I’m for Tulsi Gabbard
“As DNI Mrs Tulsi Gabbard has:
♦ chased down intelligence community leakers,
♦ released the JFK files,
♦ released Joe Biden’s domestic terrorism surveillance plan,
♦ intercepted an NIC plot to impeach President Trump (confirmed by Rubio),
♦ taken control of the Presidential Daily Briefing,
♦ and more recently begun to confront the weaponized corruption within the IC Inspector General organization.
These are actions, not words, and those actions speak boldly. Suffice to say, her effectiveness has placed a target on her back.”
I also agree that if those GOP on the SSCI and other leaders in and out of the USIC succeed in removing Tulsi Gabbard , they win and the deep state continues to be quarterbacked by the CIA. AND, that’s a win for the bad actors trying to target and survive Trump.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/06/18/a-dangerous-moment-the-targeting-of-tulsi-gabbard/
“As DNI Mrs Tulsi Gabbard has:
♦ chased down intelligence community leakers,
♦ released the JFK files,
♦ released Joe Biden’s domestic terrorism surveillance plan,
♦ intercepted an NIC plot to impeach President Trump (confirmed by Rubio),
♦ taken control of the Presidential Daily Briefing,
♦ and more recently begun to confront the weaponized corruption within the IC Inspector General organization.
These are actions, not words, and those actions speak boldly. Suffice to say, her effectiveness has placed a target on her back.”
I also agree that if those GOP on the SSCI and other leaders in and out of the USIC succeed in removing Tulsi Gabbard , they win and the deep state continues to be quarterbacked by the CIA. AND, that’s a win for the bad actors trying to target and survive Trump.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/06/18/a-dangerous-moment-the-targeting-of-tulsi-gabbard/
The Last Refuge
A Dangerous Moment - The Targeting of Tulsi Gabbard - The Last Refuge
For the sake of urgency I’m going to talk in direct and bold terms about the targeting of Tulsi Gabbard. The IC system is attempting to remove her as a disruptive influence by using Iran as a wedge to get her out, but the issue they have with Director Gabbard…
❤808🔥314👍167👎11
ATTENTION!
What are the advantages for Russia & China if there is a delayed decision by the United States?
SITREP FOLLOWS:
First, I have no definitive evidence confirming specific actions by Russia or China during this upcoming period. This analysis is based on personal experience. However, there is clear evidence of previous & long-term support by both nations for the Iranian regime. In war, delays usually advantage the defender & allow time to improve their position (tactical & strategic)
Russia's Strategic Benefits:
1. The primary advantage to a delay provides a great distraction & diverts American attention & resources from the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
2. By Trump canceling a meeting w/ Zelensky to focus on the Middle East, Russia may face less U.S. pressure on its actions in Ukraine.
3. Russia will use this time to strategically consolidate, gain political & diplomatic capital by acting as an international broker through organizations like the UN.
4. Tactically, this period allows Russian military forces to consolidate, reorganize, refit &, if necessary, be replaced. Essentially, Russian military commanders, if smart (& they are), will consolidate & reposition their forces to gain positional advantage.
5. Russia could use the delay to bolster IR's air defenses, potentially supplying advanced systems like the S-400 or other military support. Doing so would enhance IR's resilience against IS or potential U.S. strikes, aligning w/ Russia's interest in maintaining IR as a key ally. This action is not out of the question. If the U.S. can provide for one side, we must consider the fact that Russia will provide for the other.
6. The conflict has driven a 15% increase in Russian oil prices, benefiting Russia's economy, which relies heavily on energy exports. Guarantee, a prolonged delay only helps Russia's economy & keeps Middle East tensions high further disrupting global oil markets.
China's Strategic Benefits:
1. China clearly sees this as a major opportunity for them to gain vastly more regional influence. China will use this window to expand diplomatic, economic, & military options across the Middle East. Like it or not, they already have far more influence than we truly understand.
2. China will position themselves as a neutral or mediating party (they are anything but).
3. China will strengthen ties with IR & other regional players, countering U.S. dominance in the region. Everyone needs to understand the "region" is really the "trans-region", & we must take into account the Central Asian Republic nations as well East Africa & those nations bordering the Eastern Med. For instance, the Red Sea & the Suez Canal are vital supply lines & must remain open.
4. The war provides a major distraction for Taiwan & will reduce attention on the looming Indo-Pacific theater of war. They will view this as a strategic opening to advance their objectives regarding Taiwan. For instance, increasing military maneuvers or economic pressure, knowing there is less attention or less interference (a high pucker factor in the Indo-Pacific for sure).
