a great deal of undesirables.

Africans and Latinx are financial net negatives, a significant share do not work or pursue unnecessary work. Legal Migrants in general are an overall detriment across the developed world, besides some of western european background. This is without mentioning the crime introduced by their presence.

What Elon fails to cover is East and South Asia, being not so violent and ‘positive’ compared to others, which appeals to employers, elites, etc. But they aren't a model minority.

Not only are Asians a strong pillar of the Left, they fill schools, displacing rightful students, and are notorious, universal fraudsters. This justifies banning legal migration from China, the same must apply to India and the rest.

President Trump's political consultant and long-time friend Roger Stone acknowledges and affirms that Israel attacked the United States during the USS Liberty incident. Stone is accused of bedding with Antisemitism, to which he replies “I have some pork chops”.

Many noticers are undesirable, so someone respectable like Stone levelling the same criticisms in a sensible way is an effective message. Likewise, Trump's moderate judgments of Israel, reasonable war stance, and distrust of Netanyahu sets the tone for an America that is tough in itself and tough on others, away from the old norm.

Trump Immigration Enforcement Will Be Bad For Employers And Illegals, Good For American Workers

Lack of immigration enforcement for the last 30 years put employers in a bind.

Staffing agencies feed large companies illegal workers and will face challenges replacing the workforce.

However, it turns out America is actually full of Americans who ARE willing to do the work that employers and the media have been saying for years that "Americans won't do."

James Fulford reviews the stats in full here:

The battle over legal immigration has begun. While Trump maintains having the Whitest administration in decades, several picks have been undesirable, namely: Indians. Ethnocentric, egotistic, and notorious for opportunistic fraud, Indians have positioned themselves into key positions in the UK, Canada, Germany, and now America.

MAGA loyalists have taken a stand against this, successfully garnering the attention of important, relevant figures in the 'Tech' circles—which the sperging of groypers failed to do. Musk was forced to admit that the system 'needs to be fixed' and David Sacks claims their techies will not mess with immigration policy, which is still not good enough.

Prominent conservative Jewess Laura Loomer is calling for a 20 year immigration moratorium. In a promising response, JD Vance has agreed with pundit Josiah Lippincott that 'we need to help American families', not import more third worlders. The pressure is on and must continue to be pushed by reasonable voices.

Big name conservative Jack Posobiec has railed against legal immigration, with Laura Loomer leading the most aggressive charge. Steve Bannon, among many others, call for a massive reduction or moratorium on immigration.

The Tech Head David Sacks maintains that he and his team will not touch immigration policy, and has no intent to impede Stephen Miller, our best advocate. Elon apparently only wishes for a 'high quality' influx, and Vance appears to side against mass importation.

At face value, this entails trickle migration, yet still of undesired masses. Until there is action towards our ends, such as a mass deportation, moratorium, end of birthright citizenship, stricter filter, fewer faults, and a fortified border, the pressure must continue. Importantly, this fight would not be happening at all had Trump lost, so this opportunity is something to appreciate, not loathe.

The Christmas H-1B Wars—Tech Immigration Just Displaces A Better Class Of American Worker

Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk, both immigrants, glorify the H1-B program and discover what real American workers (and voters) think about it.

Update on Trump legal immigration policy:

H-1B visa entry-level wage requirement will be raised to the 45th %ile or higher, high-skilled workers at 95th %ile. These higher standards restrict foreign workers, cutting their presence by a third or as much as 90% in some businesses.

INA section 243(d) is to be employed, pausing legal immigration from uncooperative countries, while INA section 212(f) will be imposed to begin a partial moratorium of migrants into the United States. Travel Ban is to return, including nations with risk of jihadis., terrorism, spying, and more.

Vetting will expand, keeping out the anti-White or otherwise undesirable types, even those likely to lean left. What migrants do enter are subject to extreme filtering and can be swiftly removed if found to be a negative impact. The Denaturalisation Office will open, allowing migrant-became-citizens to be stripped of citizenship and deported. In short, massive improvement on the legal migration front.

By the numbers, refugee resettlement and asylees being suspended, diversity lottery being ended, and outlawing chain migration, all of which were announced, will reduce the legal immigration problem by up to 40%. Coming restrictions against employment-migration, namely raising the pay floor & tightening entry requirements, will additionally cut down the influx.

Beyond executive migration policy, the Immigration Act of 1990 and of 1965 are Acts of Congress, meaning they must be taken down by Congress, not the President, so those glaring holes must be addressed toward our represenatives with immense pressure, whether to significantly adjust or entirely end them.

Only the Anglosphere, North & Western Europe, Israel, and East Asia are overwhelmingly positive fiscal contributions as migrants into the United States or other developed countries. Considering the tendencies and self-interests of Asians, their positive presence is redundant, and Israeli foreign-loyalty adds an unnecessary risk to their otherwise beneficial fiscal activity.

Africa and Arabia, followed by the rest of 'less likeable' Asia, regardless of wealth, are bad news for every country they enter, from rape gangs to welfare consumption. In America, Latinx are just as bad, belonging to the global Brown Belt of Unproductives & Undesirables. LatAm perversion and burden is terribly high.

Anglosphere accounts for up to 60% of all advancement in the modern world. Over 44% of foreign-founded F500 in the U.S. are Anglo-origin, another 40% are Western Euro. And they uphold Western values the best. In short, on avg, even if 'colourblind' or by pure meritocracy, only NWE make good immigrants.

In a show of practical prowess, Trump's America First, immigration restrictionist aide and advisor Stephen Miller has been gaining power in the coming administration. As of late, Miller has convened with Congressional Republicans to push them to cut off funding that protects migrants, direct resources to increase the size of immigration enforcement, and disregard concerns about their numbers.

Taking advantage of his higher role, Miller has sent a warning to pro-immigration factions, like Big Tech, and personally lectured Mark Zuckerberg, among others, to stay out of the way, stating "Mr. Trump [will] crack down on immigration and go to war against diversity". His law firm, America First Legal, has successfully taken down diversity policies of major companies from McDonald's to Meta.

Over 200 politicians have received notice that interfering with mass deportation or migration restriction will be faced with federal prosecution. Multifacted, pro- & reactive approaches as this are what's needed to succeed.