Forwarded from Ratfinks
https://www.rt.com/russia/548578-kuleba-russian-invasion-false-claims/
Does this sound like an imminent invasion?
Does this sound like an imminent invasion?
RT
Ukraine rebukes US claims
The country’s foreign minister Dmitry Kuleba has called for people to ignore “apocalyptic predictions” being promoted
Forwarded from Ratfinks
To summarize:
The US had ultimate credible evidence that Russia was going to make a video to start a war until that info was deliberately leaked to the US by Russia to trick them into thinking they were going to make a video, but that doesn't mean they were NOT going to make a video or think about making one.
😂😂😂😂😂
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/could-us-intel-of-russias-false-flag-in-ukraine-be-part-of-putins-plan/ar-AATBsLg
The US had ultimate credible evidence that Russia was going to make a video to start a war until that info was deliberately leaked to the US by Russia to trick them into thinking they were going to make a video, but that doesn't mean they were NOT going to make a video or think about making one.
😂😂😂😂😂
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/could-us-intel-of-russias-false-flag-in-ukraine-be-part-of-putins-plan/ar-AATBsLg
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Russia and Ukraine propaganda by the deep state, and possible NATO membership, plays into supply issues, famine, and depopulation.
https://vestikavkaza.ru/analytics/esli-rossia-s-ukrainoj-ne-pomiratsa-obe-poteraut-pokupatelej-zerna.html
https://vestikavkaza.ru/analytics/esli-rossia-s-ukrainoj-ne-pomiratsa-obe-poteraut-pokupatelej-zerna.html
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Propaganda VS Truth
Propaganda (permissible by the Law if War if not inciting violations)
Putin never said what the headline suggests. Daily Mail used the terms "fiery warnings" and "nuclear war".
Truth is buried by Google. They know Putin will not invade and are using (and deliberately abusing) their security concerns (sent to the US on December 17, 2021).
https://www.scitecheuropa.eu/borrell-said-that-russia-has-no-desire-to-seize-ukraine/625/
Propaganda (permissible by the Law if War if not inciting violations)
Putin never said what the headline suggests. Daily Mail used the terms "fiery warnings" and "nuclear war".
Truth is buried by Google. They know Putin will not invade and are using (and deliberately abusing) their security concerns (sent to the US on December 17, 2021).
https://www.scitecheuropa.eu/borrell-said-that-russia-has-no-desire-to-seize-ukraine/625/
Ratfinks
Propaganda VS Truth Propaganda (permissible by the Law if War if not inciting violations) Putin never said what the headline suggests. Daily Mail used the terms "fiery warnings" and "nuclear war". Truth is buried by Google. They know Putin will not invade…
Telegram
Ratfinks
It's all connected. Footnotes take you back to help with understandings.
Propaganda that incites violations of the Law of War is prohibited.
Commanders must make judgements based on good faith and morals with the information they have. They are lying about…
Propaganda that incites violations of the Law of War is prohibited.
Commanders must make judgements based on good faith and morals with the information they have. They are lying about…
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Per Law of War chapter 16.5, Russia may only use cyberattacks on banks if it's a military objective. More propaganda.
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/european-us-regulators-tell-banks-prepare-russian-cyberattack-threat-2022-02-09/
https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/european-us-regulators-tell-banks-prepare-russian-cyberattack-threat-2022-02-09/