5. Prolonged uncertainty in the Middle East could keep oil prices volatile, benefiting China's strategic petroleum reserves or its energy negotiations w/ other suppliers. It would be very wise for America to fill up our strategic oil reserves now.
6. The CCP will capitalize on global market instability to strengthen their position in trade or investment deals.
Again, there is no direct evidence of Russia or China conducting any of the active measures I'm addressing, but trust, just as we have our situation room busy, Russia & China do as well.
Pray for President Trump. God knows we are experiencing historic times & our readiness as a nation is in a considerably different geo-strategic posture than it was at any other time in the last 100 years.
What are the advantages for Russia & China if there is a delayed decision by the United States?
SITREP FOLLOWS:
First, I have no definitive evidence confirming specific actions by Russia or China during this upcoming period. This analysis is based on personal experience. However, there is clear evidence of previous & long-term support by both nations for the Iranian regime. In war, delays usually advantage the defender & allow time to improve their position (tactical & strategic)
Russia's Strategic Benefits:
1. The primary advantage to a delay provides a great distraction & diverts American attention & resources from the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
2. By Trump canceling a meeting w/ Zelensky to focus on the Middle East, Russia may face less U.S. pressure on its actions in Ukraine.
3. Russia will use this time to strategically consolidate, gain political & diplomatic capital by acting as an international broker through organizations like the UN.
4. Tactically, this period allows Russian military forces to consolidate, reorganize, refit &, if necessary, be replaced. Essentially, Russian military commanders, if smart (& they are), will consolidate & reposition their forces to gain positional advantage.
5. Russia could use the delay to bolster IR's air defenses, potentially supplying advanced systems like the S-400 or other military support. Doing so would enhance IR's resilience against IS or potential U.S. strikes, aligning w/ Russia's interest in maintaining IR as a key ally. This action is not out of the question. If the U.S. can provide for one side, we must consider the fact that Russia will provide for the other.
6. The conflict has driven a 15% increase in Russian oil prices, benefiting Russia's economy, which relies heavily on energy exports. Guarantee, a prolonged delay only helps Russia's economy & keeps Middle East tensions high further disrupting global oil markets.
China's Strategic Benefits:
1. China clearly sees this as a major opportunity for them to gain vastly more regional influence. China will use this window to expand diplomatic, economic, & military options across the Middle East. Like it or not, they already have far more influence than we truly understand.
2. China will position themselves as a neutral or mediating party (they are anything but).
3. China will strengthen ties with IR & other regional players, countering U.S. dominance in the region. Everyone needs to understand the "region" is really the "trans-region", & we must take into account the Central Asian Republic nations as well East Africa & those nations bordering the Eastern Med. For instance, the Red Sea & the Suez Canal are vital supply lines & must remain open.
4. The war provides a major distraction for Taiwan & will reduce attention on the looming Indo-Pacific theater of war. They will view this as a strategic opening to advance their objectives regarding Taiwan. For instance, increasing military maneuvers or economic pressure, knowing there is less attention or less interference (a high pucker factor in the Indo-Pacific for sure).
5. Prolonged uncertainty in the Middle East could keep oil prices volatile, benefiting China's strategic petroleum reserves or its energy negotiations w/ other suppliers. It would be very wise for America to fill up our strategic oil reserves now.
6. The CCP will capitalize on global market instability to strengthen their position in trade or investment deals.
Again, there is no direct evidence of Russia or China conducting any of the active measures I'm addressing, but trust, just as we have our situation room busy, Russia & China do as well.
Pray for President Trump. God knows we are experiencing historic times & our readiness as a nation is in a considerably different geo-strategic posture than it was at any other time in the last 100 years.
👍451❤174🔥51👎23
ATTENTION!
The NUCLEAR OPTION or which option should be taken OFF the table.
SITREP follows:
It is often said that a military commander should leave all options for military action on the table until the final decision is made. In fact, I’ve stated many times that in warfare, the best plan provides the most options right up until the last moment. This strategy has the benefit of keeping the enemy off balance, not knowing what to expect.
Yet this strategy also has drawbacks, and I want to address why I believe that at this historic moment in the war between Isreal and Iran, the drawbacks far exceed the benefits, for one of those options.
First, I am deeply concerned by today’s article in Newsweek ennoscriptd “Is Donald Trump Considering Tactical Nukes Against Iran?”
