Trump's latest Truth serves as an order to all agencies and enforcement under the Executive Branch to dedicate their full might towards 'detaining and deporting millions upon million of illegal aliens' in the major U.S. cities, where the majority of foreigners reside.

This comes after his Ag secretary stated priorities will change, to help 'lower-risk' areas adjust to the coming deportation of 'every illegal alien'. That is an acceptable and understandable shift, so long as they continue to remove many millions, which I discussed in previous posts on the complexity of foreigners in industry, but the communication in recent days was sub-par. Miscommunication allows unnecessary confusion to demoralise parts of the base, hopefully they learn from this week and operate more clearly.

This would bring the travel ban to over 50 countries affected, a great reduction in access

Trump's Big Beautiful Bill has far-reaching, deep-changing immigration provisions such as expensive entry & application fees, and a new remittance tax (affecting legal and illegal migrants). It cuts various federal and state benefits away from noncitizens and provides the resources ICE needs to remove at least 1 million aliens a year—that is ICE-alone; FBI, CBP, military, local law enforcement and self-deports would multiply the outcome.

BBB becoming law has the potential to supercharge our remigration effort, quintupling the progress already made without it. Using this as a foundation, America First, thereby pro-White, legislation has a door to enter the mainstream. Over time, with legal backing, we would find ways to implement demographically explicit changes in our favour.

White House confirms ICE raids at farms, plants, resturaunts and similar businesses are not stopping—enforcement will continue.

ICE again doubles down worksite raids and announces a way for business owners, including of farms and services, to report their misconduct and work with the govt to remove their aliens and replace them with American or temporary legal workers.

Every state has the authority to pass local legislation restricting what purchased land may be used for, and the Bill does not allow treasured natural territory to be appropriated. This provision to sell public land is easily modified, and we have thousands of ugly towns and cities to tear down in favour of new parks, if the Senate for whatever reason wants to add this to the Bill.

My stance on the Middle East situation is that the USA allowed this chaos when we created Israel, we should be the ones to end the chaos now. This does not mean 'dying for Israel' or engaging in a war, President Trump successfully navigated his first term without new wars and is fully aware of Israeli manipulativeness. It does mean, as Vance explained today, the USA will have to involve itself in direct and indirect ways at times until a reasonable resolution is reached.

Arabs and Jews alike are a volatile, violent force located in the exact centre of the world. They have relations with the Chinese, the Russians, our traitors and our Christians. They love themselves more than they hate eachother, and at the end of the day will continue bothering the West for future years unless something is done. The non-Western world, that includes Israel—Israel is not the one in control of this dynamic, either—should be put in its place, which does not require 'war' but will be done with American might.

93% drop in border encounters, 100% drop in migrant releases

A better, more appropriate plan is to drive the 'Hispanic' population down to 0 by any means necessary, over time

Good read of the situation, and correct. Trump doesn't care about regime change—doesn't care that Arabs have theocracies or that North Korea has Juche—doesn't aim to 'spread Democracy' or save all poor people. His metric for diplomacy is whether a nation is agreeable enough to be productive and contribute to shared prosperity. While Israel does cause problems, it offers 'something' of value and is liked by most Christians. Iran has neither of those qualities, but it could try to by making a significant deal.

The man leading Trump's Israel-planning team wants to reduce the role Israel has over the region and believes Israel is a 'bad ally' which previous administrations of America has 'enabled' to do bad things.

Shortened version of Vance's response to the Iran situation. TLDR he understands people being upset at the prospect of involvement in the Middle East—been there for over 25 years—and he emphasises that nothing which is currently happening was unprecedented or unannounced. That said, Trump has earned enough Trust to try his strategy out; we've seen him work conflict out before, he doesn't aim for war.

I've seen Trump critics imply this is a 'rugpull' or that Trump 'lied' about No New Wars. If you think that, you're really just retarded. Every President in the last 50 years, besides Trump, has started a war. He wouldn't need to pretend at this point, and has been clear he wants a stable, available Middle East. Are you really surprised that there is a little shake up in a notoriously shakey region we've been 'trying' to tame for 60 yrs?

This is the big announcement people warned me about?

Something I would pursue with the Middle East, until our direct involvement has formally ended, is leveraging foreign aid against these countries such that to receive any assistance, they must recall their migrants from America and Europe. Trump has used tariffs this way, as a pressure tool for negotiarion—the ties we keep for now could be used as strings, a tool for remigration. Removal would effectively pay for itself and the money saved goes into domestic demographic repair