Forwarded from Ratfinks
Dan Scavino posted at 12:10 AM on May 19, 2022
This could play with RED2
Trump points at the second red stripe > RED2
continental US > Pennsylvania
Continental refers to the original 13 colonies. Oz Pennsylvania election audit would bypass communication blackout because they've already mentioned Oz hundreds of times. They cannot ignore this story now.
Promoting a controversial candidate, either insider win or Trump endorsement loss, they fell into Trump's trap.
This could play with RED2
Trump points at the second red stripe > RED2
continental US > Pennsylvania
Continental refers to the original 13 colonies. Oz Pennsylvania election audit would bypass communication blackout because they've already mentioned Oz hundreds of times. They cannot ignore this story now.
Promoting a controversial candidate, either insider win or Trump endorsement loss, they fell into Trump's trap.
Forwarded from Gateway Pundit
14 State Populations Were Miscounted in 2020 Census - Overcounting Heavily Favored Democrats
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/14-state-populations-miscounted-2020-census-overcounting-heavily-favored-democrats/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/14-state-populations-miscounted-2020-census-overcounting-heavily-favored-democrats/
The Gateway Pundit
14 State Populations Were Miscounted in 2020 Census - Overcounting Heavily Favored Democrats | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina…
According to the Census Bureau, 14 state populations were significantly miscounted in the 2020 census.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Law of War, Chapter 1.5
"War" as a Legal Concept
"As a legal concept, “war” has traditionally been viewed as a condition in which a State is prosecuting its rights by military force, usually against another State. However, the precise definition of “war” often depends on the specific legal context in which it is used."
"War" as a Legal Concept
"As a legal concept, “war” has traditionally been viewed as a condition in which a State is prosecuting its rights by military force, usually against another State. However, the precise definition of “war” often depends on the specific legal context in which it is used."
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Footnote 68:
1956 FM 27-10 (Change No. 1 1976) ¶8 (“While it is usually accompanied by the commission of acts of violence, a state of war may exist prior to or subsequent to the use of force.”); VII MOORE’S DIGEST 153 (“Much confusion may be avoided by bearing in mind the fact that by the term war is meant not the mere employment of force, but the existence of the legal condition of things in which rights are or may be prosecuted by force.”); GROTIUS, LAW OF WAR & PEACE 33 (1.1.2.1) (“war is the condition of those contending by force”).
1956 FM 27-10 (Change No. 1 1976) ¶8 (“While it is usually accompanied by the commission of acts of violence, a state of war may exist prior to or subsequent to the use of force.”); VII MOORE’S DIGEST 153 (“Much confusion may be avoided by bearing in mind the fact that by the term war is meant not the mere employment of force, but the existence of the legal condition of things in which rights are or may be prosecuted by force.”); GROTIUS, LAW OF WAR & PEACE 33 (1.1.2.1) (“war is the condition of those contending by force”).
Election fraud > violates our Constitutional rights
thus...
Census fraud > violates our Constitutional rights
thus...
Census fraud > violates our Constitutional rights
🤔1
Forwarded from Ratfinks
War Crimes, such as Crimes Against Humanity, cannot be charged for offenses that occurred before conflict began BUT...
"...the United States could not institute a military tribunal within its own jurisdiction to pass upon violations of the laws and customs of war, unless such violations were committed upon American persons or American property..."
War Crimes/Crimes Against Humanity [traitors/spies violating the Constitution: census, voting, apportionment] on American property or people allows for military tribunals.
To charge Crimes Against Humanity before the conflict began, it must have been executed within jurisdiction of the tribunal, aka American property or people.
"...the United States could not institute a military tribunal within its own jurisdiction to pass upon violations of the laws and customs of war, unless such violations were committed upon American persons or American property..."
War Crimes/Crimes Against Humanity [traitors/spies violating the Constitution: census, voting, apportionment] on American property or people allows for military tribunals.
To charge Crimes Against Humanity before the conflict began, it must have been executed within jurisdiction of the tribunal, aka American property or people.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
continuing...
Why were Nazi atrocities not "Crimes Against Humanity" before the war began?
“To constitute Crimes against Humanity, the acts relied on before the outbreak of war must have been in execution of, or in connection with, any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is of the opinion that revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were, it has not been *satisfactorily proved* that they were done in execution of, or in connection with, any such crime. The Tribunal therefore cannot make a general declaration that the acts before 1939 were Crimes against Humanity within the meaning of the Charter, but from the beginning of the war in 1939 War Crimes were committed on a vast scale, which were also Crimes against Humanity;"
Basically, the deep state can be charged for Crimes Against Humanity prior to military occupation from the earliest point that crimes can be *proven* to have knowingly occurred on American people or soil and against the Constitution. No statute of limitations.
Census fraud [knowingly] by foreign infiltrators to apportion unconstitutionally House representatives, unbalanced and unfairly, to make laws and commit election fraud.
Why were Nazi atrocities not "Crimes Against Humanity" before the war began?
“To constitute Crimes against Humanity, the acts relied on before the outbreak of war must have been in execution of, or in connection with, any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is of the opinion that revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were, it has not been *satisfactorily proved* that they were done in execution of, or in connection with, any such crime. The Tribunal therefore cannot make a general declaration that the acts before 1939 were Crimes against Humanity within the meaning of the Charter, but from the beginning of the war in 1939 War Crimes were committed on a vast scale, which were also Crimes against Humanity;"
Basically, the deep state can be charged for Crimes Against Humanity prior to military occupation from the earliest point that crimes can be *proven* to have knowingly occurred on American people or soil and against the Constitution. No statute of limitations.
Census fraud [knowingly] by foreign infiltrators to apportion unconstitutionally House representatives, unbalanced and unfairly, to make laws and commit election fraud.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/myanmar-court-ahead-suu-kyi-corruption-trial-84931916
ABC News
Myanmar court gives go-ahead for Suu Kyi corruption trial
A court in Myanmar has ruled that a corruption trial for ousted leader Aung San Suu Kyi and three political colleagues will continue after finding that prosecutors presented sufficient evidence for their indictment