This issue has been raised because some former military officials have speculated on Cable News shows that only through the use of tactical nuclear weapons would we be able to successfully penetrate underground enrichment facilities in Iran. The Newsweek article quoted a Fox News report that a White House official said that the Trump Administration has “not taken anything ‘off the table’ including the use of tactical nuclear weapons.”
It deserves restating that tactical nuclear weapons ARE nuclear weapons.
This type of reporting was taken very seriously by Russia, causing Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov to state the obvious — that any use of tactical nuclear weapons by the United States in Iran would be a catastrophic development.
A few days ago, Pakistan, a well-armed nuclear power, threatened to drop nuclear weapons on Israel if Israel used nuclear weapons on Iran. I believe Pakistan is not making an idle threat, and I do not want our country to be responsible for the destruction of Israel.
This type of talk must end.
Tensions in the world are already high enough, and leaving the use of nuclear weapons “on the table” is preserving an option that I believe the United States would never employ. But, allowing such open discussion about the US initiating the use of nuclear weapons puts everyone at risk. As long as this possibility exists, other countries will be developing plans to counter-strike — using nuclear weapons.
When nuclear weapons are in play, even as a matter of speculation, the possibility of mistake and miscalculation exists. The first casualties of a mistake or miscalculation would be American troops on Middle East bases and American ships in the region -- but it would not end there.
Nuclear weapons have not been employed since World War II (I recognize they were atomic, but smart readers will get the point), and we cannot afford for this conflict to move the world “up the nuclear escalation ladder.”
If I were advising the President, I would recommend in the strongest possible terms that he declare that the United States will not initiate the use of nuclear weapons against Iran.
I would not recommend waiting two weeks to make that announcement; I would urge him to do this now.
It is time to slam shut and nail down the top on the Pandora’s box that contains dreaded nuclear weapons.
The NUCLEAR OPTION or which option should be taken OFF the table.
SITREP follows:
It is often said that a military commander should leave all options for military action on the table until the final decision is made. In fact, I’ve stated many times that in warfare, the best plan provides the most options right up until the last moment. This strategy has the benefit of keeping the enemy off balance, not knowing what to expect.
Yet this strategy also has drawbacks, and I want to address why I believe that at this historic moment in the war between Isreal and Iran, the drawbacks far exceed the benefits, for one of those options.
First, I am deeply concerned by today’s article in Newsweek ennoscriptd “Is Donald Trump Considering Tactical Nukes Against Iran?”
This issue has been raised because some former military officials have speculated on Cable News shows that only through the use of tactical nuclear weapons would we be able to successfully penetrate underground enrichment facilities in Iran. The Newsweek article quoted a Fox News report that a White House official said that the Trump Administration has “not taken anything ‘off the table’ including the use of tactical nuclear weapons.”
It deserves restating that tactical nuclear weapons ARE nuclear weapons.
This type of reporting was taken very seriously by Russia, causing Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov to state the obvious — that any use of tactical nuclear weapons by the United States in Iran would be a catastrophic development.
A few days ago, Pakistan, a well-armed nuclear power, threatened to drop nuclear weapons on Israel if Israel used nuclear weapons on Iran. I believe Pakistan is not making an idle threat, and I do not want our country to be responsible for the destruction of Israel.
This type of talk must end.
Tensions in the world are already high enough, and leaving the use of nuclear weapons “on the table” is preserving an option that I believe the United States would never employ. But, allowing such open discussion about the US initiating the use of nuclear weapons puts everyone at risk. As long as this possibility exists, other countries will be developing plans to counter-strike — using nuclear weapons.
When nuclear weapons are in play, even as a matter of speculation, the possibility of mistake and miscalculation exists. The first casualties of a mistake or miscalculation would be American troops on Middle East bases and American ships in the region -- but it would not end there.
Nuclear weapons have not been employed since World War II (I recognize they were atomic, but smart readers will get the point), and we cannot afford for this conflict to move the world “up the nuclear escalation ladder.”
If I were advising the President, I would recommend in the strongest possible terms that he declare that the United States will not initiate the use of nuclear weapons against Iran.
I would not recommend waiting two weeks to make that announcement; I would urge him to do this now.
It is time to slam shut and nail down the top on the Pandora’s box that contains dreaded nuclear weapons.
❤557🔥158👍115👎12
ATTENTION!
