Every state has the authority to pass local legislation restricting what purchased land may be used for, and the Bill does not allow treasured natural territory to be appropriated. This provision to sell public land is easily modified, and we have thousands of ugly towns and cities to tear down in favour of new parks, if the Senate for whatever reason wants to add this to the Bill.

My stance on the Middle East situation is that the USA allowed this chaos when we created Israel, we should be the ones to end the chaos now. This does not mean 'dying for Israel' or engaging in a war, President Trump successfully navigated his first term without new wars and is fully aware of Israeli manipulativeness. It does mean, as Vance explained today, the USA will have to involve itself in direct and indirect ways at times until a reasonable resolution is reached.

Arabs and Jews alike are a volatile, violent force located in the exact centre of the world. They have relations with the Chinese, the Russians, our traitors and our Christians. They love themselves more than they hate eachother, and at the end of the day will continue bothering the West for future years unless something is done. The non-Western world, that includes Israel—Israel is not the one in control of this dynamic, either—should be put in its place, which does not require 'war' but will be done with American might.

93% drop in border encounters, 100% drop in migrant releases

A better, more appropriate plan is to drive the 'Hispanic' population down to 0 by any means necessary, over time

Good read of the situation, and correct. Trump doesn't care about regime change—doesn't care that Arabs have theocracies or that North Korea has Juche—doesn't aim to 'spread Democracy' or save all poor people. His metric for diplomacy is whether a nation is agreeable enough to be productive and contribute to shared prosperity. While Israel does cause problems, it offers 'something' of value and is liked by most Christians. Iran has neither of those qualities, but it could try to by making a significant deal.

The man leading Trump's Israel-planning team wants to reduce the role Israel has over the region and believes Israel is a 'bad ally' which previous administrations of America has 'enabled' to do bad things.

Shortened version of Vance's response to the Iran situation. TLDR he understands people being upset at the prospect of involvement in the Middle East—been there for over 25 years—and he emphasises that nothing which is currently happening was unprecedented or unannounced. That said, Trump has earned enough Trust to try his strategy out; we've seen him work conflict out before, he doesn't aim for war.

I've seen Trump critics imply this is a 'rugpull' or that Trump 'lied' about No New Wars. If you think that, you're really just retarded. Every President in the last 50 years, besides Trump, has started a war. He wouldn't need to pretend at this point, and has been clear he wants a stable, available Middle East. Are you really surprised that there is a little shake up in a notoriously shakey region we've been 'trying' to tame for 60 yrs?

This is the big announcement people warned me about?

Something I would pursue with the Middle East, until our direct involvement has formally ended, is leveraging foreign aid against these countries such that to receive any assistance, they must recall their migrants from America and Europe. Trump has used tariffs this way, as a pressure tool for negotiarion—the ties we keep for now could be used as strings, a tool for remigration. Removal would effectively pay for itself and the money saved goes into domestic demographic repair

Is this the average 'Westerner' now?

President Trump again offers a way out for the Iranians, despite claims online that we are at war or that he is trying to start one. Iran has no chance of winning against Israel or America or Europe, if it came to that—it would actually benefit from making a deal with the U.S., thereby disarming the Israeli argument. The fact that Iran repeatedly threatens to hurt the Zionists, and then does nothing, makes it seem like a Useful Idiot regime.

Unwanted Migration and especially Illegal Migration is largely condemned across major parts of the White world now, downstream of the ongoing U.S. victory. It will come to pass that previous waves of inharmonious migration should be equally stigmatised.

Turks and non-Germans in Germany, various East Europeans in UK & Denmark, most latecomers to America at least since 1965 if not before, Russians in the Baltics, and other examples are instances of offensive demographic displacement which, compared to recent criminal migration, have become normal.

Remigration as a movement, motive and imperative will continue to grow; we as the inheritors of the struggle to 'see it through' will confront otherwise ignored boundaries. Whether that expresses itself as 'Every race has its place' or 'My race owns this space', Remigration—the great homecoming—is an idea that needs practical and physical means to become real, so it's best to start thinking and investing in it right now.