Forwarded from Ratfinks
Space Force timestamp 10:19 AM > Drop 1019 > Law of War page 1019
"Follow the LOOP."
New study talks about Coronal Loops, rings from the sun's corona, are actually an optical illusion.
Solar flares "reported" 3 times this week. CME incoming.
Law of War page 1019 > chapter 16.4 "Cyber Operations and the Law of Neutrality"
Connects to Space Force (Cyber Operations) and Russian special operation in Ukraine (Law of Neutrality violation by NATO States, legally allowing Russian trespass in Ukraine for liberation).
https://scitechdaily.com/coronal-loops-might-not-be-loops-at-all-when-i-saw-the-results-my-mind-exploded/
"Follow the LOOP."
New study talks about Coronal Loops, rings from the sun's corona, are actually an optical illusion.
Solar flares "reported" 3 times this week. CME incoming.
Law of War page 1019 > chapter 16.4 "Cyber Operations and the Law of Neutrality"
Connects to Space Force (Cyber Operations) and Russian special operation in Ukraine (Law of Neutrality violation by NATO States, legally allowing Russian trespass in Ukraine for liberation).
https://scitechdaily.com/coronal-loops-might-not-be-loops-at-all-when-i-saw-the-results-my-mind-exploded/
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Solar flare today.
Something else solar related, too. NASA firing rockets to study the sun. 🤔
https://www.google.com/amp/s/tech.hindustantimes.com/amp/tech/news/wow-nasa-to-do-a-first-shoot-rockets-at-northern-lights-today-reveal-truth-behind-solar-storms-71648029614744.html
Something else solar related, too. NASA firing rockets to study the sun. 🤔
https://www.google.com/amp/s/tech.hindustantimes.com/amp/tech/news/wow-nasa-to-do-a-first-shoot-rockets-at-northern-lights-today-reveal-truth-behind-solar-storms-71648029614744.html
Forwarded from Intel Slava
🇺🇲🇷🇺⚡NATO will not deploy troops in Ukraine to avoid war with Russia - Alliance Secretary General Stoltenberg, responding to Poland's proposal to send a peacekeeping mission to Ukraine.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Here's how I understand it:
The US is a country with states, as in provinces or territories with individual governments but under a larger government.
NATO is an alliance of states via a treaty, as in a union of countries (also called states but in different context).
If the US sends military into Mexico, it's an invasion by the US. If they're from Texas, it's the US. If they're from California, it's still the entire US. This is not the case with NATO.
If NATO sends troops to Mexico it would matter who they are connected to since there is no NATO military. It is an organization of military from multiple countries. Per the Law of War, though an alliance of nations, each country is bound to individual obligations via their own respective government and laws. "An attack on one is an attack on all", therefore "An attack by one is an attack by all". This is inconsistent since NATO is not a country with a military.
NATO is not party to the 1949 Geneva Conventions but member states are parties to the Geneva Conventions. They are obligated to respect them "in all circumstances". Therefore, if NATO is requesting 1949 Geneva Convention violations, or Law of War violations, then it is up to the nations to refuse.
The US is a country with states, as in provinces or territories with individual governments but under a larger government.
NATO is an alliance of states via a treaty, as in a union of countries (also called states but in different context).
If the US sends military into Mexico, it's an invasion by the US. If they're from Texas, it's the US. If they're from California, it's still the entire US. This is not the case with NATO.
If NATO sends troops to Mexico it would matter who they are connected to since there is no NATO military. It is an organization of military from multiple countries. Per the Law of War, though an alliance of nations, each country is bound to individual obligations via their own respective government and laws. "An attack on one is an attack on all", therefore "An attack by one is an attack by all". This is inconsistent since NATO is not a country with a military.
NATO is not party to the 1949 Geneva Conventions but member states are parties to the Geneva Conventions. They are obligated to respect them "in all circumstances". Therefore, if NATO is requesting 1949 Geneva Convention violations, or Law of War violations, then it is up to the nations to refuse.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
I found out one of the objectives of Russia's special operation: Denying NATO and Nazis civilian buildings and resources to conduct and sustain their operations.
Pompeo timestamp 10:46 > Law of War page 1046
"Different Support Structures for Non-State Armed Groups"
Non-State Armed Groups > NATO
"In addition to non-State armed groups, other military objectives may also be more difficult to identify because non-State armed groups often do not use military infrastructure (e.g., military bases, logistics facilities) to conduct and sustain their operations. Rather, non-State armed groups may seek to use ostensibly civilian buildings and resources to conduct and sustain their operations. Denying non-State armed groups such support may be particularly important to the success of military operations and justifiable under the law of war."
Per the footnote 93, those who take out these resources succeed in battles. Those who took out less than two targets lost every single one.
Footnote book noscript is a JFK quote.
Pompeo timestamp 10:46 > Law of War page 1046
"Different Support Structures for Non-State Armed Groups"
Non-State Armed Groups > NATO
"In addition to non-State armed groups, other military objectives may also be more difficult to identify because non-State armed groups often do not use military infrastructure (e.g., military bases, logistics facilities) to conduct and sustain their operations. Rather, non-State armed groups may seek to use ostensibly civilian buildings and resources to conduct and sustain their operations. Denying non-State armed groups such support may be particularly important to the success of military operations and justifiable under the law of war."
Per the footnote 93, those who take out these resources succeed in battles. Those who took out less than two targets lost every single one.
Footnote book noscript is a JFK quote.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Continued from previous post
From Law of War page 1046, footnote 93: "interdicting the insurgents' supply of arms and ammunition".
Special operation to cut off NATO/Nazi supplies in order to ensure success.
Mariupol is strategic in that it is the largest port in the Sea of Azov, not to mention all its businesses and resources.
From Law of War page 1046, footnote 93: "interdicting the insurgents' supply of arms and ammunition".
Special operation to cut off NATO/Nazi supplies in order to ensure success.
Mariupol is strategic in that it is the largest port in the Sea of Azov, not to mention all its businesses and resources.