Israel struck Iran with a surprise attack on 12 June. There have been many reports out regarding the actions, reactions, & counteractions, all components of this war. The following is an assessment of the IS campaign & it effectiveness. America has a lot at stake here, never mind gaining or losing more prestige on the world stage. Let's face it, the wars in AFG and Iraq did us no favors.
It is now clear the IS campaign consists of at least four phases:
1. The initial surprise attack with a continuing series of airstrikes.
2. Expected Iranian retaliation by IS.
3. IS sustained operations
4. Plans for & execution of escalation operations.
The evidence leans toward IS achieving massive tactical successes, but strategic goals remain incomplete & there is controversy over the extent of damage to IR’s nuclear program & U.S. involvement.
Phases & Performance:
Overall: The IS campaign against IR, appears to be progressing through multiple phases, each with varying levels of success.
Airstrike Phase: IS launched a well planned & coordinated airstrike targeting IR nuclear sites like Natanz & Fordow, military installations, & key personnel, including top generals & nuclear scientists.
Performance: I assess this phase was highly effective, achieving air superiority & destroying over 130 strategic targets, including command centers & missile factories, within 48 hours.
IR Retaliation Phase (clearly considered & prepared for by IS): IR responded with at least 10 waves of missile strikes & drone attacks, hitting IS sites like a hospital & an oil refinery, causing civilian casualties.
Performance: IR’s efforts were largely ineffective, with about 90% of attacks intercepted by IS’s Iron Dome & U.S. systems, limiting damage despite some civilian impact.
Sustained Operations Phase: IS is continuing to target specific IR assets, focusing on remaining nuclear facilities & high-value individuals, with ongoing operations as of the past 24 hrs.
Performance: I assess Israel is achieving mixed results. They are degrading IR’s capabilities, key sites like Fordow appear to remain intact, requiring further action.
Escalatory Phase: There is a growing possibility of U.S. involvement, especially to target hardened sites like Fordow, which could significantly escalate the conflict & bring in other global & nuclear capable nations aligned against each other.
Performance: Uncertain at this phase because it depends on decisions from DJT. There does not appear to be any American appetite for “boots on the ground” (rightly so in my judgement) & there is no apparent direct military action that can be confirmed at this stage, but there is significant support being provided.
Assessment; IS has shown superior tactical dominance, an exquisite level of intelligence collection & targeting prowess (to be admired by warriors of this profession), BUT fully dismantling IR’s nuclear program remains a massive challenge.
Bottom Line: The conflict will continue for many more weeks unless there is a cease fire of some sort agreed to & there remains clear potential for even broader escalation.
My assessment, given the “unconditional surrender” call by our President, for success to be achieved, there will have to be a MINIMUM of three outcomes:
1. NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
2. New IR leadership (preferably chosen by the Iranian people).
3. ALL IR proxies (Hamas, HZ, Houthis) be completely dismantled or, at least, severely diminished with no further support of any kind by IR.
It is a no brainer this has been an incredibly complex conflict with both tactical wins and select strategic uncertainties shaping its future. I guarantee the world is closely monitoring all military actions, diplomatic efforts, & international responses. For those who care about America’s Future, it will be crucial to understanding the various antagonists as well as the world’s responses as things further evolve (or erode).
Israel struck Iran with a surprise attack on 12 June. There have been many reports out regarding the actions, reactions, & counteractions, all components of this war. The following is an assessment of the IS campaign & it effectiveness. America has a lot at stake here, never mind gaining or losing more prestige on the world stage. Let's face it, the wars in AFG and Iraq did us no favors.
It is now clear the IS campaign consists of at least four phases:
1. The initial surprise attack with a continuing series of airstrikes.
2. Expected Iranian retaliation by IS.
3. IS sustained operations
4. Plans for & execution of escalation operations.
The evidence leans toward IS achieving massive tactical successes, but strategic goals remain incomplete & there is controversy over the extent of damage to IR’s nuclear program & U.S. involvement.
Phases & Performance:
Overall: The IS campaign against IR, appears to be progressing through multiple phases, each with varying levels of success.
Airstrike Phase: IS launched a well planned & coordinated airstrike targeting IR nuclear sites like Natanz & Fordow, military installations, & key personnel, including top generals & nuclear scientists.
Performance: I assess this phase was highly effective, achieving air superiority & destroying over 130 strategic targets, including command centers & missile factories, within 48 hours.
IR Retaliation Phase (clearly considered & prepared for by IS): IR responded with at least 10 waves of missile strikes & drone attacks, hitting IS sites like a hospital & an oil refinery, causing civilian casualties.
