🇵🇸 🇮🇱 🇪🇬 Israel moved its “Yellow Line” buffer zone deeper into Palestinian territory in Gaza [dashed yellow line is where they were as of a few weeks ago] even though the solid line is where they’re supposed to be per the Sharm El Sheikh Agreement with Egypt’s General Intelligence Service (G.I.S.) & the U.S. White House. Israel’s Minister of Defense Katz has also been talking about the return of Israeli settlements to Gaza, and has cited the prevention of a repeat of the 10/7/2023 events as the reason for a deeper buffer zone [don’t ask me how further IDF occupation will prevent that]. Egypt’s G.I.S. for its part has managed to unify all the various Palestinian factions in Cairo in recent days to form a Palestinian government to run Gaza as opposed to having some sort of foreign-imposed committee [which is what the U.S. White House had preferred]

Israel also has serious differences with Egypt on Phase II of the Sharm El Sheikh Agreement, the militarization of both sides of the border, the IDF-occupied “Philadelphi Corridor” [Gaza’s border with Egypt], Rafah Crossing, and the $35B energy deal [Israel hasn’t approved export certificates for US firm Chevron yet as far as I know]. Some other disagreements include files such as Lebanon where Egypt’s G.I.S. has held high profile mediation talks involving Hezbollah/Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) & Israel as well as the US; both to prevent an internal conflict as well as an Israeli offensive.

📎 CAIRO X

FLOCK Cameras and PALANTIR surveillance has already been rolled out.

Tim Walz criticizes JD Vance for saying “it’s okay to be White,” while accusing the Trump administration of “White supremacy.”

Without double standards they would have none.

The kids might be ok

@EnjoyTheD

India

India

Sheboons outside of western civilization

gooners in shambles

Time to check in on the UKSSR.

🅵ʀᴀɢɪʟᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍ🆄ɴɪsᴍ

Do not let the machine "think for you."

Merry Christmas Purebloods🎄🎁

⚖️ 🇺🇸 🏛 He Who Decides the Exception: Trump Should Disregard the Supreme Court’s National Guard Ruling

⬛️ Judicial overreach mustn’t be permitted to trample the public necessity.

🔶️ The Supreme Court has again reminded the country that, in the American system, the judiciary can halt executive action with the stroke of a pen—this time keeping in place a lower-court order blocking President Trump’s attempt to federalize and deploy National Guard forces to protect besieged immigration enforcement operations in and around Chicago.

🔶️ The point was that a republic cannot outsource its highest political judgments to a tribunal without hollowing out self-government. Put those threads together—Cicero’s salus populi, Aquinas’ equity, Locke’s prerogative, Hamilton’s executive energy, Jefferson’s coordinate construction, Jackson’s independence, Lincoln’s warning—and you get a tradition that modern progressives and libertarians alike often deny exists: an argument that the executive office is not merely an administrative convenience but a constitutional instrument designed for decision under pressure. So what does that imply for the case at hand? First, it implies that the Court’s emergency posture is not neutral. By keeping the deployment blocked while litigation drags on, the judiciary effectively chooses a policy: it prefers the risk of executive incapacity to the risk of executive overreach. That may be defensible in some cases. But it should be recognized for what it is: not a purely legal determination, but a choice about which dangers the regime is willing to tolerate.

🔶️ The Chicago dispute will be litigated in briefs and orders. But the constitutional question will be answered elsewhere: in whether Americans still believe that self-government means the people, through politics, can authorize decisive action for the common good—or whether “vital questions affecting the whole people” will be “irrevocably fixed” by the judiciary alone.

https://www.afpost.news/editorials/He-who-decides-the-exception