Performance: IR’s efforts were largely ineffective, with about 90% of attacks intercepted by IS’s Iron Dome & U.S. systems, limiting damage despite some civilian impact.
Sustained Operations Phase: IS is continuing to target specific IR assets, focusing on remaining nuclear facilities & high-value individuals, with ongoing operations as of the past 24 hrs.
Performance: I assess Israel is achieving mixed results. They are degrading IR’s capabilities, key sites like Fordow appear to remain intact, requiring further action.
Escalatory Phase: There is a growing possibility of U.S. involvement, especially to target hardened sites like Fordow, which could significantly escalate the conflict & bring in other global & nuclear capable nations aligned against each other.
Performance: Uncertain at this phase because it depends on decisions from DJT. There does not appear to be any American appetite for “boots on the ground” (rightly so in my judgement) & there is no apparent direct military action that can be confirmed at this stage, but there is significant support being provided.
Assessment; IS has shown superior tactical dominance, an exquisite level of intelligence collection & targeting prowess (to be admired by warriors of this profession), BUT fully dismantling IR’s nuclear program remains a massive challenge.
Bottom Line: The conflict will continue for many more weeks unless there is a cease fire of some sort agreed to & there remains clear potential for even broader escalation.
My assessment, given the “unconditional surrender” call by our President, for success to be achieved, there will have to be a MINIMUM of three outcomes:
1. NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
2. New IR leadership (preferably chosen by the Iranian people).
3. ALL IR proxies (Hamas, HZ, Houthis) be completely dismantled or, at least, severely diminished with no further support of any kind by IR.
It is a no brainer this has been an incredibly complex conflict with both tactical wins and select strategic uncertainties shaping its future. I guarantee the world is closely monitoring all military actions, diplomatic efforts, & international responses. For those who care about America’s Future, it will be crucial to understanding the various antagonists as well as the world’s responses as things further evolve (or erode).
👍472❤184👎45🔥43
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Given what we’re facing, this video is worth sharing.
No one wants to say it and the name calling will begin, but I’ve written a national bestseller (Field of Fight) about this problem. It’s real, they know it and so does everyone else. We have to stop kidding ourselves.
No one wants to say it and the name calling will begin, but I’ve written a national bestseller (Field of Fight) about this problem. It’s real, they know it and so does everyone else. We have to stop kidding ourselves.
👍713🔥205❤78👎36
ATTENTION!
SITREP Follows. This is a tactical and initial report (I will be providing updates in the next 12-24 hrs). The battle damage assessment is not fully known but clearly the POTUS decided that IS could not fully accomplish the complete destruction of the IR nuclear capability. Therefore, he made a very crucial and calculated decision to ensure IR would not have a nuclear capability. China & Russia take notice and be very precise in your decision making.
Time now to stand shoulder to shoulder with President Donald J. Trump & Vice President JD Vance
Natanz, Fordow, Isfahan, Fordow secondary explosions.
SITREP Follows. This is a tactical and initial report (I will be providing updates in the next 12-24 hrs). The battle damage assessment is not fully known but clearly the POTUS decided that IS could not fully accomplish the complete destruction of the IR nuclear capability. Therefore, he made a very crucial and calculated decision to ensure IR would not have a nuclear capability. China & Russia take notice and be very precise in your decision making.
Time now to stand shoulder to shoulder with President Donald J. Trump & Vice President JD Vance
Natanz, Fordow, Isfahan, Fordow secondary explosions.
👍715🔥215❤141👎63
ATTENTION!
SITREP #11
The IR regime’s military & its capabilities as well as its vulnerabilities are not well understood by the average American & need to be. The reason is because we find ourselves in a different place than we were merely 24 hours ago. Keep in mind, we've fought for two plus decades on both sides of IR w/ very little strategic success. Iraq is likely controlled by Iran, & we retreated under fire from AFG. We must figure out how to fight for peace & get out of these wars.
Our U.S. strategic position, given the ongoing conflict between IS & IR, & now w/ even more direct U.S. military involvement changes the global equation. There are now direct threats here in the homeland & Americans abroad have been issued a travel advisory.
Restating what I assess as necessary objectives for IS to achieve are as follows; 1) An Iran w/ no nuclear weapons, 2) Regime change (if Khamenei stays in charge due to some negotiated peace deal, I personally don’t believe IS can declare victory, also the declaration of “unconditional surrender” by POTUS will have to be further defined if Khamenei is still in charge when this war ends. True regime change MUST come from the people of Iran & a reminder that ANY regime change comes w/ massive challenges & finally, 3) Defeating IR's surrogate forces.
What follows are IR's capabilities and strengths:
They still possess a large military w/ approximately 610,000 active personnel & 350,000 reserves, providing significant numbers for defense & asymmetric operations.
IR has an arsenal of over 3K ballistic missiles. The IRGC, with its Quds Force & proxies are still relatively operational & maintain a global presence for unconventional warfare operations, compensating for their conventional weaknesses. More concerning is their indigenous defense industry. Given decades of sanctions, IR was driven to a strategy of self-reliance, enabling them to produce drones, tanks, & naval assets, reducing dependence on foreign supplies. lastly, IR has a clear & distinct geographic and population size advantage (~92M people). Its mountainous terrain & control over the Strait of Hormuz affords natural defenses & provides leverage to disrupt global oil flows. Even if it affects them, IR would still seriously consider this act.
IR also has clear vulnerabilities, especially given the military actions by IS against their regional surrogate forces, but those organizations are not yet fully defeated. IR's biggest military weakness is that some of their conventional forces are outdated. For instance, their air force relies on aging aircraft & lacks modern technology, while their tanks & naval vessels are largely obsolete. IS has so degraded IR's air defense system, it now appears to have air supremacy of the skies over IR. Economic sanctions and economic challenges limit funding for any upgrades or modernization of their military equipment. Additional economic strains on IR will have a direct impact on their military operations. Losses of allies such as the Assad regime in Syria have weakened IR's regional network, reducing its strategic depth. Finally, the advanced technology gap compared to the U.S., Israel, & some European militaries is abysmal w/ its forces lacking advanced command & control & early warning systems, & other cutting-edge weaponry.
These & other factors suggest that if the IR regime survives, it will rely heavily on a strategic defense in depth & asymmetric tactics (regionally & globally). And, even though its conventional capabilities are strained given current military pressures, powers like China and Russia appear to be stepping in to offer their diplomatic and other support. If there were ever an opportunity in recent history for the people of IR to rise against their regime, now is the time.
SITREP #11
The IR regime’s military & its capabilities as well as its vulnerabilities are not well understood by the average American & need to be. The reason is because we find ourselves in a different place than we were merely 24 hours ago. Keep in mind, we've fought for two plus decades on both sides of IR w/ very little strategic success. Iraq is likely controlled by Iran, & we retreated under fire from AFG. We must figure out how to fight for peace & get out of these wars.
Our U.S. strategic position, given the ongoing conflict between IS & IR, & now w/ even more direct U.S. military involvement changes the global equation. There are now direct threats here in the homeland & Americans abroad have been issued a travel advisory.
Restating what I assess as necessary objectives for IS to achieve are as follows; 1) An Iran w/ no nuclear weapons, 2) Regime change (if Khamenei stays in charge due to some negotiated peace deal, I personally don’t believe IS can declare victory, also the declaration of “unconditional surrender” by POTUS will have to be further defined if Khamenei is still in charge when this war ends. True regime change MUST come from the people of Iran & a reminder that ANY regime change comes w/ massive challenges & finally, 3) Defeating IR's surrogate forces.
What follows are IR's capabilities and strengths:
They still possess a large military w/ approximately 610,000 active personnel & 350,000 reserves, providing significant numbers for defense & asymmetric operations.
IR has an arsenal of over 3K ballistic missiles. The IRGC, with its Quds Force & proxies are still relatively operational & maintain a global presence for unconventional warfare operations, compensating for their conventional weaknesses. More concerning is their indigenous defense industry. Given decades of sanctions, IR was driven to a strategy of self-reliance, enabling them to produce drones, tanks, & naval assets, reducing dependence on foreign supplies. lastly, IR has a clear & distinct geographic and population size advantage (~92M people). Its mountainous terrain & control over the Strait of Hormuz affords natural defenses & provides leverage to disrupt global oil flows. Even if it affects them, IR would still seriously consider this act.
IR also has clear vulnerabilities, especially given the military actions by IS against their regional surrogate forces, but those organizations are not yet fully defeated. IR's biggest military weakness is that some of their conventional forces are outdated. For instance, their air force relies on aging aircraft & lacks modern technology, while their tanks & naval vessels are largely obsolete. IS has so degraded IR's air defense system, it now appears to have air supremacy of the skies over IR. Economic sanctions and economic challenges limit funding for any upgrades or modernization of their military equipment. Additional economic strains on IR will have a direct impact on their military operations. Losses of allies such as the Assad regime in Syria have weakened IR's regional network, reducing its strategic depth. Finally, the advanced technology gap compared to the U.S., Israel, & some European militaries is abysmal w/ its forces lacking advanced command & control & early warning systems, & other cutting-edge weaponry.
These & other factors suggest that if the IR regime survives, it will rely heavily on a strategic defense in depth & asymmetric tactics (regionally & globally). And, even though its conventional capabilities are strained given current military pressures, powers like China and Russia appear to be stepping in to offer their diplomatic and other support. If there were ever an opportunity in recent history for the people of IR to rise against their regime, now is the time.
❤468🔥190👍121👎31
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Doug Macgregor and I are friends and while we don’t always agree on everything, this interview regarding THE TRUTH must be listened to by every American who cares about America’s Future. The American people CAN handle THE TRUTH and ARE willing to sacrifice IF they are told THE TRUTH. Sadly our government has lied so often, few trust it any longer.
I know President Trump and he has seriously sacrificed a lot but the challenges he faces are immense. He cannot do it alone. We MUST fight for THE TRUTH. In fact, as citizens, we have an obligation, a DUTY, to demand it from our elected leaders.
I know President Trump and he has seriously sacrificed a lot but the challenges he faces are immense. He cannot do it alone. We MUST fight for THE TRUTH. In fact, as citizens, we have an obligation, a DUTY, to demand it from our elected leaders.
👍931❤251🔥150👎24
Khamenei, do not underestimate the American people’s desire for PEACE.
America will fight for PEACE at all costs.
That said, we will be asking our leadership for a clear statement on the objectives, the criteria, and the conditions of a ceasefire with a fanatic like you. You have never sought peace, you have always sought to increase tension in the region and around the world, you constantly fuel hatred and you seek death and annihilation of Israel. Additionally, your own citizens hate you. You’re a tyrant and a dictator. Your distorted version of your political ideology is not sustainable in a world that is rapidly interconnected.
My strongest recommendation is that you take this historic opportunity to leave Iran. The people of Iran would be vastly better off if you just leave. Take your family with you and go someplace to praise your little head off; Iran, the Middle East and the world will be better off.
Part 2 Continued Below
America will fight for PEACE at all costs.
That said, we will be asking our leadership for a clear statement on the objectives, the criteria, and the conditions of a ceasefire with a fanatic like you. You have never sought peace, you have always sought to increase tension in the region and around the world, you constantly fuel hatred and you seek death and annihilation of Israel. Additionally, your own citizens hate you. You’re a tyrant and a dictator. Your distorted version of your political ideology is not sustainable in a world that is rapidly interconnected.
My strongest recommendation is that you take this historic opportunity to leave Iran. The people of Iran would be vastly better off if you just leave. Take your family with you and go someplace to praise your little head off; Iran, the Middle East and the world will be better off.
Part 2 Continued Below
👍513❤137🔥71👎26
If you hang around, I suggest you take advantage of the offer on the table. President Trump is a once in a lifetime leader. Imperfect but very strong in his convictions and his belief in America and the freedoms we will protect and, more importantly, he’s figured out how to fight.
Peace through Strength.
Peace through Strength.
❤779👍219🔥95👎17
Music still offers a view into the soul of a nation and Bob Dylan’s timeless song says it all.
“The Times They Are A Changing!”
https://music.apple.com/us/album/the-times-they-are-a-changin/159476281?i=159476284
“The Times They Are A Changing!”
https://music.apple.com/us/album/the-times-they-are-a-changin/159476281?i=159476284
Apple Music - Web Player
The Times They Are A-Changin' by Bob Dylan on Apple Music
Album · 1964 · 10 Songs
❤401👍145🔥47👎23
ATTENTION!
SITREP #12: A Ceasefire amid the 12 Day War between Israel & Iran.
Ceasefires are always a difficult proposition even when the opposing sides are face to face across battle lines on the ground. There are many examples throughout history describing these type challenges.
The immense sophistication of this war with all the advanced weaponry, long range air & missile systems, & artificial & human intelligence gathering made the negotiations for this ceasefire monumental. That said, ceasefires are always fragile & we pray this one is not simply aspirational.
While we await the terms & conditions of the cease fire agreement mediated by the POTUS & the Emir of Qatar between Israel & Iran, let's review the bidding of the current state of play.
During the next 24-72 hours there will be great strategic ambiguity. Both sides & many in the international community will make various pronouncements with differing degrees of acceptance. Regardless, the conditional acceptance by both sides is a POSITIVE indicator to end this war.
Specific terms & conditions of the ceasefire agreement are not fully known & ceasefires during periods of intense conflict are dicey anyway. Let's face it, the animosity between the belligerents is severe.
For Isreal & the United States, one very clear objective was the complete destruction of Iran's nuclear weapons capability. It remains unclear however if there are any terms calling for leadership changes or a dismantling of Iranian surrogate forces such as HZ, Hamas or the Houthis.
Based on what we now know here is some of the framework:
1. Phased Implementation:
There will be a phased implementation over the next 24-48 hours (and beyond). A separation of warring parties & likely a stand down of certain type capabilities.
2. Cessation of attacks:
Mutual cessation of military attacks against each other, essentially, NO MORE FIGHTING!
3. Continued mediation:
Mediation by Qatar & U.S. Leaders will continue. Special envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary Rubio , Vice President JD Vance , & direct intervention by President Trumphave been central to achieving the ceasefire. Qatar’s Prime Minister, Al Thani, also played a pivotal role in securing the ceasefire.
It is very clear the military strikes by the United States against the nuclear facilities inside of Iran were DECISIVE bringing this 12-Day War to an end.
May credit go to those steady hands on the triggers of diplomacy.
I am certain in the coming days more will become clear on the specific terms & conditions of the ceasefire. For now, pray for those who typically suffer the most. In this case, the citizens of Israel & Iran who felt the pain of war.
I’ll leave readers with my somewhat nuanced perspective on avoiding further conflict. At times, it is wise in some situations to avoid further conflict while in others, it is not. Avoiding it here was very wise. Key, & always on the table is pursuing peace & reconciliation. This was made very clear by our President from day one of this war. And thank God for humanity it was.
ISAIAH 6:8 🙏🏼🇺🇸
SITREP #12: A Ceasefire amid the 12 Day War between Israel & Iran.
Ceasefires are always a difficult proposition even when the opposing sides are face to face across battle lines on the ground. There are many examples throughout history describing these type challenges.
The immense sophistication of this war with all the advanced weaponry, long range air & missile systems, & artificial & human intelligence gathering made the negotiations for this ceasefire monumental. That said, ceasefires are always fragile & we pray this one is not simply aspirational.
While we await the terms & conditions of the cease fire agreement mediated by the POTUS & the Emir of Qatar between Israel & Iran, let's review the bidding of the current state of play.
During the next 24-72 hours there will be great strategic ambiguity. Both sides & many in the international community will make various pronouncements with differing degrees of acceptance. Regardless, the conditional acceptance by both sides is a POSITIVE indicator to end this war.
Specific terms & conditions of the ceasefire agreement are not fully known & ceasefires during periods of intense conflict are dicey anyway. Let's face it, the animosity between the belligerents is severe.
For Isreal & the United States, one very clear objective was the complete destruction of Iran's nuclear weapons capability. It remains unclear however if there are any terms calling for leadership changes or a dismantling of Iranian surrogate forces such as HZ, Hamas or the Houthis.
Based on what we now know here is some of the framework:
1. Phased Implementation:
There will be a phased implementation over the next 24-48 hours (and beyond). A separation of warring parties & likely a stand down of certain type capabilities.
2. Cessation of attacks:
Mutual cessation of military attacks against each other, essentially, NO MORE FIGHTING!
3. Continued mediation:
Mediation by Qatar & U.S. Leaders will continue. Special envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary Rubio , Vice President JD Vance , & direct intervention by President Trumphave been central to achieving the ceasefire. Qatar’s Prime Minister, Al Thani, also played a pivotal role in securing the ceasefire.
It is very clear the military strikes by the United States against the nuclear facilities inside of Iran were DECISIVE bringing this 12-Day War to an end.
May credit go to those steady hands on the triggers of diplomacy.
I am certain in the coming days more will become clear on the specific terms & conditions of the ceasefire. For now, pray for those who typically suffer the most. In this case, the citizens of Israel & Iran who felt the pain of war.
I’ll leave readers with my somewhat nuanced perspective on avoiding further conflict. At times, it is wise in some situations to avoid further conflict while in others, it is not. Avoiding it here was very wise. Key, & always on the table is pursuing peace & reconciliation. This was made very clear by our President from day one of this war. And thank God for humanity it was.
ISAIAH 6:8 🙏🏼🇺🇸
👍463❤210🔥37👎8